Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:11 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Because Monk has only been in charge for 4 games. im not sure why you are ignoring the excellent play and focussing on the possession. what do you think we were doing? sitting on the ball?
You like facts and the facts say the better the performance the more chance you have of scoring do they not?
So one would assume performance is very important
Fair play you are one dull c**t. Possesion, performance and whatever other bollocks you want to spout mean f**k all, its whats on the score board at the end of the game that counts unfortunately and thats all that matters.
No wonder your own fans and most of tjis board think your wrong. Deluded. Sad and obsessed. And WRONG
nobby, you can call me all the names under the sun, im still going to be right.
Lots of people regularly say im wrong only to end up looking like plums, ask your fellow mod Tony![]()
Posession and performance (or bollocks as you refer to it) are the things that allow the goals, you dont just pluck goals from nowhere. The better you play the more you score. The worse you play, the less you score.
So by default, performance is very important. If you dont think so then it may explain why you havent scored for 4 games
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:11 am
CraigCCFC wrote:NATION OF DOMINATION
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:13 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:waddle wrote:Fucked that right up today , can't believe monk brought Leroy f*cking lita on that bloke controls a ball further than i could kick it , players looked knackered at the end hope it's just a reaction to the napoli games if not we could still be in the shit
Dont see what options he had in fairness, we dont have a replacement for Bony. There is no way Marvin Emnes can lead the line on his own with 4 or 5 Palace defenders to contend with.
At the end of the day the goal we conceded was an incorrect penalty decision. First half was terrific, second half we were clearly depleted with arguably the most key defender, midfielder and attacker taken off injured or sick.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:15 am
nobby wrote:
Goals win games f**k all else end of discussion.
and performance gets goals, end of discussion![]()
2 other things.
1 Your only on here because on your own forums even your OWN fans think your a prick and thats a FACT.
i dont have a forum, if you re talking about planetswans im still a member and a popular contributor. Usually because im often correct![]()
oh sorry forgot.... FACT
2 You got no mates at all so come on here and try to ridicule anyone and everyone just because you have an inferiority complex about yourself and were probably bullied in school etc and this is your way of getting people back.
dont even know what to say about that. Is this the forum equivalent of stamping your feet and throwing all your toys out of the pram?
Bless, you may score soon and wont be so upset when Swansea play so well![]()
Im not going to speak on behalf of Tony, hes more than capable of speaking for himself.
you dont need to, its on the forum for all to see. And a reason why he doesnt post anymore.![]()
Having said that with you its all through a keyboard as you aint got the bollocks to speak face to face unlike some of your fans many who I have met and become friendly with I even hope to have a beer soon with 64 Jack and hes awilling to reciprocate the offer unlike some. f*cking shitarse.
you pay for my flight and I will tell you we were sensational to your face. Hows your bollocks then? Offer open![]()
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:16 am
popeye21 wrote:
I agree that it was an incorrect penalty decision, but it was bound to happen to Chico sooner or later due to all his play acting to get players sent off. He will probably get sent off again this season incorrectly and there won't be many football fans feeling sorry for him. So you sow you reap.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:19 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:
Goals win games f**k all else end of discussion.
and performance gets goals, end of discussion![]()
2 other things.
1 Your only on here because on your own forums even your OWN fans think your a prick and thats a FACT.
i dont have a forum, if you re talking about planetswans im still a member and a popular contributor. Usually because im often correct![]()
oh sorry forgot.... FACT
2 You got no mates at all so come on here and try to ridicule anyone and everyone just because you have an inferiority complex about yourself and were probably bullied in school etc and this is your way of getting people back.
dont even know what to say about that. Is this the forum equivalent of stamping your feet and throwing all your toys out of the pram?
Bless, you may score soon and wont be so upset when Swansea play so well![]()
Im not going to speak on behalf of Tony, hes more than capable of speaking for himself.
you dont need to, its on the forum for all to see. And a reason why he doesnt post anymore.![]()
Having said that with you its all through a keyboard as you aint got the bollocks to speak face to face unlike some of your fans many who I have met and become friendly with I even hope to have a beer soon with 64 Jack and hes awilling to reciprocate the offer unlike some. f*cking shitarse.
you pay for my flight and I will tell you we were sensational to your face. Hows your bollocks then? Offer open![]()
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:23 am
nobby wrote:
Will ignore your bollocks again.
what like the ridiculous notion that the better the performance the more chance you have of winning you mean?![]()
Hate to tell you nobby, but its sort of a fundamental part of football. I know its fun for people to disagree with their hero roathie, but sometimes you just have to take a step back and actually realise you are talking like a pleb![]()
So you NEVER come home to Wales ever then. Again total bollocks.
very rarely, when I do the last thing on my mind is ringing a cardiff fan to tell him we are sensational to his face![]()
Although my offer stands to you![]()
Shit arse end of.
nobby by name nobby by nature![]()
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:28 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:
Will ignore your bollocks again.
what like the ridiculous notion that the better the performance the more chance you have of winning you mean?![]()
Hate to tell you nobby, but its sort of a fundamental part of football. I know its fun for people to disagree with their hero roathie, but sometimes you just have to take a step back and actually realise you are talking like a pleb![]()
So you NEVER come home to Wales ever then. Again total bollocks.
