Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:57 pm
lj1985 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
ALL Sponsorship deals pay cash...what a fool!
Ask yourself why did the jacks pay £900 000 to 32RED, so they could get out of the last season with them, you dont do that unless something big is on the horizon.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:57 pm
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:03 pm
lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Stadium expansion? You cant expand that piece of shit it wasnt designed to be expanded its a pile of wank
Keep up ffs, planning permission has been submited
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:04 pm
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:04 pm
NEATHBLUES wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Stadium expansion? You cant expand that piece of shit it wasnt designed to be expanded its a pile of wank
Keep up ffs, planning permission has been submited
To 22k?![]()
Expanding a council house, who would have thought.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:07 pm
Wayne S wrote:Are you sure its GWFX? Goldenway Investments. They are a small investment company with a shared office in London. They have an arm in Hong Kong and New Zealand but their portfolio is smaller than the individual wealth of some Premier League club owners.
I think this maybe a business tie up and they will be looking for investors for Swansea and not investing themselves.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:07 pm
NJ73 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Stadium expansion? You cant expand that piece of shit it wasnt designed to be expanded its a pile of wank
Seems a bit of a waste of time for us to have applied for the planning permission then eh?
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:07 pm
lj1985 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
ALL Sponsorship deals pay cash...what a fool!
Ask yourself why did the jacks pay £900 000 to 32RED, so they could get out of the last season with them, you dont do that unless something big is on the horizon.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:11 pm
bluelikeyou wrote:lj1985 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
ALL Sponsorship deals pay cash...what a fool!
Ask yourself why did the jacks pay £900 000 to 32RED, so they could get out of the last season with them, you dont do that unless something big is on the horizon.
Lets say the jacks had been paid that 900k for next season. But got offered £1.2m by another company... they could pay off
the 900k and STILL be £300k up on the deal. thats BIG that is
you are a weapon of gignormous proportions young man![]()
![]()
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:19 pm
lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:19 pm
bluelikeyou wrote:lj1985 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
ALL Sponsorship deals pay cash...what a fool!
Ask yourself why did the jacks pay £900 000 to 32RED, so they could get out of the last season with them, you dont do that unless something big is on the horizon.
Lets say the jacks had been paid that 900k for next season. But got offered £1.2m by another company... they could pay off
the 900k and STILL be £300k up on the deal. thats BIG that is
you are a weapon of gignormous proportions young man![]()
![]()
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:21 pm
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:23 pm
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:30 pm
d20 wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
Some news on your so called expansion,mate of mine works in construction and knows the head guy who was on the build of your stadium and he told him that your council when given the different prices tendered chose the cheapest with the cheapest materials,now what that means as told by him is your structure cannot be extended on as it is, each stand would have to be taken down and rebuilt as the current structure is not strong enough to hold the extension because if the materials used due too your council going cheap.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:30 pm
CityGent wrote:The jacks on one hand try and lord over everyone how frugal they are with their perfectly run community club model
On the other hand shitheads like this beaut try and brag about signing multi million deals with rich corporations
Look up the word'hypocrisy'you stupid jack c**t
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:31 pm
lj1985 wrote:d20 wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
Some news on your so called expansion,mate of mine works in construction and knows the head guy who was on the build of your stadium and he told him that your council when given the different prices tendered chose the cheapest with the cheapest materials,now what that means as told by him is your structure cannot be extended on as it is, each stand would have to be taken down and rebuilt as the current structure is not strong enough to hold the extension because if the materials used due too your council going cheap.
FFS tell your mate to stay off the drugs, the stadium can and is being expanded, thats why the club has submitted planning permission. As for cheapest materials this is not bangladesh ffs there are safety regulations in this country with all building material from the steel to the concrete to the plastic seats,(the stadium was built by interserve do you honestly think they'd use sub standard materials) please tell me you were on a wind up cos noone can be that thick.
