Strange one ince to jacks on loan??

Raothie says he rarely changes his opinion but then changes his opinion of what a top side is in the space of 4 months

"Rarely" being the operative word of course

And it hasnt actually changed in the context he is on about. I wouldnt call Everton a top side in the same bracket as the top 4 sides which is what it was about after reading it.

However Everton have improved and i would consider them a top side, but not ONE of the top sides. All about context.

Likewise chump, at you squirming.

Managed to work google yet?

Yep and it says Everton are a top side (no they're not, yes they are etc) and that 'seem' is a word you're allowed to use to express a personal opinion

Likewise chump, at you squirming.

Managed to work google yet?

Yep and it says Everton are a top side (no they're not, yes they are etc) and that 'seem' is a word you're allowed to use to express a personal opinion

Read above chump

Where are these google screenshots Mr Jobs?

Raothie says he rarely changes his opinion but then changes his opinion of what a top side is in the space of 4 months

"Rarely" being the operative word of course

And it hasnt actually changed in the context he is on about. I wouldnt call Everton a top side in the same bracket as the top 4 sides which is what it was about after reading it.

However Everton have improved and i would consider them a top side, but not ONE of the top sides. All about context.

This has nothing to do with context, in that thread you clearly stated Everton wont finish in the top 6 therefore not a top side then you go on yourself to say they can't be a top side as the have never finished in the top 3. However, now in your opinion to be a top side you just have to be in the top 10. Therefore, your opinion of what a top side is has changed so not exactlly rare is it when you continuously move the goal posts.

How can Everton be a top side but not one of the top sides? Surely its the same thing

Likewise chump, at you squirming.

Managed to work google yet?

Yep and it says Everton are a top side (no they're not, yes they are etc) and that 'seem' is a word you're allowed to use to express a personal opinion

Read above chump

Where are these google screenshots Mr Jobs?

I don't know where are they you schizo?

Raothie says he rarely changes his opinion but then changes his opinion of what a top side is in the space of 4 months

"Rarely" being the operative word of course

And it hasnt actually changed in the context he is on about. I wouldnt call Everton a top side in the same bracket as the top 4 sides which is what it was about after reading it.

However Everton have improved and i would consider them a top side, but not ONE of the top sides. All about context.

This has nothing to do with context, in that thread you clearly stated Everton wont finish in the top 6 therefore not a top side then you go on yourself to say they can't be a top side as the have never finished in the top 3. However, now in your opinion to be a top side you just have to be in the top 10. Therefore, your opinion of what a top side is has changed so not exactlly rare is it when you continuously move the goal posts.

How can Everton be a top side but not one of the top sides? Surely its the same thing

It has everything to do with context. As ive said the term "top side" is as vague a term as you can get. I guess depending on context Leeds cam be considered one of the "top sides in england" considering they are in the "top" 2 tiers.

Hiwever my discussion with Alex was was regarding comparing eachothers fixtures. I said we had already played top sides in Chelsea, Arsenal and Man United - where he tried of offset one of those with Everton.

In that scenario I wouldnt call everton a top side. As i said, context is everything.

I don't know where are they you schizo?

So you arent doing it then Chorizo? You said you typed the, in and couldnt find anything even though the first page is littered with them

I don't know where are they you schizo?

So you arent doing it then Chorizo? You said you typed the, in and couldnt find anything even though the first page is littered with them

Where did I say I'd googled anything (if that's what you meant by "typed the, in")? More lies to suit your flawed argument schizo

I don't know where are they you schizo?

So you arent doing it then Chorizo? You said you typed the, in and couldnt find anything even though the first page is littered with them

Where did I say I'd googled anything (if that's what you meant by "typed the, in")? More lies to suit your flawed argument schizo

You asked for articles on spurs and liverpool interest.

I said type it into google and you will see for yourself.

You responded with "so there arent any then"

You are claiming there arent any even though ive told you where thet are? Is that a lie to suit your agenda carps?

Raothie says he rarely changes his opinion but then changes his opinion of what a top side is in the space of 4 months

"Rarely" being the operative word of course

And it hasnt actually changed in the context he is on about. I wouldnt call Everton a top side in the same bracket as the top 4 sides which is what it was about after reading it.

However Everton have improved and i would consider them a top side, but not ONE of the top sides. All about context.

