Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:31 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:
I accept that but you told me to be who i was so this is me being me. Thats what you wanted was it not?
Also, the name change of Hull City really hit home that we could be Cardiff City Dragons FC sooner than we think and that was a wake up call and then I decided it was time, before something bad like that happened, to make a stand.
I never claimed to be perfect.
![]()
![]()
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:56 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:You claimed the same after scarf gate, then changed your mind again. I personally couldn't back a campaign whose leader was so contradictory on the main subject.
You claim that BU aren't perfect, but this group is far from perfect either. As I said, a group aimed at resoring and maintaining identity would be totally against ANY name change.
If this is genuinely how you feel, you need to stick to it & apologise to those you've abused & mocked for holding the same opinions that you do.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:01 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:02 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:03 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
There's a few who disagree and its only a few hardworking and dedicated people I need to make strides forward. Lets just hope we get our blue back aye instead of having a pop at others. Most of us want the same thing at the end of the day.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:06 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Says the person who has had a pop at people for being "dinosaurs" for wanting blue back for the past 12 months.
Maybe next week, you'll be a neutral yellow again?
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:09 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:14 pm
You belittled anyone who wanted their traditions back & now you're forming a group to do exactly that?
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:14 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:20 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:No I belittled people who wanted to force Tan out and risk the survival of the club I love but of course you know everything and everyones motives. You even said yourself you'd rather administration and become a phoenix club if it meant Tan out. That's not something I agree with and never will not even now. I want the debt to equity conversion done and then to peacefully try and get the club some tradition back - blue as the kit colour - a modernised badge with the bluebird - that is not our old ways. Its progression with restoring some tradition at the same time.
This is not another group that is like Bluebirds Unite. If you want to restore 100% of traditions - old badge and blue back - then go and support their cause. That is your choice.
If you want a modernised badge featuring the bluebird with blue back at home then that is what we want.
Survival - debt to equity conversion
Progression - working with the club peacefully and professionally
Tradition - blue home kit and bluebird as the important emblem.
I think you fail to grasp the difference.
![]()
![]()
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:22 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:23 pm
sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
barry dont you think past actions from some of the bu supporters will discredit there agendas?
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:25 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
barry dont you think past actions from some of the bu supporters will discredit there agendas?
Yes, which is why I've told them directly that they should watch why they say. This seems to have fallen on deaf ears, sadly.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:27 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:As you said yourself on here... With Tan here, we will red at home.. You told people who were fighting it that they were wasting their time, then you do it yourself.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:28 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:29 pm
sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
barry dont you think past actions from some of the bu supporters will discredit there agendas?
Yes, which is why I've told them directly that they should watch why they say. This seems to have fallen on deaf ears, sadly.
so why should people take anything bu come out with now seriously?
like you have commented on they have no chance due to past actions
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:30 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:
So why are you bothering then Chuckles?
I told them the way they were fighting it was a waste of time. It is a waste of time fighting it. The aim is to work with the club and approach this professional by communicating with them, not by marching through the streets in blue further pissing Tan off when its all over Sky. That's gonna solve all of our problems. I hope it don't backfire and wish Bluebirds Unite the best but I am skeptical of the march and what it will actually achieve.
You know Tan is stubborn yourself. Fight him and try and force blue in his face and he'll just drive you into the ground like a tent peg. Working with him and the other pro reds or reluctant reds (whatever your terminology is for them these days) and then you can make them understand what it truly means and work on something.
Marching through the streets for a televised game will only bring with it negative mentions from the media and this will not impress Tan in the slightest when he's trying to build a powerful brand internationally he can profit from.
GREAT IDEA TO GET YOUR BLUE KIT BACK. PISS OFF THE ONE MAN WHO HAS THE POWER TO DO SO. LOGIC IN ITS FINEST FORM.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:32 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
barry dont you think past actions from some of the bu supporters will discredit there agendas?
Yes, which is why I've told them directly that they should watch why they say. This seems to have fallen on deaf ears, sadly.
so why should people take anything bu come out with now seriously?
like you have commented on they have no chance due to past actions
Those people were not speaking on the behalf of BU, but themselves. Anything that has come from BU has been perfectly fine. No mocking, no threats.
