Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:21 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:22 pm
Coco wrote:So is your post B&W or Grey ?!?! The hypocricy in 'According to some" is fascinating ! Are you personally , RED , BLUE or GREY , maybe a sorta SKY BLUE eh ?!
Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:24 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:What are you babbling on about? Where have I said i prefer he will leave with debt?
Stop making a fool of yourself. You can't help but WUM can you?even when you're trying to be serious.
You mocked people for holding the view you are now setting up a group for.![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Aug 20, 2013 3:33 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Coco wrote:So is your post B&W or Grey ?!?! The hypocricy in 'According to some" is fascinating ! Are you personally , RED , BLUE or GREY , maybe a sorta SKY BLUE eh ?!
Im talking in views. Its not black or white for everyone. Not everyone is simply red or blue. Some are in between. Just like not everyone is extreme in politics. Well this is football club politics.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 3:35 pm
Coco wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:Coco wrote:So is your post B&W or Grey ?!?! The hypocricy in 'According to some" is fascinating ! Are you personally , RED , BLUE or GREY , maybe a sorta SKY BLUE eh ?!
Im talking in views. Its not black or white for everyone. Not everyone is simply red or blue. Some are in between. Just like not everyone is extreme in politics. Well this is football club politics.
You cannot be all things to all men Barney ,U have to pin your colours to a mast sometime/somewhere ! You limit the base of your proposed group to those mirror-images of yourself and I feel you're doomed to fail simply because you will attract too few to be a viable force ! Pro-blues/Bluebird badge fans need a cohesive banner under which to unite albeit with differing opinions surrounding that 'united goal' , for some it's BU for others it's not ....... but the fact they have a banner to rally around is paramount !
Tue Aug 20, 2013 3:42 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Coco wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:Coco wrote:So is your post B&W or Grey ?!?! The hypocricy in 'According to some" is fascinating ! Are you personally , RED , BLUE or GREY , maybe a sorta SKY BLUE eh ?!
Im talking in views. Its not black or white for everyone. Not everyone is simply red or blue. Some are in between. Just like not everyone is extreme in politics. Well this is football club politics.
You cannot be all things to all men Barney ,U have to pin your colours to a mast sometime/somewhere ! You limit the base of your proposed group to those mirror-images of yourself and I feel you're doomed to fail simply because you will attract too few to be a viable force ! Pro-blues/Bluebird badge fans need a cohesive banner under which to unite albeit with differing opinions surrounding that 'united goal' , for some it's BU for others it's not ....... but the fact they have a banner to rally around is paramount !
Nail your colours to a mast? No. I have my own set views of what I want to do and if people wish to align with those views then fair enough but they are neither pro blue or pro red. Thats the difference. Pick a team, take the childish Labour and Conversatives and you'll end up in the same dire sorry state this country is in. The answer lies somewhere in between.
![]()
Tue Aug 20, 2013 3:46 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:You said you'd be happy for us to go into admin and for Tan to leave last summer. That would have obviously have left us in debt.
No I mocked you for wanting the club to go into admin to attain those goals.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Quotes please?!sadly, you're making things up again.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Quotes please?!sadly, you're making things up again.
So did you say you wanted Tan to leave last summer? Yes you did. You were happy for Tan out. You said that. That would have meant admin.
The safe hands shit is all hypothetical and you know it.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:14 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:You said you'd be happy for us to go into admin and for Tan to leave last summer. That would have obviously have left us in debt.
No I mocked you for wanting the club to go into admin to attain those goals.
Quotes please?!sadly, you're making things up again.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:18 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:24 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Not really. Totally different. The person co-ordinating this was talking of creating a "red army" the other day, now this..
How can anyone take that seriously?
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:31 pm
sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Not really. Totally different. The person co-ordinating this was talking of creating a "red army" the other day, now this..
How can anyone take that seriously?
i suppose the same way ordinary fans can take bu seriously
after the statement from there spokes person,constant abuse on there face book
to fans who do not agree with them.
i do agree with you to some extent,but it not totally different, you cannot slag off one
person for comments they made,and not another group.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:37 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Not really. Totally different. The person co-ordinating this was talking of creating a "red army" the other day, now this..
How can anyone take that seriously?
i suppose the same way ordinary fans can take bu seriously
after the statement from there spokes person,constant abuse on there face book
to fans who do not agree with them.
i do agree with you to some extent,but it not totally different, you cannot slag off one
person for comments they made,and not another group.
Difference is, that's not the BU officials talking. I agree, it's wrong & should be rectified, but it isn't officials from BU speaking. There was one incident, which was regrettable.
However, for 12 months, James has mocked & promoted "red army" "the rise of the great red dragon" "yellow neutrals" etc & now he's doing this...
That's why I can't take him seriously...
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:39 pm
sleepers wrote:if that is the case barry i agree with you.
but bu have made a rod for there own backs by saying stupid things
and by not distancing them selfs from some off the things on fb
it is poorly run,and i do not think alot of the fans take them seriously
i am not having a dig at you barry,just my opinion![]()
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:46 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:47 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:if that is the case barry i agree with you.
but bu have made a rod for there own backs by saying stupid things
and by not distancing them selfs from some off the things on fb
it is poorly run,and i do not think alot of the fans take them seriously
i am not having a dig at you barry,just my opinion![]()
I agree with you except that its not BU making the comments, but it's members. I've posted on their site myself, telling them that posts of that nature are ruining BUs credibility, but there's a number that just don't seem to care about that.
Sian's comment was regrettable & she HAS apologised, immediately, if I remember correctly.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:49 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:55 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:New Group To Restore Tradition - The Ninian Stand
Barnett i would be with you on this but you changed your mind with opinions on issues more than my missis changes shoes, so i can not take you seriously at all on here but good luck
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:56 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I feel the fb group should be moderated or even better, admin only. In fairness though, people need to remember that they are the views of the individual, not the group.
Eg this site belongs to Annis, doesn't mean that every comment that is posted is a comment he agrees with or condones..
Do I think Sian should stand down? Not for that remark, no. I do feel that changes do need to be made to their site though.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:57 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:58 pm
sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:I feel the fb group should be moderated or even better, admin only. In fairness though, people need to remember that they are the views of the individual, not the group.
Eg this site belongs to Annis, doesn't mean that every comment that is posted is a comment he agrees with or condones..
Do I think Sian should stand down? Not for that remark, no. I do feel that changes do need to be made to their site though.
difference between bu site an this barry is bu are fighting for something
as for sian totally disagree,if i made a statement against most of my members like she
done against the fan base,and i thought it was holding my group back i would take a step back
for the good of the group
Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:57 pm
Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:24 pm
Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:24 pm
Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:27 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Well?
Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:29 pm
Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:29 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Well?
I've spoke to Jon Candy since and many complained that too many groups leads to factions which furthers the divide. I'll just be supporting the team myself by wearing blue to games and taking my blue + white retro scarf. The fans who want blue back will do so either in their own way or with Bluebirds Unite.
Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:30 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:So you've founded a pro Tan's fashion group instead?
Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:32 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Mug