Loopy Welsh Government =Fooking idiots

I knew this would happen hence why I voted against devolution. Bunch of second rate politicians whom we don't need. Either every REGION of the UK gets an assembly or none at all. What makes us so different to regions of England? We as a nation have such an attitude of self entitlement.

I think everyone with some level of political sense knew they would happen. The public sector in Wales has ballooned since the introduction of the WAG and we are all paying for it by them slicing off the money from either Westminister or Europe before its past down to the local councils.

We are the scroungers of the UK and it embarrasses me when I see comments on here lampooning the Union. We'd be scrounging off the EU if it wasn't for the UK.

As far as I am concerned the WAG need to address the balance between the size of the public sector compared to the private sector, I saw that admiral have done exceedingly well since basing themselves here, why aren't they doing more of that? Or did the LG scandal put a stop to that policy.

I do think that the WAG are pushing more and more to the left with bringing in rubbish new laws simply because of the anti colation agenda.

Give them tax rasing powers and we be fucked IMO. Not one of them has ever run a business yet they seem to think that they know whats wrong with the Welsh Ecomony!!!!

Says the bloke who sold his business and didn't get paid for it. Then spent months chasing them in court whilst constantly asking for advice of the regulars on a football / lads message board.

You're a funny fucker, fair play.

Sorry but people chasing people for monies on a whole range of things so what your point is....?

My point being that your business acumen is hardly up there with Branson and Sugar.

Although I do think I've seen a few twitter posts from from the Sugar begging for legal advice?

Oh hang on, I haven't.

I do think that the WAG are pushing more and more to the left with bringing in rubbish new laws simply because of the anti colation agenda.

Give them tax rasing powers and we be fucked IMO. Not one of them has ever run a business yet they seem to think that they know whats wrong with the Welsh Ecomony!!!!

Says the bloke who sold his business and didn't get paid for it. Then spent months chasing them in court whilst constantly asking for advice of the regulars on a football / lads message board.

You're a funny fucker, fair play.

Sorry but people chasing people for monies on a whole range of things so what your point is....?

My point being that your business acumen is hardly up there with Branson and Sugar.

Although I do think I've seen a few twitter posts from from the Sugar begging for legal advice?

Oh hang on, I haven't.

Yeah you right it isn't but I'm 'probably' on more than you so I must be doing something right. I know that there are legal people on this forum who have given me fantastic 'free' advice and I am very grateful for. However surely I'm sure both Branson and Sugar would agree that advice is much better being free than paying for it especially if its the right advice.

However your point is getting away from my point of no business people in the leading group at the WAG making the decisions on our behalf especially as many of themhave gone through the Union system so from an early age they are already anti-business.

the whole country is down the pan, people who do wrong, bad or cant be arsed to work have more rights than us mugs who do everything by the book, work and pay taxes!! IT PAYS TO BE A C**T IN LIFE!

Not one of them has ever run a business?

There are Farmers, business managers, Firemen, Assembly line workers, Surveyors
Mining engineers... a rich mix indeed. Many of whom 'ran' businesses.

It means f**k all. YOU allegedly run your own business. Who would believe a word
you say?

Politicians in Britain (not just Wales) are self-serving egotistic tossers whose only
real agenda is self-serving

Most of the younger politician have never had a proper job, they've been a MPs, clerk or assistants straight from university this is particulary true of Labour.
To be a MP you should have held a proper job or run a business for several years, thats why so many of them are out of touch with us.

Anyway Guy Fawkes is my hero he had the right idea.

Not one of them has ever run a business?

There are Farmers, business managers, Firemen, Assembly line workers, Surveyors
Mining engineers... a rich mix indeed. Many of whom 'ran' businesses.

It means f**k all. YOU allegedly run your own business. Who would believe a word
you say?

