Spurs all over jacks

You said 6! You were incorrect factually once again.

And you said your instead of you're

My point remains.

So injured players now sit on the bench? So what if Chico was injured in the first minute, bearing in mind Williams was the only centre half you had in the subs? You don't put injured players on the bench you plank. So you've lost Williams for ONE PL all season where you didn't win

16%

Players not fit enough to start, absolutely. Hardly a shocker

Why are you saying how many we have lost?

On the bench for 1 of those 3 so not injured. 1 of the non starts was a win, leaving 1 game where he was injured where you lost. I thought the purpose of your argument was to blame your poor form on injured defenders; I'm just taking Williams out of it as in reality you can only point to 1 game where you could say him being injured affected the result.

Off now fella, enjoy your day.

Of course he was injured, otherwise he would have played you plank

The purpose of my "argument" was to say Michu coming back wouldnt really do that much as our injuries are and have been mainly on the wing and in defence.

Keep up carps

So injured players now sit on the bench? So what if Chico was injured in the first minute, bearing in mind Williams was the only centre half you had in the subs? You don't put injured players on the bench you plank. So you've lost Williams for ONE PL all season where you didn't win

16%

How can their injuries "Mainly" be in defence when its the area that has made the most appearences for them

The wing is justified as Hernandez has been out, and Dyer, but he has been caught out exagerating / lying to try and make his point (about not missing Michu). AGAIN!!!!

Not through Injury they havent (Davies has been an un used sub) and Chico has only missed 2.

Canas also missed games not through injury but Leon getting selected ahead of him at the start of the season.

You can try twisting this way, that a way, this way, that a way Wizbit but your lies and exagerations are shining through dear boy

Yes they have.

Every single one of our starting defensive unit of 6 have missed matches through injury.

This is significant and this is why the return of Michu makes little difference. Which lets not forget was the point in hand mr troll

Now can we talk about why you said bony hasnt been injured and canas was 4th choice midielder?

Rangel - missed 32% of our prem games 22% actually
Davies - missed 16% of our Prem games 14% actually

Chico - missed 16% of our Prem games 9% actually

Williams - missed 16% of our Prem games 14% actually

Vorm - missed 48% of our games 9% actually

Tiendalli - hasnt been fit enough to play after nagging injuries for what seems like all season. Hes been fit enough to play the 22% Rangel missed
Not to mention our defensive midfielder role in which we now have to play a center back Jordi Amat What? for one PL game, 4.54 %
Now stop trolling theres a good lad.

On the bench for 1 of those 3 so not injured. 1 of the non starts was a win, leaving 1 game where he was injured where you lost. I thought the purpose of your argument was to blame your poor form on injured defenders; I'm just taking Williams out of it as in reality you can only point to 1 game where you could say him being injured affected the result.

Off now fella, enjoy your day.

Of course he was injured, otherwise he would have played you plank

The purpose of my "argument" was to say Michu coming back wouldnt really do that much as our injuries are and have been mainly on the wing and in defence.

Keep up carps

So injured players now sit on the bench? So what if Chico was injured in the first minute, bearing in mind Williams was the only centre half you had in the subs? You don't put injured players on the bench you plank. So you've lost Williams for ONE PL all season where you didn't win

16%

How can their injuries "Mainly" be in defence when its the area that has made the most appearences for them

The wing is justified as Hernandez has been out, and Dyer, but he has been caught out exagerating / lying to try and make his point (about not missing Michu). AGAIN!!!!

Because in our defensive unit we have had 7 injuries.

Vorm
Tiendalli
Davies
Williams
Chico
Rangel
Canas

On the wing we have had 3 injuries

Routledge
Dyer
Canas

In attacking midfield we have had 2 injuries

Michu
De Guzman
Shelvey if you want to count today?

Up front we have had 1 injury

Bony


I make that over 50% of our injuries this season have been to the defensive unit. Shame

Not through Injury they havent (Davies has been an un used sub) and Chico has only missed 2.

Canas also missed games not through injury but Leon getting selected ahead of him at the start of the season.

You can try twisting this way, that a way, this way, that a way Wizbit but your lies and exagerations are shining through dear boy

Yes they have.

Every single one of our starting defensive unit of 6 have missed matches through injury.