![]()
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:34 pm
CityGent wrote:The jacks on one hand try and lord over everyone how frugal they are with their perfectly run community club model
On the other hand shitheads like this beaut try and brag about signing multi million deals with rich corporations
Look up the word'hypocrisy'you stupid jack c**t
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:34 pm
d20 wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
Some news on your so called expansion,mate of mine works in construction and knows the head guy who was on the build of your stadium and he told him that your council when given the different prices tendered chose the cheapest with the cheapest materials,now what that means as told by him is your structure cannot be extended on as it is, each stand would have to be taken down and rebuilt as the current structure is not strong enough to hold the extension because if the materials used due too your council going cheap.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:48 pm
NJ73 wrote:CityGent wrote:The jacks on one hand try and lord over everyone how frugal they are with their perfectly run community club model
On the other hand shitheads like this beaut try and brag about signing multi million deals with rich corporations
Look up the word'hypocrisy'you stupid jack c**t
In what possible way is a well run community club signing a major sponsorship deal with a rich corporation hypocritical?
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:09 pm
CityGent wrote:NJ73 wrote:CityGent wrote:The jacks on one hand try and lord over everyone how frugal they are with their perfectly run community club model
On the other hand shitheads like this beaut try and brag about signing multi million deals with rich corporations
Look up the word'hypocrisy'you stupid jack c**t
In what possible way is a well run community club signing a major sponsorship deal with a rich corporation hypocritical?
When no companies would touch you with a ten foot shitty stick for years post Petty, you had to basically start again and become self sufficient, which was obviously a unique and successful way forward for you. Those jacks who tried to look down their noses at us having a rich benefactor instead of your model are now seemingly happy to take the filthy lucre from the same capitalist ventures/banks/investment corporations that we've been dealing with for years
There's your hypocrisy. Perhaps you'll understand, but I don't hold much hope for the other one here
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:16 pm
CityGent wrote:NJ73 wrote:CityGent wrote:The jacks on one hand try and lord over everyone how frugal they are with their perfectly run community club model
On the other hand shitheads like this beaut try and brag about signing multi million deals with rich corporations
Look up the word'hypocrisy'you stupid jack c**t
In what possible way is a well run community club signing a major sponsorship deal with a rich corporation hypocritical?
When no companies would touch you with a ten foot shitty stick for years post Petty, you had to basically start again and become self sufficient, which was obviously a unique and successful way forward for you. Those jacks who tried to look down their noses at us having a rich benefactor instead of your model are now seemingly happy to take the filthy lucre from the same capitalist ventures/banks/investment corporations that we've been dealing with for years
There's your hypocrisy. Perhaps you'll understand, but I don't hold much hope for the other one here
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:21 pm
NJ73 wrote:CityGent wrote:NJ73 wrote:CityGent wrote:The jacks on one hand try and lord over everyone how frugal they are with their perfectly run community club model
On the other hand shitheads like this beaut try and brag about signing multi million deals with rich corporations
Look up the word'hypocrisy'you stupid jack c**t
In what possible way is a well run community club signing a major sponsorship deal with a rich corporation hypocritical?
When no companies would touch you with a ten foot shitty stick for years post Petty, you had to basically start again and become self sufficient, which was obviously a unique and successful way forward for you. Those jacks who tried to look down their noses at us having a rich benefactor instead of your model are now seemingly happy to take the filthy lucre from the same capitalist ventures/banks/investment corporations that we've been dealing with for years
There's your hypocrisy. Perhaps you'll understand, but I don't hold much hope for the other one here
Self sufficiency is based around living within your income. Sponsorship is income. Ergo, sponsorship is a means to self sufficiency.
It's totally different to your situation.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:33 pm
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:34 pm
NJ73 wrote:d20 wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
Some news on your so called expansion,mate of mine works in construction and knows the head guy who was on the build of your stadium and he told him that your council when given the different prices tendered chose the cheapest with the cheapest materials,now what that means as told by him is your structure cannot be extended on as it is, each stand would have to be taken down and rebuilt as the current structure is not strong enough to hold the extension because if the materials used due too your council going cheap.
Have you ever heard of building up the stand from behind and attaching it on? You know, much like Man Utd did![]()
No need to knock anything down.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:39 pm
lj1985 wrote:bluelikeyou wrote:lj1985 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:lj1985 wrote:BigBadG wrote:Every1 has a sponsor you prick
Not like this onestadium expansion will be payed for by these guys
ALL Sponsorship deals pay cash...what a fool!