This has nothing to do with context, in that thread you clearly stated Everton wont finish in the top 6 therefore not a top side then you go on yourself to say they can't be a top side as the have never finished in the top 3. However, now in your opinion to be a top side you just have to be in the top 10. Therefore, your opinion of what a top side is has changed so not exactlly rare is it when you continuously move the goal posts.

How can Everton be a top side but not one of the top sides? Surely its the same thing

It has everything to do with context. As ive said the term "top side" is as vague a term as you can get. I guess depending on context Leeds cam be considered one of the "top sides in england" considering they are in the "top" 2 tiers.

Hiwever my discussion with Alex was was regarding comparing eachothers fixtures. I said we had already played top sides in Chelsea, Arsenal and Man United - where he tried of offset one of those with Everton.

In that scenario I wouldnt call everton a top side. As i said, context is everything.

You were comparing top 6 sides where you disregarded Everton nothing to do with Alex comparing them to Man Utd or Chelsea.

In that thread you clearly state Everton can't be classed as a top side as they have never finished in the top 3, that doesnt need context. Now according to you, you can be a top side as long as you finish in the top 10. Big difference there

A top side with no chance of finishing top, never compete in the modern day champions league (once maybe) and never finished in the top 3 in Prem history. Give over ffs

Theres being pedantic and then theres just being argumentative for the sake of it. Stop now because i have far more stats to pull out

I think that explains what you think a top side is then doesnt it

Raothie says he rarely changes his opinion but then changes his opinion of what a top side is in the space of 4 months

"Rarely" being the operative word of course

And it hasnt actually changed in the context he is on about. I wouldnt call Everton a top side in the same bracket as the top 4 sides which is what it was about after reading it.

However Everton have improved and i would consider them a top side, but not ONE of the top sides. All about context.

This has nothing to do with context, in that thread you clearly stated Everton wont finish in the top 6 therefore not a top side then you go on yourself to say they can't be a top side as the have never finished in the top 3. However, now in your opinion to be a top side you just have to be in the top 10. Therefore, your opinion of what a top side is has changed so not exactlly rare is it when you continuously move the goal posts.

How can Everton be a top side but not one of the top sides? Surely its the same thing

It has everything to do with context. As ive said the term "top side" is as vague a term as you can get. I guess depending on context Leeds cam be considered one of the "top sides in england" considering they are in the "top" 2 tiers.

Hiwever my discussion with Alex was was regarding comparing eachothers fixtures. I said we had already played top sides in Chelsea, Arsenal and Man United - where he tried of offset one of those with Everton.

In that scenario I wouldnt call everton a top side. As i said, context is everything.

You were comparing top 6 sides where you disregarded Everton nothing to do with Alex comparing them to Man Utd or Chelsea.

In that thread you clearly state Everton can't be classed as a top side as they have never finished in the top 3, that doesnt need context. Now according to you, you can be a top side as long as you finish in the top 10. Big difference there

A top side with no chance of finishing top, never compete in the modern day champions league (once maybe) and never finished in the top 3 in Prem history. Give over ffs

Theres being pedantic and then theres just being argumentative for the sake of it. Stop now because i have far more stats to pull out

I think that explains what you think a top side is then doesnt it

in the context we were discussing then yes that sums it up perfectly and stick by that.

I have no need to stop, i stand by every word. Give me your best shot

Raothie says he rarely changes his opinion but then changes his opinion of what a top side is in the space of 4 months

"Rarely" being the operative word of course

And it hasnt actually changed in the context he is on about. I wouldnt call Everton a top side in the same bracket as the top 4 sides which is what it was about after reading it.

However Everton have improved and i would consider them a top side, but not ONE of the top sides. All about context.

This has nothing to do with context, in that thread you clearly stated Everton wont finish in the top 6 therefore not a top side then you go on yourself to say they can't be a top side as the have never finished in the top 3. However, now in your opinion to be a top side you just have to be in the top 10. Therefore, your opinion of what a top side is has changed so not exactlly rare is it when you continuously move the goal posts.

How can Everton be a top side but not one of the top sides? Surely its the same thing

It has everything to do with context. As ive said the term "top side" is as vague a term as you can get. I guess depending on context Leeds cam be considered one of the "top sides in england" considering they are in the "top" 2 tiers.

Hiwever my discussion with Alex was was regarding comparing eachothers fixtures. I said we had already played top sides in Chelsea, Arsenal and Man United - where he tried of offset one of those with Everton.

In that scenario I wouldnt call everton a top side. As i said, context is everything.