This is significant and this is why the return of Michu makes little difference. Which lets not forget was the point in hand mr troll

Now can we talk about why you said bony hasnt been injured and canas was 4th choice midielder?

Your central midfielders have missed more games and after all Michu is a central midfielder as you confirmed on the Bony thread.

Rangel - missed 32% of our prem games 22% actually
Davies - missed 16% of our Prem games 14% actually

Chico - missed 16% of our Prem games 9% actually

Williams - missed 16% of our Prem games 14% actually

Vorm - missed 48% of our games 9% actually

Tiendalli - hasnt been fit enough to play after nagging injuries for what seems like all season. Hes been fit enough to play the 22% Rangel missed
Not to mention our defensive midfielder role in which we now have to play a center back Jordi Amat What? for one PL game, 4.54 %
Now stop trolling theres a good lad.

Well we are never going to agree on the percentages it seems.

However what we both agree is all our defenders have been out injured.

Now then, if our striker and attacking midfielder are fit and healthy... Then why would I desperately want Michu back? Stick him on the wing?

Your argument makes little sense Chris. As usual

So you cant win an argument so just keep posting the same stuff I have already answered then is it?

And I quote.....


Because in our defensive unit we have had 7 injuries.

Vorm
Tiendalli
Davies
Williams
Chico
Rangel
Canas

On the wing we have had 3 injuries

Routledge
Dyer
Canas

In attacking midfield we have had 2 injuries

Michu
De Guzman
Shelvey if you want to count today?

Up front we have had 1 injury

Bony

I make that over 50% of our injuries this season have been to the defensive unit. Shame

No we are never going to agree on percentages when you lie about them Roathie

The defensive 7 unit. When the f**k did Malky take over from Laudrup

Before you get an orgasm, i obviously meant Hernandez on the wing not Canas.

So injured players now sit on the bench? So what if Chico was injured in the first minute, bearing in mind Williams was the only centre half you had in the subs? You don't put injured players on the bench you plank. So you've lost Williams for ONE PL all season where you didn't win

16%

Players not fit enough to start, absolutely. Hardly a shocker

Why are you saying how many we have lost?

But fit enough to come on if needed, which could have been minute 1, so not injured. May have been rested but then that's a managerial decision.
So that's 2 games where he didn't feature on the team sheet, 1 of which you won with a clean sheet, so it had no bearing on the result The fact is Williams wasn't in the match squad for 1 game where you lost, so not really a major factor in your poor season. Keep up.

No we are never going to agree on percentages when you lie about them Roathie

The defensive 7 unit. When the f**k did Malky take over from Laudrup

I didnt lie, you just think they cant be on the bench if they are injured - where as i think they can. You lied when you said bony wasnt injured and that canas was 4th choice captain and that under malky you scored 0.7 goals a game didnt you

We have a goalkeeper and a back 4 with a defensive midfielder - that is 6. All were injured including our reserve fullback - 7

Which as i said... Has seen most of our injuries

Even excluding bench appearances you lied about the percentages Roathie.

As you were

So injured players now sit on the bench? So what if Chico was injured in the first minute, bearing in mind Williams was the only centre half you had in the subs? You don't put injured players on the bench you plank. So you've lost Williams for ONE PL all season where you didn't win

16%

Players not fit enough to start, absolutely. Hardly a shocker

Why are you saying how many we have lost?

But fit enough to come on if needed, which could have been minute 1, so not injured. May have been rested but then that's a managerial decision.
So that's 2 games where he didn't feature on the team sheet, 1 of which you won with a clean sheet, so it had no bearing on the result The fact is Williams wasn't in the match squad for 1 game where you lost, so not really a major factor in your poor season. Keep up.

Nope. If they arent fit enough to start then they are indeed not fit.

Again for the third time - what has the baring on the result got to do with anything? You seem to be having your own little argument here.

Let me tell you again....

Polo said "bet you arent glad Michu is out now" (i initially said it would probably be a blessing in disguise as it will give Bony a chance and Michu is wasted up front... Which of course proved correct)

My reply was "why? When most of our injury problems are in defence and the wings" (which I have just proved that the overwhelming injury list has been to defenders and wingers"

Simple as that

Even excluding bench appearances you lied about the percentages Roathie.

As you were

Nope, I stand by them. They will all be there or there abouts and thus back up my point that all of them have missed games - thus proving my point most injuries have come in defence

You lied about malkys percentage of team goals thou didnt you? And that canas was 4th choice captain didnt you? And that bony wasnt injured didnt you?