Ask yourself why did the jacks pay £900 000 to 32RED, so they could get out of the last season with them, you dont do that unless something big is on the horizon.
Lets say the jacks had been paid that 900k for next season. But got offered £1.2m by another company... they could pay off
the 900k and STILL be £300k up on the deal. thats BIG that is
you are a weapon of gignormous proportions young man![]()
![]()
And who said its £1.2 million, at the moment GWFX is just a rumour, but what is not a rumour is that next season sponsor will be major there may well be separate sponsor for the stadium expansion project.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:39 pm
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:41 pm
bluelikeyou wrote:Obviously the only f*cking Jacks who ever knew anything about the Building game was Fatty Lewis![]()
![]()
Of course the jacks never used ''sub-standard'' building materials. But there are huge differences between the stresses and strengths in structural steel. Put simply (i best had) Cardiff Citys ground was originally built to be added on to. So the strength of the steel structure and the design of the build was all taken into account, which is why Cardiff can build up. No such allowances were made at the Liberty. The council DID build it on the cheap. Thats doesnt mean it was built sub-standard, but it does mean that the original steels are not strong enough to just add weight to, and the piles are not deep enough anyway. I think this will all come to light over the coming months.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:44 pm
Inthemixer wrote:Sorry mate, I work in Sports Sponsorship and you are way off the mark with this one. Swansea were actually showcased last season for underselling their shirt sponsorship in terms of the Premier League market. They have bought out the current sponsor early because they clocked onto this. They have overpaid for the year they owe to as compensation to the incumbent brand too.
It goes without saying that they have obviously done this because ultimately they can make more financially from the new brand but you shouldn't be heralding this development as some sort of substantial occurrence or investment. The Premier League sponsorship market is lucrative, and your hierarchy under sold last season.
Much more significant would be to talk about Cardiff City mulling over a completely digital stadium (which is what I am hearing), which would allow complete brand dominance for their partners to a TV audience of millions. It would allow the club to restructure their sponsorship portfolio substantially.
Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:48 pm
lj1985 wrote:Inthemixer wrote:Sorry mate, I work in Sports Sponsorship and you are way off the mark with this one. Swansea were actually showcased last season for underselling their shirt sponsorship in terms of the Premier League market. They have bought out the current sponsor early because they clocked onto this. They have overpaid for the year they owe to as compensation to the incumbent brand too.
It goes without saying that they have obviously done this because ultimately they can make more financially from the new brand but you shouldn't be heralding this development as some sort of substantial occurrence or investment. The Premier League sponsorship market is lucrative, and your hierarchy under sold last season.
Much more significant would be to talk about Cardiff City mulling over a completely digital stadium (which is what I am hearing), which would allow complete brand dominance for their partners to a TV audience of millions. It would allow the club to restructure their sponsorship portfolio substantially.
not my words but the words of the swans vice chairman
Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:01 pm
Inthemixer wrote:lj1985 wrote:Inthemixer wrote:Sorry mate, I work in Sports Sponsorship and you are way off the mark with this one. Swansea were actually showcased last season for underselling their shirt sponsorship in terms of the Premier League market. They have bought out the current sponsor early because they clocked onto this. They have overpaid for the year they owe to as compensation to the incumbent brand too.
It goes without saying that they have obviously done this because ultimately they can make more financially from the new brand but you shouldn't be heralding this development as some sort of substantial occurrence or investment. The Premier League sponsorship market is lucrative, and your hierarchy under sold last season.
Much more significant would be to talk about Cardiff City mulling over a completely digital stadium (which is what I am hearing), which would allow complete brand dominance for their partners to a TV audience of millions. It would allow the club to restructure their sponsorship portfolio substantially.
not my words but the words of the swans vice chairman
Well yes, that's hardly surprising is it? Ending a sponsorship early is always politically delicate for brand and rights holder. Swansea wouldn't come out directly and say 'We didn't do a good enough deal in the first place'. The brand would insist Swansea took decisive steps in preventing any rumours that they made the decision to ensure their public image remained intact.
Again, I am not saying that this isn't an increase in revenue... I am 100% confident it will be. However, I can guarantee that it won't be guaranteeing you Champions League football any time soon.
I can keep talking you through this if you wish...