Nathan Redmond

If they have already accepted bid's from Swansea and Norwich, Why could they not accept one from us?

Because if Swansea made the first bid for 2mil and it was accepted by your way of thinking how could Norwich have a 2mil bid accepted as well?

If they have already accepted bid's from Swansea and Norwich, Why could they not accept one from us?

Because if Swansea made the first bid for 2mil and it was accepted by your way of thinking how could Norwich have a 2mil bid accepted as well?

you can accept as many bids as you like as its up to the player which one gets sealed in the 3 way contract. they may well have accepted a bid from you also, but you have just spunked away 500k on nothing if the rumour posted on this thread is true... which lets face it is highly doubtful.

If they have already accepted bid's from Swansea and Norwich, Why could they not accept one from us?

Because if Swansea made the first bid for 2mil and it was accepted by your way of thinking how could Norwich have a 2mil bid accepted as well?

you can accept as many bids as you like as its up to the player which one gets sealed in the 3 way contract. they may well have accepted a bid from you also, but you have just spunked away 500k on nothing if the rumour posted on this thread is true... which lets face it is highly doubtful.

Ahh cheers for clearing it up.

Unwashed is another one of roath acounts

PTB[/size]

If they have already accepted bid's from Swansea and Norwich, Why could they not accept one from us?

Because if Swansea made the first bid for 2mil and it was accepted by your way of thinking how could Norwich have a 2mil bid accepted as well?

you can accept as many bids as you like as its up to the player which one gets sealed in the 3 way contract. they may well have accepted a bid from you also, but you have just spunked away 500k on nothing if the rumour posted on this thread is true... which lets face it is highly doubtful.

Ahh cheers for clearing it up.

no worries.

it has to be in place to stop unlawful shill bidding.

Pray tell then Roathy how Swansea had a written agreement with Cliftonville for Rory Donnelly for 100k.

Source: Huw Jenkins
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16047293


Only for Everton to up the bid and therefore backtrack on the agreement.

Source: Brendan Rodgers
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... n-Donnelly

And as such Swansea then had to increase their offer to land him.

Pray tell then Roathy how Swansea had a written agreement with Cliftonville for Rory Donnelly for 100k.

Source: Huw Jenkins
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16047293


Only for Everton to up the bid and therefore backtrack on the agreement.

Source: Brendan Rodgers
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... n-Donnelly

And as such Swansea then had to increase their offer to land him.

No need to pray, just ask and you shall get the answer.

there clearly wasn't a written contract between the clubs no matter what Jenkins believed.

Pray tell then Roathy how Swansea had a written agreement with Cliftonville for Rory Donnelly for 100k.

Source: Huw Jenkins
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16047293


Only for Everton to up the bid and therefore backtrack on the agreement.

Source: Brendan Rodgers
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... n-Donnelly

And as such Swansea then had to increase their offer to land him.

No need to pray, just ask and you shall get the answer.

there clearly wasn't a written contract between the clubs no matter what Jenkins believed.

So you're saying your Chairman is so incompetent that he can't even get a transfer contract sorted out even though there was confirmed interest from far bigger clubs and as such he cost your club a significant amount of money?

Pray tell then Roathy how Swansea had a written agreement with Cliftonville for Rory Donnelly for 100k.

Source: Huw Jenkins
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16047293


Only for Everton to up the bid and therefore backtrack on the agreement.

Source: Brendan Rodgers
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... n-Donnelly

And as such Swansea then had to increase their offer to land him.

No need to pray, just ask and you shall get the answer.

there clearly wasn't a written contract between the clubs no matter what Jenkins believed.

So you're saying your Chairman is so incompetent that he can't even get a transfer contract sorted out even though there was confirmed interest from far bigger clubs and as such he cost your club a significant amount of money?

im saying my chairman that lead us from league 2 to the top half of the premier league, who posted £30.5m profit for the club in the last two years was incorrect in stating he had written agreement. Evertons bid proved otherwise. Nothing he did cost the club money, he cannot make other clubs write a written acceptance.

made an error? certainly... incompetent? you wish

Pray tell then Roathy how Swansea had a written agreement with Cliftonville for Rory Donnelly for 100k.