So injured players now sit on the bench? So what if Chico was injured in the first minute, bearing in mind Williams was the only centre half you had in the subs? You don't put injured players on the bench you plank. So you've lost Williams for ONE PL all season where you didn't win

16%

Players not fit enough to start, absolutely. Hardly a shocker

Why are you saying how many we have lost?

But fit enough to come on if needed, which could have been minute 1, so not injured. May have been rested but then that's a managerial decision.
So that's 2 games where he didn't feature on the team sheet, 1 of which you won with a clean sheet, so it had no bearing on the result The fact is Williams wasn't in the match squad for 1 game where you lost, so not really a major factor in your poor season. Keep up.

Nope. If they arent fit enough to start then they are indeed not fit.

Again for the third time - what has the baring on the result got to do with anything? You seem to be having your own little argument here.

Let me tell you again....

Polo said "bet you arent glad Michu is out now" (i initially said it would probably be a blessing in disguise as it will give Bony a chance and Michu is wasted up front... Which of course proved correct)

My reply was "why? When most of our injury problems are in defence and the wings" (which I have just proved that the overwhelming injury list has been to defenders and wingers"

Simple as that

And I've proved that the Williams injury had little or no bearing on your poor results. Simple as that

Every player has missed at least one game, and seeing as that there are more defenders in your squad than any other position then obviously if you are just counting single games as a period injury then every club in the land must have a defensive injury list

Seeing as you want to take it back to the whole season then both De Guzman and Bony have missed more games than any of your defenders, excluding Vorm of course but its not like Michu is going to play in goals

And lets forget you said Williams, Davies and Rangel in "recent weeks" which I proved with stats another lie.

And I've proved that the Williams injury had little or no bearing on your poor results. Simple as that

who are you proving that to then? And more importantly..... why?

Every player has missed at least one game, and seeing as that there are more defenders in your squad than any other position then obviously if you are just counting single games as a period injury then every club in the land must have a defensive injury list

so you agree with me that most of our injuries have been to our defence then

Seeing as you want to take it back to the whole season then both De Guzman and Bony have missed more games than any of your defenders, excluding Vorm of course but its not like Michu is going to play in goals

I dont even understand your point there

And lets forget you said Williams, Davies and Rangel in "recent weeks" which I proved with stats another lie.

its not a lie at all, your deduction of recent weeks is different to mine.

However saying bony wasnt injured (even though you now say he was), saying canas was 4th choice captain and that Malkys team scored 0,7 a game is a lie isnt it? Tut tut

Even excluding bench appearances you lied about the percentages Roathie.

As you were

Nope, I stand by them. They will all be there or there abouts and thus back up my point that all of them have missed games - thus proving my point most injuries have come in defence

You lied about malkys percentage of team goals thou didnt you? And that canas was 4th choice captain didnt you? And that bony wasnt injured didnt you?

How can you stand by something that is mathematically inacurrate?

Vorm has missed 9 out of 22 thats 41% not 48%. An exageration of some 17%.

Rangel hasnt started 6 of 22 games thats 27% not 33%. An exageration of 22%.

The other 3 I will leave you off as your maths have been woeful recently. Your claim Michu only playing a third (33%) up front last season being testament to this.

And I've proved that the Williams injury had little or no bearing on your poor results. Simple as that

who are you proving that to then? And more importantly..... why?

You, because you love your stats yet can't work out percentages

Here to help

You, because you love your stats yet can't work out percentages

Here to help

Says the man who got his wrong

Hes replies have nothing to do with percentages - here to help

Even excluding bench appearances you lied about the percentages Roathie.

As you were

Nope, I stand by them. They will all be there or there abouts and thus back up my point that all of them have missed games - thus proving my point most injuries have come in defence

You lied about malkys percentage of team goals thou didnt you? And that canas was 4th choice captain didnt you? And that bony wasnt injured didnt you?

How can you stand by something that is mathematically inacurrate?

Vorm has missed 9 out of 22 thats 41% not 48%. An exageration of some 17%.

so 41% to 48% is 17% now what a liar

Rangel hasnt started 6 of 22 games thats 27% not 33%. An exageration of 22%.

i think you mean 6%

The other 3 I will leave you off as your maths have been woeful recently. Your claim Michu only playing a third (33%) up front last season being testament to this.

and i was spot on with the sentiment just like here - and it kills you

Mow then... Canas 4th choice captain, malkys teams scoring 0.7 a game and bony not being injured?

