I SEE THERE IS A SMALL EXTENSION BEING BUILT

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/10268581

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/10268581

Keep wishing.

Craig it's not a big issue but for the record, the vital statistics came from you not bakedalaska.

[b]Your boxing skills would not come into it if Craig managed to sit on you.Bakedalasker [/b]Moderator

Posts: 8208
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:46 am
Location: Derby
Private messageE-mail BakedalaskerTop
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterReport this postReply with quoteRe: FAO CraigCCFC(blue mocker)Where were you 15 years ago?
by CraigCCFC » Sat Jun 01, 2013 3:50 pm

6 foot 6 (almost 7) and 22 stone of pure love!!!!

Craig it's not a big issue but for the record, the vital statistics came from you not bakedalaska.

[b]Your boxing skills would not come into it if Craig managed to sit on you.Bakedalasker [/b]Moderator

Posts: 8208
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:46 am
Location: Derby
Private messageE-mail BakedalaskerTop
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterReport this postReply with quoteRe: FAO CraigCCFC(blue mocker)Where were you 15 years ago?
by CraigCCFC » Sat Jun 01, 2013 3:50 pm

6 foot 6 (almost 7) and 22 stone of pure love!!!!

Yeah, instigated by Ian and the sitting comment otherwise you wouldnt have a clue what he was on about

Craig it's not a big issue but for the record, the vital statistics came from you not bakedalaska.

[b]Your boxing skills would not come into it if Craig managed to sit on you.Bakedalasker [/b]Moderator

Posts: 8208
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:46 am
Location: Derby
Private messageE-mail BakedalaskerTop
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterReport this postReply with quoteRe: FAO CraigCCFC(blue mocker)Where were you 15 years ago?
by CraigCCFC » Sat Jun 01, 2013 3:50 pm

6 foot 6 (almost 7) and 22 stone of pure love!!!!

Yeah, instigated by Ian and the sitting comment otherwise you wouldnt have a clue what he was on about

Blame Ian

No worries anyway mate-0

Your very odd. Still not sure who you really are either. This is certainly not your main account.

Who will be first to turn this into a rebrand thread??









Ooppsss sorry

Baz, do you know what colour brick they are using?

Your very odd. Still not sure who you really are either. This is certainly not your main account.

I'm not odd and this is my main account, long time viewer and i have to say over the months i've found your posts amusing but you do seem conflicted over the rebrand. For instance, in the space of one week you went from this quote i believe in Tans vision i have embraced the rebrand TO THIS QUOTE A WEEKE LATER.... I want us back in blue

Your very odd. Still not sure who you really are either. This is certainly not your main account.

he used to post as Don Cowie or something like that.

Your very odd. Still not sure who you really are either. This is certainly not your main account.

I'm not odd and this is my main account, long time viewer and i have to say over the months i've found your posts amusing but you do seem conflicted over the rebrand. For instance, in the space of one week you went from this quote i believe in Tans vision i have embraced the rebrand TO THIS QUOTE A WEEKE LATER.... I want us back in blue

Not once have I ever embraced the rebrand. Search my posts. Think you have me confused with someone else.

Your very odd. Still not sure who you really are either. This is certainly not your main account.

he used to post as Don Cowie or something like that.

Mario i have always liked you, dismissing the trust on grounds of them lacking working class credentials made me chuckle aye

Your very odd. Still not sure who you really are either. This is certainly not your main account.

I'm not odd and this is my main account, long time viewer and i have to say over the months i've found your posts amusing but you do seem conflicted over the rebrand. For instance, in the space of one week you went from this quote i believe in Tans vision i have embraced the rebrand TO THIS QUOTE A WEEKE LATER.... I want us back in blue

Not once have I ever embraced the rebrand. Search my posts. Think you have me confused with someone else.

Ok i will search, if i am wrong i will appologise. For the record after watching you on here, i think you're a bluebird and would fully get behind a movement for blue once it's up, moving & having an effect.

Your very odd. Still not sure who you really are either. This is certainly not your main account.

I'm not odd and this is my main account, long time viewer and i have to say over the months i've found your posts amusing but you do seem conflicted over the rebrand. For instance, in the space of one week you went from this quote i believe in Tans vision i have embraced the rebrand TO THIS QUOTE A WEEKE LATER.... I want us back in blue

I don't see any 'confusion' in Chuckles statements. He simply has chosen to 'accept' the red under the circumstances that we find ourselves under but in reality WANTS the blue back...but IMHO not at all costs

Chuckles, correct me if I am wrong, mate

Sven......chuckles???? Im confused

Sven......chuckles???? Im confused

Craig i couldn't find the post of you embracing the rebrand so i'll have to appologise about that allegation.


Sven, having been through his posts, Craig is a bluebird end of.

Sven......chuckles???? Im confused

Craig, it's simple...

Red to me is reluctantly 'acceptable' as opposed to the 'alternatives' that might have occurred. However, in that ideal world that none of us live in, I would prefer to go back to blue...

Doesn't make me anti-blue or specifiacally pro-red but it does make me a realist and one who has far more important things to worry about (and hopefully cheer about) in the coming season...

Can't speak for Chuckles on that opinion. I was simply trying to point out that Chuckles isn't as inconsistent as he was made out to be (even if I don't always agee with his views)

Sven......chuckles???? Im confused

Craig, it's simple...

Red to me is reluctantly 'acceptable' as opposed to the 'alternatives' that might have occurred. However, in that ideal world that none of us live in, I would prefer to go back to blue...

Doesn't make me anti-blue or specifiacally pro-red but it does make me a realist and one who has far more important things to worry about (and hopefully cheer about) in the coming season...

Can't speak for Chuckles on that opinion. I was simply trying to point out that Chuckles isn't as inconsistent as he was made out to be (even if I don't always agee with his views)

Who mentioned chuckles? Thats where im confused.You quoted a convo between me and blue really and were harping on about chuckles.......im lost

Sven......chuckles???? Im confused

Craig, it's simple...

Red to me is reluctantly 'acceptable' as opposed to the 'alternatives' that might have occurred. However, in that ideal world that none of us live in, I would prefer to go back to blue...

Doesn't make me anti-blue or specifiacally pro-red but it does make me a realist and one who has far more important things to worry about (and hopefully cheer about) in the coming season...

Can't speak for Chuckles on that opinion. I was simply trying to point out that Chuckles isn't as inconsistent as he was made out to be (even if I don't always agee with his views)

Who mentioned chuckles? Thats where im confused.You quoted a convo between me and blue really and were harping on about chuckles.......im lost

Craig, shit, you are right!! I am so sorry...obviously Chuckles on the brain!!

PS: I don't think you are contradictory either!