Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:11 pm
SCFC wrote:No chance of this happening, he should be playing regularly for Spurs next season. He wasn't available for loan last season, and on the back of a better season than expected he's not going to be available for loan this season. It would be a step backwards in his career to the stage he was at in 2011 when he joined us, he's moved on since then and will be looking to establish himself as a regular for Spurs and England in the next couple of years and his best chance of doing that is staying with Spurs.
I wouldn't be surprised if you were in for him, but like with a lot of your targets you need to get realistic.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:13 pm
Cult of Personality wrote:Stringer Bell wrote:I think Spurs will go after a new centre back. You look at the players linked with Villas Boas and you know its only a matter of time before a player like Caulker is facing the exit door. He's a good player but Spurs can and will get better on the continent.
Will probably be Belgian too, bloody loves his Belgians
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:14 pm
SCFC wrote:No chance of this happening, he should be playing regularly for Spurs next season. He wasn't available for loan last season, and on the back of a better season than expected he's not going to be available for loan this season. It would be a step backwards in his career to the stage he was at in 2011 when he joined us, he's moved on since then and will be looking to establish himself as a regular for Spurs and England in the next couple of years and his best chance of doing that is staying with Spurs.
I wouldn't be surprised if you were in for him, but like with a lot of your targets you need to get realistic.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:18 pm
CityGent wrote:SCFC wrote:No chance of this happening, he should be playing regularly for Spurs next season. He wasn't available for loan last season, and on the back of a better season than expected he's not going to be available for loan this season. It would be a step backwards in his career to the stage he was at in 2011 when he joined us, he's moved on since then and will be looking to establish himself as a regular for Spurs and England in the next couple of years and his best chance of doing that is staying with Spurs.
I wouldn't be surprised if you were in for him, but like with a lot of your targets you need to get realistic.
So are you saying it would be a fantastic capture for Cardiff City FC?..
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:19 pm
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:22 pm
SCFC wrote:No chance of this happening, he should be playing regularly for Spurs next season. He wasn't available for loan last season, and on the back of a better season than expected he's not going to be available for loan this season. It would be a step backwards in his career to the stage he was at in 2011 when he joined us, he's moved on since then and will be looking to establish himself as a regular for Spurs and England in the next couple of years and his best chance of doing that is staying with Spurs.
I wouldn't be surprised if you were in for him, but like with a lot of your targets you need to get realistic.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:23 pm
CityGent wrote:SCFC wrote:No chance of this happening, he should be playing regularly for Spurs next season. He wasn't available for loan last season, and on the back of a better season than expected he's not going to be available for loan this season. It would be a step backwards in his career to the stage he was at in 2011 when he joined us, he's moved on since then and will be looking to establish himself as a regular for Spurs and England in the next couple of years and his best chance of doing that is staying with Spurs.
I wouldn't be surprised if you were in for him, but like with a lot of your targets you need to get realistic.
So are you saying it would be a fantastic capture for Cardiff City FC?..
Super Kev wrote:SCFC wrote:No chance of this happening, he should be playing regularly for Spurs next season. He wasn't available for loan last season, and on the back of a better season than expected he's not going to be available for loan this season. It would be a step backwards in his career to the stage he was at in 2011 when he joined us, he's moved on since then and will be looking to establish himself as a regular for Spurs and England in the next couple of years and his best chance of doing that is staying with Spurs.
I wouldn't be surprised if you were in for him, but like with a lot of your targets you need to get realistic.
Need to get realistic? We're on the verge of getting Capoue (wanted by Atletico Madrid, but we have more funds). Aim for the moon and you'll fall amongst the stars.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:27 pm
SCFC wrote:It looks far from done and he does seem to be wanting to join Atletico Madrid or a bigger club rather than you. You may be able to attract him with money, but I think you'd be doing much better to sign players like John Brayford who want to play for you on realistic wages joining for a realistic transfer fee who will be able to settle in to your side easily.
I don't think Capoue would be the best of signings, especially considering what you would be paying for him, I don't think he'll be able to make the sort of impact that you'd be looking for given the transfer fee and I don't think he's suited to your style of play based on televised games last season.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:27 pm
Cult of Personality wrote:We've attracted a top talent in Cornelius, a quality Football League right back and a potential England GK. We are being level headed.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:37 pm
Stringer Bell wrote:Cult of Personality wrote:We've attracted a top talent in Cornelius, a quality Football League right back and a potential England GK. We are being level headed.