You were comparing top 6 sides where you disregarded Everton nothing to do with Alex comparing them to Man Utd or Chelsea.

In that thread you clearly state Everton can't be classed as a top side as they have never finished in the top 3, that doesnt need context. Now according to you, you can be a top side as long as you finish in the top 10. Big difference there

A top side with no chance of finishing top, never compete in the modern day champions league (once maybe) and never finished in the top 3 in Prem history. Give over ffs

Theres being pedantic and then theres just being argumentative for the sake of it. Stop now because i have far more stats to pull out

I think that explains what you think a top side is then doesnt it

in the context we were discussing then yes that sums it up perfectly and stick by that.

I have no need to stop, i stand by every word. Give me your best shot

I'm still puzzeled how Everton are now a top side but not one of the top side? Same thing really

Raothie says he rarely changes his opinion but then changes his opinion of what a top side is in the space of 4 months

"Rarely" being the operative word of course

And it hasnt actually changed in the context he is on about. I wouldnt call Everton a top side in the same bracket as the top 4 sides which is what it was about after reading it.

However Everton have improved and i would consider them a top side, but not ONE of the top sides. All about context.

This has nothing to do with context, in that thread you clearly stated Everton wont finish in the top 6 therefore not a top side then you go on yourself to say they can't be a top side as the have never finished in the top 3. However, now in your opinion to be a top side you just have to be in the top 10. Therefore, your opinion of what a top side is has changed so not exactlly rare is it when you continuously move the goal posts.

How can Everton be a top side but not one of the top sides? Surely its the same thing

It has everything to do with context. As ive said the term "top side" is as vague a term as you can get. I guess depending on context Leeds cam be considered one of the "top sides in england" considering they are in the "top" 2 tiers.

Hiwever my discussion with Alex was was regarding comparing eachothers fixtures. I said we had already played top sides in Chelsea, Arsenal and Man United - where he tried of offset one of those with Everton.

In that scenario I wouldnt call everton a top side. As i said, context is everything.

You were comparing top 6 sides where you disregarded Everton nothing to do with Alex comparing them to Man Utd or Chelsea.

In that thread you clearly state Everton can't be classed as a top side as they have never finished in the top 3, that doesnt need context. Now according to you, you can be a top side as long as you finish in the top 10. Big difference there

A top side with no chance of finishing top, never compete in the modern day champions league (once maybe) and never finished in the top 3 in Prem history. Give over ffs

Theres being pedantic and then theres just being argumentative for the sake of it. Stop now because i have far more stats to pull out

I think that explains what you think a top side is then doesnt it

in the context we were discussing then yes that sums it up perfectly and stick by that.

I have no need to stop, i stand by every word. Give me your best shot

I'm still puzzeled how Everton are now a top side but not one of the top side? Same thing really

Well if you would stop getting excited and listen then you would understand.

Leeds united are in the top 2 tiers of english football. 32nd out of 92. It could be said they are one of the top teams in the country. But if discussing the big guns of the prem using the word top then Leeds most certainly wouldmt be considered a top team.

For this debate to progress you must understand the word "context".

Look at rugby with the TMO. Same replay, but depending on the slight difference in wording to the question from the referee the TMO will have a differing result. Context.

I don't know where are they you schizo?

So you arent doing it then Chorizo? You said you typed the, in and couldnt find anything even though the first page is littered with them

Where did I say I'd googled anything (if that's what you meant by "typed the, in")? More lies to suit your flawed argument schizo

You asked for articles on spurs and liverpool interest.

I said type it into google and you will see for yourself.

You responded with "so there arent any then"

You are claiming there arent any even though ive told you where thet are? Is that a lie to suit your agenda carps?

Why would I follow direction from you schizo? You're my bitch and the onus was on you. Google away!

So why haven't a 'top' PL club moved for him by now, either last summer or now with only 4 days of the window to go?

Why would I follow direction from you schizo? You're my bitch and the onus was on you. Google away!

So why haven't a 'top' PL club moved for him by now, either last summer or now with only 4 days of the window to go?

Because YOU wanted to know Columbo

Now onto your second claim - how do you know they havent? Is this another lie to suit your agenda?

I want proof they havent

Why would I follow direction from you schizo? You're my bitch and the onus was on you. Google away!

So why haven't a 'top' PL club moved for him by now, either last summer or now with only 4 days of the window to go?

Because YOU wanted to know Columbo

Now onto your second claim - how do you know they havent? Is this another lie to suit your agenda?