What we have here, is a totally different story. One boy who has mocked people for their beliefs, for the past 12 months, now wants to set up a group for those very beliefs he has mocked!
didnt the lady who is the spokes person for bu say that any fan that supports red is not a true fan,
then had to retract that statement
How can anyone take that seriously?
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:34 pm
sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
barry dont you think past actions from some of the bu supporters will discredit there agendas?
Yes, which is why I've told them directly that they should watch why they say. This seems to have fallen on deaf ears, sadly.
so why should people take anything bu come out with now seriously?
like you have commented on they have no chance due to past actions
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:34 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:37 pm
sleepers wrote:sorry barry dont know what happened to my comment,
didnt the lady who is the spokes person for bu say that anyone who
wears red is not a true fan,then had to retract that statement?
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:39 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:39 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:My opinions are different. I'd quite happily have Tan leave if it meant a return to blue.
*DISCLAIMER* These are my views & my views only. Not the views of BU or anyone else.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:41 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Anyway, I'm off. James, I've tried to show you why some wont take you seriously & if I were you, I'd apologise for having a go at people who have fought for blue over the last 12 months, with your posts ridiculing them. Maybe you'll get a lot more uptake.
![]()
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:46 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Good luck. As I've said, your past actions on here will mean that you have no chance of being taken seriously.
barry dont you think past actions from some of the bu supporters will discredit there agendas?
Yes, which is why I've told them directly that they should watch why they say. This seems to have fallen on deaf ears, sadly.
so why should people take anything bu come out with now seriously?
like you have commented on they have no chance due to past actions
Those people were not speaking on the behalf of BU, but themselves. Anything that has come from BU has been perfectly fine. No mocking, no threats.
What we have here, is a totally different story. One boy who has mocked people for their beliefs, for the past 12 months, now wants to set up a group for those very beliefs he has mocked!
How can anyone take that seriously?
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:52 pm
sleepers wrote:i think the march is a year to late,and the only way is to go through the supporters club
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:52 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:
They're the beliefs I mocked before Chuckles. I don't agree with those views even now but you are entitled to them of course as a fan.
You would be happy with Tan out and financial instability for a return to blue. You would be happy with admin for a return to blue.
I wouldn't. Survival of the club is key for this group. We don't want to support a phoenix club version of Cardiff City FC, we want the Cardiff City we grew up supporting at Ninian Park, not a replica.
We want to make the move when the time is right when debt to equity is done and Tan has shares to deal with, not debt. Shares Tan can sell, debt he can leave us riddled in and if no owner pops up then we are in a mess. With shares Tan is far more likely to sell up and that we could accept as it would ensure survival of the club.
We want progression, not the old badge back. You want the old badge back, there's a difference. We want a modernised badge with the bluebird back. Thats bringing the tradition back in that the bluebird will be the main emblem but its also progression as its a new design for international branding in the modern world.
We want tradition, a return to blue at home, but not at the cost of the club or survival. We want all 3 but not at the cost of something else and we can get all 3 if we approach this properly.
Like hell would I risk seeing the club go under and struggle just to return to blue when I know there are other options out there.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:02 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:"If I leave, I will leave this club in good hands."
Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:04 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:sleepers wrote:i think the march is a year to late,and the only way is to go through the supporters club
sleepers, people have an extremist mindset now because of the divide which I'll admit is down to the rebrand. Its being made worse by this mindset. Like gang warfare, the problems usually are caused by a catalyst, often poverty. With the split you have factions who are all judgemental of one another and question the motives of each other. It leads to deep lying paranoia.
According to some
If you want tradition back you are a pro blue and should support Bluebirds Unite.
If you want to just get on with things you are a pro red or embracing the rebrand and against Bluebirds Unite.
Its not as black and white as that and there's a grey scale in between where many fans are at mate but some won't see it for some reason. I wouldn't call myself a pro blue hence not following Bluebirds Unite and I wouldn't call myself a pro red who loves Tan. I am somewhere in between who wants the club to progress but bring back some traditional values the club has had.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:11 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:"If I leave, I will leave this club in good hands."
Rather he left the club in good hands in no debt than with debt sorry Chuckles my brother.![]()
Shares are less dangerous than debt, surely you understand that.
even when you're trying to be serious.