Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:01 pm
NIBluebird wrote:Zabier wrote:NIBluebird wrote:Zabier wrote:NIBluebird wrote:BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Its not natural for a start - woman was created for man - simple
It's not natural? Doggy style isn't necessarily natural going on that basis... if doggy style is natural though then doesn't that mean homosexuality is natural because the male g-spot is the prostate gland.
Its not the sexual position its the male and male concept
Are your views influenced by religion or are they non-religious views? Just interest to know where your thinking is coming from. You use the term "created" which suggests you might be religious which would be pointless continuing this debate because then we would get into the chicken vs the egg argument!
Religious Zabier - the chicken and egg is simple , since everything was created the chicken came first - see its simple - also this subject is very contentious so this will be my last post on it as it doesnt affect CCFCbut have a good day
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:02 pm
Zabier wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:Zabier wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:This isn't about love, I'm sure jimmy saville love his kids but it still wasn't right for him to screw them in the ass. For me the simple fact is that gay people can't procreate by having sex and so I consider it unnatural whether you look at it from evolution or religion its still wrong, end of story
So by saying that do you think that infertile men and women should be refused the right to get married?
No because that's a defect, not a choice, you're trying to compare disabled people with gay people
I would not even use the word disabled for someone that can't have kids mate.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:06 pm
Zabier wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:Zabier wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:This isn't about love, I'm sure jimmy saville love his kids but it still wasn't right for him to screw them in the ass. For me the simple fact is that gay people can't procreate by having sex and so I consider it unnatural whether you look at it from evolution or religion its still wrong, end of story
So by saying that do you think that infertile men and women should be refused the right to get married?
No because that's a defect, not a choice, you're trying to compare disabled people with gay people
I would not even use the word disabled for someone that can't have kids mate.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:06 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:09 pm
Zabier wrote:I see what you are saying but I really am finding it impossible to agree with what you are saying. Think we will just have to agree to disagree. I just don't think there's any harm in gay marriage. How does it hurt others? Imagine if a law came in saying that those that had tattoos and piercings were not allowed to be married to people that didn't have tattoos or piercings due to them not being natural. It's a murky argument.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:10 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:17 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:31 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:33 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:34 pm
CantonJack wrote:Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:36 pm
taffyapple wrote:Gay people dont bother me. If I stop to imagine the 'icky' bits though, it makes
me wanna puke. So I dont. Lete them get on with it. Gay marriage? If they want
to, so what, it dont bother me!!
But I would NOT let gay couples adopt Children. No way.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:40 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:40 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:43 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:What I find amusing is the fact that the ones against gay marriage arguing that marraige means "the union of a man and woman in the eyes of god" how many of them attend Church regularly? To me it all comes down to homophobia
For me its not up to me to decide whether religons should allow it. The best action would to grant the same rights of married people to people in civil partnerships.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:44 pm
CantonJack wrote:Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:46 pm
Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What I find amusing is the fact that the ones against gay marriage arguing that marraige means "the union of a man and woman in the eyes of god" how many of them attend Church regularly? To me it all comes down to homophobia
For me its not up to me to decide whether religons should allow it. The best action would to grant the same rights of married people to people in civil partnerships.
ohhhh ack at her, speak to the hand boyfriend
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:48 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What I find amusing is the fact that the ones against gay marriage arguing that marraige means "the union of a man and woman in the eyes of god" how many of them attend Church regularly? To me it all comes down to homophobia
For me its not up to me to decide whether religons should allow it. The best action would to grant the same rights of married people to people in civil partnerships.
ohhhh ack at her, speak to the hand boyfriend
I'm not gay but nice try. I would just rather see a portion of my friends to have the same rights as me and everyone else in society.
, anyone who isn't good and proper should be put to sleep!
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:50 pm
Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What I find amusing is the fact that the ones against gay marriage arguing that marraige means "the union of a man and woman in the eyes of god" how many of them attend Church regularly? To me it all comes down to homophobia
For me its not up to me to decide whether religons should allow it. The best action would to grant the same rights of married people to people in civil partnerships.
ohhhh ack at her, speak to the hand boyfriend
I'm not gay but nice try. I would just rather see a portion of my friends to have the same rights as me and everyone else in society.
so pedophiles and murders can have the same rights?, anyone who isn't good and proper should be put to sleep!
