Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:24 am

Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:Then you mentioned my comment towards you and whilst I agree it was a sick comment to make I would also state that it clearly isn't a malicious rumour!!!

Do you think there is something missing in your personal make-up that allows you to
spout such foul stuff though?

Furthermore, you are trying to distance yourself from making an apology about it
(not to me, it was water off a ducks back).. but the facts are you made an awful
reference to an awful disease that upset the whole board.

So there IS an apology due


But that clearly wasn't a 'Malicious rumour!!!!'.I'm sorry but do you know what a Malicious rumour actually is..?


Oh God, its like shelling peas with this weapon :lol: :lol: .....

Malicious: motivated by wrongful, vicious, or mischievous purposes

You thought it just meant vicious didnt you :?



No not at all. There's a difference between a rumour and a comment. That is where my point is coming from and I see that you are trying to not mention the disgusting Mcphail rumour which others stated.


So no apology for wishing death on people by Cancer? Because it wasnt a malicious rumour?

You really are special :roll:

You knew you'd done wrong, so as usual, you fucked off and hid for a while. But you upset
a hell of a lot of people.


So I was right all along. This whole thread even through it's an incorrect thread is just you being bitter and want an apology for a comment I said months ago. Well you know what 'I'm sorry'. There you go and I hope that the bitterness doesn't last with you much longer because quiet frankly I'm sure other members don't want to see constant threads like this popping up all the time.


Dont apologise to me lad. I make allowances for you. Serious. Apologise to the board
like you should have done the very second you came back

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:41 am

You stated that there IS an apology due which I give. One of my first posts on here contained an apology to others who I have offended in the past so what's the issue now ?

You make an incorrect thread about me in the first place so now we are at a shake hands moment then surely I deserve an apology for this incorrect thread. Or are you not man enough to do that an move on ?

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:46 am

Angry Man wrote:You stated that there IS an apology due which I give. One of my first posts on here contained an apology to others who I have offended in the past so what's the issue now ?

You make an incorrect thread about me in the first place so now we are at a shake hands moment then surely I deserve an apology for this incorrect thread. Or are you not man enough to do that an move on ?


:lol: :lol: You should be more specific and apologise to the board (not me) for making references to
wishing people death by cancer. That was disgusting for many people and very upsetting

Its a measure of you that you brought up McPhail which was a totally
different thing.

So apologise for that and we'll call it a draw

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:55 am

taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:You stated that there IS an apology due which I give. One of my first posts on here contained an apology to others who I have offended in the past so what's the issue now ?

You make an incorrect thread about me in the first place so now we are at a shake hands moment then surely I deserve an apology for this incorrect thread. Or are you not man enough to do that an move on ?


:lol: :lol: You should be more specific and apologise to the board (not me) for making references to
wishing people death by cancer. That was disgusting for many people and very upsetting

Its a measure of you that you brought up McPhail which was a totally
different thing.

So apologise for that and we'll call it a draw


Sorry but surely that comes under 'I apologise to anyone I've offended in the past' doesn't it ? :?

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:57 am

Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:You stated that there IS an apology due which I give. One of my first posts on here contained an apology to others who I have offended in the past so what's the issue now ?

You make an incorrect thread about me in the first place so now we are at a shake hands moment then surely I deserve an apology for this incorrect thread. Or are you not man enough to do that an move on ?


:lol: :lol: You should be more specific and apologise to the board (not me) for making references to
wishing people death by cancer. That was disgusting for many people and very upsetting

Its a measure of you that you brought up McPhail which was a totally
different thing.

So apologise for that and we'll call it a draw


Sorry but surely that comes under 'I apologise to anyone I've offended in the past' doesn't it ? :?


What a cop out

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:00 pm

taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:You stated that there IS an apology due which I give. One of my first posts on here contained an apology to others who I have offended in the past so what's the issue now ?

You make an incorrect thread about me in the first place so now we are at a shake hands moment then surely I deserve an apology for this incorrect thread. Or are you not man enough to do that an move on ?


:lol: :lol: You should be more specific and apologise to the board (not me) for making references to
wishing people death by cancer. That was disgusting for many people and very upsetting

Its a measure of you that you brought up McPhail which was a totally
different thing.

So apologise for that and we'll call it a draw


I brought up McPhail because you point was completely unbalanced and I'm sure others would see that way.

Are you going to apologise to me for starting this thread ?

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:02 pm

taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:You stated that there IS an apology due which I give. One of my first posts on here contained an apology to others who I have offended in the past so what's the issue now ?

You make an incorrect thread about me in the first place so now we are at a shake hands moment then surely I deserve an apology for this incorrect thread. Or are you not man enough to do that an move on ?


:lol: :lol: You should be more specific and apologise to the board (not me) for making references to
wishing people death by cancer. That was disgusting for many people and very upsetting

Its a measure of you that you brought up McPhail which was a totally
different thing.