Source: Huw Jenkins
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16047293


Only for Everton to up the bid and therefore backtrack on the agreement.

Source: Brendan Rodgers
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... n-Donnelly

And as such Swansea then had to increase their offer to land him.

No need to pray, just ask and you shall get the answer.

there clearly wasn't a written contract between the clubs no matter what Jenkins believed.

So you're saying your Chairman is so incompetent that he can't even get a transfer contract sorted out even though there was confirmed interest from far bigger clubs and as such he cost your club a significant amount of money?

im saying my chairman that lead us from league 2 to the top half of the premier league, who posted £30.5m profit for the club in the last two years was incorrect in stating he had written agreement. Evertons bid proved otherwise. Nothing he did cost the club money, he cannot make other clubs write a written acceptance.

made an error? certainly... incompetent? you wish

Or maybe there was a clause in the written arrangement that meant if a higher bid came in they could withdraw the deal? It would be a sensible arrangement for the selling club when they knew there was quite a lot of interest in the player.

Perhaps the Redmond deal has a similar clause?

its nonsense. why would you push the price up by 500k when Prem clubs are involved. its throwing away money. Its a cut price deal as it is, so £2m or £2.5 isn't going to put anyone off.

its rubbish im afraid, and again common sense dictates that.

its nonsense. why would you push the price up by 500k when Prem clubs are involved. its throwing away money. Its a cut price deal as it is, so £2m or £2.5 isn't going to put anyone off.

its rubbish im afraid, and again common sense dictates that.

Not necessarily. The teams may have strict transfer budgets and they may well have two million spare from their other targets and Redmond fit the bill quite well but the few hundred thousand more might mean they'd have to rearrange their targets a bit more.

its nonsense. why would you push the price up by 500k when Prem clubs are involved. its throwing away money. Its a cut price deal as it is, so £2m or £2.5 isn't going to put anyone off.

its rubbish im afraid, and again common sense dictates that.

Not necessarily. The teams may have strict transfer budgets and they may well have two million spare from their other targets and Redmond fit the bill quite well but the few hundred thousand more might mean they'd have to rearrange their targets a bit more.

get real

Transfers are a three way contractual agreement. when a club puts an official written bid for a player it is rejected, accepted or waited on. if its waited on then there is the chance of someone bidding more in which you then tell the other club to up the bid. if it is accepted, then it is accepted contractually and the transfer fee is sealed between the two parties, depending on the buying club agreeing a contractual bond with the third party - the player, and the deal is done. If our bid of £2m has been accepted officially (in writing) then they can not demand more.

sorry.

Have you seen written evidence that this bid has been accepted - in writing ?

If not then the o.p has as much chance as being right as you have.

It may have been verbally agreed, and these people DO go back on these agreements, we've had it happen to us more times than I care to remember.

Who knows whether it's £2m, £2,2m or £2.5m - one might include VAT, one might include agents fees.. add-ons etc..

It's not as simple as you seem to think - however I doubt you have experience of buying anything more than a packet of sweets


By the way I've no idea where he's going and although I'd be happy to see him come here, I'd far far rather Ince. Redmond seems a good player , but inconsistent from reports I've heard. Likely to go to Everton if they are in for him anyway.

im not saying its simple. I think its a ridiculous notion that you have bid 20% more than bids already accepted.

If it's £2.5m as opposed to £2m, I think you'll find it's 25% more

Transfers are a three way contractual agreement. when a club puts an official written bid for a player it is rejected, accepted or waited on. if its waited on then there is the chance of someone bidding more in which you then tell the other club to up the bid. if it is accepted, then it is accepted contractually and the transfer fee is sealed between the two parties, depending on the buying club agreeing a contractual bond with the third party - the player, and the deal is done. If our bid of £2m has been accepted officially (in writing) then they can not demand more.

sorry.