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:54 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What I find amusing is the fact that the ones against gay marriage arguing that marraige means "the union of a man and woman in the eyes of god" how many of them attend Church regularly? To me it all comes down to homophobia
For me its not up to me to decide whether religons should allow it. The best action would to grant the same rights of married people to people in civil partnerships.
ohhhh ack at her, speak to the hand boyfriend
I'm not gay but nice try. I would just rather see a portion of my friends to have the same rights as me and everyone else in society.
so pedophiles and murders can have the same rights?, anyone who isn't good and proper should be put to sleep!
How does being Gay link to pedophiles and murder?
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:59 pm
Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What I find amusing is the fact that the ones against gay marriage arguing that marraige means "the union of a man and woman in the eyes of god" how many of them attend Church regularly? To me it all comes down to homophobia
For me its not up to me to decide whether religons should allow it. The best action would to grant the same rights of married people to people in civil partnerships.
ohhhh ack at her, speak to the hand boyfriend
I'm not gay but nice try. I would just rather see a portion of my friends to have the same rights as me and everyone else in society.
so pedophiles and murders can have the same rights?, anyone who isn't good and proper should be put to sleep!
How does being Gay link to pedophiles and murder?
Because there's something missing upstairs, they are missing something in the brain thus makes them unnormal![]()
Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:27 pm
taffyapple wrote:Gay people dont bother me. If I stop to imagine the 'icky' bits though, it makes
me wanna puke. So I dont. Lete them get on with it. Gay marriage? If they want
to, so what, it dont bother me!!
But I would NOT let gay couples adopt Children. No way.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:29 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:12 pm
Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Ben wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What I find amusing is the fact that the ones against gay marriage arguing that marraige means "the union of a man and woman in the eyes of god" how many of them attend Church regularly? To me it all comes down to homophobia
For me its not up to me to decide whether religons should allow it. The best action would to grant the same rights of married people to people in civil partnerships.
ohhhh ack at her, speak to the hand boyfriend
I'm not gay but nice try. I would just rather see a portion of my friends to have the same rights as me and everyone else in society.
so pedophiles and murders can have the same rights?, anyone who isn't good and proper should be put to sleep!
How does being Gay link to pedophiles and murder?
Because there's something missing upstairs, they are missing something in the brain thus makes them unnormal![]()
Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:44 pm
Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:13 pm
krabb wrote:RFMH wrote:Yes
Why anyone would want to keep rights for themselves but stand in the way of others is beyond belief.
spot on.....to mant people want to interfere with others....instead of worrying about what they themselves are doing...![]()
![]()
Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:15 pm
RFMH wrote:
1500 species exhibit homosexual behaviour. Yet only humans exhibit homophobic behaviour. So which is the unnatural one? Fail.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:22 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:
Gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but I can see the common sense of a civil partnership. The difference IMO is marriage is the bedrock of family life and it is impossible for same sex couples to produce offspring in the way hetrosexuals can. Therefore being denied marriage is not treating them less favourably, they simply do-not fit the criteria for marriage and should stick to civil partnerships instead.
Tony Blue Williams wrote:
Why is it that everytime Gays are denied something they play the homophobic card?
Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:23 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:krabb wrote:RFMH wrote:Yes
Why anyone would want to keep rights for themselves but stand in the way of others is beyond belief.
spot on.....to mant people want to interfere with others....instead of worrying about what they themselves are doing...![]()
![]()
Can't say I agree with that. The Countryside Alliance didn't want interferance when Fox hunting was banned due to the overwhelming marjority of people beliving that it was a disgusting and barbaric practise.
Gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but I can see the common sense of a civil partnership. The difference IMO is marriage is the bedrock of family life and it is impossible for same sex couples to produce offspring in the way hetrosexuals can.
Therefore being denied marriage is not treating them less favourably, they simply do-not fit the criteria for marriage and should stick to civil partnerships instead.
The difference IMO is marriage is the bedrock of family life
Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:31 pm
BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:taffyapple wrote:Gay people dont bother me. If I stop to imagine the 'icky' bits though, it makes
me wanna puke. So I dont. Lete them get on with it. Gay marriage? If they want
to, so what, it dont bother me!!
But I would NOT let gay couples adopt Children. No way.
I know gay couples that could provide a far better upbringing for a child than some of the drug riddled right offs you see on Jeremy Kyle every morning.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:36 pm