A jack Thread....

I've given you examples of where your theory is flawed. Which shows that your theory could be wrong. It could be right, nobody knows.

but there is far more examples of my theory being right than yours.

"So you don't think Swansea would be top" - you asked me this despite me stating that already in my post, so you didn't read it. wrong again.

ive responded to that one. I said "even someone with your limited intellect would realise we were discussing the latter part of the equation".

Glad you admit you were wrong about the squad too.

where did I admit that? Or are you trolling again. Debate if you wish to debate or have the ability to, continue this childish schoolboy, posting if you can't. Unless you have already resorted to that it seems

Why ask the question if you already knew the answer?

Doesn't matter if there are far more examples in your theory, the fact that there are examples of my theory prove that it's not 100% fact like you are implying it would be.

Why ask the question if you already knew the answer?

Doesn't matter if there are far more examples in your theory, the fact that there are examples of my theory prove that it's not 100% fact like you are implying it would be.

I answered that one a few posts back. You posted a contradictory message and I asked for confirmation - it's hardly a taxing situation.

As for the second part, the question was where do you "think" the clubs would be, so I answered under that bracket - at no point did I opt out of the context and say this post was indeed fact rather than opinion. So it seems it was you reading post incorrectly after all. Context is set by the OP and is only changed once stated. Learn.

And I'm glad you realise that my scenario is far more likely than yours as the examples of such by far outweigh the counter part.

looks like we have another Troll

Yes I accept that, but to totally dismiss my opinion without thought is wrong, as I was able to provide examples where my theory COULD have been correct.

Nothing contradicting about my post. It's you who has trouble reading.

Anyway, I've had enough of your trolling. You've been banned many times before and will be again soon.

Yes I accept that, but to totally dismiss my opinion without thought is wrong, as I was able to provide examples where my theory COULD have been correct.

Nothing contradicting about my post. It's you who has trouble reading.

Anyway, I've had enough of your trolling. You've been banned many times before and will be again soon.

Where did I dismiss your opinion?

Thanks in advance

Banned again soon.

Don't worry you still have your Paul Chuckle account to fall back on.

FairPlay, this is further evidence as to why we have so many internal issues and problems within our fan base.

A simple question regarding squad ability turns into a name calling squabbling match between posters....


Quite sad in reality.

Daft question - if we went up and they came down the squads would change - so you cannot make a true reflection of "where the teams would be"

Don't worry you still have your Paul Chuckle account to fall back on.

If you're new, why would you know this?

You'll be banned again soon.

FairPlay, this is further evidence as to why we have so many internal issues and problems within our fan base.

A simple question regarding squad ability turns into a name calling squabbling match between posters....


Quite sad in reality.

Don't make me laugh, he's not a fan. He's a Jack. It's Roath Magic.

Don't worry you still have your Paul Chuckle account to fall back on.

If you're new, why would you know this?

You'll be banned again soon.

Why are you assuming I'm new? Have I said that then or are you lying again? Come on Paul, I mean Barry. Whichever one you use.

Not at all, only used that account whilst I was banned on this one.

Banned again soon for you, eh? Don't worry, I'm sure you'll set up another account soon enough!

This is f*cking stupid