Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:40 pm
Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:48 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:tan not anyone else ? not lim ? sorry but this is down to lim ,as city gent and other ITK have already said
Tan is the one that brought in a painter to replace one of Malky's trusted team.
Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:51 pm
Damned Yank wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:tan not anyone else ? not lim ? sorry but this is down to lim ,as city gent and other ITK have already said
Tan is the one that brought in a painter to replace one of Malky's trusted team.
Frankly Chuckle I think your stance on this and the way you are sticking to your guns is admirable.
The thing is, with Malky in charge of transfers, the issue of Borat is becoming irrelevant. He won't be around in a few months mark my words.
Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:58 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Damned Yank wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:tan not anyone else ? not lim ? sorry but this is down to lim ,as city gent and other ITK have already said
Tan is the one that brought in a painter to replace one of Malky's trusted team.
Frankly Chuckle I think your stance on this and the way you are sticking to your guns is admirable.
The thing is, with Malky in charge of transfers, the issue of Borat is becoming irrelevant. He won't be around in a few months mark my words.
Maybe so, but isn't that the club trying to restore "normality" after another one of VT's urges?
How long before he does some major damage?
Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:58 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Damned Yank wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:tan not anyone else ? not lim ? sorry but this is down to lim ,as city gent and other ITK have already said
Tan is the one that brought in a painter to replace one of Malky's trusted team.
Frankly Chuckle I think your stance on this and the way you are sticking to your guns is admirable.
The thing is, with Malky in charge of transfers, the issue of Borat is becoming irrelevant. He won't be around in a few months mark my words.
Maybe so, but isn't that the club trying to restore "normality" after another one of VT's urges?
How long before he does some major damage?
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:00 pm
wez1927 wrote:wasnt lim to blame for it all ,confirmed yesterday by city gent and vince elm also earlier by steve davies
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:02 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:wasnt lim to blame for it all ,confirmed yesterday by city gent and vince elm also earlier by steve davies
No. Considering you are one to not like gossip, your reliance on supposed ITK people is rather ironic.![]()
Tan & Tan alone appointed the painter. The club have since seen fit to "re-jig" to cover up his ridiculous decision.
Although it appears that Lim was at fault for this supposed over spend.
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:05 pm
wez1927 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:wasnt lim to blame for it all ,confirmed yesterday by city gent and vince elm also earlier by steve davies
No. Considering you are one to not like gossip, your reliance on supposed ITK people is rather ironic.![]()
Tan & Tan alone appointed the painter. The club have since seen fit to "re-jig" to cover up his ridiculous decision.
Although it appears that Lim was at fault for this supposed over spend.
just wondering how do you know it was tan and tan alone from gossip sources
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:06 pm
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:11 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:wasnt lim to blame for it all ,confirmed yesterday by city gent and vince elm also earlier by steve davies
No. Considering you are one to not like gossip, your reliance on supposed ITK people is rather ironic.![]()
Tan & Tan alone appointed the painter. The club have since seen fit to "re-jig" to cover up his ridiculous decision.
Although it appears that Lim was at fault for this supposed over spend.
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:17 pm
bluelover wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:wasnt lim to blame for it all ,confirmed yesterday by city gent and vince elm also earlier by steve davies
No. Considering you are one to not like gossip, your reliance on supposed ITK people is rather ironic.![]()
Tan & Tan alone appointed the painter. The club have since seen fit to "re-jig" to cover up his ridiculous decision.
Although it appears that Lim was at fault for this supposed over spend.
I can see you are totally anti-Tan which is fine but why do you go on and on about this painter! It was pretty obvious at the time that Tan had a hidden agenda for appointing him and he was never going to be responsible for selecting players during the January transfer window. Do you honestly believe Tan would give a 23 year old with no football knowledge authority to spend his millions![]()
The purpose of appointing him i.e. forcing Malkay to follow Moody after their spat last Tuesday has now gone away following the revelations about Lim and the decision to give Malkay a more hands on role within the club. It was an impulsive stupid decision but he was never going to be the Head of Recruitment, I think 99% of us realize that
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:23 pm
Damned Yank wrote:The thing is, with Malky in charge of transfers, the issue of Borat is becoming irrelevant. He won't be around in a few months mark my words.
