Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:19 pm
cakey-8t7 wrote:Any protests inside the ground in front of the sky cameras will make Cardiff city fans look like a bigger bunch of muppets than Blackburn rovers fans, EMBARRASING
Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:22 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:cakey-8t7 wrote:Any protests inside the ground in front of the sky cameras will make Cardiff city fans look like a bigger bunch of muppets than Blackburn rovers fans, EMBARRASING
What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:26 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:cakey-8t7 wrote:Any protests inside the ground in front of the sky cameras will make Cardiff city fans look like a bigger bunch of muppets than Blackburn rovers fans, EMBARRASING
What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:35 pm
Xcasual wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:cakey-8t7 wrote:Any protests inside the ground in front of the sky cameras will make Cardiff city fans look like a bigger bunch of muppets than Blackburn rovers fans, EMBARRASING
What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
So why the panic ?
Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:38 pm
dazzyt wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:cakey-8t7 wrote:Any protests inside the ground in front of the sky cameras will make Cardiff city fans look like a bigger bunch of muppets than Blackburn rovers fans, EMBARRASING
What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
Not gonna argue with you cj,I think you should be embarrassed for allowing these people to destroy our club
Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:13 am
CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:cakey-8t7 wrote:Any protests inside the ground in front of the sky cameras will make Cardiff city fans look like a bigger bunch of muppets than Blackburn rovers fans, EMBARRASING
What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
Not gonna argue with you cj,I think you should be embarrassed for allowing these people to destroy our club
Im not embarassed. At first I was as annoyed as you and was even thinking of stop watching cardiff, however, after some thought I decided I would continue to support the team and would support VT as long as the promise of the debt would be wiped. And like others once everything promised has happened then we should try to change back to blue. I would rather play the waiting game take everything he has promised us (that is if it happens I admit) then try to convince him to go blue or whoever is in charge.
I
Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:33 am
dazzyt wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:cakey-8t7 wrote:Any protests inside the ground in front of the sky cameras will make Cardiff city fans look like a bigger bunch of muppets than Blackburn rovers fans, EMBARRASING
What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
Not gonna argue with you cj,I think you should be embarrassed for allowing these people to destroy our club
Im not embarassed. At first I was as annoyed as you and was even thinking of stop watching cardiff, however, after some thought I decided I would continue to support the team and would support VT as long as the promise of the debt would be wiped. And like others once everything promised has happened then we should try to change back to blue. I would rather play the waiting game take everything he has promised us (that is if it happens I admit) then try to convince him to go blue or whoever is in charge.
I
It's a good point you make there mate but remember when you were pissed off?,well some people can't accept it but you could and that is ok but don't argue with people who can't accept it as you felt like that once.If we all reluctantly accept red we will remain red so someone has to keep the fight going.Do you want to remain red or go back to blue?
Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:57 am
CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:cakey-8t7 wrote:Any protests inside the ground in front of the sky cameras will make Cardiff city fans look like a bigger bunch of muppets than Blackburn rovers fans, EMBARRASING
What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
Not gonna argue with you cj,I think you should be embarrassed for allowing these people to destroy our club
Im not embarassed. At first I was as annoyed as you and was even thinking of stop watching cardiff, however, after some thought I decided I would continue to support the team and would support VT as long as the promise of the debt would be wiped. And like others once everything promised has happened then we should try to change back to blue. I would rather play the waiting game take everything he has promised us (that is if it happens I admit) then try to convince him to go blue or whoever is in charge.
I
It's a good point you make there mate but remember when you were pissed off?,well some people can't accept it but you could and that is ok but don't argue with people who can't accept it as you felt like that once.If we all reluctantly accept red we will remain red so someone has to keep the fight going.Do you want to remain red or go back to blue?
