Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:31 am
cityone wrote:NorgBlue wrote:cityone wrote:NorgBlue wrote:cityone wrote:
Coming from you that is absolutely priceless, you couldn't make it up if you tried.![]()
![]()
Have I ever voluntarily left then? Or as usual are you jumping in with absolutely no understanding of what has been said?
Try the second part of your sentence dick brain, the part that you are assuming people will come back under another name, as i said, you couldn't make it up.![]()
Right? And why is that a bad thing, have I said coming back is a unacceptable then?
As I said, you clearly have no idea what was being said columbo![]()
Another who should log off
Maybe you could give barnet one of your user names, afterall, you must have at least fifty have you not???
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:31 am
NorgBlue wrote:
The term was "big gun" wasn't it? Off the top of my head?
Everton are certainly not a big gun. But they are one of the top teams for sure, if i said they weren't then in hindsight I disagree.
Although my "argument" with carpe was that he changed what he said, not the content of what he changed it to.
RoathMagic wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Just because Roathie doesn't rate Everton, nobody is allowed to call them a top side? What nonsense.
They havent even finished in the top 3 in premier league history. Finished in the top 4 once.![]()
How anyone can call them a top side is beyond me and just simply wrong, like it or not. Those are the facts and they speak for themselves.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:31 am
TownhillMagic wrote:NorgBlue wrote:TownhillMagic wrote:124 posts in under 48 hours. What a sad man.
175 out of 176 posts about one manwhat an incredible infatuation you have
WRONG. I have discussed other topics. Apology accepted Troll.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:31 am
NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Where did I mention top 10?
Making stuff up again![]()
My post was perfectly valid and only a pedantic troll like yourself would try and make an issue over it
You said top clubs. In my opinion a top club is a top 10 club. What did you allude to then? Top 4? 6? 8?![]()
Either way you changed it after the other poster reeled off loads of teams interested![]()
Nothing pedantic about pointing out where you moved the goalposts sonny
So you admit I didn't say top 10. Apology accepted and I'll allow you to back track![]()
Sven stated there were 6 clubs showing interest which was news to me. Prior to that piece of info it didn't SEEM that there were any clubs interested other than Swansea
So you now admit you changed it then?
Apology accepted
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:32 am
NorgBlue wrote:larsanstrum wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Swansea wanted a loan deal with first refusal on the permanent signing at end of the season to see if he fits in with the Swansea style. Blackpool refused initially but have since agreed.
Swansea will pay some money up front for the loan deal and then depending on when the permanent transfer goes through they will receive the rest of the agreed amount or the compensation value.
If he went to Monaco they would have received next to nothing a la Ledley and Celtic so Blackpool have been bent over a table by Huw to make this happen. Hes essentially getting a try before you buy.
Invention. If Ince goes to Swans it will because he knows his value will fall should he stay at
struggling Blackpool. He wants shop window for the few months Ince and father truly believe him
to be a great great talent. they still stupidly believe Liverpool will see him play in the Premier
League and offer him the World to sign. and fight Man Utd and offers from all over world for him![]()
But you say Swansea have him tied up but only if they want him. How silly
Incorrect.
It is a loan with a view to a permanent move. The decision now lies with the club and the loan fee will het deducted from the final fee/compensation. This is just how it is.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:33 am
Carpe Diem wrote:
Change what? I've stuck to my posts and reaffirmed many times already
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:34 am
larsanstrum wrote:show proof!!
The only decision Swansea will make is if to sign him if he says yes to the loan move.
End of season will they get first refusal as you put it? Well yes most probable but only because
Ince will already be at Swansea playing. Jenkins will say please sign for us. Ince will say no. that
is the end of it.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:40 am
NorgBlue wrote:larsanstrum wrote:show proof!!
The only decision Swansea will make is if to sign him if he says yes to the loan move.
End of season will they get first refusal as you put it? Well yes most probable but only because
Ince will already be at Swansea playing. Jenkins will say please sign for us. Ince will say no. that
is the end of it.