Politicians in Britain (not just Wales) are self-serving egotistic tossers whose only
real agenda is self-serving

Most of the younger politician have never had a proper job, they've been a MPs, clerk or assistants straight from university this is particulary true of Labour.
To be a MP you should have held a proper job or run a business for several years, thats why so many of them are out of touch with us.

Anyway Guy Fawkes is my hero he had the right idea.

The younger ones most definitely.

But they are all cunts. Self-serving wankers

I do think that the WAG are pushing more and more to the left with bringing in rubbish new laws simply because of the anti colation agenda.

Give them tax rasing powers and we be fucked IMO. Not one of them has ever run a business yet they seem to think that they know whats wrong with the Welsh Ecomony!!!!

Says the bloke who sold his business and didn't get paid for it. Then spent months chasing them in court whilst constantly asking for advice of the regulars on a football / lads message board.

You're a funny fucker, fair play.

Sorry but people chasing people for monies on a whole range of things so what your point is....?

My point being that your business acumen is hardly up there with Branson and Sugar.

Although I do think I've seen a few twitter posts from from the Sugar begging for legal advice?

Oh hang on, I haven't.

Yeah you right it isn't but I'm 'probably' on more than you so I must be doing something right. I know that there are legal people on this forum who have given me fantastic 'free' advice and I am very grateful for. However surely I'm sure both Branson and Sugar would agree that advice is much better being free than paying for it especially if its the right advice.

However your point is getting away from my point of no business people in the leading group at the WAG making the decisions on our behalf especially as many of themhave gone through the Union system so from an early age they are already anti-business.

"but I'm probably more money than you..." Great start there, it doesn't bother me if you are. Funny you mention it mind.

Do you think the elected politicians in WAG don't consult with business consultancies, leaders, business schools etc?

Are you that blinkered. Perhaps someone should put them contact with you so you can offer your expertise?

I'll assume after your last visit to court you know very little about contract and tenancy laws.

Like I said (unintentionally) you're a funny fucker.

I do think that the WAG are pushing more and more to the left with bringing in rubbish new laws simply because of the anti colation agenda.

Give them tax rasing powers and we be fucked IMO. Not one of them has ever run a business yet they seem to think that they know whats wrong with the Welsh Ecomony!!!!

Says the bloke who sold his business and didn't get paid for it. Then spent months chasing them in court whilst constantly asking for advice of the regulars on a football / lads message board.

You're a funny fucker, fair play.

Sorry but people chasing people for monies on a whole range of things so what your point is....?

My point being that your business acumen is hardly up there with Branson and Sugar.

Although I do think I've seen a few twitter posts from from the Sugar begging for legal advice?

Oh hang on, I haven't.

Yeah you right it isn't but I'm 'probably' on more than you so I must be doing something right. I know that there are legal people on this forum who have given me fantastic 'free' advice and I am very grateful for. However surely I'm sure both Branson and Sugar would agree that advice is much better being free than paying for it especially if its the right advice.

However your point is getting away from my point of no business people in the leading group at the WAG making the decisions on our behalf especially as many of themhave gone through the Union system so from an early age they are already anti-business.

"but I'm probably more money than you..." Great start there, it doesn't bother me if you are. Funny you mention it mind.

Do you think the elected politicians in WAG don't consult with business consultancies, leaders, business schools etc?

Are you that blinkered. Perhaps someone should put them contact with you so you can offer your expertise?

I'll assume after your last visit to court you know very little about contract and tenancy laws.

Like I said (unintentionally) you're a funny fucker.

People from the WAG can ' consult' as much as they want buy until they experience the risk and the pressure that comes with that then personally that's not good enough in my book.

Also your assumption about my last court appearance just shows really how little you know about the case and how much you relay on unbalanced lazy reporting.

I do think that the WAG are pushing more and more to the left with bringing in rubbish new laws simply because of the anti colation agenda.

Give them tax rasing powers and we be fucked IMO. Not one of them has ever run a business yet they seem to think that they know whats wrong with the Welsh Ecomony!!!!