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:33 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:The thing is, with Malky in charge of transfers, the issue of Borat is becoming irrelevant. He won't be around in a few months mark my words.
Damned, why is he even around now? My call is Tan doesn't trust Malky as much as he claims in the media and is having this fella as his private eye on the case with him and the squad to see whats truly up. The fact this Kazakh has even been brought in to be babysitter totally undermines Malky's position as a managerial professional. Basically, Tan wants someone to report back to him on whats happening which is a joke. This guy could make anything up, could pass on information wrongly - he knows sod all about football other than a bit of research before the role. Its laughable. It truly is.
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:42 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:The thing is, with Malky in charge of transfers, the issue of Borat is becoming irrelevant. He won't be around in a few months mark my words.
Damned, why is he even around now? My call is Tan doesn't trust Malky as much as he claims in the media and is having this fella as his private eye on the case with him and the squad to see whats truly up. The fact this Kazakh has even been brought in to be babysitter totally undermines Malky's position as a managerial professional. Basically, Tan wants someone to report back to him on whats happening which is a joke. This guy could make anything up, could pass on information wrongly - he knows sod all about football other than a bit of research before the role. Its laughable. It truly is.
Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:50 pm
bluelover wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:The thing is, with Malky in charge of transfers, the issue of Borat is becoming irrelevant. He won't be around in a few months mark my words.
Damned, why is he even around now? My call is Tan doesn't trust Malky as much as he claims in the media and is having this fella as his private eye on the case with him and the squad to see whats truly up. The fact this Kazakh has even been brought in to be babysitter totally undermines Malky's position as a managerial professional. Basically, Tan wants someone to report back to him on whats happening which is a joke. This guy could make anything up, could pass on information wrongly - he knows sod all about football other than a bit of research before the role. Its laughable. It truly is.
Your a bit behind with this. A board meeting has taken place and a transfer committee has been formed headed by the Chairman and with Malkay as Head of Recruitment in all but name only i.e. he has the final say. The Kazakh isn't on any of the committees along with Lim and both are now redundant. The Kazakh having being used as an innocent pawn has deliberately not been mentioned at all as he happens to be the son of a very wealthy man and a friend of Tan's son. He will disappear VERY quietly as will Lim to save face all around
Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:00 pm
bluelover wrote:
Your a bit behind with this. A board meeting has taken place and a transfer committee has been formed headed by the Chairman and with Malkay as Head of Recruitment in all but name only i.e. he has the final say. The Kazakh isn't on any of the committees along with Lim and both are now redundant. The Kazakh having being used as an innocent pawn has deliberately not been mentioned at all as he happens to be the son of a very wealthy man and a friend of Tan's son. He will disappear VERY quietly as will Lim to save face all around
Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:31 am
Gonzo wrote:Igovernor wrote:Seems some are missing the point, the painter is no more except in name, the committee will in future seek and buy in players, this is a very positive statement, as obviously Moody carried the can for lim's non action, and Lim will be on his way very soon. I see again that all the doom mongers are out in force, and when VT turns the debt to equity, they will still say there is something behind it there is, there will then not be very much re: loans and certainly not over £50m
This point seems to have escaped most. Moodys role no longer exists.
Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:05 am
Bluebird64 wrote:wez1927 wrote:redordead wrote:Bluebina wrote:wez1927 wrote:Gonzo wrote:Igovernor wrote:Seems some are missing the point, the painter is no more except in name, the committee will in future seek and buy in players, this is a very positive statement, as obviously Moody carried the can for lim's non action, and Lim will be on his way very soon. I see again that all the doom mongers are out in force, and when VT turns the debt to equity, they will still say there is something behind it there is, there will then not be very much re: loans and certainly not over £50m
This point seems to have escaped most. Moodys role no longer exists.
what ever you say will fall on deafs ears tan is the devil on this sitethis statement is probably the best thats ever come out of the club ,tan is keeping all his promises so far also the events of last week have been addressed with the re shuffle at board level
Hmmm not 100% on this one, I feel a bit happier that he is writing the interest off and will probably turn the debt to equity, but I am still a bit worried about what happened last week that we definately know about, and also what happened that we haven't been told about?