Have you seen written evidence that this bid has been accepted - in writing ?

If not then the o.p has as much chance as being right as you have.

It may have been verbally agreed, and these people DO go back on these agreements, we've had it happen to us more times than I care to remember.

Who knows whether it's £2m, £2,2m or £2.5m - one might include VAT, one might include agents fees.. add-ons etc..

It's not as simple as you seem to think - however I doubt you have experience of buying anything more than a packet of sweets


By the way I've no idea where he's going and although I'd be happy to see him come here, I'd far far rather Ince. Redmond seems a good player , but inconsistent from reports I've heard. Likely to go to Everton if they are in for him anyway.

im not saying its simple. I think its a ridiculous notion that you have bid 20% more than bids already accepted.

If it's £2.5m as opposed to £2m, I think you'll find it's 25% more

our bid was 2.2m I believe

Transfers are a three way contractual agreement. when a club puts an official written bid for a player it is rejected, accepted or waited on. if its waited on then there is the chance of someone bidding more in which you then tell the other club to up the bid. if it is accepted, then it is accepted contractually and the transfer fee is sealed between the two parties, depending on the buying club agreeing a contractual bond with the third party - the player, and the deal is done. If our bid of £2m has been accepted officially (in writing) then they can not demand more.

sorry.

Have you seen written evidence that this bid has been accepted - in writing ?

If not then the o.p has as much chance as being right as you have.

It may have been verbally agreed, and these people DO go back on these agreements, we've had it happen to us more times than I care to remember.

Who knows whether it's £2m, £2,2m or £2.5m - one might include VAT, one might include agents fees.. add-ons etc..

It's not as simple as you seem to think - however I doubt you have experience of buying anything more than a packet of sweets


By the way I've no idea where he's going and although I'd be happy to see him come here, I'd far far rather Ince. Redmond seems a good player , but inconsistent from reports I've heard. Likely to go to Everton if they are in for him anyway.

im not saying its simple. I think its a ridiculous notion that you have bid 20% more than bids already accepted.

If it's £2.5m as opposed to £2m, I think you'll find it's 25% more

our bid was 2.2m I believe

Fact is you don't know for sure what any of the bids were, you are just making yourself look stupid again.

By the way £2.5m is not 20% more than £2.2m

Transfers are a three way contractual agreement. when a club puts an official written bid for a player it is rejected, accepted or waited on. if its waited on then there is the chance of someone bidding more in which you then tell the other club to up the bid. if it is accepted, then it is accepted contractually and the transfer fee is sealed between the two parties, depending on the buying club agreeing a contractual bond with the third party - the player, and the deal is done. If our bid of £2m has been accepted officially (in writing) then they can not demand more.

sorry.

Have you seen written evidence that this bid has been accepted - in writing ?

If not then the o.p has as much chance as being right as you have.

It may have been verbally agreed, and these people DO go back on these agreements, we've had it happen to us more times than I care to remember.

Who knows whether it's £2m, £2,2m or £2.5m - one might include VAT, one might include agents fees.. add-ons etc..

It's not as simple as you seem to think - however I doubt you have experience of buying anything more than a packet of sweets


By the way I've no idea where he's going and although I'd be happy to see him come here, I'd far far rather Ince. Redmond seems a good player , but inconsistent from reports I've heard. Likely to go to Everton if they are in for him anyway.

im not saying its simple. I think its a ridiculous notion that you have bid 20% more than bids already accepted.

If it's £2.5m as opposed to £2m, I think you'll find it's 25% more

our bid was 2.2m I believe

Fact is you don't know for sure what any of the bids were, you are just making yourself look stupid again.

By the way £2.5m is not 20% more than £2.2m

there are differing reports regarding the bids accepted. Some say £2m some say £2.2m, so I went on the average of £2.1m

20% more than £2.1m is £2.52m which is what the rumours started on this thread say you have bid for him.

hope that helps

As much as I think 'The Unwashed' is sometimes a nauseous idiot, he's right on this one. A bid has been accepted by Brum and that is that - now down to the player.

