Tue May 20, 2014 11:59 am
ToungeFrazez wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Penny dropped.
Good lad
Penny Drop in anytime you are "proven"
Tue May 20, 2014 12:08 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:ToungeFrazez wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Penny dropped.
Good lad
Penny Drop in anytime you are "proven"
Most of it is. partial debt to equity, £100m in debt afterwards, tan taking over shirt sponsorship etc
Only thing left is timeframe and nukes has heard im right on that too
Tue May 20, 2014 12:12 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:I will make the point again as it seems pertinent, if people just discussed football then then wouldn't be an issue.
However the ones to turn it personal and then complain when i reply talking about my personal life are a contradiction in themselves. I have joined the debate here and given my opinion only to be goaded (attempted should i say) regarding my personal life as people seem fascinated by it. As soon as I reply in the same vein then im wrong to do so apparently.![]()
Talk about football and we will all get along swimmingly. Although its like asking teenage girls to talk about just the music of "take that" - impossible as they will 99% of the time turn the debate to their personal lives.![]()
So fans, lets start as we mean to go on.
Which part of my footballing opinion stated here do you disagree with.
you dont have footballing opinion { or at least what opinion you do have is 100% anti Cardiff }............you tend to stay on the politics of it, and unless you are VTs accountant your guesses are as random as any others.........your personal life doesnt add up either..and as stated above, those who have achieved,or are famous,or are wealthy,well they tend to be modest about it........you..well you seem to have a NEED to brag,big yourself up.{ your living the dream on AAmessage board }. and its a pretty good medium to do it on.............and yes i am fascinated..you were the first person to bring it up in this thread you pleb.
Now i ask again, do you have any genuine queries or are you just ranting? Id be happy to answer them
Tue May 20, 2014 12:13 pm
Tue May 20, 2014 12:14 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
if i have a question it wouldnt be you id ask...........
Tue May 20, 2014 12:15 pm
ToungeFrazez wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Nothing?
Just ranting as I thought then.
Great, back to football
This your first post in this thread Mr Roath Sir. Please point direction to your loyalty fangroup if any quotes from the club regarding this OP and your magnificent relevant post. We shall overcome
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Anyone bored of Roathie being proven correct?
As soon as investments go past value of assets (including shares and potential sponsorship deals with his companies) then the risk to reward ratio tilts not in his favour and he will be out.
I did the maths for you all and said if it isnt this year then it will be next.... Again vilified for it
Tue May 20, 2014 12:17 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Didnt realise being correct was so funny. I guess im a very funny man indeed if that is the case.![]()
Log off and try again when you actually have a point. Good lad.
Tue May 20, 2014 12:18 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:ToungeFrazez wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Nothing?
Just ranting as I thought then.
Great, back to football
This your first post in this thread Mr Roath Sir. Please point direction to your loyalty fangroup if any quotes from the club regarding this OP and your magnificent relevant post. We shall overcome
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Anyone bored of Roathie being proven correct?
As soon as investments go past value of assets (including shares and potential sponsorship deals with his companies) then the risk to reward ratio tilts not in his favour and he will be out.
I did the maths for you all and said if it isnt this year then it will be next.... Again vilified for it
what maths?.......do you have mr tans figures..or roath figures......unless you have the actual figures and access to mr tans thoughts your just talking shit..........
Tue May 20, 2014 12:19 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
this lad thing is crap also........your about 28/29........were a teenager playing football on saturdays?????..during the petty era....and thats not even taking into account that you believe your primary school maths cuts it..........
Tue May 20, 2014 12:22 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
if i have a question it wouldnt be you id ask...........
Then stop ranting if you have no point to make or query needing answering.
Tue May 20, 2014 12:23 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
this lad thing is crap also........your about 28/29........were a teenager playing football on saturdays?????..during the petty era....and thats not even taking into account that you believe your primary school maths cuts it..........
Is this a query or another rant? Im not seeing a point to that post.
Tue May 20, 2014 12:27 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
if i have a question it wouldnt be you id ask...........
Then stop ranting if you have no point to make or query needing answering.
everymans dream.........be a huge success in life....nice house,beautiful wife, lots of mates who have respect for you.
or live on here and have half a dozen 15year olds that believe the rubbish you spout.........
it dont need answering roath..sad is sad is sad.............
Tue May 20, 2014 12:28 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
this lad thing is crap also........your about 28/29........were a teenager playing football on saturdays?????..during the petty era....and thats not even taking into account that you believe your primary school maths cuts it..........
Is this a query or another rant? Im not seeing a point to that post.
its the truth............
Tue May 20, 2014 12:31 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:ToungeFrazez wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Nothing?
Just ranting as I thought then.
Great, back to football
This your first post in this thread Mr Roath Sir. Please point direction to your loyalty fangroup if any quotes from the club regarding this OP and your magnificent relevant post. We shall overcome
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Anyone bored of Roathie being proven correct?
As soon as investments go past value of assets (including shares and potential sponsorship deals with his companies) then the risk to reward ratio tilts not in his favour and he will be out.
I did the maths for you all and said if it isnt this year then it will be next.... Again vilified for it
what maths?.......do you have mr tans figures..or roath figures......unless you have the actual figures and access to mr tans thoughts your just talking shit..........
