Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:24 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:I dont think it was a case of "Red or Dead" either......
But what I do believe is that, as owner of the club, Tan Sri has the right to market the club as he deems appropriate. Now that may not be to some of our liking but there again none of us pay the bills. Nor do we invest the sort of millions that he has invested.
As far as whether I believe him or not - Well, me personally, I can only go by his previous track record. Berjaya is a major success and he is a likeable person as is Simon Lim.
The people in charge of our club are good people. They have good business brains and they are turning our club from a "local club" to a "Worldwide Brand". Thats a big change and I accept that. It is not to everyones liking but gone are the days where are supporters are solely those who turn up to the stadium.
Our supporters (Or Stakeholders) are now:
1) Those who turn up to the stadium
2) Those, local, who follow the club but for whatever reason cannot get to the stadium
3) Those who follow us on Sky TV (Subscription Services)
4) Those, who next year, will follow us on PayPerView
5) Those, overseas, who buy our products
6) Those in Asia, Europe and the Americas who will want to follow and purchase items from the Cardiff City Brand
We are no longer the local club who played in blue attracting 3000 supporters with a debt and no trophies. We are about to step into the real world of Corporate Business where the rewards are much greater.
Tan Sri has proven success and I am sure that he knows what he is doing.
An aside from this I am grateful to have Tan Sri at our club. It could be worse. 20 miles from where I live is Ewood Park.
Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:54 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:56 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:57 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:09 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:17 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:21 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
And what about our traditions?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:22 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:27 pm
ashleyCCFC wrote:by making a new club is as worse what TAN is doing now.
making a new club with no history, is not right.
in my opinion just keep fighting for our identity back.
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:27 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
It's not your decision about Blackburn's managers, but you say on here that what they are doing is awful.
Well it may not be my decision, but I think what Tan has done to our club is just as bad.
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:32 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
It's not your decision about Blackburn's managers, but you say on here that what they are doing is awful.
Well it may not be my decision, but I think what Tan has done to our club is just as bad.
Barry I respect your opinion and maybe, in a few years time, things will pan out which may (or may not) cause you to have a re-think. I certainly dont know what will happen but I would prefer to trust Tan Sri than the Venkys.
4 Managers in one season (or as someone put it 1 manager for each away win) is just ridiculous. After all the good that Jack Walker did for Blackburn they have come in and virtually killed the club. The club is not marketed overseas. I certainly wouldnt pay to watch Blackburn on PPVTV and any support there is locally appears to be dwindling. We are moving in totally the opposite direction.
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:59 pm
billy ronson wrote:Does it matter which league the new team play in? I thought the reason for forming the new club is to see them play in blue with a badge that has the bluebird ? Staying in the Welsh system would allow the team if successful to represent Wales in Europe.
Also regarding the Welsh FA route, do we know at what level the new club would have to enter?
This is not a wind up, just curious ?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:28 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:36 pm
Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:29 am
Bakedalasker wrote:
And what about our traditions?
Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:56 am
Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:19 am
Paul Keevil wrote:I dont think it was a case of "Red or Dead" either......
But what I do believe is that, as owner of the club, Tan Sri has the right to market the club as he deems appropriate. Now that may not be to some of our liking but there again none of us pay the bills. Nor do we invest the sort of millions that he has invested. .
Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:48 am
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I dont think it was a case of "Red or Dead" either......
But what I do believe is that, as owner of the club, Tan Sri has the right to market the club as he deems appropriate. Now that may not be to some of our liking but there again none of us pay the bills. Nor do we invest the sort of millions that he has invested. .
Very interesting you should think that.
We have 22,000 fans every home week at the stadium who have paid collectively around £6 million per year to the club, ironically the same sum Tan paid us that then made him feel he had the right to change everything.
We have paid the bills for the club a lot longer than Tan and continue to do so. Tan is spending money like its going out of fashion, money that is then attached to the club - not himself.
That doesn't give anyone the right to do what he has done. Sorry, you are wrong.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:39 am
All Black Everything. wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:
And what about our traditions?
To be fair, when you take a deeper look into other clubs kit history etc. traditions are a load of bollocks anyway and I say that as someone who hated Tan after the scarf incident.
Liverpool play in their rivals old ground and used to play in kit like United's current one
West Ham had more blue but now have more claret on their kit than the blue which shows a change.
A few Premiership teams have stadium naming rights done by sponsors. SDA and DW Stadium are two of the obvious ones.
United had a white kit for a while as well with red being a minor feature
Arsenal have moved stadiums and have played in different colours.
Leeds changed their kit completely.
Spurs have had many different colour kits, one of which was red
Swansea have played in all white, white and red, white and orange, red white and black flames and now white and gold.
Everton have had many different colour kits
Forest & Derby have both have had different badges
Palace have been practically rebranded as well
Watford have had a kit change.
I think the obvious answer is people love the kit and badge purely because it relates to a period in their life they feel nostalgic about.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:09 pm
Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:19 pm
Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:55 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Why are people getting their knickers in a twist about these guys posting on here and "stealing" support![]()
Tan has already said 25% he can live with being unhappy, thats over 5000 of our current average gate so why are people getting concerned about this alternative club?
As we keep getting told theres plenty of fans to take those that leave's place so why so worried?
They are offering an alternative to modern football, they would probably be luckly to have 1-200 at best so I ask again, why are you getting your knickers in a twist?
Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:42 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:51 pm
Blue Legend wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
Excellent post. As long as we continue as Cardiff City Football Club thats good enough for me. Loyal supporters will stick with the club whatever colour we play in.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:56 pm
Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:44 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Blue Legend wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:The point is though that it is not our decision.
Here we have a situation where a very succesful businessman believes, based on his experience, that he can increase the wealth and "Global Brand" of Cardiff City by making changes.
He might be right he might be wrong but two things are for sure - I neither have £60m to have my say - nor do I have the experience that he has.
Dont get me wrong I would prefer to play in Blue but I am a realist. Cardiff City is not the club I started supporting in 1973. Stefan Terlezki no longer runs the club and neither does Tony Clemo. We dont have crowds of 3000 anymore. We are a much bigger fish and we are going to grow much bigger. If Tan Sri believes that playing in red will help him market the club in China and Asia generally then I have to accept that he knows what he is doing.
Financially, and on the playing side, he has not done much wrong afterall....
Excellent post. As long as we continue as Cardiff City Football Club thats good enough for me. Loyal supporters will stick with the club whatever colour we play in.
What's good for you does not mean its good for others.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:56 pm
Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:03 pm
Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:10 pm
Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:18 pm
wokingjames wrote:Guernsey joined the English Pyramid only last season, so if they can why can't an FC Cardiff?