Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:34 pm
marlee wrote:Oi Chuckles, 20% fan ownership at Swansea, hardly small
Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:48 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Oi Chuckles, 20% fan ownership at Swansea, hardly small
Hardly large.
Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:43 pm
Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:44 pm
Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:00 pm
Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:06 pm
marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:40 pm
pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:45 pm
marlee wrote:pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
But you've let them all roll you, Sam, Ridders, TG and VT, careless
Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:05 pm
pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
But you've let them all roll you, Sam, Ridders, TG and VT, careless
yes we know that! but that doesnt answer my question though!
Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:12 pm
marlee wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Oi Chuckles, 20% fan ownership at Swansea, hardly small
Hardly large.
It is when u consider that no one shareholder owns more than 24%,Swansea Trust are 3 largest
Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:23 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Oi Chuckles, 20% fan ownership at Swansea, hardly small
Hardly large.
It is when u consider that no one shareholder owns more than 24%,Swansea Trust are 3 largest
Still, hardly large.
I'm not saying it's not a great setup, it is & I wish CCFC had similar, but it isn't large.
Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:46 pm
pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:52 pm
cityone wrote:pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
It's a no brainer for the gypo's, they've no shame, they would just shaft the tax man and creditors AGAIN
Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:06 pm
marlee wrote:cityone wrote:pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
It's a no brainer for the gypo's, they've no shame, they would just shaft the tax man and creditors AGAIN
Can't shaft the tax man although you tried a few times 2 years ago, the money you owe local traders may go unreported but we all know it exists
Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:21 pm
marlee wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Oi Chuckles, 20% fan ownership at Swansea, hardly small
Hardly large.
It is when u consider that no one shareholder owns more than 24%,Swansea Trust are 3 largest
Still, hardly large.
I'm not saying it's not a great setup, it is & I wish CCFC had similar, but it isn't large.
20% is large, if supporters had 20% and one other had 80% I'd agree but as the shares are shared out between 8/9 bodies then I would say 20% is large
Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Oi Chuckles, 20% fan ownership at Swansea, hardly small
Hardly large.
Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:39 pm
SCFC wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Oi Chuckles, 20% fan ownership at Swansea, hardly small
Hardly large.
It's the largest fan ownership/trust in the Premier League.
In reality it is a 100% fan ownership, 20% is the trust and the majority of the fans but the shares are all owned by richer individuals who are all fans of the club.
Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:40 pm
SCFC wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:marlee wrote:Oi Chuckles, 20% fan ownership at Swansea, hardly small
Hardly large.
It's the largest fan ownership/trust in the Premier League.
In reality it is a 100% fan ownership, 20% is the trust and the majority of the fans but the shares are all owned by richer individuals who are all fans of the club.
Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:50 pm
cityone wrote:pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
It's a no brainer for the gypo's, they've no shame, they would just shaft the tax man and creditors AGAIN
Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:53 pm
SA1 wrote:cityone wrote:pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
It's a no brainer for the gypo's, they've no shame, they would just shaft the tax man and creditors AGAIN
People in glass houses should throw stones. Tan leaves you have a club not worth what it owes to him.AWKWARD!
Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:16 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:SA1 wrote:cityone wrote:pembroke allan wrote:marlee wrote:We know how to fight for what we believe in in Swansea, thought u had a similar spirit, but u just rolled over when VT wanted a rebrand, for shame
ok ! but scenario for you? owner comes in and you are about to get liquidated what would you do ? be liquidated or agree to shirt change? basically that's what we did!!
It's a no brainer for the gypo's, they've no shame, they would just shaft the tax man and creditors AGAIN
People in glass houses should throw stones. Tan leaves you have a club not worth what it owes to him.AWKWARD!
He hasn't left though...
Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:19 pm
Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:25 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Maybe. Maybe not. You can't base an argument about something you have no proof of happening though.
Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:26 pm
SA1 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Maybe. Maybe not. You can't base an argument about something you have no proof of happening though.
Don't panic its just a leg pull. He is not leaving till he gets his investment back........in other words never. Lastest I hear is he wants to rename the team as well, ask the powers that be.
Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:48 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:SA1 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Maybe. Maybe not. You can't base an argument about something you have no proof of happening though.
Don't panic its just a leg pull. He is not leaving till he gets his investment back........in other words never. Lastest I hear is he wants to rename the team as well, ask the powers that be.
Why not? Clubs lost most of its identity already.
Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:37 pm
ninianblue wrote::lol:yeah and i bet 50 mill of that came to cardiff