Yes some actual specific queries, now we are getting somewhere.![]()
Yep straight from his mouth. Keep up at the back.![]()
However i was sceptical of the figure he gave hence why my projection on the risk to reward ratio was spread over 24 months rather than 12 months to give room for a little chairman spreading of the truth
Tue May 20, 2014 12:34 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
so you predicted if tan kept spending our debt would rise..............bloody hell eureka
errr.... No![]()
and the more money invested and greater the debt,the more the risk to reward ratio tilts........
that is the premise of the risk to reward ratio, that is not what i brought to the debate. What i brought was a timeframe. You really dont understand this do you?![]()
what totally spins my head about this,is the fact that you think there is anyone out there that didnt know this.....
youve done the maths for us..??????..99% of ordinary people dont need a slide rule,or advanced maths book to figure those out instantly......
so again you knew all along?![]()
I havent seen one person agree that the risk to reward calculation puts him leaving within 24 months. Certainly not you![]()
Tue May 20, 2014 12:38 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
this lad thing is crap also........your about 28/29........were a teenager playing football on saturdays?????..during the petty era....and thats not even taking into account that you believe your primary school maths cuts it..........
Is this a query or another rant? Im not seeing a point to that post.
its the truth............
Its the truth that im 28/29?![]()
Oh you cut to the bone you do
Tue May 20, 2014 12:41 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
im fascinated...........initially i thought you were just a jack on a wind up....but a real jack fanatic would have got bored years ago..........this is a massive part of your life, no matter how much you play it down.........diving on the great barrier reef/ or vote 2000 times for red in an online poll...........no contest eh...........
Tue May 20, 2014 12:42 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
so you predicted if tan kept spending our debt would rise..............bloody hell eureka
errr.... No![]()
and the more money invested and greater the debt,the more the risk to reward ratio tilts........
that is the premise of the risk to reward ratio, that is not what i brought to the debate. What i brought was a timeframe. You really dont understand this do you?![]()
what totally spins my head about this,is the fact that you think there is anyone out there that didnt know this.....
youve done the maths for us..??????..99% of ordinary people dont need a slide rule,or advanced maths book to figure those out instantly......
so again you knew all along?![]()
I havent seen one person agree that the risk to reward calculation puts him leaving within 24 months. Certainly not you![]()
Tue May 20, 2014 12:44 pm
Tue May 20, 2014 12:47 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
im fascinated...........initially i thought you were just a jack on a wind up....but a real jack fanatic would have got bored years ago..........this is a massive part of your life, no matter how much you play it down.........diving on the great barrier reef/ or vote 2000 times for red in an online poll...........no contest eh...........
So we are back to ranting I see![]()
I have some fab pics to show you from my dive at the great barrier reef. Do you have any proof to back up your wild claim regarding me voting 2000 times on a poll, or has desperation caused you to make silly remarks?
Wonder what the jury will say
Tue May 20, 2014 12:52 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
im fascinated...........initially i thought you were just a jack on a wind up....but a real jack fanatic would have got bored years ago..........this is a massive part of your life, no matter how much you play it down.........diving on the great barrier reef/ or vote 2000 times for red in an online poll...........no contest eh...........
So we are back to ranting I see![]()
I have some fab pics to show you from my dive at the great barrier reef. Do you have any proof to back up your wild claim regarding me voting 2000 times on a poll, or has desperation caused you to make silly remarks?
Wonder what the jury will say
no more proof than i will recieve about you voting 2000 times..........a
pic of fish and a bloke in trunks proves f all mate.......
anyway..i have work..............enjoy your day.......mates coming over?...a barbie?..tennis lessons with rod laver?..a meal and chat with the wife?..or a multi million pound deal? good luck
Tue May 20, 2014 12:58 pm
For the same reasons that no one wins an argument, arguing only adds more tension to conflict.
If you work well with your emotions and are crafty enough, you can shift arguments into meaningful, intimate, constructive conversations.
But most of the time, arguments just turn things into bigger problems and you end up saying what you don’t really mean. You end up miscommunicating your feelings because you decided to use your words as weapons, instead of magic.
Arguing has one objective: to control. What someone thinks. What they feel. What they should do. What they want. What they need. What’s good for them.
you are even right when you are wrong, and you Sure need to be right. Tue May 20, 2014 1:00 pm
Tue May 20, 2014 1:00 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:ToungeFrazez wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Penny dropped.
Good lad
Penny Drop in anytime you are "proven"
Most of it is. partial debt to equity, £100m in debt afterwards, tan taking over shirt sponsorship etc
Only thing left is timeframe and nukes has heard im right on that too
Tue May 20, 2014 1:03 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Wrong? Where?![]()
Surely by making up that im wrong, that passage applies to you?
Irony
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=140748
Tue May 20, 2014 1:03 pm
toshacks_1_tales wrote:
Still throwing enough mud around waiting for some to stick I see. Throw a few generalised sweeping comments into the mix, and profess to be a profit. Easy to do from the outside when emotions aren't involved.
Tue May 20, 2014 1:04 pm
ToungeFrazez wrote:Ohh I remember my first encounter with you. Fun and sad at the same timebut that wasn't the point though was it
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=140748
Good luck anyways, there is no treatment for what you have, only burn out
Tue May 20, 2014 1:09 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:toshacks_1_tales wrote:
Still throwing enough mud around waiting for some to stick I see. Throw a few generalised sweeping comments into the mix, and profess to be a profit. Easy to do from the outside when emotions aren't involved.
Nothing to do with mud slinging, and there isnt much general or sweeping about my comments which is why they are always disagreed with only to then be proven correct.
You are spot on regarding emotions and ive always made that point myself on here as it goes, its why im more accurate than the average poster. I see things that their emotions wont allow them to.
Tue May 20, 2014 1:10 pm
Tue May 20, 2014 1:14 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:ToungeFrazez wrote:Ohh I remember my first encounter with you. Fun and sad at the same timebut that wasn't the point though was it
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=140748
Good luck anyways, there is no treatment for what you have, only burn out
Yep i remember that too, you claimed a save was pure luck and i corrected you and you started ranting