very rarely, when I do the last thing on my mind is ringing a cardiff fan to tell him we are sensational to his face![]()
Although my offer stands to you![]()
Shit arse end of.
nobby by name nobby by nature![]()
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:29 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:30 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:popeye21 wrote:
I agree that it was an incorrect penalty decision, but it was bound to happen to Chico sooner or later due to all his play acting to get players sent off. He will probably get sent off again this season incorrectly and there won't be many football fans feeling sorry for him. So you sow you reap.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
It wasnt a penalty and thats all there is to it. Red card, no complaints.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:32 am
popeye21 wrote:
I agree that two wrongs don't make a right, but because of Chico's previous behaviour it was almost inevitable that something like this would happen and that not many would have any sympathy.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:34 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Oh you bitch nobby![]()
The fact is im right and it destroys you. Deal with it punk
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:37 am
nobby wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Oh you bitch nobby![]()
The fact is im right and it destroys you. Deal with it punk
Ive been looking for a thread I saw on planet swamp where your own fans call you Dimi and ridicule you but I cant find it.
Sticks and stone Hwyl will never hurt me, and neither will you yet another fact to add to the growing list
so you would show me something but you cant - how convenient.
Same. I could show you a thread where everyone is calling you a prick, cant find it though but its a FACT![]()
So yes you are WRONG.
Nope still RIGHT, and its still clearly destroying you.![]()
Off you pop now then, off my thread please, only sensible contributors here and you stopped being that pretty mUch as soon as you entered.![]()
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:38 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:41 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Oh you bitch nobby![]()
The fact is im right and it destroys you. Deal with it punk
Ive been looking for a thread I saw on planet swamp where your own fans call you Dimi and ridicule you but I cant find it.
Sticks and stone Hwyl will never hurt me, and neither will you yet another fact to add to the growing list
so you would show me something but you cant - how convenient.
Same. I could show you a thread where everyone is calling you a prick, cant find it though but its a FACT![]()
So yes you are WRONG.
Nope still right, amd its still destroying you.![]()
Off you pop now then, off my thread please, only sensible contributors here and you stopped being that pretty mich as soon as you entered.![]()
. Sad lonely life with no mates and a huge infetiority complex. Even your own fans think your a dicm. CLASSIC. Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:43 am
BobBankLoyalist wrote:Would Manning prefer an individual accolade or would he prefer a winners medal? This is why the only stat that ever matters is the final score regardless of the sport.
"it makes absolutely no sense to what we are discussing. If Manning hadnt played well then he wouldn't be in the super bowl - think about it."
It makes complete sense. But you don't here...If Manning hadnt played well then he wouldn't be in the super bowl - think about it.
nope it makes no sense at all. Do you even know what your argument is? Because i cant fathom head nor tail of it to match up to anything being discussed here.
Welcome to try again though.
Forget the sport just think of the logic, the person in question DID play well IN the final, being the main man controlling the play when he was on the field, creating history in the process - a bit like Swansea keeping the ball controlling the game and probably creating Premier League history for first half possession.
right....
However control means nothing if you can't kill a game off. Denver couldn't and in this case you couldn't. History will show Manning created history but ultimately the only stat that will stay in the memory is that the opposition won. History will show Swansea had 83% first half possession, the only stat that will ultimately mean anything to anyone is that you drew 1-1.
but you can only match the stat to the time frame. You cant show a stat that was valid for the forst half and match it up with the second half.
We had 83% and as a result of that dominance we went in 1-0 up. Crystal palace had more possession in the second half and played the better football and they won the second half 1-0 - its no coincidence.
You'll more than likely have enough to keep afloat and not really have to look over your shoulders unlike us who are firmly in it. But I'd take getting smashed up every week on statistics if like Palace did today, come away with a point or 3 - unfortunately, we don't look good enough to do that currently.
thats the thing, it wont happen. If you get smashed in the statistics week after week then you will lose more often than not, if you are superior in the statistics then you will win more often than not.
I bet you if you take all the winners from this game week, most had more shots on target and possession.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:44 am
nobby wrote:Got you by the bollocks. No one likes you your own fans included. No wonder you fucked off to Oz and no one likes you over there because your on here 24/7. Sad lonely life with no mates and a huge infetiority complex. Even your own fans think your a dicm. CLASSIC.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:50 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:Got you by the bollocks. No one likes you your own fans included. No wonder you fucked off to Oz and no one likes you over there because your on here 24/7. Sad lonely life with no mates and a huge infetiority complex. Even your own fans think your a dicm. CLASSIC.
Got me by the bollocks by saying nobody likes me?![]()
Oh bless, i will just have to console myself with being correct and it destroying you then
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:54 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:56 am
nobby wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:Got you by the bollocks. No one likes you your own fans included. No wonder you fucked off to Oz and no one likes you over there because your on here 24/7. Sad lonely life with no mates and a huge infetiority complex. Even your own fans think your a dicm. CLASSIC.
