Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:23 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Nope, we have a much better squad than Palace, WBA, Fulham, Norwich, possibly Stoke.
The players are good enough, the managers over the season haven't organised or motivated them properly.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For 40m we spent we SHOULD have a better squad than the likes of Palace.
Unfortunately we dont.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:33 pm
Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Nope, we have a much better squad than Palace, WBA, Fulham, Norwich, possibly Stoke.
The players are good enough, the managers over the season haven't organised or motivated them properly.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For 40m we spent we SHOULD have a better squad than the likes of Palace.
Unfortunately we dont.
Palace have a worse squad, but a much better manager. A manager that would give you a kickin if you performed some of the ways we have.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:55 pm
DandoCCFC wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:Baffled the fans have no bad word on MM despite milking OUR CLUB dry of 50 million.
Proof please? Or is this yet another assumption from the anti Malky brigade? Love the fact the anti Malky lot are still criticising Malky's spending, despite him managing to continuously keep us above the relegation zone with these signings.
Proof, transfers. Because spending 50 million and only got our head above water despite getting creamed in 30 minutes v Southampton.
It's almost if supporters are happy he milked our club dry of 50 million, how delusional can you be.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:59 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Nope, we have a much better squad than Palace, WBA, Fulham, Norwich, possibly Stoke.
The players are good enough, the managers over the season haven't organised or motivated them properly.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For 40m we spent we SHOULD have a better squad than the likes of Palace.
Unfortunately we dont.
Palace have a worse squad, but a much better manager. A manager that would give you a kickin if you performed some of the ways we have.
No offence you think Taylor is "quality" so you are the last person whos opinion I would listen to on which squad is better.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:07 pm
daleccfcmapley wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Nope, we have a much better squad than Palace, WBA, Fulham, Norwich, possibly Stoke.
The players are good enough, the managers over the season haven't organised or motivated them properly.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For 40m we spent we SHOULD have a better squad than the likes of Palace.
Unfortunately we dont.
Palace have a worse squad, but a much better manager. A manager that would give you a kickin if you performed some of the ways we have.
No offence you think Taylor is "quality" so you are the last person whos opinion I would listen to on which squad is better.
mario is a idiot we have about 5 decent players yet he thinks that we have better squad than nowrich fulham and stoke who have been in the premier league for years he is f*cking clueless
Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:51 pm
daleccfcmapley wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Nope, we have a much better squad than Palace, WBA, Fulham, Norwich, possibly Stoke.
The players are good enough, the managers over the season haven't organised or motivated them properly.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For 40m we spent we SHOULD have a better squad than the likes of Palace.
Unfortunately we dont.
Palace have a worse squad, but a much better manager. A manager that would give you a kickin if you performed some of the ways we have.
No offence you think Taylor is "quality" so you are the last person whos opinion I would listen to on which squad is better.
mario is a idiot we have about 5 decent players yet he thinks that we have better squad than nowrich fulham and stoke who have been in the premier league for years he is f*cking clueless
Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:20 pm
Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:25 pm
Mario wrote:daleccfcmapley wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Nope, we have a much better squad than Palace, WBA, Fulham, Norwich, possibly Stoke.
The players are good enough, the managers over the season haven't organised or motivated them properly.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For 40m we spent we SHOULD have a better squad than the likes of Palace.
Unfortunately we dont.
Palace have a worse squad, but a much better manager. A manager that would give you a kickin if you performed some of the ways we have.
No offence you think Taylor is "quality" so you are the last person whos opinion I would listen to on which squad is better.
mario is a idiot we have about 5 decent players yet he thinks that we have better squad than nowrich fulham and stoke who have been in the premier league for years he is f*cking clueless
Chill out you little rent boy.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:03 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:Baffled the fans have no bad word on MM despite milking OUR CLUB dry of 50 million.
Proof please? Or is this yet another assumption from the anti Malky brigade? Love the fact the anti Malky lot are still criticising Malky's spending, despite him managing to continuously keep us above the relegation zone with these signings.
Proof, transfers. Because spending 50 million and only got our head above water despite getting creamed in 30 minutes v Southampton.
It's almost if supporters are happy he milked our club dry of 50 million, how delusional can you be.
Kenny Dalglish has obviously milked his beloved Liverpool dry then and Tony Pulis milked Stoke dry signing Kenwyne Jones for 8 million. What about Alex Ferguson milking Man Utd dry by signing Bebe for 7.5 million too! You've heard it first, every manager who makes a poor signing is milking his club dry, which would mean EVERY manager at some point has milked his club dry! Well that's the case in Dando's world anyway!
Did anyone think Malky was milking our club dry when we beat Man City, won at Fulham, drew against Everton and Hull and started the season well? No!
But once again, you use the Southampton game when the DAMAGE BY TAN WAS ALREADY DONE!