DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Thanks for giving us the actual truth Steve.

How long will this thread last

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

Thought you were finished with this forum?

Steve is one of the best posters on here.

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

Thought you were finished with this forum?

Steve is one of the best posters on here.

Totally agree with you. I haven't posted on here for a long time. Find it all far to cringy. But personally Steve is one of the handful of posters I look out for.

The Steve Davies appreciation society

Tells it like it is and cuts straight through any bullshit

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

Thought you were finished with this forum?

feel free to delete my account by all means. your reaction is typical of the mods on this forum all gather round to protect each others asses.
Carl asked a question and i posted the response to that question. the bid for wanyama was never accepted by celtic because it was 2 million short of the 12 million they had already accepted.
i just posted to put the record straight.
i stopped posting purely because of the cowardly & libellous crap posted about paul guy on here

nice try bakes
i dident delete any of my posts a moderator wiped the posts back to zero.
the speed it got deleted i thought there had been a call to arms and you were all at it.
thats it for me on here bakes anyway now because some of the remarks made against paul were scandalous and proved to be false yet that person did not have the courage to aplogise for his comments.
this forum has shown itself up tonight as just a vehicle for moderators to abuse peole at their own leisure and then delete the comments when they have gone to far.
perhaps you should rebrand the forum as its like a commie dictatorship on here at times

Obviously not a man of your word are you Steve.

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

Thought you were finished with this forum?

feel free to delete my account by all means. your reaction is typical of the mods on this forum all gather round to protect each others asses.
Carl asked a question and i posted the response to that question. the bid for wanyama was never accepted by celtic because it was 2 million short of the 12 million they had already accepted.
i just posted to put the record straight.
i stopped posting purely because of the cowardly & libellous crap posted about paul guy on here

nice try bakes
i dident delete any of my posts a moderator wiped the posts back to zero.
the speed it got deleted i thought there had been a call to arms and you were all at it.
thats it for me on here bakes anyway now because some of the remarks made against paul were scandalous and proved to be false yet that person did not have the courage to aplogise for his comments.
this forum has shown itself up tonight as just a vehicle for moderators to abuse peole at their own leisure and then delete the comments when they have gone to far.
perhaps you should rebrand the forum as its like a commie dictatorship on here at times

Obviously not a man of your word are you Steve.

He is allowed to change his mind, I would rather see him posting on here he doesn't bulls**t like some

[
He is allowed to change his mind, I would rather see him posting on here he doesn't bulls**t like some

ok

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

Thought you were finished with this forum?

feel free to delete my account by all means. your reaction is typical of the mods on this forum all gather round to protect each others asses.
Carl asked a question and i posted the response to that question. the bid for wanyama was never accepted by celtic because it was 2 million short of the 12 million they had already accepted.
i just posted to put the record straight.
i stopped posting purely because of the cowardly & libellous crap posted about paul guy on here

nice try bakes
i dident delete any of my posts a moderator wiped the posts back to zero.
the speed it got deleted i thought there had been a call to arms and you were all at it.
thats it for me on here bakes anyway now because some of the remarks made against paul were scandalous and proved to be false yet that person did not have the courage to aplogise for his comments.
this forum has shown itself up tonight as just a vehicle for moderators to abuse peole at their own leisure and then delete the comments when they have gone to far.
perhaps you should rebrand the forum as its like a commie dictatorship on here at times

Obviously not a man of your word are you Steve.

Everybody's entitled to change their mind!!! Or does it suit you to let egoistic Carl get away with his bullshit unchallenged

[
He is allowed to change his mind, I would rather see him posting on here he doesn't bulls**t like some

ok

Good

Everybody's entitled to change their mind!!! Or does it suit you to let egoistic Carl get away with his bullshit unchallenged

It doesn't bother me if Carl is challenged or not.

Everybody's entitled to change their mind!!! Or does it suit you to let egoistic Carl get away with his bullshit unchallenged

It doesn't bother me if Carl is challenged or not.

So who is right in your opinion? Steve or Carl?

Everybody's entitled to change their mind!!! Or does it suit you to let egoistic Carl get away with his bullshit unchallenged

It doesn't bother me if Carl is challenged or not.

So who is right in your opinion? Steve or Carl?

Why are you asking me?

Why are you asking me?

Why not?

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Why are you asking me?

Why not?

ok

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Poor example. Not the same ratio.

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Poor example. Not the same ratio.

nothing to do with ratio £2 million is £2 million. If the demand is clearly there why throw it away?

