Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:54 pm
swansealad69 wrote:Our running cost for this seaaon is near on 40m.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:57 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:00 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:42 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:44 pm
NJ73 wrote:You should consider that transfer/wage budgets from this and previous season will be lower than those for next season due to the huge increase in tv money coming from next season.
I thought it was interesting that Tan said he thought the core of your squad was fine and £20-25m would go on 2-3 players.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:30 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:£25m is terrible for a Premier League team wanting to survive.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:35 pm
NJ73 wrote:You should consider that transfer/wage budgets from this and previous season will be lower than those for next season due to the huge increase in tv money coming from next season.
I thought it was interesting that Tan said he thought the core of your squad was fine and £20-25m would go on 2-3 players.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:41 pm
cakey-8t7 wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:£25m is terrible for a Premier League team wanting to survive.
What and end up like qpr, it's about how u spend you doughnut not how much u spend
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:45 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:cakey-8t7 wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:£25m is terrible for a Premier League team wanting to survive.
What and end up like qpr, it's about how u spend you doughnut not how much u spend
If you think Malky can pull off a Swansea in the transfer market you are crazy. They got most of their newer and better quality players thanks to the pull of Laudrup who is highly respected. He convinced them to join Swansea and play good football in the Premier League. Malky won't have the same pull. Great man, great future in management I believe but at the moment he hasn't got that pull.
Swansea got bargains because Laudrup had contacts and could persuade players to want to leave their current club to play in the Premier League under him.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:50 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:53 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:It is a concern that velikonja and kimbo have had little impact and they were big money Malky signings.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:56 pm
BlueSince82 wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:It is a concern that velikonja and kimbo have had little impact and they were big money Malky signings.
Kimbo little impact?
Have you watched him?
He's been quality and made and impact everytime he's played.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:58 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:BlueSince82 wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:It is a concern that velikonja and kimbo have had little impact and they were big money Malky signings.
Kimbo little impact?
Have you watched him?
He's been quality and made and impact everytime he's played.
Not in my opinion. He's neat and tidy but makes little impact on games, certainly for the price tag.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:59 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:01 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:That's another thing we will have to wait and see regarding. But I've not been impressed.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:06 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:31 pm
Parnassus wrote:If that is just transfer fees then it's certainly a substantial amount. But overspending has been the main worry and upon promotion was hoped that it would stop.
With £25m spending comes players that want big wages. Look at QPR, it's ugly.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:45 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Parnassus wrote:If that is just transfer fees then it's certainly a substantial amount. But overspending has been the main worry and upon promotion was hoped that it would stop.
With £25m spending comes players that want big wages. Look at QPR, it's ugly.
Your right, we should look for players that only want to play for us for the honour, because it's not about the wages they can earn, I'm with you on this, could be the new way forward.
Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:26 am
BigGwynram wrote:Parnassus wrote:If that is just transfer fees then it's certainly a substantial amount. But overspending has been the main worry and upon promotion was hoped that it would stop.
With £25m spending comes players that want big wages. Look at QPR, it's ugly.
Your right, we should look for players that only want to play for us for the honour, because it's not about the wages they can earn, I'm with you on this, could be the new way forward.
Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:04 am
Paxman wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Parnassus wrote:If that is just transfer fees then it's certainly a substantial amount. But overspending has been the main worry and upon promotion was hoped that it would stop.
With £25m spending comes players that want big wages. Look at QPR, it's ugly.
Your right, we should look for players that only want to play for us for the honour, because it's not about the wages they can earn, I'm with you on this, could be the new way forward.
Is that what was said then? No.
It's about punching above the clubs financial weight and the problems at leads to. But as you have brought up the players, you have to ask yourself why anyone who can command such a fee and wage would consider themselves only good enough for a team likely to fight relegation, I show you exhibit odemwingie and exhibit samba and then show you exhibit QPR.
Spending £8m on a player and giving him 40k a week wages is all well and good if the profits the club make allow for that. Look at Swansea, first season record signing was £3.5m on Danny graham and 25k a week, year after it was £6m on Ki and 35k a week, next year they have probably earned the financial elbow room to buy a £9m player and 50k a week.
You seem on a one man mission to preach the word of liquidation.
Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:12 am
Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:48 pm
Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:43 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:People can bang on about this figure all they like but it was put out there at exactly the same time as the name change release with the intention to try and get people talking about the money side of things instead of the actual intentions.
Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:37 pm