Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:39 am
Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:47 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Hofmeister wrote:buckblue11 wrote:to all those who booed tan while he was giving his speech hang your heads in shame.tan has saved Cardiff.if it were not for him we could be where pompy are.please wake up and smell the coffee and support the team not the colour.
Hmmm... Let me see... has no clue about football, calls fans customers, lied to us, took our colours, our badge, our identity, our tradition....
Ahmmm...
NO
Saved us from the taxman, got rid of Jones, hired and backed MM and delivered Premiership football for the first time in 51 years.
I can never understand the mind set of those who put their own selfish preferences before the good of the team.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:53 am
mjw6150 wrote:VT is a Cardiff City Legend. The man who saved the club from extinction and whose clever running of the club in appointing and backing Malky Mackay has seen us finally rise to the Premier League.
Even on the colour issue, he has been up front and seems willing to listen and compromise.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:01 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Hofmeister wrote:the good things that Tan has done for the club are tiny compared to the rebranding. Damned Yank got pretty close, if he hadnt done the rebrand, he would get the respect from everyone as he would be the perfect owner...
This is where you are completely away with the fairies. Tan doesn't give a dam about your view of a 'perfect owner', he is here to make money.
In his opinion he needed a rebrand and therefore went ahead with it. I'm not saying that is what I personally wanted but I am realistic enough to understand you don't get something for nothing and as the pay off was a massive investment (whether that is loaned or equity) then I was happy to live with it.
Sorry but fans like you have to man up and understand that like Father Christmas the 'perfect owner' really doesn't exist and if we want to make our way in the football world then we have to adapt and make the most of oppotunities that come our way.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:09 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Hofmeister wrote:the good things that Tan has done for the club are tiny compared to the rebranding. Damned Yank got pretty close, if he hadnt done the rebrand, he would get the respect from everyone as he would be the perfect owner...
This is where you are completely away with the fairies. Tan doesn't give a dam about your view of a 'perfect owner', he is here to make money.
In his opinion he needed a rebrand and therefore went ahead with it. I'm not saying that is what I personally wanted but I am realistic enough to understand you don't get something for nothing and as the pay off was a massive investment (whether that is loaned or equity) then I was happy to live with it.
Sorry but fans like you have to man up and understand that like Father Christmas the 'perfect owner' really doesn't exist and if we want to make our way in the football world then we have to adapt and make the most of oppotunities that come our way.
Tony he did not need the rebrand at all.Its all based around one mans deluded superstitions about the colour red.You may argue that its his money so he can do what he likes but I dont think that it was justifyable sacrificing our colours based on superstition alone.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:15 am
Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:26 am
harold pinta wrote:Respect works both ways.Tan will get as much respect from me as he has shown us. Zero. This last few months he has shown himself to be an egotistical and slightly deranged man that doesn't give a shit about what the fans think.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:42 am
Zabier wrote:harold pinta wrote:Respect works both ways.Tan will get as much respect from me as he has shown us. Zero. This last few months he has shown himself to be an egotistical and slightly deranged man that doesn't give a shit about what the fans think.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Respect is a two way street. He lost my respect when he disrespected decades of tradition by getting rid of the colour blue. If he had even met with fans before and sat to explain the methodology behind it then it might have been easier to take. However, he called us customers instead of fans and basically told the "25%" (where did he get that f*cking figure from? Blatant propaganda!) to go and f**k themselves if they didn't like it.
I was beginning to doubt my integrity when I chose not to renew for next season but recent weeks have just re-affirmed to me that I have made the right decision. I will always support Cardiff and the players but I will never support that man. Just because he has money and "saved" us (sorry, I forgot he was doing it out of the goodness of his heart and not to take a flogged horse and make some profit from it) does not mean he automatically wins respect. Tan doesn't give a f**k about any of you. He would sell you all to a slave market if he could make a bit of profit from it. If you think otherwise then you're bloody deluded as he is.
If Tan wants our respect then he has to earn it. You don't buy respect. You earn it.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:49 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Zabier wrote:harold pinta wrote:Respect works both ways.Tan will get as much respect from me as he has shown us. Zero. This last few months he has shown himself to be an egotistical and slightly deranged man that doesn't give a shit about what the fans think.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Respect is a two way street. He lost my respect when he disrespected decades of tradition by getting rid of the colour blue. If he had even met with fans before and sat to explain the methodology behind it then it might have been easier to take. However, he called us customers instead of fans and basically told the "25%" (where did he get that f*cking figure from? Blatant propaganda!) to go and f**k themselves if they didn't like it.