If City have bid, I'd love to see him at the CCS. Can't see it happening though.

As much as I think 'The Unwashed' is sometimes a nauseous idiot, he's right on this one. A bid has been accepted by Brum and that is that - now down to the player.

If City have bid, I'd love to see him at the CCS. Can't see it happening though.

More than 1 bid has been accepted. Swansea & Norwich definitely. Possibly others as well, with Everton also mentioned .

As much as I think 'The Unwashed' is sometimes a nauseous idiot, he's right on this one. A bid has been accepted by Brum and that is that - now down to the player.

If City have bid, I'd love to see him at the CCS. Can't see it happening though.

More than 1 bid has been accepted. Swansea & Norwich definitely. Possibly others as well, with Everton also mentioned .

that's never been in question.

Have you seen written evidence that this bid has been accepted - in writing ?

If not then the o.p has as much chance as being right as you have.

It may have been verbally agreed, and these people DO go back on these agreements, we've had it happen to us more times than I care to remember.

Who knows whether it's £2m, £2,2m or £2.5m - one might include VAT, one might include agents fees.. add-ons etc..

It's not as simple as you seem to think - however I doubt you have experience of buying anything more than a packet of sweets


By the way I've no idea where he's going and although I'd be happy to see him come here, I'd far far rather Ince. Redmond seems a good player , but inconsistent from reports I've heard. Likely to go to Everton if they are in for him anyway.[/quote]

im not saying its simple. I think its a ridiculous notion that you have bid 20% more than bids already accepted.[/quote]

If it's £2.5m as opposed to £2m, I think you'll find it's 25% more [/quote]

our bid was 2.2m I believe[/quote]

Fact is you don't know for sure what any of the bids were, you are just making yourself look stupid again.

By the way £2.5m is not 20% more than £2.2m[/quote]

there are differing reports regarding the bids accepted. Some say £2m some say £2.2m, so I went on the average of £2.1m

20% more than £2.1m is £2.52m which is what the rumours started on this thread say you have bid for him.

hope that helps [/quote]




So basically you don't know any more than the guy who said we'd bid for him and just plucked a figure out of the air. the 32m and 32.2m figures are guesses and as i said may or may not be not what the receiving club is getting, but what the buying club is receiving.

Unfortunately you just wanted to be pedantic and try to point score, but failed.

32 million He ain't worth that.

So basically you don't know any more than the guy who said we'd bid for him and just plucked a figure out of the air. the 32m and 32.2m figures are guesses and as i said may or may not be not what the receiving club is getting, but what the buying club is receiving.

Unfortunately you just wanted to be pedantic and try to point score, but failed.

not entirely sure how you came to that conclusion? It is reported everywhere you care to look that we have had a bid of between 2m and 2.2m. It is reported nowhere other than this thread that you have bid 2.5m for him. if you cant see the difference there then you really are a weapon

As for being pedantic? where? the only pedantic comments on here were your ''20% more is not £2.5m its £2.54m''

log off son.

So basically you don't know any more than the guy who said we'd bid for him and just plucked a figure out of the air. the £2m and £2.2m figures are guesses and as i said may or may not be not what the receiving club is getting, but what the buying club is receiving.

Unfortunately you just wanted to be pedantic and try to point score, but failed.

not entirely sure how you came to that conclusion? It is reported everywhere you care to look that we have had a bid of between 2m and 2.2m. It is reported nowhere other than this thread that you have bid 2.5m for him. if you cant see the difference there then you really are a weapon

As for being pedantic? where? the only pedantic comments on here were your ''20% more is not £2.5m its £2.54m''

log off son.

Show me where I made that comment ?

I didn't,- so, not only are you stupid you are a lying sh1tbag too.

Given that there is more than one figure reported then there is no definitive figure. Bit difficult for you ?

So basically you don't know any more than the guy who said we'd bid for him and just plucked a figure out of the air. the £2m and £2.2m figures are guesses and as i said may or may not be not what the receiving club is getting, but what the buying club is receiving.

