Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:28 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:29 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Took the goal very well although Green should have got it really but they all count.
Overall thought Miller was very poor though and agree he did look lazy, its just one game though and got one goal. I expect a lot more from him in the upcoming games but im sure he will the more games he gets
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:29 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:29 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:29 pm
quadsas wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Took the goal very well although Green should have got it really but they all count.
Overall thought Miller was very poor though and agree he did look lazy, its just one game though and got one goal. I expect a lot more from him in the upcoming games but im sure he will the more games he gets
probably first sensible post in this thread, and that's what I thought too
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:30 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:30 pm
valleyrambill wrote:this is a lesson to quadsas
dont make any statement until the end of the game
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:30 pm
nerd wrote:quadsas wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Took the goal very well although Green should have got it really but they all count.
Overall thought Miller was very poor though and agree he did look lazy, its just one game though and got one goal. I expect a lot more from him in the upcoming games but im sure he will the more games he gets
probably first sensible post in this thread, and that's what I thought too
Is that because it agrees with your point?
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:31 pm
Daniel M wrote:He was definitely less than impressive overall and to me he didn't look match fit and as 'in-sync' with the other players, often played passes to far forwards or backwards and was generally sloppy but at the end of the day he done what was needed and what he does best and that was finish
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:31 pm
Cardiff_Llandaff_Bluebird wrote:valleyrambill wrote:this is a lesson to quadsas
dont make any statement until the end of the game
I know![]()
![]()
. He is still trying to fight his corner this kid even though he knows he has been knocked out like Foreman against Ali.
It must hurt to be made to look like a total arse who just comes on here to troll and then is made to look totally stupid.
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:31 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:32 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:33 pm
nerd wrote:Daniel M wrote:He was definitely less than impressive overall and to me he didn't look match fit and as 'in-sync' with the other players, often played passes to far forwards or backwards and was generally sloppy but at the end of the day he done what was needed and what he does best and that was finish
As I said before, first competitive game. Massively revamped side up front and midfield. Unlike the defence, it'll take time for those players to gel, work out chemistry between them.
Only an idiot would expect every single player, the formation to come out working 100% first game of the season..
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:33 pm
quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:quadsas wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Took the goal very well although Green should have got it really but they all count.
Overall thought Miller was very poor though and agree he did look lazy, its just one game though and got one goal. I expect a lot more from him in the upcoming games but im sure he will the more games he gets
probably first sensible post in this thread, and that's what I thought too
Is that because it agrees with your point?
it's because it's true, don't tell me you don't agree with him.
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:33 pm
quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:quadsas wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Took the goal very well although Green should have got it really but they all count.
Overall thought Miller was very poor though and agree he did look lazy, its just one game though and got one goal. I expect a lot more from him in the upcoming games but im sure he will the more games he gets
probably first sensible post in this thread, and that's what I thought too
Is that because it agrees with your point?
it's because it's true, don't tell me you don't agree with him.
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:33 pm
quadsas wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:For those that thought Kenny Miller was shit let me ask you all a question. Do you know anything about the game of football?? The shift or workrate, tracking back and defending by Kenny Miller was awesome and the finish for the goal was top drawer. Right place right time that's what being a striker is all about. Ok you may say Green should have saved it but he didn't. I know everyone is entitled to their opinion but I happen to think if you thought Kenny had a shit game then get a grip of yourselves. You should be getting behind all our players 100% and backing them all the way. We just won 1-0 at one of the teams everyone seems to think might win this league FFS![]()
![]()
![]()
Well done to all the boys and the support at West Ham........ Fecking made my weekend can't wait till next Sunday
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
are you serious? he was lazy, never pressured defenders, didn't win a single header all game, lucky for him Gestede made all the work
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:35 pm
quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:Daniel M wrote:He was definitely less than impressive overall and to me he didn't look match fit and as 'in-sync' with the other players, often played passes to far forwards or backwards and was generally sloppy but at the end of the day he done what was needed and what he does best and that was finish
As I said before, first competitive game. Massively revamped side up front and midfield. Unlike the defence, it'll take time for those players to gel, work out chemistry between them.
Only an idiot would expect every single player, the formation to come out working 100% first game of the season..
it wasn't "sync" that was the problem, he never took a good position, lost all headers, was completely overpowered by defenders, it had nothing to do with formation or gelling, he was terrible technically
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:35 pm
quadsas wrote:oh my it's just a f*cking loop all overeither way neither of us will find a compromise but no point in discussion anymore. I think Miller is shit, and I will think so until he proves me wrong
![]()
![]()
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:35 pm
quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:Daniel M wrote:He was definitely less than impressive overall and to me he didn't look match fit and as 'in-sync' with the other players, often played passes to far forwards or backwards and was generally sloppy but at the end of the day he done what was needed and what he does best and that was finish
As I said before, first competitive game. Massively revamped side up front and midfield. Unlike the defence, it'll take time for those players to gel, work out chemistry between them.
