Mike Williamson waiting to sign

waddle forgets they signed leroy lita i think.. great ambission that.

I dont know why people are even biting at what waddle has said. He knows f**k all about football and his poor little mind is clogged up with Cardiff obsession. Why is he so worried about our signings is beyond me. Having said that why he feels the need to even be on a Cardiff city messsge board is further beyond me.

Worry about your own team sunshine were doing and will do fine.

I love the way you state you don't know why people are biting then bite a damn sight more than anyone else

OBSESSED. Sad very very sad.

Wahey !!!! And again

yes but that's my point williamson is a long way off being a good replacement

Just like Schekter was a long way off being a good replacement too?

so do you think williamson is the type of player you should be looking to buy at this moment in time , shekter was dog shit by the way

But he will be 4th choice behind Hudson, Turner and Connolly so as a 4th choice centre back I think he would fit the bill.

Don't forget you had Mr Alan Tate as your 3rd/4th choice, are you seriously telling me Williamson is significantly worse than him

Williamson is being lined up as 4th or even 5th choice so in that regard I don't think it's a bad signing.

Don't be silly , we didn't buy Tate for the prem did we , we showed a bit of loyalty to a long serving player for our promotion season

No but he took up a wage and squad place so you simply can't take him out of the equation. You kept him on as 4th choice and he simply wasn't up to the job and couldn't hold a candle to a player like Williamson who has significant Prem experience.

Don't skew the argument to suit the answers you have because you are beginning to make yourself look pretty stupid.

Let's put this in simple comparitive terms for you. Are you really saying that the four CBs you had in Williams, Monk, Tate with late addition of Caulker was significantly stronger in depth than Hudson, Turner, Connolly and Williamson/Barnett ?

If you are then the conversation ends. I wouldn't agree with you but it's all about opinions.

yes without a shadow of a doubt Williams , caulker , monk and Tate over your lot any day of the week

waddle forgets they signed leroy lita i think.. great ambission that.

That's what was available at the time within our price range , your billionaire backer supposedly has 25 mill at least to spend and you're looking at a 4th choice donkey from relegation battlers

Leroy Lita

yes without a shadow of a doubt Williams , caulker , monk and Tate over your lot any day of the week

williams and caulker yeah, but not the other two!!

yes without a shadow of a doubt Williams , caulker , monk and Tate over your lot any day of the week

williams and caulker yeah, but not the other two!!

Agreed, which is why I asked that knob Waddle to compare depth but now he's just being a biased Jack rather than having a reasonable debate

I think people have to realise that we are not, yet, at the point where we can attract 4 top quality centre backs particularly when they wouldn't be 1st choice.

If Williamson signed he would arguably 4th or maybe even 5th choice here behind Hudson, Turner, Connelly and Barnett (if he signs). He would merely be a replacement for Nugent who just isn't ready for the Prem yet.

Not all the players we sign will walk into the the first XI and MM will just be ensuring that he has reliable/experienced back-up should things go wrong, e.g. injury, suspensions, etc.

On that basis Williamson would be a solid signing.

You are telling me malky is going to spend 2million on a 5th choice defender?

f**k.

I think people have to realise that we are not, yet, at the point where we can attract 4 top quality centre backs particularly when they wouldn't be 1st choice.

If Williamson signed he would arguably 4th or maybe even 5th choice here behind Hudson, Turner, Connelly and Barnett (if he signs). He would merely be a replacement for Nugent who just isn't ready for the Prem yet.

Not all the players we sign will walk into the the first XI and MM will just be ensuring that he has reliable/experienced back-up should things go wrong, e.g. injury, suspensions, etc.

On that basis Williamson would be a solid signing.

After all the names you've been talking about on here I would piss myself if your first signing was this donkey

why does it matter if he's our first or our last?[/obsessedot so much your first just the fact that this is the level you are looking to buy , sends out a cracking message to the fans don't you think ?

Yes one mans donkey is another mans thoroubred! As been proven so many times before! What about the other names mentioned? Mmmm selectively biased comments. Ffs twaddle can do better surely? Or you just the run of the mill obsessed Swansea tw*t that comes on here?

Monk and Tate over Hudson & Turner

Monk and Tate over Hudson & Turner

What I said was I would pick the four Swansea defenders before the cardiff ones that was the question given to me , individually wasn't mentioned