Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:58 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:58 pm
Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
That from someone who is obviously an authority on all things football![]()
Jesus man for a transfer under £1M and his salary included of about the same per year I would suspect, it's great business!
As I say I hope Im wrong but for some reason I don't think I am. Whats wrong with having a different opinion as you on a public forum..?
Nothing wrong with it at all..........I just disagree with you.......strongly!
His record at Sunderland is poor I agree but where he has started games he has scored goals. Forwards are made up of 50% confidence and I believe Malky can give him that confiddence to go and bag double figures before the end of the season.
2006–2009 → Manchester United 2 (0)
2006–2007 → Royal Antwerp (loan) 33 (21) Goal every 1.57
2007–2008 → Hull City (loan) 34 (15) Goal every 2.26
2008–2009 → Tottenham Hotspur (loan) 10 (1) ......I'm sure you can work this one out![]()
2009– Sunderland 58 (6) Goal every 9.6 games
Total to date = Goal every 3.1 games but due to his injuries I think this is actually very respectable! My only concern is not the goals he will bring but his ability to keep fit, I would imagine the medical will pick that up.
listen I'm not talking about before his Sunderland days because they are 3 years ago alone!!!! 1 goal in every 9.6 games and that alone says something
Yes it does....he's been injured a lot!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:58 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:59 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Vaz Te is getting games for West Ham you complete berk so its not like West Ham are desperate to get him off the wage bill.
what like FA Cup games you mean
He's played in 7 league games and 2 league cup games...........oh and NO FA Cup games scoring 1 league goal
so he didn't play against Man Utd in the reply the other day then..? I must have been seeing things then!!!!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:00 pm
taffyapple wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
Classic "wont even get double figures"???
There are 19 games left
8 or 9 goals would be a decent return for any striker.
But dont let that get in the way eh
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:00 pm
CardiffBatman888 wrote:FAO ADMINS - Please hide or delete this post before Campbell see's this *doubter* post. May affect him signing the contract!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:01 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:01 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:01 pm
Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Vaz Te is getting games for West Ham you complete berk so its not like West Ham are desperate to get him off the wage bill.
what like FA Cup games you mean
He's played in 7 league games and 2 league cup games...........oh and NO FA Cup games scoring 1 league goal
so he didn't play against Man Utd in the reply the other day then..? I must have been seeing things then!!!!
I stand corrected he did........but 1 in 10........comparible do you think?
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:02 pm
Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:That from someone who is obviously an authority on all things football![]()
Jesus man for a transfer under £1M and his salary included of about the same per year I would suspect, it's great business!
As I say I hope Im wrong but for some reason I don't think I am. Whats wrong with having a different opinion as you on a public forum..?
Nothing wrong with it at all..........I just disagree with you.......strongly!
His record at Sunderland is poor I agree but where he has started games he has scored goals. Forwards are made up of 50% confidence and I believe Malky can give him that confiddence to go and bag double figures before the end of the season.
2006–2009 → Manchester United 2 (0)
2006–2007 → Royal Antwerp (loan) 33 (21) Goal every 1.57
2007–2008 → Hull City (loan) 34 (15) Goal every 2.26
2008–2009 → Tottenham Hotspur (loan) 10 (1) ......I'm sure you can work this one out![]()
2009– Sunderland 58 (6) Goal every 9.6 games
Total to date = Goal every 3.1 games but due to his injuries I think this is actually very respectable! My only concern is not the goals he will bring but his ability to keep fit, I would imagine the medical will pick that up.
listen I'm not talking about before his Sunderland days because they are 3 years ago alone!!!! 1 goal in every 9.6 games and that alone says something
Yes it does....he's been injured a lot!
It also says that he only managed to score a goal every 9.6 games!!!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:04 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:06 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:07 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Vaz Te is getting games for West Ham you complete berk so its not like West Ham are desperate to get him off the wage bill.
what like FA Cup games you mean
He's played in 7 league games and 2 league cup games...........oh and NO FA Cup games scoring 1 league goal
so he didn't play against Man Utd in the reply the other day then..? I must have been seeing things then!!!!
I stand corrected he did........but 1 in 10........comparible do you think?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
FFS!!!!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:09 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:11 pm
Angry Man wrote:
Right so he's off their wage bill at the earlier point!!! FFS!!!!Talk about brain dead!!!
![]()
FFS!!! HE KNOW KNOWS WEST HAMS TRANSFER POLICY!!!!MALKY GET HIM ON YOUR SCOUTING TEAM!!!! FFS!!!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:12 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:13 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:15 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:20 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:41 pm
Angry Man wrote:taffyapple wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
Classic "wont even get double figures"???
There are 19 games left
8 or 9 goals would be a decent return for any striker.
But dont let that get in the way eh
Ok I'll lower it then. IMO he wont get 8 goals!!! Is that ok for you Taffy..?
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:45 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:55 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:02 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Nevermind double figures according to Pembroke Alien he will need to score 15. No less.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:02 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Nevermind double figures according to Pembroke Alien he will need to score 15. No less.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:06 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:17 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:30 pm
CityGent wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Nevermind double figures according to Pembroke Alien he will need to score 15. No less.
That's not as good as some of Adams whoppers. He wanted to get rid of Mark Hudson after half a season
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:30 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Nevermind double figures according to Pembroke Alien he will need to score 15. No less.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:34 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Nevermind double figures according to Pembroke Alien he will need to score 15. No less.
Potty polo i have made no comment on cambells goal tally, so if you are going to be a pratt at least tell truths not made up bull shiiite! Just because you are full of it doesnt mean you can talk it?
this conversation is terminated again!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:49 pm