Show proof otherwise? I have already got a betting thread up regarding the subject.
Put your money where your mouth is, join the thread
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:41 am
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:43 am
larsanstrum wrote:NorgBlue wrote:larsanstrum wrote:show proof!!
The only decision Swansea will make is if to sign him if he says yes to the loan move.
End of season will they get first refusal as you put it? Well yes most probable but only because
Ince will already be at Swansea playing. Jenkins will say please sign for us. Ince will say no. that
is the end of it.
Show proof otherwise? I have already got a betting thread up regarding the subject.
Put your money where your mouth is, join the thread
And with that i laugh goodbye. I can now say i am an ex Molde player and know more of
transfers and dealings perhaps than ever you will. So what you say is not a feasible. There
is always deals such as the one you speak of but with Swansea and Ince? most definitely no.
You are making the story in your own head
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:43 am
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:44 am
TownhillMagic wrote:Well done Barry, you've caught out the troll
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:45 am
TownhillMagic wrote:William, were you lying or trolling about Everton.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:46 am
NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Change what? I've stuck to my posts and reaffirmed many times already
You said there doesnt seem to be anyone interested apart from malky and Huw... You then said... Okay well there doesnt seem to be any top teams![]()
If i show you an article saying Liverpool and Tottenham want him, will it then be... Okay no current champions league holders
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:46 am
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:48 am
TownhillMagic wrote:Well done William, it's good to admit you were wrong.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:50 am
Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Change what? I've stuck to my posts and reaffirmed many times already
You said there doesnt seem to be anyone interested apart from malky and Huw... You then said... Okay well there doesnt seem to be any top teams![]()
If i show you an article saying Liverpool and Tottenham want him, will it then be... Okay no current champions league holders
I said it because I didn't have any information that suggested otherwise. Any team. Sven told me about interest from 6 teams and then I stated no top teams. That's not back tracking or moving goal posts, it's a discussion on a forum where m real point was why teams weren't coming in for him. Let's see if any do make serious bids.
Please show me the article re Liverpool and spurs
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:51 am
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:56 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Roathie, it's not the fact that Everton were a top side or not, it was the fact that you were refusing to call a team that wasn't in the top 4 regularly, a top side & now you are?
I can only think because it suits your agenda both times..![]()
So he's right, you were either wrong, or just trolling to play down a significant point?
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:57 am
NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Change what? I've stuck to my posts and reaffirmed many times already
You said there doesnt seem to be anyone interested apart from malky and Huw... You then said... Okay well there doesnt seem to be any top teams![]()
If i show you an article saying Liverpool and Tottenham want him, will it then be... Okay no current champions league holders
I said it because I didn't have any information that suggested otherwise. Any team. Sven told me about interest from 6 teams and then I stated no top teams. That's not back tracking or moving goal posts, it's a discussion on a forum where m real point was why teams weren't coming in for him. Let's see if any do make serious bids.
Please show me the article re Liverpool and spurs
[/quote
Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:58 am
NorgBlue wrote:larsanstrum wrote:NorgBlue wrote:larsanstrum wrote:show proof!!
The only decision Swansea will make is if to sign him if he says yes to the loan move.
End of season will they get first refusal as you put it? Well yes most probable but only because
Ince will already be at Swansea playing. Jenkins will say please sign for us. Ince will say no. that
is the end of it.
Show proof otherwise? I have already got a betting thread up regarding the subject.
Put your money where your mouth is, join the thread
And with that i laugh goodbye. I can now say i am an ex Molde player and know more of
transfers and dealings perhaps than ever you will. So what you say is not a feasible. There
is always deals such as the one you speak of but with Swansea and Ince? most definitely no.
You are making the story in your own head
Don't want to put your money where your mouth is then?