Ive never criticised someone for wanting to go blue and proteting about it as Ive said Im not going to stop you from protesting its your right. I think your wrong about it and I still believe it will be more embarassing than anything if its only a few hundred out of 25000 that are protesting mainly because as someone mentioned before it will just look like everyone else is in favour of VT so counter productive. By everyone just wearing blue will be a big enough statement to be honest and if KCB want to protest that outside would be their best option. We all want to be blue but some of us have realised that it would be better to take the rebrand now get everything promised if it happens and then fight for the colour rather than fight now and lose out of everything that was promised only if the rebrand went through.
Honestly what would you rather, Stay blue but keep the debt or go red for the time being but relatively debt free, new training ground, expanded stadium and in the prem and then for us to fight for the colour blue? I know what I would want.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:07 am
CjBluebird17 wrote:What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
[/quote]
[/quote]Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:18 am
CjBluebird17 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What will be more embarrasing about it is that it will only be a few hundred at most out of what 25000
Not gonna argue with you cj,I think you should be embarrassed for allowing these people to destroy our club
[/quote]
[/quote]Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:19 am
Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:29 am
dazzyt wrote:The club stated the money for Langstone was there so get shot of Sam.As for transfers those players obviously didn't think what we were offering was good enough and maybe just maybe we didn't offer the right deal and it may of cost us promotion.that we will never know.As for the debt,we are losing 1,2 million a month with our current owners and they spend money on posters at the front of the stadium...tell me how often do you look up that high.......Never mate is the answer,we are losing 1.2 mill a month and who do we owe it to....I will let you answer that
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:23 am
CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:The club stated the money for Langstone was there so get shot of Sam.As for transfers those players obviously didn't think what we were offering was good enough and maybe just maybe we didn't offer the right deal and it may of cost us promotion.that we will never know.As for the debt,we are losing 1,2 million a month with our current owners and they spend money on posters at the front of the stadium...tell me how often do you look up that high.......Never mate is the answer,we are losing 1.2 mill a month and who do we owe it to....I will let you answer that
As I said I didnt really want to get into the whole langstone thing but just take it as I feel that Sam has been "moving the goal posts" to quote people on here alot since the rebranding. As for the debt of losing £1.2 million a month the way I see it is we had to pay extra wages last season of Dave Jones and his staff aswell as players that were on too high a salaries but as the way this season goes wages are going to be larger. But you go to remember we dont gain income from food sales and such plus merchandise such as shirts we dont get nearly as much as what we the customers pay for it. The main point of the rebranding is to gain extra income into the club whether it be shirt sales (doubtfull I know but any increase will be helpful) but more imporantly sponsorship such as stadium name and also further investors. Also if we make the premiership we will be gaining a great income stream.
As for giant posters and looking up they are there for asthetics to make it look appealing. Since its been done oure stadium looks alot nicer ablight the mixed colour scheme
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:49 am
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:51 am
BLOOBLUD wrote:its not defaced mate it now looks more like our own stadium and not a shared one.new exciting signings how is that not a positive direction to take if you want to get somewhere like pl.Debt free well i understand your concern but as its been said cut them some slack and give them a chance.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:08 pm
dazzyt wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:The club stated the money for Langstone was there so get shot of Sam.As for transfers those players obviously didn't think what we were offering was good enough and maybe just maybe we didn't offer the right deal and it may of cost us promotion.that we will never know.As for the debt,we are losing 1,2 million a month with our current owners and they spend money on posters at the front of the stadium...tell me how often do you look up that high.......Never mate is the answer,we are losing 1.2 mill a month and who do we owe it to....I will let you answer that
As I said I didnt really want to get into the whole langstone thing but just take it as I feel that Sam has been "moving the goal posts" to quote people on here alot since the rebranding. As for the debt of losing £1.2 million a month the way I see it is we had to pay extra wages last season of Dave Jones and his staff aswell as players that were on too high a salaries but as the way this season goes wages are going to be larger. But you go to remember we dont gain income from food sales and such plus merchandise such as shirts we dont get nearly as much as what we the customers pay for it. The main point of the rebranding is to gain extra income into the club whether it be shirt sales (doubtfull I know but any increase will be helpful) but more imporantly sponsorship such as stadium name and also further investors. Also if we make the premiership we will be gaining a great income stream.
