Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:34 pm
llan bluebird wrote:Well I hope his favourite colour is blue !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:39 pm
No Smoking wrote:taffyapple wrote:Parasite:
An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a
different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host
Not Tan.
He is fully developed billionaire. He certainly does not shelter, or live off Cardiff City.
And as for contributing nothing?![]()
![]()
Righto.
Tan isn't a billionaire.
Secondly, anyone that takes from its host in order for selfish gain is a parasite. Everything tan gives he wants back AND more while taking our identity.
Sorry bud, but in football terms Tan is as close to a parasite as you are ever go into get.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:49 pm
No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:53 pm
No Smoking wrote:taffyapple wrote:Parasite:
An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a
different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host
Not Tan.
He is fully developed billionaire. He certainly does not shelter, or live off Cardiff City.
And as for contributing nothing?![]()
![]()
Righto.
Tan isn't a billionaire.
Secondly, anyone that takes from its host in order for selfish gain is a parasite. Everything tan gives he wants back AND more while taking our identity.
Sorry bud, but in football terms Tan is as close to a parasite as you are ever go into get.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:55 pm
Slow Train wrote:No Smoking wrote:taffyapple wrote:Parasite:
An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a
different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host
Not Tan.
He is fully developed billionaire. He certainly does not shelter, or live off Cardiff City.
And as for contributing nothing?![]()
![]()
Righto.
Tan isn't a billionaire.
Secondly, anyone that takes from its host in order for selfish gain is a parasite. Everything tan gives he wants back AND more while taking our identity.
Sorry bud, but in football terms Tan is as close to a parasite as you are ever go into get.
And our fans are like junkies getting their fix of cash and fame, without worrying about the shitstorm of a comedown just down the road
Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:57 pm
rb1976 wrote:Slow Train wrote:No Smoking wrote:taffyapple wrote:Parasite:
An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a
different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host
Not Tan.
He is fully developed billionaire. He certainly does not shelter, or live off Cardiff City.
And as for contributing nothing?![]()
![]()
Righto.
Tan isn't a billionaire.
Secondly, anyone that takes from its host in order for selfish gain is a parasite. Everything tan gives he wants back AND more while taking our identity.
Sorry bud, but in football terms Tan is as close to a parasite as you are ever go into get.
And our fans are like junkies getting their fix of cash and fame, without worrying about the shitstorm of a comedown just down the road
Our fans?
Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:58 pm
Slow Train wrote:rb1976 wrote:Slow Train wrote:No Smoking wrote:taffyapple wrote:Parasite:
An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a
different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host
Not Tan.
He is fully developed billionaire. He certainly does not shelter, or live off Cardiff City.
And as for contributing nothing?![]()
![]()
Righto.
Tan isn't a billionaire.
Secondly, anyone that takes from its host in order for selfish gain is a parasite. Everything tan gives he wants back AND more while taking our identity.
Sorry bud, but in football terms Tan is as close to a parasite as you are ever go into get.
And our fans are like junkies getting their fix of cash and fame, without worrying about the shitstorm of a comedown just down the road
Our fans?
Yes, they show little concern about our finances. People saying we need to sign 3 more players, when we are already down 20mil+ a year
Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:00 pm
glas wrote:If he is a sultan, he should be ok for raisin some money.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:01 pm
rb1976 wrote:Slow Train wrote:rb1976 wrote:Slow Train wrote:No Smoking wrote:taffyapple wrote:Parasite:
An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a
different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host
Not Tan.
He is fully developed billionaire. He certainly does not shelter, or live off Cardiff City.
And as for contributing nothing?![]()
![]()
Righto.
Tan isn't a billionaire.
Secondly, anyone that takes from its host in order for selfish gain is a parasite. Everything tan gives he wants back AND more while taking our identity.
Sorry bud, but in football terms Tan is as close to a parasite as you are ever go into get.
And our fans are like junkies getting their fix of cash and fame, without worrying about the shitstorm of a comedown just down the road
Our fans?
Yes, they show little concern about our finances. People saying we need to sign 3 more players, when we are already down 20mil+ a year
People?
Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:12 pm
Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:42 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Roath faggot,
good evening.
This has been a most productive thread.
Hi again![]()
You have clearly shown your jack b*stard colours.
by correcting so,e inaccuracies? Oh right?![]()
You have also admitted your homosexual tendancies.
are you against homosexuals then? You are awfully defensive about the subject considering you have posted time and time about other men masterbatingThe lady doth protest too much? Who knew liking jonbrand would make me gay? Oh well, I'll roll with it
![]()
What next I wonder.
The creme de menthe obviously has an effect.You should lay off it.
What larks!
have you managed to correctly count to seven yet?![]()
p.s.
regarding currencies you didn't answer my earlier post regarding the gold standard. Any chance of an explanation?
You can barely string a sentence together without talking about men's sexual preferences, male masterbation or your fantasy man roath. With a string of homophopic bile.....I'm sure it wasn't worth reading,
P.s. I think you have passed the 50% mark now. 50% of your posts dedicated to your fantasy man roath of someone else you wish to be him. That really is incredible![]()
Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:43 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:50 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Incorrect.
There really isn't anymore I need to add.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:51 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Incorrect.
There really isn't anymore I need to add.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:52 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Incorrect.
There really isn't anymore I need to add.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:55 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Incorrect.
There really isn't anymore I need to add.
I am correct
Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:58 pm
pembroke allan wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Incorrect.
There really isn't anymore I need to add.
I am correct
there is no empire only commenwealth, as just stated all world commodities are traded in dollars!! oil/grain ect ect
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:00 pm
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:00 pm
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:02 pm
thehumblegringo wrote:Why pple take the time to answer this tw*t is beyond me. He is a complete and utter c**t who i wouldnt piss on if he was on fire
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:03 pm
thehumblegringo wrote:Why pple take the time to answer this tw*t is beyond me. He is a complete and utter c**t who i wouldnt piss on if he was on fire
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:26 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Incorrect.
There really isn't anymore I need to add.
Evening NS I see you're still at it. I'm intrigued by this dollar question. Surely you admit that the US dollar is the most traded currency in the world?
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:27 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Incorrect.
There really isn't anymore I need to add.
I am correct
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:28 pm
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:32 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:cityone wrote:Tan is a dollar (U.S) billionaire, most money men world wide are based on or compared by U.S dollars.
Not sensible ones that are based in the uk.
The British empire is long gone the world trades in dollars.
Incorrect.
There really isn't anymore I need to add.
I am correct
No you
What did west ham do with the bundle of US dollars we gave them for Maynard?
Must be a pain for the players to have to take a trip to the bureau de chancge every week.
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:33 pm
pembroke allan wrote:i love it when i am right (see above comments) change subject!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:34 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
I am correct
No you aren't
What did west ham do with the bundle of US dollars we gave them for Maynard?
Must be a pain for the players to have to take a trip to the bureau de chancge every week.
But I'm still correct
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:36 pm
No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:i love it when i am right (see above comments) change subject!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What? Where have I changed the subject? We are talking about this dollar nonsense still are we not?
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:37 pm
Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:38 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:i love it when i am right (see above comments) change subject!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What? Where have I changed the subject? We are talking about this dollar nonsense still are we not?
Are you party to the clubs accounts. NO
Your just guessing really aren't you.