Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:43 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:mosts fans just dont care.
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:43 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:pengedragon wrote:Lawnmower wrote:As for the debt, I explained elsewhere, from the moment Tan started putting in the future of the club depended on him, the debt is so big now that he has the power to pull the plug on us at any time, so whether its' £100m or £150 the most important thing is that he stays interested.
or what if the rest of the shareholders got together and said they'd sort out a deal to pay tan off with the tv money and then cut costs to safeguard the future of the club
i assume most fans would be happy with that as the future of the club is most important ?
I would, a lot of reluctant reds better start manouvering themslves because the red or dead 'reason' for backing the rebrand won't exist for much longer.
Won't be a hiding place then, A straight queston, will you sell out or not? I trust whole hearetedly most bluebirds will do the right thing.
mosts fans just dont care.
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:47 pm
Malky Is My God wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:mosts fans just dont care.
I wish more realised this Craig. The majority of our fans are just happy to get on with things and realise they have more pressing concerns in life. Some right self important idiots on here who believe most others must think like them. People will think what they want and are free to do so.
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:50 pm
Real_Blue_Really wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:pengedragon wrote:Lawnmower wrote:As for the debt, I explained elsewhere, from the moment Tan started putting in the future of the club depended on him, the debt is so big now that he has the power to pull the plug on us at any time, so whether its' £100m or £150 the most important thing is that he stays interested.
or what if the rest of the shareholders got together and said they'd sort out a deal to pay tan off with the tv money and then cut costs to safeguard the future of the club
i assume most fans would be happy with that as the future of the club is most important ?
I would, a lot of reluctant reds better start manouvering themslves because the red or dead 'reason' for backing the rebrand won't exist for much longer.
Won't be a hiding place then, A straight queston, will you sell out or not? I trust whole hearetedly most bluebirds will do the right thing.
mosts fans just dont care.
Speak for yourself Craig
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:51 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:pengedragon wrote:Lawnmower wrote:As for the debt, I explained elsewhere, from the moment Tan started putting in the future of the club depended on him, the debt is so big now that he has the power to pull the plug on us at any time, so whether its' £100m or £150 the most important thing is that he stays interested.
or what if the rest of the shareholders got together and said they'd sort out a deal to pay tan off with the tv money and then cut costs to safeguard the future of the club
i assume most fans would be happy with that as the future of the club is most important ?
I would, a lot of reluctant reds better start manouvering themslves because the red or dead 'reason' for backing the rebrand won't exist for much longer.
Won't be a hiding place then, A straight queston, will you sell out or not? I trust whole hearetedly most bluebirds will do the right thing.
mosts fans just dont care.
Speak for yourself Craig
I'm not speaking for anyone, the facts don't lie.
How many fans do we have?
How many are actively doing something about it?
Answer these honestly and I think you'll find my original statement of "most fans just don't care" to be true.
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:53 pm
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:55 pm
) that many on here would have backed to the hilt if he had done this - which is obviously laughable.
)
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:57 pm
LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Given the current bids supposedly on the table, whilst our debt level is troubling - it shows that we have the collateral behind us to be able to fund this. By all accounts it's from VT directly (albeit at 7% interest) - but do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?
There was a previous bushy-eyed owner, (that would have had us liquidated btw - oh no he wouldn't, he's one of us, he LOVES us) that many on here would have backed to the hilt if he had done this - which is obviously laughable.
Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:00 pm
Real_Blue_Really wrote:LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Given the current bids supposedly on the table, whilst our debt level is troubling - it shows that we have the collateral behind us to be able to fund this. By all accounts it's from VT directly (albeit at 7% interest) - but do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?
There was a previous bushy-eyed owner, (that would have had us liquidated btw - oh no he wouldn't, he's one of us, he LOVES us) that many on here would have backed to the hilt if he had done this - which is obviously laughable.
2do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?" Erm Yes
Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:02 pm
LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Given the current bids supposedly on the table, whilst our debt level is troubling - it shows that we have the collateral behind us to be able to fund this. By all accounts it's from VT directly (albeit at 7% interest) - but do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?
There was a previous bushy-eyed owner, (that would have had us liquidated btw - oh no he wouldn't, he's one of us, he LOVES us) that many on here would have backed to the hilt if he had done this - which is obviously laughable.