Only an idiot would expect every single player, the formation to come out working 100% first game of the season..
it wasn't "sync" that was the problem, he never took a good position, lost all headers, was completely overpowered by defenders, it had nothing to do with formation or gelling, he was terrible technically
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:36 pm
nerd wrote:quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:Daniel M wrote:He was definitely less than impressive overall and to me he didn't look match fit and as 'in-sync' with the other players, often played passes to far forwards or backwards and was generally sloppy but at the end of the day he done what was needed and what he does best and that was finish
As I said before, first competitive game. Massively revamped side up front and midfield. Unlike the defence, it'll take time for those players to gel, work out chemistry between them.
Only an idiot would expect every single player, the formation to come out working 100% first game of the season..
it wasn't "sync" that was the problem, he never took a good position, lost all headers, was completely overpowered by defenders, it had nothing to do with formation or gelling, he was terrible technically
LMFAO.
So he didn't actually take a good position for the goal - defender tracking him, Miller stopping to make space then?
Lost all headers? He's not a target man. Why we pumped the ball long for him and Earnie was baffling.
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:38 pm
quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:Daniel M wrote:He was definitely less than impressive overall and to me he didn't look match fit and as 'in-sync' with the other players, often played passes to far forwards or backwards and was generally sloppy but at the end of the day he done what was needed and what he does best and that was finish
As I said before, first competitive game. Massively revamped side up front and midfield. Unlike the defence, it'll take time for those players to gel, work out chemistry between them.
Only an idiot would expect every single player, the formation to come out working 100% first game of the season..
it wasn't "sync" that was the problem, he never took a good position, lost all headers, was completely overpowered by defenders, it had nothing to do with formation or gelling, he was terrible technically
LMFAO.
So he didn't actually take a good position for the goal - defender tracking him, Miller stopping to make space then?
Lost all headers? He's not a target man. Why we pumped the ball long for him and Earnie was baffling.
he did take a very good position that time, he did very well when we caught them offguard, that was good.
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:39 pm
nerd wrote:quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:quadsas wrote:nerd wrote:Daniel M wrote:He was definitely less than impressive overall and to me he didn't look match fit and as 'in-sync' with the other players, often played passes to far forwards or backwards and was generally sloppy but at the end of the day he done what was needed and what he does best and that was finish
As I said before, first competitive game. Massively revamped side up front and midfield. Unlike the defence, it'll take time for those players to gel, work out chemistry between them.
Only an idiot would expect every single player, the formation to come out working 100% first game of the season..
it wasn't "sync" that was the problem, he never took a good position, lost all headers, was completely overpowered by defenders, it had nothing to do with formation or gelling, he was terrible technically
LMFAO.
So he didn't actually take a good position for the goal - defender tracking him, Miller stopping to make space then?
Lost all headers? He's not a target man. Why we pumped the ball long for him and Earnie was baffling.
he did take a very good position that time, he did very well when we caught them offguard, that was good.
So basically when you wrote "he never took a good position" only to then contradict yourself when you acknowledged he took at least one good position, you don't think that might actually weaken your argument?
this is for you Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:40 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:40 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:41 pm
Steve Van Halen wrote:Fair play, your a muppett. Hes a proven scorer at this level, 50 goals in 160 games for wolves and you think hes shit? Hes proven himself, you've got nothing.
that's why he is shit player for 1millionSun Aug 07, 2011 2:43 pm
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:43 pm
quadsas wrote:Steve Van Halen wrote:Fair play, your a muppett. Hes a proven scorer at this level, 50 goals in 160 games for wolves and you think hes shit? Hes proven himself, you've got nothing.
he scored those goals when he was young, he isn't anymorethat's why he is shit player for 1million
gremmur police is going to get you btw.
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:44 pm
nerd wrote:Ok, Quadsas, a challenge for you.
You keep saying Miller is shit, needs to prove you wrong. Leaving aside flaws with that approach, a simple question.
What does Miller have to do to prove you wrong?
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:45 pm
ccfc1981 wrote:quadsas wrote:Steve Van Halen wrote:Fair play, your a muppett. Hes a proven scorer at this level, 50 goals in 160 games for wolves and you think hes shit? Hes proven himself, you've got nothing.
he scored those goals when he was young, he isn't anymorethat's why he is shit player for 1million
gremmur police is going to get you btw.
he was awesome for rangers last season mate
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:46 pm