Swansea City's owners pocket £2m windfall

The intial u turn wasnt a lie. The messages of support swayed him to stick with the original plan as the majority were behind it. Thats not a lie.

He put aside 10m for langston who refused that offer, they are talking now.


Agreement with creditors.....really.....accept 5p in the pound or you will end up with nothing. That is screwing them over im afraid.

Id dress like that for his bank balance. Hes not stupid when you compare his and your bank statements

And then after saying, we won't rebrand your club he decided to go ahead and do so. That's not really sticking to his word, maybe his plans to change debt to equity will change.

He put £10 million aside and then asked them to write off the debt for the good of the club.

The creditors accepted the agreement.

He is stupid, when you compare our clubs and your club finances. We don't need a rich owner if we're able to be successful whilst running with money that's coming in to the club. Tan has changed your clubs identity and upset a large amount of your support based on luck and that Man. United and Liverpool are the two most supported teams in Asia and both play in red "coincidence?".

The intial u turn wasnt a lie. The messages of support swayed him to stick with the original plan as the majority were behind it. Thats not a lie.

He put aside 10m for langston who refused that offer, they are talking now.


Agreement with creditors.....really.....accept 5p in the pound or you will end up with nothing. That is screwing them over im afraid.

Id dress like that for his bank balance. Hes not stupid when you compare his and your bank statements

And then after saying, we won't rebrand your club he decided to go ahead and do so. That's not really sticking to his word, maybe his plans to change debt to equity will change.

He put £10 million aside and then asked them to write off the debt for the good of the club.

The creditors accepted the agreement.

He is stupid, when you compare our clubs and your club finances. We don't need a rich owner if we're able to be successful whilst running with money that's coming in to the club. Tan has changed your clubs identity and upset a large amount of your support based on luck and that Man. United and Liverpool are the two most supported teams in Asia and both play in red "coincidence?".

So you read nothing of my post. I answered your points and you just said exactly the same thing with no counter points involved. Your debating skills are woeful

The intial u turn wasnt a lie. The messages of support swayed him to stick with the original plan as the majority were behind it. Thats not a lie.

He put aside 10m for langston who refused that offer, they are talking now.


Agreement with creditors.....really.....accept 5p in the pound or you will end up with nothing. That is screwing them over im afraid.

Id dress like that for his bank balance. Hes not stupid when you compare his and your bank statements

And then after saying, we won't rebrand your club he decided to go ahead and do so. That's not really sticking to his word, maybe his plans to change debt to equity will change.

He put £10 million aside and then asked them to write off the debt for the good of the club.

The creditors accepted the agreement.

He is stupid, when you compare our clubs and your club finances. We don't need a rich owner if we're able to be successful whilst running with money that's coming in to the club. Tan has changed your clubs identity and upset a large amount of your support based on luck and that Man. United and Liverpool are the two most supported teams in Asia and both play in red "coincidence?".

SCFC you say Tan is stupid and I will tend to agree with you to a certain degree. The counter claim to this is that he can't be stupid as he is a billionaire. Well the problem some people in power have is that they let it go to their head and they believe their own hype. Also add to that no one dare challenges them then they think they are God and come out with stupid things. History has proved that and these type of guys usually end up falling big time.

I wont put Tan up there with the worst kind yet, far from it. However some of the statements he has said makes you wonder if he should be. Even so I am hearing he is a listener and would rather deal with those that oppose him than those that lick his arse. I hope this is true because there are quite a few opposing forces for him to deal with.

The intial u turn wasnt a lie. The messages of support swayed him to stick with the original plan as the majority were behind it. Thats not a lie.

He put aside 10m for langston who refused that offer, they are talking now.


Agreement with creditors.....really.....accept 5p in the pound or you will end up with nothing. That is screwing them over im afraid.

Id dress like that for his bank balance. Hes not stupid when you compare his and your bank statements

And then after saying, we won't rebrand your club he decided to go ahead and do so. That's not really sticking to his word, maybe his plans to change debt to equity will change.

He put £10 million aside and then asked them to write off the debt for the good of the club.

The creditors accepted the agreement.

He is stupid, when you compare our clubs and your club finances. We don't need a rich owner if we're able to be successful whilst running with money that's coming in to the club. Tan has changed your clubs identity and upset a large amount of your support based on luck and that Man. United and Liverpool are the two most supported teams in Asia and both play in red "coincidence?".

SCFC you say Tan is stupid and I will tend to agree with you to a certain degree. The counter claim to this is that he can't be stupid as he is a billionaire. Well the problem some people in power have is that they let it go to their head and they believe their own hype. Also add to that no one dare challenges them then they think they are God and come out with stupid things. History has proved that and these type of guys usually end up falling big time.