Got me by the bollocks by saying nobody likes me?![]()
Oh bless, i will just have to console myself with being correct and it destroying you then
You know, I know and ALL the posters on planet swans know how much of a dick you are.No one on here or planet swans like you. DIMI they call you on there. They even take the piss out of you. I will find the threads but until then at least YOU know the truth and its f*cking killing you billy no mates.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:56 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:01 am
nobby wrote:http://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/swanseacity/forum/104713/knew-there-was-a-reason-i-didnt-post-here-much-these-days/#22
just for you DIMI
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:08 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:http://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/swanseacity/forum/104713/knew-there-was-a-reason-i-didnt-post-here-much-these-days/#22
just for you DIMI
Agent Dimi you pleb, it was the username before Parlay![]()
Its like me saying everyone is taking the piss out of you and calling you a knob by saying nobby, you absolute idiot![]()
![]()
Lets quote the link shall we......
"Nice post mate......I agree with you"
"He's right though"
"He usually is right.He'll get the attention he'll crave on AAMB now.They do love him on there"
"He absolutely is. He could be Osama bin Laden for all I care, what he's posted there is spot on. This forum is mostly populated with f*ckwits at the moment."
"Spot fcuking on post of the day"
"Spot on"
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:09 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:13 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:13 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:14 am
nobby wrote:http://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/swanseacity/forum/101379/tom-ince-to-agree-to-swans-loan/#57
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
WRONG WRONG
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:19 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:http://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/swanseacity/forum/101379/tom-ince-to-agree-to-swans-loan/#57
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
WRONG WRONG
Nope RIGHT![]()
You got it wrong. Offer still stands nobby no bollocks
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:23 am
BobBankLoyalist wrote:It's because of the way you started the thread saying in your opinion you were playing sensational football and, again, in your opinion said to count you out of the relegation scrap.
we were playing sensational football tonight. Until HT. and ive always maintained we are not in the relegation scrap, it was not based on todays performance - i said it prior to Kick off.![]()
It sounds condescending in the extreme and you don't know yet if you are out of the relegation scrap. I'll be surprised if you do go down (unless your form dips or you have a run of injuries/suspensions) but you cannot be discounted 100% especially as there's 30 points+ for teams to play for - that statement is at best you getting carried away as you were winning at half time, or at worst you are clearly not thinking straight.
how is that condescending? Its an opinion on MY teams not yours. I refute both accusations. We were dominating at half time as the stats show. And you cam count us out of the relegation scrap as far as im concerned. With our GD we are essentially on 30 points. 2 wins and a draw from the last 10 should be enough and that should be done with relative ease.
Going back to Manning for the last time he was playing sensationally well for the first two quarters and at half time the pundits were saying that with his stats the Broncos should have been out of sight at half time. They weren't. Nor were you today even though you had nearly all the possession for 45 minutes.
makes no difference. The better you play, the better the stats, the better the chance of winning. As I showed 6 of the 7 winners this week all had better stats. Coincidence? Of course not.
As another Swansea fan has posted, "sensational football, lined with pure dominance" you have to look at Liverpool's first half performance against Arsenal. THEY dominated and were out of sight at half time. Whether it was sensational is up for debate but it was dazzling to watch (in my opinion) and if you ran a poll to football fans which 45 minutes of football they would consider was more sensational and dominant then I wouldn't mind guessing there would be only one winner.
so everything is based on one match? What about a barca 45 mins? If that was better than liverpools, is liverpools no linger sensational?
Its all about perspective.
Like I've said previously you do post some reasonable comments/debate on times, I'm not stupid enough to ignore that. But there are times when I read some of what you write and I just shake my head and can understand why you have the reputation you do.
i have the reputation i do because people dont wish to accept when im clearly right.
Like in this instance, trying to say performance has no correlation to results?! Its lunacy.
No one will give a shit if you shoved your hands up once in a while and said that you were wrong in something you posted, or you went a bit OTT on some of your opinions (specifically the finance posts as you know as much as myself and everyone does about what really is going on behind closed doors. You surmise, like everyone else does on here, but you come across as if your opinions are fact like you are sat at the board meetings.)
so what am i supposed to be wrong about? Nobody has told me yet?
I have said we were dominating at half time. We had 83% possession and 400% more shots on target![]()
Its an amazing conversation.
All I'm saying is have a bit of humility and agree that some people may know more than you on times. It's not hard and no one will think any less of you, in fact it may actually change some posters opinions of you.
so you want me to say performance has no baring on results and is just coincidence every week.
And 83% possession and 400% more shots on goal isnt a dominant half... Just to make people feel better?
Im the poster I am because .i stick to my guns when im clearly right and don't pander to those who wish me to be wrong.
How anybody can argue against either of the above is beyond me![]()
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:23 am
nobby wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:nobby wrote:http://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/swanseacity/forum/101379/tom-ince-to-agree-to-swans-loan/#57
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
WRONG WRONG
Nope RIGHT![]()
You got it wrong. Offer still stands nobby no bollocks
Ince didnt sign thick tw*t. No one lijes you not even your own fans how sad.