Unfortunately you just wanted to be pedantic and try to point score, but failed.

not entirely sure how you came to that conclusion? It is reported everywhere you care to look that we have had a bid of between 2m and 2.2m. It is reported nowhere other than this thread that you have bid 2.5m for him. if you cant see the difference there then you really are a weapon

As for being pedantic? where? the only pedantic comments on here were your ''20% more is not £2.5m its £2.54m''

log off son.

Show me where I made that comment ?

I didn't,- so, not only are you stupid you are a lying sh1tbag too.

Given that there is more than one figure reported then there is no definitive figure. Bit difficult for you ?

the average was taken which was 2.2m. 20% ontop is £2.5m pretty much.

32 million He ain't worth that.

Ha ha, true. Now that would be an odd one.

Just my gentle touch on the keyboard.

So basically you don't know any more than the guy who said we'd bid for him and just plucked a figure out of the air. the £2m and £2.2m figures are guesses and as i said may or may not be not what the receiving club is getting, but what the buying club is receiving.

Unfortunately you just wanted to be pedantic and try to point score, but failed.

not entirely sure how you came to that conclusion? It is reported everywhere you care to look that we have had a bid of between 2m and 2.2m. It is reported nowhere other than this thread that you have bid 2.5m for him. if you cant see the difference there then you really are a weapon

As for being pedantic? where? the only pedantic comments on here were your ''20% more is not £2.5m its £2.54m''

log off son.

Show me where I made that comment ?

I didn't,- so, not only are you stupid you are a lying sh1tbag too.

Given that there is more than one figure reported then there is no definitive figure. Bit difficult for you ?

the average was taken which was 2.2m. 20% ontop is £2.5m pretty much.

Really ?

You give me £2.2m + 20% then and I will give to £2.5m in return.

So basically you don't know any more than the guy who said we'd bid for him and just plucked a figure out of the air. the £2m and £2.2m figures are guesses and as i said may or may not be not what the receiving club is getting, but what the buying club is receiving.

Unfortunately you just wanted to be pedantic and try to point score, but failed.

not entirely sure how you came to that conclusion? It is reported everywhere you care to look that we have had a bid of between 2m and 2.2m. It is reported nowhere other than this thread that you have bid 2.5m for him. if you cant see the difference there then you really are a weapon

As for being pedantic? where? the only pedantic comments on here were your ''20% more is not £2.5m its £2.54m''

log off son.

Show me where I made that comment ?

I didn't,- so, not only are you stupid you are a lying sh1tbag too.

Given that there is more than one figure reported then there is no definitive figure. Bit difficult for you ?

the average was taken which was 2.2m. 20% ontop is £2.5m pretty much.

Really ?

You give me £2.2m + 20% then and I will give to £2.5m in return.

20% of 2.1m is 420k.

420k + 2.1m = 2.52m

So basically you don't know any more than the guy who said we'd bid for him and just plucked a figure out of the air. the £2m and £2.2m figures are guesses and as i said may or may not be not what the receiving club is getting, but what the buying club is receiving.

Unfortunately you just wanted to be pedantic and try to point score, but failed.

not entirely sure how you came to that conclusion? It is reported everywhere you care to look that we have had a bid of between 2m and 2.2m. It is reported nowhere other than this thread that you have bid 2.5m for him. if you cant see the difference there then you really are a weapon

As for being pedantic? where? the only pedantic comments on here were your ''20% more is not £2.5m its £2.54m''

log off son.

Show me where I made that comment ?

I didn't,- so, not only are you stupid you are a lying sh1tbag too.

Given that there is more than one figure reported then there is no definitive figure. Bit difficult for you ?

the average was taken which was 2.2m. 20% ontop is £2.5m pretty much.

Really ?

You give me £2.2m + 20% then and I will give to £2.5m in return.

20% of 2.1m is 420k.

420k + 2.1m = 2.52m

Read your original post again.

the average was taken which was 2.2m

yeah and you said 32m

its clear what was meant.