What is your defence plaintiff?

Every player has missed at least one game, and seeing as that there are more defenders in your squad than any other position then obviously if you are just counting single games as a period injury then every club in the land must have a defensive injury list

so you agree with me that most of our injuries have been to our defence then

Seeing as you want to take it back to the whole season then both De Guzman and Bony have missed more games than any of your defenders, excluding Vorm of course but its not like Michu is going to play in goals

I dont even understand your point there

And lets forget you said Williams, Davies and Rangel in "recent weeks" which I proved with stats another lie.

its not a lie at all, your deduction of recent weeks is different to mine.

However saying bony wasnt injured (even though you now say he was), saying canas was 4th choice captain and that Malkys team scored 0,7 a game is a lie isnt it? Tut tut

Malkys team scored 13 goals in 18 games thats an average of 0.72222222 per game Roathie.

I will let you off though as your maths has been exposed as woeful this past couple of weeks and this thread especially.

And my point about De Guzman and Bony, two of the players who play in the positions Michu plays, have been out for more matches than any defensive individual (Vorm excluded) so your point about having Michu not making a difference as another position has been affected more is again, ie not true.

Even excluding bench appearances you lied about the percentages Roathie.

As you were

Nope, I stand by them. They will all be there or there abouts and thus back up my point that all of them have missed games - thus proving my point most injuries have come in defence

You lied about malkys percentage of team goals thou didnt you? And that canas was 4th choice captain didnt you? And that bony wasnt injured didnt you?

How can you stand by something that is mathematically inacurrate?

Vorm has missed 9 out of 22 thats 41% not 48%. An exageration of some 17%.

so 41% to 48% is 17% now what a liar

Rangel hasnt started 6 of 22 games thats 27% not 33%. An exageration of 22%.

i think you mean 6%

The other 3 I will leave you off as your maths have been woeful recently. Your claim Michu only playing a third (33%) up front last season being testament to this.

and i was spot on with the sentiment just like here - and it kills you

Mow then... Canas 4th choice captain, malkys teams scoring 0.7 a game and bony not being injured?

What is your defence plaintiff?

41 x 1.17 = 48. You made an exageration of 17%

27 x 1.21 = 33. You made an exageration of 21%

You, because you love your stats yet can't work out percentages

Here to help

Says the man who got his wrong

Hes replies have nothing to do with percentages - here to help

2 out of 22 looks like 9% to me but judging by your mathematical ability you would make it 48%

Every player has missed at least one game, and seeing as that there are more defenders in your squad than any other position then obviously if you are just counting single games as a period injury then every club in the land must have a defensive injury list

so you agree with me that most of our injuries have been to our defence then

Seeing as you want to take it back to the whole season then both De Guzman and Bony have missed more games than any of your defenders, excluding Vorm of course but its not like Michu is going to play in goals

I dont even understand your point there

And lets forget you said Williams, Davies and Rangel in "recent weeks" which I proved with stats another lie.

its not a lie at all, your deduction of recent weeks is different to mine.

However saying bony wasnt injured (even though you now say he was), saying canas was 4th choice captain and that Malkys team scored 0,7 a game is a lie isnt it? Tut tut

Malkys team scored 13 goals in 18 games thats an average of 0.72222222 per game Roathie.

you get it right now after i corrected you

I will let you off though as your maths has been exposed as woeful this past couple of weeks and this thread especially.

nothing to do with maths, they were guesses. The exact figure doesnt really matter, my point is all have been out injured meaning most of our injuries have been to our defence - keep up christopher

And my point about De Guzman and Bony, two of the players who play in the positions Michu plays, have been out for more matches than any defensive individual (Vorm excluded) so your point about having Michu not making a difference as another position has been affected more is again, ie not true.

you asked me if i wished Michu was back.... Why would I? If I thought it was a blessing in disguise that he was out because it would give bony/pozuelo a chance then what has changed Columbo?

2 out of 22 looks like 9% to me but judging by your mathematical ability you would make it 48%

What is 2 out of 22?

So how was saying Malkys team have scored 0.7 goals per game a lie then Einsteen?