Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: What are the aims of bluebirds unite?

Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:58 pm

cakey-8t7 wrote:
scott_w_ccfc wrote:
cakey-8t7 wrote:
scott_w_ccfc wrote:
cakey-8t7 wrote:Anyone in the fold know what their aims are? If its a return to full blue and not a red blue compromise I think it's a bad idea and bad news for the club because I think VT walking away would f**k us right up anyone feel the same?

If bluebirds unite wants a compromise and some blue back then tidy, but if its full blue return then it's bad news for Ccfc in the long term.

The club is moving forward and going places now be sad to lose all that just because of a colour

They're going for a full return to blue as far as i know, and i disagree with everything else in this post.

I do think going for fully blue is the best route, I don't think VT leaving would be a bad thing now that we're in the Premier League, and if we do go backwards again over a colour it would be totally worth it in my opinion, we can always build to get up to the Premier League again, the right way this time. But as i said, i dont think it would come to that as now were there, i don't think we necessarily need VT. :ayatollah:




So you don't think we necessarily need a billionaire? You know of any billionaires in waiting who could replace him and pay the transfer fees wages stadium expansion state of the art training ground etc? Let me know now id love to know maybe id change my opinion then?

Don't need big transfers, i'd rather be like most other clubs in the league who manage without a billionaire owner, either sign players on frees or affordable fees, and still have our identity in tact.

If that makes it harder to stay in/get back to the Premier League then so be it, at least we'll have done it the right way. Most other clubs in the league manager to survive without a billionaire owner and every other club manages to do so without discarding their identity/tradition, we should be able to do the same. :ayatollah:



You ain't got no ambition but if identity and being blue is more important to trying to be the best we possibly can then that's up to you.

are you seriously suggesting we will eventually challenge for the premier league title just because we play in red and have a billionaire owner . Ask QPR how their title challenge is going or Villa and Liverpool how their challenge is going both have mega rich owners and arguably both gone backwards since.

Re: What are the aims of bluebirds unite?

Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:25 pm

darran1927 wrote:
cakey-8t7 wrote:
scott_w_ccfc wrote:
cakey-8t7 wrote:
scott_w_ccfc wrote:
cakey-8t7 wrote:Anyone in the fold know what their aims are? If its a return to full blue and not a red blue compromise I think it's a bad idea and bad news for the club because I think VT walking away would f**k us right up anyone feel the same?

If bluebirds unite wants a compromise and some blue back then tidy, but if its full blue return then it's bad news for Ccfc in the long term.

The club is moving forward and going places now be sad to lose all that just because of a colour

They're going for a full return to blue as far as i know, and i disagree with everything else in this post.

I do think going for fully blue is the best route, I don't think VT leaving would be a bad thing now that we're in the Premier League, and if we do go backwards again over a colour it would be totally worth it in my opinion, we can always build to get up to the Premier League again, the right way this time. But as i said, i dont think it would come to that as now were there, i don't think we necessarily need VT. :ayatollah:




So you don't think we necessarily need a billionaire? You know of any billionaires in waiting who could replace him and pay the transfer fees wages stadium expansion state of the art training ground etc? Let me know now id love to know maybe id change my opinion then?

Don't need big transfers, i'd rather be like most other clubs in the league who manage without a billionaire owner, either sign players on frees or affordable fees, and still have our identity in tact.

If that makes it harder to stay in/get back to the Premier League then so be it, at least we'll have done it the right way. Most other clubs in the league manager to survive without a billionaire owner and every other club manages to do so without discarding their identity/tradition, we should be able to do the same. :ayatollah:



You ain't got no ambition but if identity and being blue is more important to trying to be the best we possibly can then that's up to you.

are you seriously suggesting we will eventually challenge for the premier league title just because we play in red and have a billionaire owner . Ask QPR how their title challenge is going or Villa and Liverpool how their challenge is going both have mega rich owners and arguably both gone backwards since.



Who said anything about a title challenge I think you'll find you made that up pal.

Re: What are the aims of bluebirds unite?

Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:31 pm

cakey-8t7 wrote:
darran1927 wrote:
cakey-8t7 wrote:
cakey-8t7 wrote:
scott_w_ccfc wrote:
cakey-8t7 wrote:Anyone in the fold know what their aims are? If its a return to full blue and not a red blue compromise I think it's a bad idea and bad news for the club because I think VT walking away would f**k us right up anyone feel the same?

If bluebirds unite wants a compromise and some blue back then tidy, but if its full blue return then it's bad news for Ccfc in the long term.

The club is moving forward and going places now be sad to lose all that just because of a colourThey're going for a full return to blue as far as i know, and i disagree with everything else in this post.

I do think going for fully blue is the best route, I don't think VT leaving would be a bad thing now that we're in the Premier League, and if we do go backwards again over a colour it would be totally worth it in my opinion, we can always build to get up to the Premier League again, the right way this time. But as i said, i dont think it would come to that as now were there, i don't think we necessarily need VT. :ayatollah:



So you don't think we necessarily need a billionaire? You know of any billionaires in waiting who could replace him and pay the transfer fees wages stadium expansion state of the art training ground etc? Let me know now id love to know maybe id change my opinion then?

Don't need big transfers, i'd rather be like most other clubs in the league who manage without a billionaire owner, either sign players on frees or affordable fees, and still have our identity in tact.

If that makes it harder to stay in/get back to the Premier League then so be it, at least we'll have done it the right way. Most other clubs in the league manager to survive without a billionaire owner and every other club manages to do so without discarding their identity/tradition, we should be able to do the same. :ayatollah:



You ain't got no ambition but if identity and being blue is more important to trying to be the best we possibly can then that's up to you.

are you seriously suggesting we will eventually challenge for the premier league title just because we play in red and have a billionaire owner . Ask QPR how their title challenge is going or Villa and Liverpool how their challenge is going both have mega rich owners and arguably both gone backwards since.



Who said anything about a title challenge I think you'll find you made that up pal.

You implied it with the highlighted bit of your quote , if you didn't mean that I apologise