Malky will also be feeling the pressure more than ever now which can't be good.....
why the f@ck do you care so much about what happened to moody,the club haven't got to explain every coming and going regarding staff.These things happen in football,get over it.
if i sack one of my bar staff for what ever reason i dont tell my customers why its obivious that moody and lim have had a fallen out and both will we gone
What a crap example wez. For a start you would need good grounds to sack someone and they would have needed to have commited some sort of gross misconduct to warrant this. There is no evidence that this has taken place here.If the employee appealed against your action then you would indeed have to justify to him and others why and on what grounds the dismissal was justified.
You cannot pretend we fans are just mere customers. We are far more than this and are the lifeblood of the club. To dismiss us as mere customers is an insult to all fans blue and red. Why people want to know what is happening is that they care deeply about the future of the club and the implications of getting rid of a backroom member of staff who has a proven track record and is vital to our future ambitions only to replace him with someone who is completely unsuitable. If Malky is concerned about these actions and it worries him then it should worry us also. To give you an example based on your bar staff scenario then it would be like you sacking the best barman for no good reason and then to replace him with some idiot that drops your glasses spills beer on your customers and is also rude to them and then not expecting your loyal customers to demand answers or ignore them completely. I am sure if you acted in this way then the business would not only suffer but possibly fail to survive.
Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:00 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Im passed caring. The damage is already done. I just want our club back and the circus to stop.
Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:19 am
jezzy666 wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:wez1927 wrote:redordead wrote:Bluebina wrote:wez1927 wrote:Gonzo wrote:Igovernor wrote:Seems some are missing the point, the painter is no more except in name, the committee will in future seek and buy in players, this is a very positive statement, as obviously Moody carried the can for lim's non action, and Lim will be on his way very soon. I see again that all the doom mongers are out in force, and when VT turns the debt to equity, they will still say there is something behind it there is, there will then not be very much re: loans and certainly not over £50m
This point seems to have escaped most. Moodys role no longer exists.
what ever you say will fall on deafs ears tan is the devil on this sitethis statement is probably the best thats ever come out of the club ,tan is keeping all his promises so far also the events of last week have been addressed with the re shuffle at board level
Hmmm not 100% on this one, I feel a bit happier that he is writing the interest off and will probably turn the debt to equity, but I am still a bit worried about what happened last week that we definately know about, and also what happened that we haven't been told about?
Malky will also be feeling the pressure more than ever now which can't be good.....
why the f@ck do you care so much about what happened to moody,the club haven't got to explain every coming and going regarding staff.These things happen in football,get over it.
if i sack one of my bar staff for what ever reason i dont tell my customers why its obivious that moody and lim have had a fallen out and both will we gone
What a crap example wez. For a start you would need good grounds to sack someone and they would have needed to have commited some sort of gross misconduct to warrant this. There is no evidence that this has taken place here.If the employee appealed against your action then you would indeed have to justify to him and others why and on what grounds the dismissal was justified.
You cannot pretend we fans are just mere customers. We are far more than this and are the lifeblood of the club. To dismiss us as mere customers is an insult to all fans blue and red. Why people want to know what is happening is that they care deeply about the future of the club and the implications of getting rid of a backroom member of staff who has a proven track record and is vital to our future ambitions only to replace him with someone who is completely unsuitable. If Malky is concerned about these actions and it worries him then it should worry us also. To give you an example based on your bar staff scenario then it would be like you sacking the best barman for no good reason and then to replace him with some idiot that drops your glasses spills beer on your customers and is also rude to them and then not expecting your loyal customers to demand answers or ignore them completely. I am sure if you acted in this way then the business would not only suffer but possibly fail to survive.
this is funny, dont you think that if it wasnt good ground to sack him or some sort of unfair dismissal, that moody and malky etc would have appealed this, and tried to sue tan etc.
point is moody hasnt come out to defend himself, malky hasnt either, so there is obvious grounds as to why he has been removed, grounds which we wont find out for a while due to legal reasons im sure, or at least out of respect for moody so that it doesnt tarnish his reputation.
as for the latter, sorry to break it to you but we are customers... passionate ones who care a lot more than paying customers at a bar but we are customers all the same, if we dont go, others will come. we dont deserve to know the reasons behind the ins and outs as we dont own the club. im not saying the business wont suffer with tans decisions, but do we have a right to know his reasoning behind them...no not at all.
Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:28 am
Bluebird64 wrote:jezzy666 wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:wez1927 wrote:redordead wrote:Bluebina wrote:wez1927 wrote:Gonzo wrote:Igovernor wrote:Seems some are missing the point, the painter is no more except in name, the committee will in future seek and buy in players, this is a very positive statement, as obviously Moody carried the can for lim's non action, and Lim will be on his way very soon. I see again that all the doom mongers are out in force, and when VT turns the debt to equity, they will still say there is something behind it there is, there will then not be very much re: loans and certainly not over £50m
This point seems to have escaped most. Moodys role no longer exists.
what ever you say will fall on deafs ears tan is the devil on this sitethis statement is probably the best thats ever come out of the club ,tan is keeping all his promises so far also the events of last week have been addressed with the re shuffle at board level
Hmmm not 100% on this one, I feel a bit happier that he is writing the interest off and will probably turn the debt to equity, but I am still a bit worried about what happened last week that we definately know about, and also what happened that we haven't been told about?
Malky will also be feeling the pressure more than ever now which can't be good.....
why the f@ck do you care so much about what happened to moody,the club haven't got to explain every coming and going regarding staff.These things happen in football,get over it.
if i sack one of my bar staff for what ever reason i dont tell my customers why its obivious that moody and lim have had a fallen out and both will we gone
What a crap example wez. For a start you would need good grounds to sack someone and they would have needed to have commited some sort of gross misconduct to warrant this. There is no evidence that this has taken place here.If the employee appealed against your action then you would indeed have to justify to him and others why and on what grounds the dismissal was justified.
You cannot pretend we fans are just mere customers. We are far more than this and are the lifeblood of the club. To dismiss us as mere customers is an insult to all fans blue and red. Why people want to know what is happening is that they care deeply about the future of the club and the implications of getting rid of a backroom member of staff who has a proven track record and is vital to our future ambitions only to replace him with someone who is completely unsuitable. If Malky is concerned about these actions and it worries him then it should worry us also. To give you an example based on your bar staff scenario then it would be like you sacking the best barman for no good reason and then to replace him with some idiot that drops your glasses spills beer on your customers and is also rude to them and then not expecting your loyal customers to demand answers or ignore them completely. I am sure if you acted in this way then the business would not only suffer but possibly fail to survive.
this is funny, dont you think that if it wasnt good ground to sack him or some sort of unfair dismissal, that moody and malky etc would have appealed this, and tried to sue tan etc.
point is moody hasnt come out to defend himself, malky hasnt either, so there is obvious grounds as to why he has been removed, grounds which we wont find out for a while due to legal reasons im sure, or at least out of respect for moody so that it doesnt tarnish his reputation.
as for the latter, sorry to break it to you but we are customers... passionate ones who care a lot more than paying customers at a bar but we are customers all the same, if we dont go, others will come. we dont deserve to know the reasons behind the ins and outs as we dont own the club. im not saying the business wont suffer with tans decisions, but do we have a right to know his reasoning behind them...no not at all.
No wonder we as fans are the laughing stock of British football with views like this. As much as it pains me to admit it, we all know fans with similar views and they are generally the ones who were leaving in droves at half time against Newcastle when we got outplayed during the first half.They normally do not chant but politely clap instead which does wonders for the atmosphere and rarely attend away matches unless its a cup final at Wembley. So I suppose I can see why under these circumstances certain fans would consider themselves as mere customers.
Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:26 am
Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:08 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Jezzy please read my post again. I have not stated that the example is aimed at you personally. I stated that we all know fans with similar views and they generally tend to be the type who leave early which is a generalisation not a specific.
No one is saying that any fan is better than another but it is understandable why a fan who leaves a game early when we are getting beat or does not support the club away may feel that they are just a customer as you state. Many fans who spend 6 hours on a coach each way going to Hull for example who also live and breathe Cardiff City and have invested time and considerable costs following their team may be offended at the suggestion that they are a mere customer.
I state again that some fans are far more than that and our club is a business but cannot be compared to a bar as Wez suggested..
Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:57 am
Sven Ghali wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:Im passed caring. The damage is already done. I just want our club back and the circus to stop.
the third sentence (above) suggests you DO care, James