Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:14 pm

Barry I can not fathom why they are so obtuse! Do you think it is genetic?

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:16 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:Barry I can not fathom why they are so obtuse! Do you think it is genetic?


Are you suggesting people that disagree with you have a genetic disability?

Thats sick.

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:17 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:Get in touch with reality! Do you really consider WBA to be a top ten premier league side? Genuine question!


Genuine answer. Last year they finished 8th. That is top ten. As I said, whether they maintain that status at the end of this season remains to be seen. At present they are only five points off being a top ten club, so with 19 games remaining it's still very possible. However, as I have said, you cannot dispute the fact that last season they finished eighth and so are a top ten club. You can only judge a club on it's final position

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:18 pm

But they aren't.. As the current table proves. :laughing6:

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:21 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:Barry I can not fathom why they are so obtuse! Do you think it is genetic?


Why am I being obtuse? It appears that you are the one with the difficulty in understanding simple statements of fact. Are there any points in any of my posts that are factually inaccurate? If so, please point them out. If not, please let me know which parts of my explanation you don't understand and I will try to explain it to you in shorter words to help you out

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:21 pm

Don't be a smart arse, I never implied any disability! Unlike, your crude remark about cutting up food! You have read things into my comments that are not explicit,
These are constraints of written communication you fail to comprehend.
Get back in your closet and pretend . to follow Norwegian football.
Excuse my diction, so very hard when your intoxicated and disabled.

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:22 pm

PremierJacks - relying on facts, but ignoring the one that proves him wrong.

:laughing6:

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:23 pm

So what is the latest with Solskjaer then? :sleepy2:

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:24 pm

WolvesBluebird wrote:So what is the latest with Solskjaer then? :sleepy2:


Who gives a shit - this is much more fun!

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:24 pm

So,are Hull City a bottom three club?

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:26 pm

So what is the latest with Solskjaer then? :sleepy2:

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:26 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks - relying on facts, but ignoring the one that proves him wrong.

:laughing6:


Once again I will ask - point out any facts in my statements that are incorrect

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:27 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:So,are Hull City a bottom three club?


No - Hull's status cannot be decided until the end of the season when they're finishing position is established

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:28 pm

What about Hull City?

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:28 pm

So what is the latest with Solskjaer then? :sleepy2:

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:30 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:What about Hull City?


Haven't you already asked that question?

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:31 pm

WolvesBluebird wrote:So what is the latest with Solskjaer then? :sleepy2:


Who?

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:32 pm

So, Hull City, above you in the league have no status? Are thy bottom three side?
Try telling that to their fans!
They have a proven record over 19 games, but that's. nothing to the ultimate authority that is Jack fans.
Deluded!
Last edited by beddaubluebird on Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:34 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:Don't be a smart arse, I never implied any disability! Unlike, your crude remark about cutting up food! You have read things into my comments that are not explicit,
These are constraints of written communication you fail to comprehend.
Get back in your closet and pretend . to follow Norwegian football.
Excuse my diction, so very hard when your intoxicated and disabled.


:lol: so you are the only one that is allowed to imply such a thing? Sounds about right with you :D

You still havent showed me where I have claimed to follow Norwegian football, claimed to know better than Laudrup, said you were disabled etc etc for all this nonsense you dont have much to back yourself up do you :lol:

Now is your chance - the forum is watching.....

Please excuse my genetically disabled sense. :laughing6:

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:36 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:So, Hull City, above you in the league have no status? Are thy bottom three side?
Try telling that to their fans!
They have a proven record over 19 games, but thee ants nothing to the ultimate authority that is Jack fans.
Deluded!


No, realistic. I seem to remember a couple of seasons ago Blackpool (who beat you in the play offs, I believe) having 28 points after 19 games, but got only about 7 points in the second half of the season, ending in relegation. That's why you can only judge a club's status after the 38 games.

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:36 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:So, Hull City, above you in the league have no status? Are thy bottom three side?
Try telling that to their fans!
They have a proven record over 19 games, but that's. nothing to the ultimate authority that is Jack fans.
Deluded!


They are a newly promoted side. I would happily tell them they are not a top 10 side. Finish in the top 10 and they can have that status until it changes :thumbup:

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:37 pm

PremierJacks wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks - relying on facts, but ignoring the one that proves him wrong.

:laughing6:


Once again I will ask - point out any facts in my statements that are incorrect

That swansea are a top 10 club. :laughing6:

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:39 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
PremierJacks wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks - relying on facts, but ignoring the one that proves him wrong.

:laughing6:


Once again I will ask - point out any facts in my statements that are incorrect

That swansea are a top 10 club. :laughing6:


Read the posts

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:42 pm

I have. Your statement that Swansea are a top 10 side is factually incorrect.

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:43 pm

Not once have I said that people fromSwansea are genetically inferior, you need to read far more carefully Castro!

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:47 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:Not once have I said that people fromSwansea are genetically inferior, you ended toreador far more carefully Castro!


It's hard to read carefully when you say such things as "you ended toreador". Your guess is as good as mine Martyn. :lol:

Don't back out now, you implied that those who disagreed had a genetic deficiency. Disgusting.

Ive tried to debate sensibly with you yet you seem intent on not replying to the matter in hand and deciding to make things up. Silly boy.

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:49 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:I have. Your statement that Swansea are a top 10 side is factually incorrect.


No, it's not

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:51 pm

You claimed to have tracked Solskjaer's career as a potential replacement for Laudrup! How can you have done that without following Norwegian football?
You claimed to know how to make better use of Swansea's wide players despite only
watching games from Austtalia!
You also implied quite categorically that I was a person who needed help cutting their food! That in its self suggests I am disabled. What other sort of imagery were you suggesting?

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:55 pm

Castro/Roathie you should check your own typos! I think you will find incorrect mine despite being intoxicated and needing help cutting up my food.

Re: Solskjaer latest

Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:56 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:You claimed to have tracked Solskjaer's career as a potential replacement for Laudrup! How can you have done that without following Norwegian football?

by having a link to the Man Utd reserves, noting his ability and then seeing what hes achieved at Molde. Is this really that hard to comprehend?

You claimed to know how to make better use of Swansea's wide players despite on
Y watching games from Austtalia!

no I didnt. I said how I would prefer to use the wingers. Nathan Dyer has gone on record saying he prefers to play wider rather than inside. Its Laudrups preference. Martinez and Rogers also prefer this style does this then make it wrong because I also hold that opinion?

Why does it matter which country I watch from? Are you saying unless you go to the World Cup in Brazil you cannot have an opinion on it ? :lol:


You also implied quite categorically that I was a person who needed help cutting their food! That in its self suggests I am disabled. What other sort of imagery were you suggesting?

you asked me to find you a link - i replied with would you like me to cut up your food too. It was a throw away remark at your apparent lack of ability to do a simple task, disability hadnt entered my mind.

Now how about some sense from you Martyn?