Says the bloke who sold his business and didn't get paid for it. Then spent months chasing them in court whilst constantly asking for advice of the regulars on a football / lads message board.

You're a funny fucker, fair play.

Sorry but people chasing people for monies on a whole range of things so what your point is....?

My point being that your business acumen is hardly up there with Branson and Sugar.

Although I do think I've seen a few twitter posts from from the Sugar begging for legal advice?

Oh hang on, I haven't.

Yeah you right it isn't but I'm 'probably' on more than you so I must be doing something right. I know that there are legal people on this forum who have given me fantastic 'free' advice and I am very grateful for. However surely I'm sure both Branson and Sugar would agree that advice is much better being free than paying for it especially if its the right advice.

However your point is getting away from my point of no business people in the leading group at the WAG making the decisions on our behalf especially as many of themhave gone through the Union system so from an early age they are already anti-business.

"but I'm probably more money than you..." Great start there, it doesn't bother me if you are. Funny you mention it mind.

Do you think the elected politicians in WAG don't consult with business consultancies, leaders, business schools etc?

Are you that blinkered. Perhaps someone should put them contact with you so you can offer your expertise?

I'll assume after your last visit to court you know very little about contract and tenancy laws.

Like I said (unintentionally) you're a funny fucker.[/quote]

People from the WAG can ' consult' as much as they want buy until they experience the risk and the pressure that comes with that then personally that's not good enough in my book.

Also your assumption about my last court appearance just shows really how little you know about the case and how much you relay on unbalanced lazy reporting.[/quote]

That's right its a conspiracy between the Labour controlled media and Merthyr council to stop you gaining control with your people power policies.

The case looks simple enough to me.

Inflated, egotistical wannabe political maverick who additionally masquerades as a businessman tries intimidating a family as he doesn't know simple tenancy law. I got that bit right haven't I?

Yet you're advising all and sundry on economics, commerce and business.

Like I said you're a funny fucker.

I do think that the WAG are pushing more and more to the left with bringing in rubbish new laws simply because of the anti colation agenda.

Give them tax rasing powers and we be fucked IMO. Not one of them has ever run a business yet they seem to think that they know whats wrong with the Welsh Ecomony!!!!

Says the bloke who sold his business and didn't get paid for it. Then spent months chasing them in court whilst constantly asking for advice of the regulars on a football / lads message board.

You're a funny fucker, fair play.

Sorry but people chasing people for monies on a whole range of things so what your point is....?

My point being that your business acumen is hardly up there with Branson and Sugar.

Although I do think I've seen a few twitter posts from from the Sugar begging for legal advice?

Oh hang on, I haven't.

Yeah you right it isn't but I'm 'probably' on more than you so I must be doing something right. I know that there are legal people on this forum who have given me fantastic 'free' advice and I am very grateful for. However surely I'm sure both Branson and Sugar would agree that advice is much better being free than paying for it especially if its the right advice.

However your point is getting away from my point of no business people in the leading group at the WAG making the decisions on our behalf especially as many of themhave gone through the Union system so from an early age they are already anti-business.

"but I'm probably more money than you..." Great start there, it doesn't bother me if you are. Funny you mention it mind.

Do you think the elected politicians in WAG don't consult with business consultancies, leaders, business schools etc?

Are you that blinkered. Perhaps someone should put them contact with you so you can offer your expertise?

I'll assume after your last visit to court you know very little about contract and tenancy laws.

Like I said (unintentionally) you're a funny fucker.

People from the WAG can ' consult' as much as they want buy until they experience the risk and the pressure that comes with that then personally that's not good enough in my book.

Also your assumption about my last court appearance just shows really how little you know about the case and how much you relay on unbalanced lazy reporting.[/quote]

That's right its a conspiracy between the Labour controlled media and Merthyr council to stop you gaining control with your people power policies.