I was beginning to doubt my integrity when I chose not to renew for next season but recent weeks have just re-affirmed to me that I have made the right decision. I will always support Cardiff and the players but I will never support that man. Just because he has money and "saved" us (sorry, I forgot he was doing it out of the goodness of his heart and not to take a flogged horse and make some profit from it) does not mean he automatically wins respect. Tan doesn't give a f**k about any of you. He would sell you all to a slave market if he could make a bit of profit from it. If you think otherwise then you're bloody deluded as he is.
If Tan wants our respect then he has to earn it. You don't buy respect. You earn it.
Like many fans, I have chosen not to renew and went through the same emotions as you but have now realised it was the right thing to do. Your comments pretty much sum up my feelings on the whole issue.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:58 am
Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:45 am
Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:09 am
LLangynwyd Blue wrote:Totally agree with you, I felt embarrassed during the game when our so called supporters were singing, and the heckling during VT speech, am I suprised ? no is the answer to that, I would call them small minded with the need to grow up and show a bit of maturity and respect, but football attracts these people, only time will make them mature, I suppose when I was growing up in the sixties seventies and eighties watching Cardiff I would have been classed one of them, but I allways toed the line never stepping over it, I now look to see the bigger picture and what VT has done for this club, yes he has changed the colour and badge, that is a price that I am prepared to pay to see my club prosper and flourish, lets be done with this divide, we are on the brink of a new era and yet we have morons who would see the club go backwards to get what they want, if you don't like it let someone else have your seat and then you can move on with your life.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:00 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Hofmeister wrote:the good things that Tan has done for the club are tiny compared to the rebranding. Damned Yank got pretty close, if he hadnt done the rebrand, he would get the respect from everyone as he would be the perfect owner...
This is where you are completely away with the fairies. Tan doesn't give a dam about your view of a 'perfect owner', he is here to make money.
In his opinion he needed a rebrand and therefore went ahead with it. I'm not saying that is what I personally wanted but I am realistic enough to understand you don't get something for nothing and as the pay off was a massive investment (whether that is loaned or equity) then I was happy to live with it.
Sorry but fans like you have to man up and understand that like Father Christmas the 'perfect owner' really doesn't exist and if we want to make our way in the football world then we have to adapt and make the most of oppotunities that come our way.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:06 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Hofmeister wrote:the good things that Tan has done for the club are tiny compared to the rebranding. Damned Yank got pretty close, if he hadnt done the rebrand, he would get the respect from everyone as he would be the perfect owner...
This is where you are completely away with the fairies. Tan doesn't give a dam about your view of a 'perfect owner', he is here to make money.
In his opinion he needed a rebrand and therefore went ahead with it. I'm not saying that is what I personally wanted but I am realistic enough to understand you don't get something for nothing and as the pay off was a massive investment (whether that is loaned or equity) then I was happy to live with it.
Sorry but fans like you have to man up and understand that like Father Christmas the 'perfect owner' really doesn't exist and if we want to make our way in the football world then we have to adapt and make the most of oppotunities that come our way.
Tony he did not need the rebrand at all.Its all based around one mans deluded superstitions about the colour red.You may argue that its his money so he can do what he likes but I dont think that it was justifyable sacrificing our colours based on superstition alone.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:17 am
Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:22 am
JonCCFC wrote:Sven Ghali wrote:Hofmeister wrote:buckblue11 wrote:to all those who booed tan while he was giving his speech hang your heads in shame.tan has saved Cardiff.if it were not for him we could be where pompy are.please wake up and smell the coffee and support the team not the colour.
Hmmm... Let me see... has no clue about football, calls fans customers, lied to us, took our colours, our badge, our identity, our tradition....
Ahmmm...
NO
Hmmm, now let ME see:
Erm, Tan saved the club (when no one else would)
Erm, Tan brought Malky to the club (forget the Shearer stories)
Erm, fans are effectively customers (they spend their hard-earned at the club)
Erm, when EXACTLY has he LIED to us? (The debt to equity issue will be sorted shortly)
Erm, took our colours? (He changed the colour of the shirt in exchange for a LOT of money and promotion)
Erm, Tan took our identity? (Are we no longer Cardiff City FC?)
Erm, Tan took our tradition? (What? Has he taken away our FA Cup win or our history?)
You must lead one perfect life to genuinely think Tan has been anything but good for Cardiff City FC![]()
You're clutching at straws, he could kill someone and you'd still find a way to defend Tan!
Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:49 am
Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:02 pm
Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:48 pm
Bluebird64 wrote:mjw6150 wrote:VT is a Cardiff City Legend. The man who saved the club from extinction and whose clever running of the club in appointing and backing Malky Mackay has seen us finally rise to the Premier League.
Even on the colour issue, he has been up front and seems willing to listen and compromise.
He is far from being a City legend but could have been but he blew it big time over the rebranding. To call him upfront about the colour issue is an insult due to his underhanded tactics and telling us he is willing to listen and compromise is just wishful thinking.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:44 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Sorry Sven, just because you've followed the club longer - doesnt mean you view point is more important, as you are implying in your post.
I've followed the city for many seasons & feel the same way as Jon does. He can't help his age, surely?![]()
The way I see it - Tan saved this club, totally agree. Had he not introduced the rebrand, he would be hero worshipped right now.
For me, his disrespected the traditions of the club, you mention the FA Cup win - that isn't a tradition?We've worn blue shirts for over a century (since CCFC became known as CCFC) & over many years worn a bluebird as our "symbol" on the crest.
Fans are customers to a certain extent, but it's unlike any other business - you don't go to a rival club if you don't like the staff/offers etc. you stick through thick & thin.
He HAS taken our colours. He's even trying to tell fans what songs to sing and what colours to wear now (talk about free speech etc, eh?!)
We are still Cardiff City, yes... But our identity is made up of many other things... Shirt colour and "bluebird" are also parts of this identity.
The way I see things, Tan gets respect when he treats the club with respect.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:07 pm
steve davies wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Hofmeister wrote:the good things that Tan has done for the club are tiny compared to the rebranding. Damned Yank got pretty close, if he hadnt done the rebrand, he would get the respect from everyone as he would be the perfect owner...
This is where you are completely away with the fairies. Tan doesn't give a dam about your view of a 'perfect owner', he is here to make money.
In his opinion he needed a rebrand and therefore went ahead with it. I'm not saying that is what I personally wanted but I am realistic enough to understand you don't get something for nothing and as the pay off was a massive investment (whether that is loaned or equity) then I was happy to live with it.
Sorry but fans like you have to man up and understand that like Father Christmas the 'perfect owner' really doesn't exist and if we want to make our way in the football world then we have to adapt and make the most of oppotunities that come our way.
Tony he did not need the rebrand at all.Its all based around one mans deluded superstitions about the colour red.You may argue that its his money so he can do what he likes but I dont think that it was justifyable sacrificing our colours based on superstition alone.
whichever way you want to look at it though he will always feel justified about his lucky red because he got us promoted regardless of who thinks its superstious mumbo jumbo.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:32 pm
Sven Ghali wrote:Buchanan's Exocet wrote:He gets absolutely NO respect from me.
I would tell him to his face as well.
ALWAYS A BLUE, NEVER A RED.
You won't be there next season then, oh highly principled one?![]()
Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:13 pm
Sven Ghali wrote:JonCCFC, not going to debate this issue with you for the reasons we have discussed recently, i.e. we both have totally opposing views and apparently my experiences of the fall and rise of our club over so many years means little to you (or some others TBF)![]()
Your comment 'clutching at straws' is a very naive one and is far more suited to those who still attempt to justify their anti-Tan stances with little or no evidence (other than the obvious red thing)![]()
I am NOT a pro-Red. I simply accept it for what we got in return and I would not defend Tan if he killed someone but you would need to know my personal and professional background to understand why not![]()
Do me a favour and consider your comments better in future, please![]()
Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:13 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Sorry Sven, just because you've followed the club longer - doesnt mean you view point is more important, as you are implying in your post.
I've followed the city for many seasons & feel the same way as Jon does. He can't help his age, surely?![]()
The way I see it - Tan saved this club, totally agree. Had he not introduced the rebrand, he would be hero worshipped right now.
For me, his disrespected the traditions of the club, you mention the FA Cup win - that isn't a tradition?We've worn blue shirts for over a century (since CCFC became known as CCFC) & over many years worn a bluebird as our "symbol" on the crest.
Fans are customers to a certain extent, but it's unlike any other business - you don't go to a rival club if you don't like the staff/offers etc. you stick through thick & thin.
He HAS taken our colours. He's even trying to tell fans what songs to sing and what colours to wear now (talk about free speech etc, eh?!)
We are still Cardiff City, yes... But our identity is made up of many other things... Shirt colour and "bluebird" are also parts of this identity.