I wont put Tan up there with the worst kind yet, far from it. However some of the statements he has said makes you wonder if he should be. Even so I am hearing he is a listener and would rather deal with those that oppose him than those that lick his arse. I hope this is true because there are quite a few opposing forces for him to deal with.

You are now agreeing with a trolling jack to put over your hatred towards VT, (how low will you go) lets boot tan out of the club and get ourselves back to the good old days, you remember the ones, winding up orders, transfer embargos and fire sales of our best players, those were the days eh

The intial u turn wasnt a lie. The messages of support swayed him to stick with the original plan as the majority were behind it. Thats not a lie.

He put aside 10m for langston who refused that offer, they are talking now.


Agreement with creditors.....really.....accept 5p in the pound or you will end up with nothing. That is screwing them over im afraid.

Id dress like that for his bank balance. Hes not stupid when you compare his and your bank statements

And then after saying, we won't rebrand your club he decided to go ahead and do so. That's not really sticking to his word, maybe his plans to change debt to equity will change.

He put £10 million aside and then asked them to write off the debt for the good of the club.

The creditors accepted the agreement.

He is stupid, when you compare our clubs and your club finances. We don't need a rich owner if we're able to be successful whilst running with money that's coming in to the club. Tan has changed your clubs identity and upset a large amount of your support based on luck and that Man. United and Liverpool are the two most supported teams in Asia and both play in red "coincidence?".

SCFC you say Tan is stupid and I will tend to agree with you to a certain degree. The counter claim to this is that he can't be stupid as he is a billionaire. Well the problem some people in power have is that they let it go to their head and they believe their own hype. Also add to that no one dare challenges them then they think they are God and come out with stupid things. History has proved that and these type of guys usually end up falling big time.

I wont put Tan up there with the worst kind yet, far from it. However some of the statements he has said makes you wonder if he should be. Even so I am hearing he is a listener and would rather deal with those that oppose him than those that lick his arse. I hope this is true because there are quite a few opposing forces for him to deal with.

You are now agreeing with a trolling jack to put over your hatred towards VT, (how low will you go) lets boot tan out of the club and get ourselves back to the good old days, you remember the ones, winding up orders, transfer embargos and fire sales of our best players, those were the days eh

Bang on!

Heaven forbid the Swansea "troll" actually being right?

Heaven forbid the Swansea "troll" actually being right?

He is not right though

Could you point out where he is wrong then?

Could you point out where he is wrong then?

I did further up. Open your eyes

Could you point out where he is wrong then?

I did further up. Open your eyes

All of his points were valid & correct. Open your eyes.

By the way, have you wished death on this one yet?

Could you point out where he is wrong then?

I did further up. Open your eyes

All of his points were valid & correct. Open your eyes.

By the way, have you wished death on this one yet?

Sorry, end of thread.....chuckles ruins another one.....he must be right

Wished death, not yet. Nobody has irritated me enough.

Could you point out where he is wrong then?

I did further up. Open your eyes

All of his points were valid & correct. Open your eyes.

By the way, have you wished death on this one yet?

Sorry, end of thread.....chuckles ruins another one.....he must be right

Wished death, not yet. Nobody has irritated me enough.

So you posting your opinions is fine, but when I do, because they differ from yours, its a ruined thread? You clearly have poor debating skills then.

All I asked is where SCFC was wrong, as I cannot see anything he said that was a lie. Tan did go back on his "we won't rebrand" statement, he did put money aside and then try and get them to wipe it out & he also did rebrand this club into a laughing stock and "MU" copy - all for his inanimate dragon to "protect" the bluebird, who was frightened of other club's symbols..

Could you point out where he is wrong then?

I did further up. Open your eyes

All of his points were valid & correct. Open your eyes.

By the way, have you wished death on this one yet?

Sorry, end of thread.....chuckles ruins another one.....he must be right

Wished death, not yet. Nobody has irritated me enough.

So you posting your opinions is fine, but when I do, because they differ from yours, its a ruined thread? You clearly have poor debating skills then.

All I asked is where SCFC was wrong, as I cannot see anything he said that was a lie. Tan did go back on his "we won't rebrand" statement, he did put money aside and then try and get them to wipe it out & he also did rebrand this club into a laughing stock and "MU" copy - all for his inanimate dragon to "protect" the bluebird, who was frightened of other club's symbols..

Chuckles has spoken.

End of thread

Thanks for showing that you couldn't disagree with my points.

And why would you bring up OLD news (April 9th) like this, stop obsessing over the Jacks!

Almost as obsessed as your username..

Obviously you have no idea what my username is relating to, although you may THINK you do

I was talking to "cantstandcardiff" mate.

A Big Oop's