The case looks simple enough to me.

Inflated, egotistical wannabe political maverick who additionally masquerades as a businessman tries intimidating a family as he doesn't know simple tenancy law. I got that bit right haven't I?

Yet you're advising all and sundry on economics, commerce and business.

Like I said you're a funny fucker.[/quote]

Strange how the case is so simple to you yet the tenants weren't the ones who took me on because they knew they were in the wrong. Did you read the part where I wasn't paid any rent for months, they caused thousands of quid worth of damage, they agreed to get out by a date then went back on their word ? No ? That's right because it wasn't reported!!!!

You haven't a clue about business other the law so don't try and figure out you know about my case

Strange how the case is so simple to you yet the tenants weren't the ones who took me on because they knew they were in the wrong. Did you read the part where I wasn't paid any rent for months, they caused thousands of quid worth of damage, they agreed to get out by a date then went back on their word ? No ? That's right because it wasn't reported!!!!

You haven't a clue about business other the law so don't try and figure out you know about my case[/quote]

So let's get this right...

You were fined, incurrred court costs and had to pay a victim surcharge (£4000 in total), in a criminal crown court, by a Judge, through no fault of your own, whilst the real culprits of criminal damage get off with no repercussions?

Let's start a campaign to prove your innocence!

Free Brown!

Only problem being your accusations against the tenants are bollocks.

You need a psychiatrist handsome.

You're being hilarious now.

Strange how the case is so simple to you yet the tenants weren't the ones who took me on because they knew they were in the wrong. Did you read the part where I wasn't paid any rent for months, they caused thousands of quid worth of damage, they agreed to get out by a date then went back on their word ? No ? That's right because it wasn't reported!!!!

You haven't a clue about business other the law so don't try and figure out you know about my case

So let's get this right...

You were fined, incurrred court costs and had to pay a victim surcharge (£4000 in total), in a criminal crown court, by a Judge, through no fault of your own, whilst the real culprits of criminal damage get off with no repercussions?

Let's start a campaign to prove your innocence!

Free Brown!

Only problem being your accusations against the tenants are bollocks.

You need a psychiatrist handsome.

You're being hilarious now.[/quote]

Bollocks hey but you know everything the case 'apprantly'..? So how come you didn't know that...? If that is true then why did the tenants admit it all themselves in their statement then..? You know nothing about the case believe me.

Strange how the case is so simple to you yet the tenants weren't the ones who took me on because they knew they were in the wrong. Did you read the part where I wasn't paid any rent for months, they caused thousands of quid worth of damage, they agreed to get out by a date then went back on their word ? No ? That's right because it wasn't reported!!!!

You haven't a clue about business other the law so don't try and figure out you know about my case

So let's get this right...

You were fined, incurrred court costs and had to pay a victim surcharge (£4000 in total), in a criminal crown court, by a Judge, through no fault of your own, whilst the real culprits of criminal damage get off with no repercussions?

Let's start a campaign to prove your innocence!

Free Brown!

Only problem being your accusations against the tenants are bollocks.

You need a psychiatrist handsome.

You're being hilarious now.

Bollocks hey but you know everything the case 'apprantly'..? So how come you didn't know that...? If that is true then why did the tenants admit it all themselves in their statement then..? You know nothing about the case believe me.[/quote]

Let's begin.

Tell us all about the criminal damage.

Give us the whole details.

Don' t hold back.

For those that want total Welsh independence. The Welsh Assembly is to bring in a law that can prosecute Dog owners who's Dogs attack Burglars. They want to clamp down on dangerous Dogs that attack People
This is what you get when a f*cking ultra left wing idiots get in charge. A Dog is defending its home and if it kills a Burglar then he should get a f*cking massive bone. Politicians are so unattached from the real world they make me sick.

Yer , but there again this so called Welsh government as you put it, is nothing more than an off shoot from Westminster Remember they are still answerable to the head of there part in which this case is Labour and they are more concerned with english politics than Welsh.