The way I see things, Tan gets respect when he treats the club with respect.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:20 pm
Sven Ghali wrote:Barry, I generally (as you know) respect your opinions and this post is no different. All opinions on this site are indeed PERSONAL![]()
JonCCFC have recently had a bit of a truce and I have no wish to keep raising issues with him. However, you/he must understand that I am not directly 'having a go' at his youth. We have discussed that before and I accept that he can't 'help' his age anymore than any of us can. I actually envy that I am no longer a teenager![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Where I do have a 'problem' is where he continually talks of issues that are historic as if he was there and has firsthand experiences. Unfortunately, he does not...and that is wholly my point when he disrespects the opinions (for or against) of those MANY of us who experienced the whole story over several decades![]()
He claims I am 'clutching at straws' in his post?
WTF?![]()
Apart from ONE point we (you and I) are largely in agreement yet are mature enough to realise we cannopt agree on everythingEven with regard the Red/Blue issue we are agreed that we would PREFER the Blue. My ONLY point throughout has been that we (the fans) had a decision to make and that involved a simple equation: Risk vs Cost , i.e. was the RISK of staying Blue (in Tan's words) worth the COST of the POTENTIAL of losing our beloved club?
![]()
So please, neither of you should take any of my comments as 'ageist' or too personal. They are (as are yours) just my personal opinion and (like you) I will stick with them until PROVEN differently. To date, Red/Blue apart, I fail to see exactly where Tan has let the club down?We are, afterall, in the Premier League and about to be debt-free via floatation on the Stock Markets
![]()
Who could possibly have thought that even two short seasons ago?![]()
Certainly not me because I was the original cynic!![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:21 pm
Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:31 pm
harold pinta wrote:Respect works both ways.Tan will get as much respect from me as he has shown us. Zero. This last few months he has shown himself to be an egotistical and slightly deranged man that doesn't give a shit about what the fans think.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:46 pm
TopCat CCFC wrote:Cardiff City owner Vincent Tan rules out further rebranding -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22330086
Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:38 pm
JonCCFC wrote:Sven Ghali wrote:Barry, I generally (as you know) respect your opinions and this post is no different. All opinions on this site are indeed PERSONAL![]()
JonCCFC have recently had a bit of a truce and I have no wish to keep raising issues with him. However, you/he must understand that I am not directly 'having a go' at his youth. We have discussed that before and I accept that he can't 'help' his age anymore than any of us can. I actually envy that I am no longer a teenager![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Where I do have a 'problem' is where he continually talks of issues that are historic as if he was there and has firsthand experiences. Unfortunately, he does not...and that is wholly my point when he disrespects the opinions (for or against) of those MANY of us who experienced the whole story over several decades![]()
He claims I am 'clutching at straws' in his post?
WTF?![]()
Apart from ONE point we (you and I) are largely in agreement yet are mature enough to realise we cannopt agree on everythingEven with regard the Red/Blue issue we are agreed that we would PREFER the Blue. My ONLY point throughout has been that we (the fans) had a decision to make and that involved a simple equation: Risk vs Cost , i.e. was the RISK of staying Blue (in Tan's words) worth the COST of the POTENTIAL of losing our beloved club?
![]()
So please, neither of you should take any of my comments as 'ageist' or too personal. They are (as are yours) just my personal opinion and (like you) I will stick with them until PROVEN differently. To date, Red/Blue apart, I fail to see exactly where Tan has let the club down?We are, afterall, in the Premier League and about to be debt-free via floatation on the Stock Markets
![]()
Who could possibly have thought that even two short seasons ago?![]()
Certainly not me because I was the original cynic!![]()
![]()
![]()
Tell me where I've talked about "historic issues" where I discuss things as if I've experienced them in first hand, evidence please.I'll tell you again, how long you've supported City is irrelevant. Please tell me where I disrespect the opinions of those who have "experienced the whole story".
![]()
You say that I can't back up what I've said with evidence yet you can't seem to back up your comments with evidence, hypocrisy or what.![]()
Tan deserves respect when he shows us respect. No matter what good things he's done. I will never thank him or forgive him unless he reverts us back to blue.
Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:44 pm
Buchanan's Exocet wrote:Sven Ghali wrote:Buchanan's Exocet wrote:He gets absolutely NO respect from me.
I would tell him to his face as well.
ALWAYS A BLUE, NEVER A RED.
You won't be there next season then, oh highly principled one?![]()
Like this season, no I won't, oh highly obnoxious one.