Jordan, what the Jacks cant understand is that we by default are bigger than them. They need to get used to it again. We've come up and compete instantly because we are a capital city thats thriving, can afford to pay big money for the players we want and we can fly up the table at Tan's will in the future. There are no limits to the possibilities at the moment for us as Langston is resolved and now all we need is the conversion done and the stadium capacity increased to be laughing.
The Tom Ince issue has fans worried but its a one off and was nothing to do with our lack of pull but everything to do with Tom Ince being an egotistical arse like his father who thinks he's better than he is because of the hype from the media. This is the difference in British football and elsewhere. Elsewhere the cocky footballers are the ones who are actually good/half decent like Balotelli or world class like Ronaldo. Only in Britain are the cocky players also incredibly mediocre - Barton, Ince, etc. You only have to look at Bendtner to know the influence the British media has on players. It wasn't until he come here that he thought he was God's gift.
Whilst signing Ince would have been good because we do need a winger I also think in some respects we've dodged a bullet and I hope Malky continues to do his business on the continent.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:38 pm
jackf wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:Never heard if him
To be fair why would you. He's only an england international, played for your two main rivals and spurs. Complete unkown.
On a serious not be amazed if you signed him as he is the golden boy at spurs and rightly so. Will be Englands main CB for years to come and will be Spurs best CB as he gains more experience. Why they would loan him to you would be a mystery as what can he or they gain? And if they sell him to anybody then they are insane. PS not a dig at you in any way you could substitue CCFC for SCFC and I would make the same point
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:39 pm
Super Kev wrote:He's a huge European talent, if I was him I'd want to join Atletico over us. But they can't and won't pay the amount we will for him.
He'd be our biggest signing in recent history. Possibly the difference between staying up or going down. He's just the type of player many teams need, us being one of those teams. Malky wouldn't go after him if we didn't need him. He knows what we're going to be playing like in the Prem. Capoue's one of the best defensive midfielders I've seen play. He slows down the play, controls the midfield, spreads passes out to wingers, or through to forwards. Superb all round player.
Stringer Bell wrote:Jordan, what the Jacks cant understand is that we by default are bigger than them. They need to get used to it again. We've come up and compete instantly because we are a capital city thats thriving, can afford to pay big money for the players we want and we can fly up the table at Tan's will in the future. There are no limits to the possibilities at the moment for us as Langston is resolved and now all we need is the conversion done and the stadium capacity increased to be laughing.
The Tom Ince issue has fans worried but its a one off and was nothing to do with our lack of pull but everything to do with Tom Ince being an egotistical arse like his father who thinks he's better than he is because of the hype from the media. This is the difference in British football and elsewhere. Elsewhere the cocky footballers are the ones who are actually good/half decent like Balotelli or world class like Ronaldo. Only in Britain are the cocky players also incredibly mediocre - Barton, Ince, etc. You only have to look at Bendtner to know the influence the British media has on players. It wasn't until he come here that he thought he was God's gift.
Whilst signing Ince would have been good because we do need a winger I also think in some respects we've dodged a bullet and I hope Malky continues to do his business on the continent.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:46 pm
SCFC wrote:£9.5 million is a huge amount of money to pay for a side in your position playing the role of dictating the play. See Esteban Granero for how little impact he could make in a side like yours despite having the technical ability he has. Its also a huge amount of money to pay for a player only proven in the French League, when you consider the sort of fees that the more impressive Yohann Cabaye and Moussa Sissoko went for.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:48 pm
SCFC wrote:
You seem very naive to think that players like Capoue would join you because of the size of your club, the size of your city or to want to play under Malky Mackay. They'd join you for the wages your prepared to pay, and money talks. Your not being run sustainably, and you will be losing money next season.
You'd do very well to finish 17th, and there's nothing to suggest that you are competitive at this level, as it stands you are nowhere near good enough to compete at this level.
In what way have you dodged a bullet in Ince?
If he's not proven enough to spend £8 million on, then Cornelius isn't proven enough to spend the amount that you did on him and Etienne Capoue isn't proven enough to spend £9.5 million.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:53 pm
Super Kev wrote:SCFC wrote:£9.5 million is a huge amount of money to pay for a side in your position playing the role of dictating the play. See Esteban Granero for how little impact he could make in a side like yours despite having the technical ability he has. Its also a huge amount of money to pay for a player only proven in the French League, when you consider the sort of fees that the more impressive Yohann Cabaye and Moussa Sissoko went for.