For those that want total Welsh independence. The Welsh Assembly is to bring in a law that can prosecute Dog owners who's Dogs attack Burglars. They want to clamp down on dangerous Dogs that attack People
This is what you get when a f*cking ultra left wing idiots get in charge. A Dog is defending its home and if it kills a Burglar then he should get a f*cking massive bone. Politicians are so unattached from the real world they make me sick.

Yer , but there again this so called Welsh government as you put it, is nothing more than an off shoot from Westminster Remember they are still answerable to the head of there part in which this case is Labour and they are more concerned with english politics than Welsh.

Is England gonna prosecute a Dog owner for protecting its own property ?

Strange how the case is so simple to you yet the tenants weren't the ones who took me on because they knew they were in the wrong. Did you read the part where I wasn't paid any rent for months, they caused thousands of quid worth of damage, they agreed to get out by a date then went back on their word ? No ? That's right because it wasn't reported!!!!

You haven't a clue about business other the law so don't try and figure out you know about my case

So let's get this right...

You were fined, incurrred court costs and had to pay a victim surcharge (£4000 in total), in a criminal crown court, by a Judge, through no fault of your own, whilst the real culprits of criminal damage get off with no repercussions?

Let's start a campaign to prove your innocence!

Free Brown!

Only problem being your accusations against the tenants are bollocks.

You need a psychiatrist handsome.

You're being hilarious now.

Bollocks hey but you know everything the case 'apprantly'..? So how come you didn't know that...? If that is true then why did the tenants admit it all themselves in their statement then..? You know nothing about the case believe me.

Let's begin.

Tell us all about the criminal damage.

Give us the whole details.

Don' t hold back.[/quote]

I said damage to the property, which is a Civil matter not a criminal matter.Do you know anything about the case..? You can't even word your questions correctly FFS!!!

So now you are telling me the difference between civil and criminal matters? This gets better.

Was the damage intentional? Why wasn't it mentioned in the reporting or does this damage only exist in your head? Strange you didn't use it in your defence or did you?

What's the damage again?

Let's go back to the beginning.

Did you issue either an appropriate legal notice giving the tenants the legal minimum time to leave?

Bearing mind its you who ended up in Crown, we both know you didn't. Funnily why did it end up in Crown. These matters are usually dealt with in Magistrates. Was your criminal behaviour that serious?

Stunning business and legal practice so far!

'It's never your fault, it's never your fault, you're always the victim, it's never your fault.'

I knew this would happen hence why I voted against devolution. Bunch of second rate politicians whom we don't need. Either every REGION of the UK gets an assembly or none at all. What makes us so different to regions of England? We as a nation have such an attitude of self entitlement.

I think everyone with some level of political sense knew they would happen. The public sector in Wales has ballooned since the introduction of the WAG and we are all paying for it by them slicing off the money from either Westminister or Europe before its past down to the local councils.

We are the scroungers of the UK and it embarrasses me when I see comments on here lampooning the Union. We'd be scrounging off the EU if it wasn't for the UK.

As far as I am concerned the WAG need to address the balance between the size of the public sector compared to the private sector, I saw that admiral have done exceedingly well since basing themselves here, why aren't they doing more of that? Or did the LG scandal put a stop to that policy.

Why aren't more people taking notice of this when he is 100% spot on? All I can guess is that people know he is right and have no comeback. Independence for Wales would be disastrous short term. Long term it could be fixed and everything may be okay but by then it may all be too late.

I knew this would happen hence why I voted against devolution. Bunch of second rate politicians whom we don't need. Either every REGION of the UK gets an assembly or none at all. What makes us so different to regions of England? We as a nation have such an attitude of self entitlement.

I think everyone with some level of political sense knew they would happen. The public sector in Wales has ballooned since the introduction of the WAG and we are all paying for it by them slicing off the money from either Westminister or Europe before its past down to the local councils.