2do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?" Erm Yes
And give up £60m+? Aye, OK
Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:13 pm
Real_Blue_Really wrote:LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Given the current bids supposedly on the table, whilst our debt level is troubling - it shows that we have the collateral behind us to be able to fund this. By all accounts it's from VT directly (albeit at 7% interest) - but do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?
There was a previous bushy-eyed owner, (that would have had us liquidated btw - oh no he wouldn't, he's one of us, he LOVES us) that many on here would have backed to the hilt if he had done this - which is obviously laughable.
2do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?" Erm Yes
And give up £60m+? Aye, OK
A good business man knows when to cut n run and if it 'all goes tits up' I fully expect him to cut and run. Why would he pump more money in?
Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:15 pm
LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Given the current bids supposedly on the table, whilst our debt level is troubling - it shows that we have the collateral behind us to be able to fund this. By all accounts it's from VT directly (albeit at 7% interest) - but do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?
There was a previous bushy-eyed owner, (that would have had us liquidated btw - oh no he wouldn't, he's one of us, he LOVES us) that many on here would have backed to the hilt if he had done this - which is obviously laughable.
2do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?" Erm Yes
And give up £60m+? Aye, OK
A good business man knows when to cut n run and if it 'all goes tits up' I fully expect him to cut and run. Why would he pump more money in?
Maybe something to do with exposure that the Premier League brings to a company hoping to develop it's market, plus the fact that you now get £60m+ for finishing bottom - before s/t's, sponsorship etc is even brought into the equation?
Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:20 pm
Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:37 pm
Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:16 pm
Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:46 pm
LlwyncelynBlue wrote:Given the current bids supposedly on the table, whilst our debt level is troubling - it shows that we have the collateral behind us to be able to fund this. By all accounts it's from VT directly (albeit at 7% interest) - but do you really think he'll just walk away if it all went tits up?
There was a previous bushy-eyed owner, (that would have had us liquidated btw - oh no he wouldn't, he's one of us, he LOVES us) that many on here would have backed to the hilt if he had done this - which is obviously laughable.
Tell you what, get your "mate" to agree on what's allegedly owed to him - or, better still for OUR club, get him to reveal who "Langston" are (as if we don't know![]()
)
Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:13 pm
Sat Jun 29, 2013 8:58 pm
Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:07 pm
Sun Jun 30, 2013 8:37 am
Malky Is My God wrote:Buy Cardozo for £15m then give Cardozo to Hammam as payment.
Sun Jun 30, 2013 8:53 am
goats wrote:one thing is for sure, the 10 or 15 million he owes sam hammam is really just small potatoes now...
Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:13 am
Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:22 am
CraigCCFC wrote:
I'm not speaking for anyone, the facts don't lie.
How many fans do we have?
How many are actively doing something about it?
Answer these honestly and I think you'll find my original statement of "most fans just don't care" to be true.
Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:02 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:
I'm not speaking for anyone, the facts don't lie.
How many fans do we have?
How many are actively doing something about it?
Answer these honestly and I think you'll find my original statement of "most fans just don't care" to be true.
In % terms you are absolutely correct. That's why for example Bluebirds Unite will struggle for now. City are in the PL, expanding the stadium signing quality players so the vast majority simply don't care what colour we play in or where the money to pay for it all is coming from.
That said there is a small amount who do care and there is nothing wrong with talking about it amongst ourselves.
Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:09 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:
I'm not speaking for anyone, the facts don't lie.
How many fans do we have?
How many are actively doing something about it?
Answer these honestly and I think you'll find my original statement of "most fans just don't care" to be true.
In % terms you are absolutely correct. That's why for example Bluebirds Unite will struggle for now. City are in the PL, expanding the stadium signing quality players so the vast majority simply don't care what colour we play in or where the money to pay for it all is coming from.
That said there is a small amount who do care and there is nothing wrong with talking about it amongst ourselves.
Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:32 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:
I'm not speaking for anyone, the facts don't lie.
How many fans do we have?
How many are actively doing something about it?
Answer these honestly and I think you'll find my original statement of "most fans just don't care" to be true.
In % terms you are absolutely correct. That's why for example Bluebirds Unite will struggle for now. City are in the PL, expanding the stadium signing quality players so the vast majority simply don't care what colour we play in or where the money to pay for it all is coming from.
That said there is a small amount who do care and there is nothing wrong with talking about it amongst ourselves.
Quite right, but the poster i was talking to claimed in a different thread a few days ago that BU were so big they could railroad Tan into settling the Langston debt. He seems a little nuts.
Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:16 pm