What you didn't mention is that QPR also bought near-enough a complete new side to go along with Granero. We are bringing in the quality needed. That's it. Moussa Sissoko is not better than Capoue. I would much rather Capoue. I have watched them both play together for Toulouse 4 or 5 times at the start of last season, and Capoue made almost everything happen. Puled all the strings. If the likes of Arsenal, PSG, Fiorentina, Napoli and Atletico Madrid, quite frankly all European giants feel or felt that Capoue is good enough for their side, then he's damn well good enough for ours.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:56 pm
Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:03 pm
goats wrote:how many top clubs are run sustainably? if you can spend 12 million on one player with your paltry attendances/cash in through games etc then surely you cant be? Its the sky money that pays for all of it these days is it not? Tan im sure will spend every penny of it whereas you might not be able or are you?
Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:13 pm
SCFC wrote:goats wrote:how many top clubs are run sustainably? if you can spend 12 million on one player with your paltry attendances/cash in through games etc then surely you cant be? Its the sky money that pays for all of it these days is it not? Tan im sure will spend every penny of it whereas you might not be able or are you?
We are run sustainably, we had a projected profit for 2011/12 of around £30 million. This summer we've spent just over £20 million. We're able to spend £12 million on an individual as his wages are manageable.
In our first year we spent just over £8 million in total and made £14.6 million with our highest wages around £25k a week, you were paying the likes of Craig Bellamy and Fraizer Campbell around £35k a week in the Championship. It looks like your prepared to pay £50-60k a week on wages, and your looking to spend over £25 million in transfer fees.
Many Premier League clubs debt has been manageable on the way to getting in to the Premier League, but the club feels it needs to spend more than it can afford (usually in wages) in order to stay in the league (the likes of Fulham, Wigan, Portsmouth, Bolton and Blackburn). You look like your going to fit in to this category, especially considering you managed to rack up a much higher debt than any of these clubs managed to get to on your way to getting in the division.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:21 pm
goats wrote:SCFC wrote:goats wrote:how many top clubs are run sustainably? if you can spend 12 million on one player with your paltry attendances/cash in through games etc then surely you cant be? Its the sky money that pays for all of it these days is it not? Tan im sure will spend every penny of it whereas you might not be able or are you?
We are run sustainably, we had a projected profit for 2011/12 of around £30 million. This summer we've spent just over £20 million. We're able to spend £12 million on an individual as his wages are manageable.
In our first year we spent just over £8 million in total and made £14.6 million with our highest wages around £25k a week, you were paying the likes of Craig Bellamy and Fraizer Campbell around £35k a week in the Championship. It looks like your prepared to pay £50-60k a week on wages, and your looking to spend over £25 million in transfer fees.
Many Premier League clubs debt has been manageable on the way to getting in to the Premier League, but the club feels it needs to spend more than it can afford (usually in wages) in order to stay in the league (the likes of Fulham, Wigan, Portsmouth, Bolton and Blackburn). You look like your going to fit in to this category, especially considering you managed to rack up a much higher debt than any of these clubs managed to get to on your way to getting in the division.
we are debt free (almost) now though...lots of clubs borrow beyond their means, even man utd, city, chelsea etc..
whats your wage bill estimate this season then? surely not much diff to ours at the moment? i take it most of your profit income is from TV rights?
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:10 pm
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:28 pm
cityone wrote:You'd do very well to finish 17th, and there's nothing to suggest that you are competitive at this level, as it stands you are nowhere near good enough to compete at this level.
It amazes me after two seasons in the premier league that the jacks are now experts on how things are run there, on what grounds do you come up with the above comment??? because i can only go on previous championship teams getting promoted and in the last three to four years they have done ok, as for yourselves you went up through the lottery of the play offs, spent very little money and stayed up without much problem, we on the other hand won the championship, after going top in november and staying there, have brought in two quality out field players so far with matbe four or five more to come, we'll be fine this coming season, of that i am certain.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:29 pm
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:37 pm
SCFC wrote:cityone wrote:You'd do very well to finish 17th, and there's nothing to suggest that you are competitive at this level, as it stands you are nowhere near good enough to compete at this level.