We are the scroungers of the UK and it embarrasses me when I see comments on here lampooning the Union. We'd be scrounging off the EU if it wasn't for the UK.

As far as I am concerned the WAG need to address the balance between the size of the public sector compared to the private sector, I saw that admiral have done exceedingly well since basing themselves here, why aren't they doing more of that? Or did the LG scandal put a stop to that policy.

Why aren't more people taking notice of this when he is 100% spot on? All I can guess is that people know he is right and have no comeback. Independence for Wales would be disastrous short term. Long term it could be fixed and everything may be okay but by then it may all be too late.

Social Engineering.

Wales and Welsh industry fuelled the Industrial Revolution, made England one of the richest
countries in the World a hundred years ago. Once they decided they could get steel/coal
cheaper elsewhere. f**k you Wales, your all Socialists anyway. Cheers Thatcher. c**t.

So she closed down EVERYTHING. Deliberately. Because the Welsh never voted for her anyway.
Finance/money/backing would be better spent in the Home Counties of England and London.

SHE pulled the plug on Wales.

Now we have blind deaf and dumb Welsh people saying that its the Welsh that are 'scroungers'

Well get ready folks, cos in the next 20 years, England are going to be pulling the plug again
whether you like it or not

Social Engineering.

Wales and Welsh industry fuelled the Industrial Revolution, made England one of the richest
countries in the World a hundred years ago. Once they decided they could get steel/coal
cheaper elsewhere. f**k you Wales, your all Socialists anyway. Cheers Thatcher. c**t.

So she closed down EVERYTHING. Deliberately. Because the Welsh never voted for her anyway.
Finance/money/backing would be better spent in the Home Counties of England and London.

SHE pulled the plug on Wales.

Now we have blind deaf and dumb Welsh people saying that its the Welsh that are 'scroungers'

Well get ready folks, cos in the next 20 years, England are going to be pulling the plug again
whether you like it or not

Fair enough mate. This is not a subject I know much on so not going to enter a debate with you. Fortunately for me, if you are right about them pulling the plug again, I wont be here to have to go through it.

I understand if a bugalar is found guilty,he or she would be offered a reduce sentence if he or she could speak Welsh or would be willing to learn Welsh

So now you are telling me the difference between civil and criminal matters? This gets better.

Was the damage intentional? Why wasn't it mentioned in the reporting or does this damage only exist in your head? Strange you didn't use it in your defence or did you?

What's the damage again?

Let's go back to the beginning.

Did you issue either an appropriate legal notice giving the tenants the legal minimum time to leave?

Bearing mind its you who ended up in Crown, we both know you didn't. Funnily why did it end up in Crown. These matters are usually dealt with in Magistrates. Was your criminal behaviour that serious?

Stunning business and legal practice so far!

'It's never your fault, it's never your fault, you're always the victim, it's never your fault.'

Of course there's a difference but you would surely know that given your expert eye!!!!

You seriously haven't got a clue about this case have you!!!!

rent not being paid = Civil matter
Damage to property = Civil matter
None payment to maintance charges = Civil matter

Damage = Painted walls BLACK, carpets ripped up, fireplace damaged
Appropriate legal notice was given yet they went beyond the agreed date.

It ended up in Crown because I choose to go there. It was thought that I did have a defence but when the judge in Crown looked at the case she then advised us that my defence was for the Civil courts only so I changed my defence to guilty.

Regarding the papers I can't dictate was it put in those rags but the Merthyr Express did have a 'small' section about what they done to me.

What you need to understand is that the tenants weren't the ones taking me on and that tells you a story straight away because they knew what they done was wrong.

Regarding the fine the cost will be covered by the costs awarded in the Civil case.

However its interesting that you know sweet FA about the case but feel the need to assume so much. Maybe you also assume that the papers were right every time they report on a so-called football hooligan being in the dock..?