Says it all. Bye then
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:00 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Change what? I've stuck to my posts and reaffirmed many times already
You said there doesnt seem to be anyone interested apart from malky and Huw... You then said... Okay well there doesnt seem to be any top teams![]()
If i show you an article saying Liverpool and Tottenham want him, will it then be... Okay no current champions league holders
I said it because I didn't have any information that suggested otherwise. Any team. Sven told me about interest from 6 teams and then I stated no top teams. That's not back tracking or moving goal posts, it's a discussion on a forum where m real point was why teams weren't coming in for him. Let's see if any do make serious bids.
Please show me the article re Liverpool and spurs
Of course its moving the goal posts.![]()
Your post had the motive of "hes no good anyway which is why nobody wants him"... You were shown that this wasnt the case so said "okay no top teams apart from Monaco"![]()
Type in "liverpool tom ince" and "tottenham tom ince" to google and enjoy.[/quote
So you there are no current articles, just speculation from months ago that proved groundless.
And now you have to decide what my motive was to suit your flagging argument![]()
I merely asked why there was interest in him. You let your paranoia decide the rest![]()
Loving you squirm re Everton! I remember that thread too
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:01 pm
larsanstrum wrote:
what a childs way of wriggling from a lie. As if anybody on the internet is to believe
you will pay money. I can say now i am sat here with three testicles hanging and nobody
would believe. what a stupid man you are goodbye from me
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:01 pm
NorgBlue wrote:cityone wrote:NorgBlue wrote:cityone wrote:NorgBlue wrote:cityone wrote:
Coming from you that is absolutely priceless, you couldn't make it up if you tried.![]()
![]()
Have I ever voluntarily left then? Or as usual are you jumping in with absolutely no understanding of what has been said?
Try the second part of your sentence dick brain, the part that you are assuming people will come back under another name, as i said, you couldn't make it up.![]()
Right? And why is that a bad thing, have I said coming back is a unacceptable then?
As I said, you clearly have no idea what was being said columbo![]()
Another who should log off
Maybe you could give barnet one of your user names, afterall, you must have at least fifty have you not???
Is that the sound of a penny dropping![]()
Read the thread in future
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:03 pm
cityone wrote:
This is where the problem lies, i do read these threads which are started by Cardiff fans on a Cardiff forum, but then the weirdo (yourself) butts in, derails the thread and it's ruined. Have you ever tried female company??? (i'm assuming you are a man/boy) it could help you with the problems you obviously have, then again it would take a special kind of woman to take a freak like you on board.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:08 pm
NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Change what? I've stuck to my posts and reaffirmed many times already
You said there doesnt seem to be anyone interested apart from malky and Huw... You then said... Okay well there doesnt seem to be any top teams![]()
If i show you an article saying Liverpool and Tottenham want him, will it then be... Okay no current champions league holders
I said it because I didn't have any information that suggested otherwise. Any team. Sven told me about interest from 6 teams and then I stated no top teams. That's not back tracking or moving goal posts, it's a discussion on a forum where m real point was why teams weren't coming in for him. Let's see if any do make serious bids.
Please show me the article re Liverpool and spurs
Of course its moving the goal posts.![]()
Your post had the motive of "hes no good anyway which is why nobody wants him"... You were shown that this wasnt the case so said "okay no top teams apart from Monaco"![]()
Type in "liverpool tom ince" and "tottenham tom ince" to google and enjoy.[/quote
So you there are no current articles, just speculation from months ago that proved groundless.
And now you have to decide what my motive was to suit your flagging argument![]()
I merely asked why there was interest in him. You let your paranoia decide the rest![]()
Loving you squirm re Everton! I remember that thread too
There are plenty showing current interest from Liverpool and Spurs. Have another search Ace Ventura![]()
You cant troll with me sunshine. You tried to be derogatory, got corrected by one of your own and then moved the goalposts![]()
No squirming from me carps. Will talk all day about it. Its a basic term "top" everyones definition of "top" is different as we have seen here. Mine had changed, something you will have to deal with if you can
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:13 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Change what? I've stuck to my posts and reaffirmed many times already
You said there doesnt seem to be anyone interested apart from malky and Huw... You then said... Okay well there doesnt seem to be any top teams![]()
If i show you an article saying Liverpool and Tottenham want him, will it then be... Okay no current champions league holders
I said it because I didn't have any information that suggested otherwise. Any team. Sven told me about interest from 6 teams and then I stated no top teams. That's not back tracking or moving goal posts, it's a discussion on a forum where m real point was why teams weren't coming in for him. Let's see if any do make serious bids.
