Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:47 am
HAVE I MISSED SOMETHING
Unread postby BigGwynram ยป Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:21 am
Been away so sorry for delay, I was there at the meeting which by the title alone KEEP CARDIFF BLUE is more than OK with me, firstly I and many others want to make sure firstly we keep Cardiff, and whilst we can't keep it blue coz we are red, we can't hopefully work to get it back to blue which I'm sure we all want.As far as I'm concerned that is an invite to any Cardiff fan.
I can honestly say, I haven't met anyone who would choose red, but if it's part of the package, then many of us will go along with it, even if it is reluctantly.
My personal view and the approach I intend taking, is to fully support the team on the pitch as always, hope and pray that VT fulfills his promises that went along with the rebrand,he deserves at least that much after rescuing us from the mess we were in, however if in six months or so time it is apparent we have been lied to or shafted, then it's a whole new ball game and we should all let him know the consequences, but until then we should keep our powder dry.
Protesting now seems pointless to me at present because we are stuck with red and a crap badge for at least one season,no problem with actions such as wearing blue shirts, and actually suggested it myself as a form of peaceful protest in the first meeting with the club and fans. But we can't disrupt the team or events on the pitch, that is madness in my eyes.
And just for the record as others have said, no threats were made by me personally other than as a generalization that was shared by a good few, I wouldn't stand by and just allow disruption to events on the pitch without at least trying to prevent it, if that is seen as a threat, then it should only be seen as one by those planning such actions.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:11 am
Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:45 am
Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:46 am
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:22 am
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:34 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:With all the personal abuse and attacks on this thread its quite laughable I get a board warning for calling someone a "moron"
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:39 am
Ruislip Blue wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:With all the personal abuse and attacks on this thread its quite laughable I get a board warning for calling someone a "moron"
You should have called them a c*** or a w***** or a b******. I think they're OK. Anyway, who did you call a moron as a matter of interest?
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:58 am
Gavlar wrote:Daya was doing similar to Taffyapple yesterday or the day before I'm not sure which, why he gets unbanned ill never know.....
Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:20 pm
Daya wrote:
Maybe he watched from his binochulars !!!
Gwyn ---- what was your season ticket number in 1999 ? No trace within the records you having one ?
Or did ou pay on the day during that period ? Couldn't have been egg chasing as you weren't playing for ponty then ?
Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:29 pm
Berwyn wrote:Daya wrote:
Maybe he watched from his binochulars !!!
Gwyn ---- what was your season ticket number in 1999 ? No trace within the records you having one ?
Or did ou pay on the day during that period ? Couldn't have been egg chasing as you weren't playing for ponty then ?
Just for the record.... No one had a season ticket number in 1999. The club didn't have a database until 2001. Before that ST's were simply sold and no decent records were kept by the club. There was this old filing cabinet but that was full of crap that made no sense to anyone. So I don't know what records you are talking about because there wasn't any.
In 1999 they didn't have any computers, they had a typewriter though and two phones.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:30 pm
taffyapple wrote:Gavlar wrote:Daya was doing similar to Taffyapple yesterday or the day before I'm not sure which, why he gets unbanned ill never know.....
You cant ban Daya or Adam.
i'd have nobody to feel superior to then![]()
Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:45 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:48 pm
Angry Man wrote: Recently he spies on the posters at the ground.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:57 pm
Angry Man wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Angry Man wrote: Recently he spies on the posters at the ground.
Oh kinky like a pervert in the wardrobe watching somebody banging his wife, sounds fun, i must confess i've had the bino case out a few times for the neighbour over the back fence![]()
You can laugh asmuch as you want but the poster in quesion (Barry Chuckle) was against the rebrand so what why was Gwyn wanting to know what he looked like..? Another attempt to bully a fellow poster if you ask me.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:58 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:00 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Adam give it up ffs.
Theres a post at the top of this page from Gwyn 3 days after the meeting in July confirming what he said.
This post has made you look silly, not that it takes much to do that, but it makes this whole topic redundant.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:00 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:01 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:Angry Man wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Angry Man wrote: Recently he spies on the posters at the ground.
Oh kinky like a pervert in the wardrobe watching somebody banging his wife, sounds fun, i must confess i've had the bino case out a few times for the neighbour over the back fence![]()
You can laugh asmuch as you want but the poster in quesion (Barry Chuckle) was against the rebrand so what why was Gwyn wanting to know what he looked like..? Another attempt to bully a fellow poster if you ask me.
I have no idea unless you seen gwyn down there with his perving bino's on then i dont even know where this thing has come from besides barry chuckles pic has been on on here a few weeks back in a few threads so most know what he looks like already so i dont get it. Its good to put a face to somebody on here if there reg posters anyway even though we have alot of troll posters in hide mode behind the screen.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:01 pm
Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Adam give it up ffs.
Theres a post at the top of this page from Gwyn 3 days after the meeting in July confirming what he said.
This post has made you look silly, not that it takes much to do that, but it makes this whole topic redundant.
Note its 3 days AFTER FFS!!!!
That is NOT what he said at the meeting and its fact which has been supported by others. Plain and simple.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:02 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:02 pm
kingdong wrote:Louie Spence fails again.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:07 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:13 pm
Angry Man wrote:Its take him 3 days to re-write what he said in front of others FFS!!!!!
The man is a bully pain and simple.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:15 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Angry Man wrote:Its take him 3 days to re-write what he said in front of others FFS!!!!!
The man is a bully pain and simple.
No proof of what he said in a heated meeting and what youve been claiming for 5 months but written proof from 5 months ago
of what hes claimed along.
Hes made you look silly to be fair.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:20 pm
Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Angry Man wrote:Its take him 3 days to re-write what he said in front of others FFS!!!!!
The man is a bully pain and simple.
No proof of what he said in a heated meeting and what youve been claiming for 5 months but written proof from 5 months ago
of what hes claimed along.
Hes made you look silly to be fair.
So others who heard it like Bluebird64 and Annis isn't good enough for your kangaroo court then..?
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:25 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Angry Man wrote:Its take him 3 days to re-write what he said in front of others FFS!!!!!
The man is a bully pain and simple.
No proof of what he said in a heated meeting and what youve been claiming for 5 months but written proof from 5 months ago
of what hes claimed along.
Hes made you look silly to be fair.
So others who heard it like Bluebird64 and Annis isn't good enough for your kangaroo court then..?
The only one holding kangaroo court was you and the evidence has been presented and made you look foolish.
Written signed statement will always prove to be better evidence than verbal hearsay. In any court.
As for Bluebird64 he was adamant Gwyn had posted it on here until the evidence presented itself. Hmmmm.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:29 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:44 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:47 pm
Berwyn wrote:ANGRY MAN..... WILL YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION FOR ME????
I keep asking a straight forward question but you seem to miss it or ignore it. Why thuogh I don't know.
Anyway here is my question again!!!
With you being more right wing than Thatcher was and Merthyr being more left wing than Cuba. How did you get elected up there? Who did you stand for and how did an extreme right wing person manage to get voted in up there?
Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:51 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Berwyn wrote:ANGRY MAN..... WILL YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION FOR ME????
I keep asking a straight forward question but you seem to miss it or ignore it. Why thuogh I don't know.
Anyway here is my question again!!!
With you being more right wing than Thatcher was and Merthyr being more left wing than Cuba. How did you get elected up there? Who did you stand for and how did an extreme right wing person manage to get voted in up there?
The Gurnos is right wing, no immigrants up there.
He got in because when he was shouting Vote for Brown the people of the gurnos thought they were voting for Heroin.