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Look who's back

As confirmed in this thread, and as I pointed out weeks ago, after Celtic agreed a deal with Southampton but Wanyama couldn't agree terms with the Saints, then indeed Celtic were willing to meet our lower price)which included a series of instalments over the next year). This was agreed in principle but a few days later Celtic reneged on the deal and Wanyama had to decide upon Southampton or no one. I hope we never have to do business with the rats ever again

I'm sure the expert in hindsight will reply to this

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Poor example. Not the same ratio.

nothing to do with ratio £2 million is £2 million. If the demand is clearly there why throw it away?

It has everything to do with ratio

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Look who's back

As confirmed in this thread, and as I pointed out weeks ago, after Celtic agreed a deal with Southampton but Wanyama couldn't agree terms with the Saints, then indeed Celtic were willing to meet our lower price)which included a series of instalments over the next year). This was agreed in principle but a few days later Celtic reneged on the deal and Wanyama had to decide upon Southampton or no one. I hope we never have to do business with the rats ever again

I'm sure the expert in hindsight will reply to this

back?

so Steve is lying in your opinion?

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Look who's back

As confirmed in this thread, and as I pointed out weeks ago, after Celtic agreed a deal with Southampton but Wanyama couldn't agree terms with the Saints, then indeed Celtic were willing to meet our lower price)which included a series of instalments over the next year). This was agreed in principle but a few days later Celtic reneged on the deal and Wanyama had to decide upon Southampton or no one. I hope we never have to do business with the rats ever again

I'm sure the expert in hindsight will reply to this

back?

so Steve is lying in your opinion?

Yes back, with your limited knowledge and baffling logic

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Poor example. Not the same ratio.

nothing to do with ratio £2 million is £2 million. If the demand is clearly there why throw it away?

It has everything to do with ratio

It has nothing to do with ratio. There would be no more chance of me accepting £12million for my £14 million house than £2million for my £4 million house.

either way im throwing away £2 million when the market is rich with prospective buyers and early in the auction.

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Poor example. Not the same ratio.

nothing to do with ratio £2 million is £2 million. If the demand is clearly there why throw it away?

It has everything to do with ratio

It has nothing to do with ratio. There would be no more chance of me accepting £12million for my £14 million house than £2million for my £4 million house.

either way im throwing away £2 million when the market is rich with prospective buyers and early in the auction.

Roathie in verbal diarrhoea shocker

Or Tom_Ince in talking more sense sensation.

You know it makes no sense, I know it makes no sense, everyone else knows it makes no sense... yet the update must be protected at all times.

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Poor example. Not the same ratio.

nothing to do with ratio £2 million is £2 million. If the demand is clearly there why throw it away?

It has everything to do with ratio

It has nothing to do with ratio. There would be no more chance of me accepting £12million for my £14 million house than £2million for my £4 million house.

either way im throwing away £2 million when the market is rich with prospective buyers and early in the auction.

Nonsense. Far more chance of willing to do business at 83% rather than 33%.

For me, its pretty straight forward.

If Stoke offered you £3 million for Mutch and you accepted, would you then accept a £1 million bid from Fulham days later?

Poor example. Not the same ratio.

nothing to do with ratio £2 million is £2 million. If the demand is clearly there why throw it away?

It has everything to do with ratio

It has nothing to do with ratio. There would be no more chance of me accepting £12million for my £14 million house than £2million for my £4 million house.

either way im throwing away £2 million when the market is rich with prospective buyers and early in the auction.

Nonsense. Far more chance of willing to do business at 83% rather than 33%.

No there isn't, there is 0% chance of either when its clear business can be done at 100%.

Well it obviously wasnt clear as Wanyama initially turned down Southampton.

Well it obviously wasnt clear as Wanyama initially turned down Southampton.

For what was said to be a £1 million payment to the agent.

Now then wouldn't it be better for Celtic to pay the £1 million on behalf of Southampton to push the deal through and get a £11 million net transfer fee, rather than accept what is essentially £2 million less than the full amount?

Arsenal and Liverpool were also sniffing around, there is no way on earth they would accept such a low bid days after a bid of £12 million was lodged. that much is obvious.

Well it obviously wasnt clear as Wanyama initially turned down Southampton.

For what was said to be a £1 million payment to the agent.

Now then wouldn't it be better for Celtic to pay the £1 million on behalf of Southampton to push the deal through and get a £11 million net transfer fee, rather than accept what is essentially £2 million less than the full amount?

Arsenal and Liverpool were also sniffing around, there is no way on earth they would accept such a low bid days after a bid of £12 million was lodged. that much is obvious.

Thats all conjecture and hear say. The only FACT is Wanyama initially turned down Southampton so unless they come back in with another bid (which eventually they did) then Celtic had to mull over our 10 million offer.

At 83% of the initial 12 million accepted there was more chance of a negotiation than if we offered 4 million which is what your silly Jordan Mutch ratio works out as.