As for giant posters and looking up they are there for asthetics to make it look appealing. Since its been done oure stadium looks alot nicer ablight the mixed colour scheme
The only thing they have done is defaced a stadium that looked bland anyway,where are those fans who were screaming for a few players to be brought in when we were in the running for auto.All this investment rubbish is a smokescreen,a few players would have made all the difference.We have been losing money for a long time and Tan is not bailing us out but lending us the money and that figure is rising daily.Until he does what he has promised we will continue to lose unless someone from China comes in.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:53 pm
Natman Blue wrote:dazzyt wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:dazzyt wrote:The club stated the money for Langstone was there so get shot of Sam.As for transfers those players obviously didn't think what we were offering was good enough and maybe just maybe we didn't offer the right deal and it may of cost us promotion.that we will never know.As for the debt,we are losing 1,2 million a month with our current owners and they spend money on posters at the front of the stadium...tell me how often do you look up that high.......Never mate is the answer,we are losing 1.2 mill a month and who do we owe it to....I will let you answer that
As I said I didnt really want to get into the whole langstone thing but just take it as I feel that Sam has been "moving the goal posts" to quote people on here alot since the rebranding. As for the debt of losing £1.2 million a month the way I see it is we had to pay extra wages last season of Dave Jones and his staff aswell as players that were on too high a salaries but as the way this season goes wages are going to be larger. But you go to remember we dont gain income from food sales and such plus merchandise such as shirts we dont get nearly as much as what we the customers pay for it. The main point of the rebranding is to gain extra income into the club whether it be shirt sales (doubtfull I know but any increase will be helpful) but more imporantly sponsorship such as stadium name and also further investors. Also if we make the premiership we will be gaining a great income stream.
As for giant posters and looking up they are there for asthetics to make it look appealing. Since its been done oure stadium looks alot nicer ablight the mixed colour scheme
The only thing they have done is defaced a stadium that looked bland anyway,where are those fans who were screaming for a few players to be brought in when we were in the running for auto.All this investment rubbish is a smokescreen,a few players would have made all the difference.We have been losing money for a long time and Tan is not bailing us out but lending us the money and that figure is rising daily.Until he does what he has promised we will continue to lose unless someone from China comes in.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Take from the upcoming hit;
By DazzyT Rascal!
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:56 pm
Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:45 am
Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:50 am
dazzyt wrote:This was actually a good topical discussion with true fans until Natman the Godsquad decided to add nothing but drivel to the thread,it's people like him that cocks it up for you lot.
Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:57 am
Natman Blue wrote:dazzyt wrote:This was actually a good topical discussion with true fans until Natman the Godsquad decided to add nothing but drivel to the thread,it's people like him that cocks it up for you lot.
I think you'll find is the way I and everyone else on this forum reads it its the other way round! You're only posting this about me now because I called you out on something similar with one of my posts. Now to this thread my post was a response to the utter nonsense you,d just posted, which was; BONKERS!!!
Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:58 am
dazzyt wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:droopy wrote:cityone wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Hmmm isnt it strange the only ones ever to threaten violence has never come from the blue camp. It is constant in the red camp and then they try and turn it on us![]()
![]()
![]()
Why have KCB now decided to protest in the stadium when the game is going on, after originally stating that all peacefull protests would take place outside the stadium????
Why protest on matchday's full stop? I really hope the pro-reds give them a pasting!![]()
But why protest when no one is watching ? Just asking like !! If you are going to protest then you do it for maximum effect. Its like me Protesting on the price of petrol so deciding to march up and down my Garden![]()
![]()
![]()
classic nukes
1977 you have changed your tune?,the protest will be in front of the Sky cameras.....not good enough?
Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:51 am
dazzyt wrote:This was actually a good topical discussion with true fans until Natman the Godsquad decided to add nothing but drivel to the thread,it's people like him that cocks it up for you lot.
Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:18 am
[/quote]