Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:22 pm
alfie sherwood wrote:
I agree Barry but there does seem to be a large element of Cardiff fans that dislike the rebrand but are looking for a utopian protest movement. Well, I'm afraid utopia doesn't exist and whilst none of us will agree with every word of every BU poster, every BU tweet or every public statement, they are the 'only show in town' and tbf, they get a lot more right than they get wrong, imo.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:23 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Andysince76 wrote:So why add to this thread as if giving support, i,e backing it up as just a pun? It's not just a pun to the morons who will take the words and run with them. I wouldn't like to wear a tee shirt with them words on. I hope that the Woman in charge has endorsed the wording. otherwise it's just shitheads gobbing off. Like I say lowest common denominator.
I support the group, simple as. To me, it's just a fun play on Tan's words yesterday, but if it were me designing the posters, I would stay away from anything that could deter people supporting the cause.
Just the same as I don't think the t shirts should have the slogan "I don't have to sell my soul."
Just my thoughts, I have no direct involvement with BU.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:26 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:28 pm
Andysince76 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Andysince76 wrote:So why add to this thread as if giving support, i,e backing it up as just a pun? It's not just a pun to the morons who will take the words and run with them. I wouldn't like to wear a tee shirt with them words on. I hope that the Woman in charge has endorsed the wording. otherwise it's just shitheads gobbing off. Like I say lowest common denominator.
I support the group, simple as. To me, it's just a fun play on Tan's words yesterday, but if it were me designing the posters, I would stay away from anything that could deter people supporting the cause.
Just the same as I don't think the t shirts should have the slogan "I don't have to sell my soul."
Just my thoughts, I have no direct involvement with BU.
Ok thanks, I understand your view, but I hope you understand my reservations, I don't know if I should support the group. I've been a fan long enough to know that groups such as this can easily be Hi-jacked as the wording disruptive would appear to be.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:31 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:34 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:The heading is a light hearted play on words... Do people really have nothing more to moan about than a pun?![]()
The Oppressed are the name of a band that are playing on the night..![]()
If you are looking to see blue reinstated as our home kit & identity restored, please come along and show your support.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:35 pm
Andysince76 wrote:Mate you are a peaceful person, I'm sure sian is too, however there are people glorifying the disruptive, and, as I've stated you absolutely have to factor in the lowest common denominator.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:37 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:38 pm
rhondda 1015 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:The heading is a light hearted play on words... Do people really have nothing more to moan about than a pun?![]()
The Oppressed are the name of a band that are playing on the night..![]()
If you are looking to see blue reinstated as our home kit & identity restored, please come along and show your support.
Nowhere in that flyer does it say that the Oppressed are playing on that night, maybe I've read it wrong ?
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:46 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Andysince76 wrote:Mate you are a peaceful person, I'm sure sian is too, however there are people glorifying the disruptive, and, as I've stated you absolutely have to factor in the lowest common denominator.
Of course, but as I said, that's not the view shared by BU. To assume it is would be generalising.
For example, there are some members here who enjoyed the scene of the 80s and the football culture... to say that all the members feel this way though would be incorrect.
As Alfie says, go along and you can work out either way.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:50 pm
Andysince76 wrote:
Oh for gods sake, you just can't have a debate can you, who generalised? Who said that because you are a member of this board you condone football violence? I stated that I, that's right I, PERSONALLY FELT UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE DISRUPTIVE WORDING BECAUSE IT MAY ENCOURAGE A SMALL COMMON DENOMINATOR. Ok I'm out. I've read posts from you before and know that unless it suits you,you'll go on and on. I was trying to have an open discussion however it appears beyond you.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:07 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Andysince76 wrote:
Oh for gods sake, you just can't have a debate can you, who generalised? Who said that because you are a member of this board you condone football violence? I stated that I, that's right I, PERSONALLY FELT UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE DISRUPTIVE WORDING BECAUSE IT MAY ENCOURAGE A SMALL COMMON DENOMINATOR. Ok I'm out. I've read posts from you before and know that unless it suits you,you'll go on and on. I was trying to have an open discussion however it appears beyond you.
In that case, I apologise. I read your post wrong.![]()
Don't stoop to insults though, it undermines your point.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:10 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:11 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:14 pm
Cardiffmad wrote:Just move on for Gods sake.
What are you trying to bloody achieve!!
Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:14 pm
thomasblue wrote:cockneywanka wrote:Every time you take a step forward you take two back with this type of we are the victims shit
Totally agree
Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:15 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Andysince76 wrote:
Oh for gods sake, you just can't have a debate can you, who generalised? Who said that because you are a member of this board you condone football violence? I stated that I, that's right I, PERSONALLY FELT UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE DISRUPTIVE WORDING BECAUSE IT MAY ENCOURAGE A SMALL COMMON DENOMINATOR. Ok I'm out. I've read posts from you before and know that unless it suits you,you'll go on and on. I was trying to have an open discussion however it appears beyond you.
In that case, I apologise. I read your post wrong.![]()
Don't stoop to insults though, it undermines your point.
Wow you're a sensitive soul if you think that post contained insults! It's not as though he abused you ffs
Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:18 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I'd say the sentence at the end was insulting. That's what an insult is, no? There was no need for it.
Where did I mention abuse?