Please show me the article re Liverpool and spurs
Of course its moving the goal posts.![]()
Your post had the motive of "hes no good anyway which is why nobody wants him"... You were shown that this wasnt the case so said "okay no top teams apart from Monaco"![]()
Type in "liverpool tom ince" and "tottenham tom ince" to google and enjoy.[/quote
So you there are no current articles, just speculation from months ago that proved groundless.
And now you have to decide what my motive was to suit your flagging argument![]()
I merely asked why there was interest in him. You let your paranoia decide the rest![]()
Loving you squirm re Everton! I remember that thread too
There are plenty showing current interest from Liverpool and Spurs. Have another search Ace Ventura![]()
You cant troll with me sunshine. You tried to be derogatory, got corrected by one of your own and then moved the goalposts![]()
No squirming from me carps. Will talk all day about it. Its a basic term "top" everyones definition of "top" is different as we have seen here. Mine had changed, something you will have to deal with if you can
Oh you're squirming alright![]()
You change to suit your trolling agenda as suggested. Like the way you decide what posters really mean as opposed to what has been posted. You're a desperately sad troll who has to be right, even if it means contradicting what you've said previously.
Show me proof of this current interest from top clubs then inspector clouseau........
Can't wait to see what you class as top clubs now, bet it's changed from 10 mins ago
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:19 pm
NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:NorgBlue wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Change what? I've stuck to my posts and reaffirmed many times already
You said there doesnt seem to be anyone interested apart from malky and Huw... You then said... Okay well there doesnt seem to be any top teams![]()
If i show you an article saying Liverpool and Tottenham want him, will it then be... Okay no current champions league holders
I said it because I didn't have any information that suggested otherwise. Any team. Sven told me about interest from 6 teams and then I stated no top teams. That's not back tracking or moving goal posts, it's a discussion on a forum where m real point was why teams weren't coming in for him. Let's see if any do make serious bids.
Please show me the article re Liverpool and spurs
Of course its moving the goal posts.![]()
Your post had the motive of "hes no good anyway which is why nobody wants him"... You were shown that this wasnt the case so said "okay no top teams apart from Monaco"![]()
Type in "liverpool tom ince" and "tottenham tom ince" to google and enjoy.[/quote
So you there are no current articles, just speculation from months ago that proved groundless.
And now you have to decide what my motive was to suit your flagging argument![]()
I merely asked why there was interest in him. You let your paranoia decide the rest![]()
Loving you squirm re Everton! I remember that thread too
There are plenty showing current interest from Liverpool and Spurs. Have another search Ace Ventura![]()
You cant troll with me sunshine. You tried to be derogatory, got corrected by one of your own and then moved the goalposts![]()
No squirming from me carps. Will talk all day about it. Its a basic term "top" everyones definition of "top" is different as we have seen here. Mine had changed, something you will have to deal with if you can
Oh you're squirming alright![]()
You change to suit your trolling agenda as suggested. Like the way you decide what posters really mean as opposed to what has been posted. You're a desperately sad troll who has to be right, even if it means contradicting what you've said previously.
Show me proof of this current interest from top clubs then inspector clouseau........
Can't wait to see what you class as top clubs now, bet it's changed from 10 mins ago
Not squirming at all sunshine. Never doyou are though, majorly
![]()
Ice asked you to type in liverpool tom ince and liverpool tom ince to google. Do that for me and take a screenshot of page 1
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:21 pm
Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:23 pm