It amazes me after two seasons in the premier league that the jacks are now experts on how things are run there, on what grounds do you come up with the above comment??? because i can only go on previous championship teams getting promoted and in the last three to four years they have done ok, as for yourselves you went up through the lottery of the play offs, spent very little money and stayed up without much problem, we on the other hand won the championship, after going top in november and staying there, have brought in two quality out field players so far with matbe four or five more to come, we'll be fine this coming season, of that i am certain.
On the grounds that you are clearly are yet to compete at this level, and just haven't shown that you are able to compete with Premier League teams yet. I don't think your current squad is good enough, and do you really think you will be good enough if you don't sign any more players? Your pretty naive if that's the case.
Reading and QPR also won the Championship, it's not how you get in to the division it's how you adapt to it and Palace and Hull as it stands have done a lot more business in the transfer market. It's the fact that you seem to be fine which is worrying for you, when the Premier League season starts and you see the quality of the opposition then you'll have hoped to have done a lot more than what you've done so far in the transfer market.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:40 pm
SCFC wrote:cityone wrote:You'd do very well to finish 17th, and there's nothing to suggest that you are competitive at this level, as it stands you are nowhere near good enough to compete at this level.
It amazes me after two seasons in the premier league that the jacks are now experts on how things are run there, on what grounds do you come up with the above comment??? because i can only go on previous championship teams getting promoted and in the last three to four years they have done ok, as for yourselves you went up through the lottery of the play offs, spent very little money and stayed up without much problem, we on the other hand won the championship, after going top in november and staying there, have brought in two quality out field players so far with matbe four or five more to come, we'll be fine this coming season, of that i am certain.
On the grounds that you are clearly are yet to compete at this level, and just haven't shown that you are able to compete with Premier League teams yet. I don't think your current squad is good enough, and do you really think you will be good enough if you don't sign any more players? Your pretty naive if that's the case.
Reading and QPR also won the Championship, it's not how you get in to the division it's how you adapt to it and Palace and Hull as it stands have done a lot more business in the transfer market. It's the fact that you seem to be fine which is worrying for you, when the Premier League season starts and you see the quality of the opposition then you'll have hoped to have done a lot more than what you've done so far in the transfer market.
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:45 pm
BobbyBlue wrote:SCFC wrote:cityone wrote:You'd do very well to finish 17th, and there's nothing to suggest that you are competitive at this level, as it stands you are nowhere near good enough to compete at this level.
It amazes me after two seasons in the premier league that the jacks are now experts on how things are run there, on what grounds do you come up with the above comment??? because i can only go on previous championship teams getting promoted and in the last three to four years they have done ok, as for yourselves you went up through the lottery of the play offs, spent very little money and stayed up without much problem, we on the other hand won the championship, after going top in november and staying there, have brought in two quality out field players so far with matbe four or five more to come, we'll be fine this coming season, of that i am certain.
On the grounds that you are clearly are yet to compete at this level, and just haven't shown that you are able to compete with Premier League teams yet. I don't think your current squad is good enough, and do you really think you will be good enough if you don't sign any more players? Your pretty naive if that's the case.
Reading and QPR also won the Championship, it's not how you get in to the division it's how you adapt to it and Palace and Hull as it stands have done a lot more business in the transfer market. It's the fact that you seem to be fine which is worrying for you, when the Premier League season starts and you see the quality of the opposition then you'll have hoped to have done a lot more than what you've done so far in the transfer market.
Lay off the smack son the transfer window is open for another month, palace and hull have signed nobodies and that shows in their pre season results. Do you know anything about football or just a troll?
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:50 pm
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:51 pm
Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:58 pm
BobbyBlue wrote:And did you say kevin phillips and dobbie? Ahhhahahaaaaahahah
Tue Jul 30, 2013 5:03 pm
Tue Jul 30, 2013 5:11 pm
SCFC wrote:
Kevin Phillips has almost 100 Premier League goals, he's an astute signing who will do a job and calling him a nobody is laughable.
Stephen Dobbie has excelled in the Championship, he's been a part of three promoted sides in the last four seasons and has done well at the same level that most of your players have done well at.
Sagbo offers a lot more than just goals and is a very good footballer, he's a cheap signing for Hull but an improvement on what they already have.
You scrutinize these signings, but how much did you pay for Cornelius again based on one season in the Danish league?