Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:35 am
taffyapple wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:We seem to be playing a few players slightly out and it's annoying, I'm think Bellamy would be best in a centre forward role behind 2 strikers with permission to swing left or right to overlap, play through balls etc, left mid is too far back as it leaves Taylor exposed if he moves up and I can't see him playing as an out and out striker. Kimbo still appears to function best as an inside forward, noone is an obvious winger, smith needs to play a little deeper, whitts is playing deep lying playmaker which isn't good, gunnarson is more of a box to box and cowie is similar but less attacking. Mutch is what we need more for the defensive midfield role but we won't because his form is poor. The only midfielder who seems to be in the right place is Conway. I think our problem is we're trying to play a defensive formation with offensive players but we can't leave the defence exposed, mostly on the flanks. Answer? We need someone to run around and cover the defensive line while we send men forward. This means that Taylor doesn't have to overlap and we can play a target man who doesn't need to be a striker so we can cut out the hoofball maybe a 4-1-3-2 with the wings willing to come back if we're getting dominated in the centre.
we need to do exactly what we're doing. winning. how can
you be 'annoyed' about that
malky plays a tight defensive game down the flanks and
forces the opposition inside where its more congested,
nd attacks are meat and drink for our big centre halfs.
Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:22 pm
BanterLad115 wrote:taffyapple wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:We seem to be playing a few players slightly out and it's annoying, I'm think Bellamy would be best in a centre forward role behind 2 strikers with permission to swing left or right to overlap, play through balls etc, left mid is too far back as it leaves Taylor exposed if he moves up and I can't see him playing as an out and out striker. Kimbo still appears to function best as an inside forward, noone is an obvious winger, smith needs to play a little deeper, whitts is playing deep lying playmaker which isn't good, gunnarson is more of a box to box and cowie is similar but less attacking. Mutch is what we need more for the defensive midfield role but we won't because his form is poor. The only midfielder who seems to be in the right place is Conway. I think our problem is we're trying to play a defensive formation with offensive players but we can't leave the defence exposed, mostly on the flanks. Answer? We need someone to run around and cover the defensive line while we send men forward. This means that Taylor doesn't have to overlap and we can play a target man who doesn't need to be a striker so we can cut out the hoofball maybe a 4-1-3-2 with the wings willing to come back if we're getting dominated in the centre.
we need to do exactly what we're doing. winning. how can
you be 'annoyed' about that
malky plays a tight defensive game down the flanks and
forces the opposition inside where its more congested,
nd attacks are meat and drink for our big centre halfs.
I know we're winning, but we can always do better, my point is we aren't fully playing to our strengths. If we reach the premier league then I'm concerned how we will play because at the moment we're a poor mans stoke.
Fri Feb 08, 2013 5:54 pm
Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:50 pm