I want proof they havent

I want proof they have. Easier to prove they have since that would constitute an action on their part that would be more tangible than doing nothing which seems to be the case. So you can't find anything then? You suggested you were going to show me an article saying liverpool and spurs wanted him? Link? A good source or just paper speculation? I still believe that if a top club did want him they would get him. Does laudrup even want him?

Apology accepted for your lie about me not finding anything on google

Why would I follow direction from you schizo? You're my bitch and the onus was on you. Google away!

So why haven't a 'top' PL club moved for him by now, either last summer or now with only 4 days of the window to go?

Because YOU wanted to know Columbo

Now onto your second claim - how do you know they havent? Is this another lie to suit your agenda?

I want proof they havent

No, He wanted to know if you knew, hence asking YOU. you don't half misread social situations my little aspergoid.( will you request this thread be removed like the rest, solely because I have flagged up your psychiatric condition)?

With regard Everton, Context is everything & the context was set and everybody apart from you understood the context my little aspergoid.

This wouldn't need saying to a nuerotypical but with you it must ne spelled out, I will won't be induldging you with a reply, you lack the emotional intelligence for sensible conversation and probably suffer waves of anxiety from argueing on here.

Regards

Always

Why would I follow direction from you schizo? You're my bitch and the onus was on you. Google away!

So why haven't a 'top' PL club moved for him by now, either last summer or now with only 4 days of the window to go?

Because YOU wanted to know Columbo

Now onto your second claim - how do you know they havent? Is this another lie to suit your agenda?

I want proof they havent

I want proof they have. Easier to prove they have since that would constitute an action on their part that would be more tangible than doing nothing which seems to be the case. So you can't find anything then? You suggested you were going to show me an article saying liverpool and spurs wanted him? Link? A good source or just paper speculation? I still believe that if a top club did want him they would get him. Does laudrup even want him?

Apology accepted for your lie about me not finding anything on google

I have showed you where to find it.

Now i want proof they havent

Apology accepted regarding your lie that nobody has come in for him

Why would I follow direction from you schizo? You're my bitch and the onus was on you. Google away!

So why haven't a 'top' PL club moved for him by now, either last summer or now with only 4 days of the window to go?

Because YOU wanted to know Columbo

Now onto your second claim - how do you know they havent? Is this another lie to suit your agenda?

I want proof they havent

No, He wanted to know if you knew, hence asking YOU. you don't half misread social situations my little aspergoid.( will you request this thread be removed like the rest, solely because I have flagged up your psychiatric condition)?

no my little obsessive. He wanted to know

With regard Everton, Context is everything & the context was set and everybody apart from you understood the context my little aspergoid.

i set the context my little obsessive, it was my discussion - therefore it seems i was the ONLY one that understood it. I know you struggle with simple concepts but theres another to decipher

This wouldn't need saying to a nuerotypical but with you it must ne spelled out, I will won't be induldging you with a reply, you lack the emotional intelligence for sensible conversation and probably suffer waves of anxiety from argueing on here.

because i wipe the floor with you thats why and point out your awful contradictions on a post by post basis mirror boy

Regards

Always

bye again

Top marks to the lad. He gets an absolute mauling , but still comes back for more.
He takes a leathering , but returns every time !

Top marks to the lad. He gets an absolute mauling , but still comes back for more.
He takes a leathering , but returns every time !

Thats what all the obsessives say when they cant win. Its Townhillmagics favourite saying

Winning becomes a habit, what can I say

Top marks to the lad. He gets an absolute mauling , but still comes back for more.
He takes a leathering , but returns every time !

He lacks the self control to stop even if harming his carefully contructed persona. It's a form of self neglect, which is why he will always need a quasi carer in his life, be that mother or aunt, sister(for the tennis)

With regard this worrying thread, Only he understands the context In my line of work people this 'out there' and detatched from a consensus point of view. They are often displaying precursory delusional ideation. If his Psychiatrist were watching this, He/She would have him in for assessment and want to see him every few days for atleast a fortnight just to see if his disaasociation develops into full blown Psychosis.He does persist without incurring damage to dignity but this arguments will zap his cortisl reserves as he engages with this board in a highly stressful 'fight or flight' approach. How this thread goes from here may well determine if Roathie gets sectioned.

Regards

Always

Top marks to the lad. He gets an absolute mauling , but still comes back for more.
He takes a leathering , but returns every time !

He lacks the self control to stop even if harming his carefully contructed persona. It's a form of self neglect, which is why he will always need a quasi carer in his life, be that mother or aunt, sister(for the tennis)

With regard this worrying thread,Only he understands the context In my line of work people this 'out there' and detatched from a consensus point of view. They are often displaying precursory delusional ideation. If his Psychiatrist were watching this, He/She would have him in for assessment and want to see him every few days for atleast a fortnight just to see if his disaasociation develops into full blown Psychosis.He does persist without incurring damage to dignity but this arguments will zap his cortisl reserves, as he engages with this board in a highly stressful 'fight or flight' approach. How this thread goes from here may well determine if Roathie gets sectioned.

Regards

Always

There is no way on Gods green earth you have a job

You have one line of argument, that you admit you stole and only use it because it makes you believe i get "uncomfortable" and lack the intellect to portray it.

completely unable to put across what you are trying to display without showing the traits yourself... When this gets pointed out you then start name calling in a rage

Awfully entertaining to watch though

Regards

Roathways

Won't be joining us looks like he's doing the same with us as he did with you , using us to prompt other teams into making an offer

Won't be joining us looks like he's doing the same with us as he did with you , using us to prompt other teams into making an offer

Told you jacks so, out of your range, go and get Ngog

Won't be joining us looks like he's doing the same with us as he did with you , using us to prompt other teams into making an offer

Told you jacks so, out of your range, go and get Ngog

Bookmarked.

Won't be joining us looks like he's doing the same with us as he did with you , using us to prompt other teams into making an offer

Told you jacks so, out of your range, go and get Ngog

I can't converse with you sorry you really are too stupid for words

what a childs way of wriggling from a lie. As if anybody on the internet is to believe
you will pay money. I can say now i am sat here with three testicles hanging and nobody
would believe. what a stupid man you are goodbye from me

So where is your proof this isn't the case then testicle boy?

You said these deals do exist but definitely dont with Ince and Swansea. I will go by your perimeters of acceptance and I want proof please. Prove it!

You hypocrite

Softy Softy catchy Monkey.
The lesson is - Dont talk rubbish unless you can prove it
My testicle claim was ridiculous and without a foundation. As was yours about the Ince deal to Swansea

what a childs way of wriggling from a lie. As if anybody on the internet is to believe
you will pay money. I can say now i am sat here with three testicles hanging and nobody
would believe. what a stupid man you are goodbye from me

So where is your proof this isn't the case then testicle boy?

You said these deals do exist but definitely dont with Ince and Swansea. I will go by your perimeters of acceptance and I want proof please. Prove it!

You hypocrite

Softy Softy catchy Monkey.
The lesson is - Dont talk rubbish unless you can prove it
My testicle claim was ridiculous and without a foundation. As was yours about the Ince deal to Swansea

Tom Ince will hold talks with Swansea this afternoon after Blackpool gave the England Under-21 winger permission to move on loan to a Premier League club for the rest of the season.

Ince is out of contract in the summer but the Seasiders, who sacked the player’s dad Paul as boss last week, have agreed to let him go now in return for a loan fee.

‘Following discussions with Thomas Ince and his representative, permission has been given for Thomas to discuss a loan move to a Premier League club,’ confirmed a statement from the Championship strugglers.

‘Thomas has expressed his ambition to play in the Premier League for the remainder of the season, a decision that the club fully understands and supports.’

Crystal Palace and Hull are also interested in the former Liverpool man, but Swansea appear to be in pole position after it emerged Ince would travel to south Wales for talks.

Swansea’s local rivals Cardiff agreed an £8million fee for Ince last summer but the player rejected the move. The current option allows Ince the opportunity to prove himself at Premier League level, then test the transfer market as a free agent in the summer.

what a childs way of wriggling from a lie. As if anybody on the internet is to believe
you will pay money. I can say now i am sat here with three testicles hanging and nobody
would believe. what a stupid man you are goodbye from me

So where is your proof this isn't the case then testicle boy?

You said these deals do exist but definitely dont with Ince and Swansea. I will go by your perimeters of acceptance and I want proof please. Prove it!

You hypocrite

Softy Softy catchy Monkey.
The lesson is - Dont talk rubbish unless you can prove it
My testicle claim was ridiculous and without a foundation. As was yours about the Ince deal to Swansea

Yet you havent proved your claim either

Do you know the word hypocrite?