Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:15 am
paulh_85 wrote:Paxman wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Paxman wrote:If anyone thinks out debts will do anything but increase now we are in the Prem are deluded.
Costs go up almost to the same rate as income. Swansea are incredibly prudent and if it wasn't for player sales would only have made a £5m profit and that was including an 11th placed finish. It's 750k a place so if they finished 17th they would have barely broke even.
why do you have to mention swansea with every post
I doubt I've mentioned them in 5% of my posts let alone all of them. Thanks for asking though.
![]()
realistically i reckon 50% of your posts have been about swansea, maybe more
Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:21 am
Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:22 am
sorry but I don't agree if a club won't pay it ,the players can't have it ,maybe british born players want more but foreign players ate a lot cheaper by end of next season we could be debt free with tv money ,sponsorship and vt turn debt in to equityPaxman wrote:wez1927 wrote:Paxman wrote:If anyone thinks out debts will do anything but increase now we are in the Prem are deluded.
Costs go up almost to the same rate as income. Swansea are incredibly prudent and if it wasn't for player sales would only have made a £5m profit and that was including an 11th placed finish. It's 750k a place so if they finished 17th they would have barely broke even.
Next season the bottom club gets 60 million just in tv money using past seasons is wrong, next year is the most lucrative season ever i,ts worth 140 million just to stay up and come down
All that will do is push players wage demands up and increase transfer fees.
Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:04 am
paulh_85 wrote:i cant really be bothered, but you (yet again) brought them up in this thread when there was no need