So apologise for that and we'll call it a draw


Sorry but surely that comes under 'I apologise to anyone I've offended in the past' doesn't it ? :?


What a cop out


Shame as I thought we could move on from this

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 3:30 pm

Why dont you apoligise to that innocent Phillipino family you threatened? That would give you more credit than a blanket apology to strangers on the internet?

Or the people of the Gurnos for winning an election as an independant but then joining UKIP?

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 3:53 pm

Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:You stated that there IS an apology due which I give. One of my first posts on here contained an apology to others who I have offended in the past so what's the issue now ?

You make an incorrect thread about me in the first place so now we are at a shake hands moment then surely I deserve an apology for this incorrect thread. Or are you not man enough to do that an move on ?


:lol: :lol: You should be more specific and apologise to the board (not me) for making references to
wishing people death by cancer. That was disgusting for many people and very upsetting

Its a measure of you that you brought up McPhail which was a totally
different thing.

So apologise for that and we'll call it a draw


Sorry but surely that comes under 'I apologise to anyone I've offended in the past' doesn't it ? :?


What a cop out


Shame as I thought we could move on from this


The Cancer disgrace was a specifically callous and evil statement, it should be addressed
separately.

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:15 pm

taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
Angry Man wrote:Taffy I have apologised for many things Ive said out of term on here.

Maybe you should ask Nukes who was the 'only' one to apologise to him with his recent issue. Yesterday I apologised to craig because I mis-understood the point he made and those are only two of many in the past.

If your point is that you want an apology or you want me to apologise to Tan and his sidekicks or Gwyn then I won't.

However thanks for giving me this platform so that I can clearly say 'sorry' to anyone else I have offended in the past.


But you were clearly wrong? Spreading rumours about him leaving in the Summer etc etc.

So when your wrong, you pick and choose who you apologise too is it?

As for me wanting one? :lol: :lol: :lol: Get a grip :?

Although wishing death on ANYONE by Cancer is a pretty evil, childish thing to do on ANY
public forum, given that you knew full well that somebody had very recently lost someone
to the disease. your a very sad, troubled individual, and for that, i think we're all sorry!!


So your veiw of a so-called malicious rumour is me saying that Tan will leave in the summer!!!! :lol: Yet you had people on here saying that McPhails cancer had returned which was untrue and to me thats far more malicious than someone saying Tan will leave FFS!!!

Then you mentioned my comment towards you and whilst I agree it was a sick comment to make I would also state that it clearly isn't a malicious rumour!!!

You clearly have a personal agenda against me and thats fine but for your creditability on here don't try and attempt to state something which is clearly incorrect.


I wont get involved re: McPhail because you are involving other people now who im pretty sure
actually did apologise.

Actually, saying somebody is going to up and leave and f**k off in the Summer dropping Cardiff City
in the shit IS malicious.

Of COURSE i've nothing personal against you, but I cast my mind back to when you were trying to bring
my son into arguments, attempting to mock "Elvis" etc etc. I think back to your ridiculous campaign to
tar me as a 'plastic' :lol: :lol:.... Your threads about Leeds in the FA Cup being my first game :lol: :lol: :lol:

You are just sport to me.


Ah right I got you so you make a post about me spreading rumours which clearly arern't rumours yet you never make a thread about people who made that disgusting rumour up about Mcphail!!!! FFS!!!! Now that alone states to me that you clearly have a personal agenda against me.

Do yourself a favour, go and work out the difference between a 'Malicious rumour' and a wind-up FFS!!! :lol:


The McPhail stuff was bad. Why did I not make a thread on it? I'll be totally frank...

I thought Annis made a right f**k up. He then got pilloried in the media and by Malky
himself for it. To be honest, he made a rod for his own back. But I'd have hated to have
been him at that time, he loves the Club (you don't) and quite possibly wasnt all that
far from being banned. But I've known him for 30 years, we're not big mates but will
always have a friendly natter (even though we disagree on a lot of stuff).. Because
we go back a long way supporting this Club. So taking into account our history together
watching City, taking into account that i KNOW what the City means to him... Sooner
than slag the feller off I actually felt for him. Hindsight can be an amazing thing. But
none of us have it!!!! Clear enough?


I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure this was resolved when it was discovered that Annis didn't actually say McPhail's cancer had returned but just posted some well wishes after his teatment hadn't gone so well.

Re: ANGRY MAN - MALICIOUS RUMOURS

Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:50 pm

Angry Man wrote:Ok the real words by yourself 'playing in red is the price we have to pay'. Now that is a rumour and in many minds was portrayed by many as being 'Red or dead'.


Well isn't that how it was, the price we had to pay for the investment was accepting the red shirt, was that misleading, was it scaremongering, or just the true situation, really can't see what you are trying to get at. :roll: