Sun May 01, 2011 9:23 pm
carlccfc wrote::lol:
Annis has sent this around facebook, why >
Sun May 01, 2011 9:25 pm
Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote::lol:
Annis has sent this around facebook, why >
Carl, for the first time ever your sounding like me![]()
![]()
Sun May 01, 2011 9:29 pm
Sun May 01, 2011 9:30 pm
carlccfc wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:First of all i read all of Carl's posts some i agree with others i dont and on this one i certainly dont. For one Carl you did not raise any objections to the Craig Bellamy deal at the time in fact you did the opposite and creamed yourself along with the rest of us. As for QPR that is down to the Football League and to be honest i would have to rely on the League to do the right thing as to be honest i have better things to do than read through pages of that Crap. If they have done wrong then as the Clubs before them Swindon Luton ETC they will have to pay the price. Is it fair ? No because the only ones it truly hurts is us the Fans and that is wrong. The guilty parties wander off into the sunset without a thought for the poor supporters that they leave behind.
How should it be done ? Perhaps the guilty party should have a lifetime ban from football ? But lets get this right would Stan or anyone from QPR have any sympathy for us had it been the other way round ? None at all !! and will i celebrate like f**k if we go up in this fashion ? of coarse i will.
Whether I raised objections to the Craig Bellamy deal at the time has no relevance Steve and nor do I object now, I am simply stating that many were gunning for us when we signed him like many seem to be gunning for QPR now when there is a possibility of a points deduction that could affect us, would you be bothered if we were mid table ?
Creaming myself, don't make me laugh will you, I took enough flak at the time when very few believed I was correct that we were indeed trying to sign him and that we offered to pay £18k pw for his services.
Sun May 01, 2011 10:37 pm
Sun May 01, 2011 10:52 pm
"We do not pay anywhere near a percentage of his wages before it is deemed morally correct"
Sun May 01, 2011 11:25 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:carlccfc wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:
You called my opinion 'poppy cock'I googled the expression and it confirmed what I thought, it's a candied popcorn flavour
Tony you use the expression first
Poppy Cock is my Nuclear option....
Sun May 01, 2011 11:54 pm
Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote::lol:
Annis has sent this around facebook, why >
Carl, for the first time ever your sounding like me![]()
![]()
Mon May 02, 2011 5:12 am
Sven Ghali wrote:Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote::lol:
Annis has sent this around facebook, why >
Carl, for the first time ever your sounding like me![]()
![]()
Oh no!! It'll be Jonesy out next!!![]()
Mon May 02, 2011 6:39 am
carlccfc wrote:That throughout all this talk of QPR and cheating etc.
Remember how many clubs were gunning for us when we signed Craig Bellamy.
We do not pay anywhere near a percentage of his wages before it is deemed morally correct and I am certain that the rules regarding loan signings will change this Summer as a result.
I am not saying that we have cheated in any way but are we right to take the moral high ground when, let's be honest, we would be going mental if another club had done what we have done throughout this season.
Yes QPR may have broken rules but they were broken in August 2009, not this season and as far as I am concerned they are worthy Champions and if we are to gain promotion automatically then I hope we do it on merit.
I am not saying I would take promotion via default but I certainly would not celebrate it and I think that way of promotion would cause problems amongst City fans as those who want DJ out would claim he has ultimately failed and he only got up by default.
Mon May 02, 2011 7:26 am
carlccfc wrote:Citysince1964 wrote:Carl I may be wrong but I thought I could remember you saying in one of your posts/updates that if we got promoted then it was agreed with Man City that we would have to pay them all of the share of Bellamy's wages that they have been paying this season. In which case we will, admittedly after the event, have paid the whole of Bellamy,s £90,000 per week wages so what's the problem? If we don't go up then we haven't gained any advantage either.
Contradiction my friend!
You say we will not have gained an advantage if we do not gain promotion, surely everyone realises that when you sign a player who was voted the best player in the Premier league the season previous that you are gaining an advantage, whether you succeed is irrelevant.
And yes you are totally correct, if we get promoted then we pay all of the wages but that is AFTER we gain the £90million
Mon May 02, 2011 7:40 am
carlccfc wrote:That throughout all this talk of QPR and cheating etc.
Remember how many clubs were gunning for us when we signed Craig Bellamy.
We do not pay anywhere near a percentage of his wages before it is deemed morally correct and I am certain that the rules regarding loan signings will change this Summer as a result.
I am not saying that we have cheated in any way but are we right to take the moral high ground when, let's be honest, we would be going mental if another club had done what we have done throughout this season.
Yes QPR may have broken rules but they were broken in August 2009, not this season and as far as I am concerned they are worthy Champions and if we are to gain promotion automatically then I hope we do it on merit.
I am not saying I would take promotion via default but I certainly would not celebrate it and I think that way of promotion would cause problems amongst City fans as those who want DJ out would claim he has ultimately failed and he only got up by default.
Mon May 02, 2011 8:12 am
Mon May 02, 2011 8:19 am
headshot wrote:to be honest i cant see qpr getting a points deduction because there will not be any time for them to win the points back but yes carl i can see where your comeing from mate
Mon May 02, 2011 8:38 am
steve davies wrote:Remember the league gave them an opportunity to put their house in order in october 2010 and their owners decided to allegedly provide them with false documentation.
do you honestly believe if found guilty of that they would just get a fine.
Mon May 02, 2011 8:41 am
Mon May 02, 2011 8:47 am
castleblue wrote:Well I would put myself firmly in the hate DJ group absolutely no doubt about that but last week I replied to a post which asked if DJ should be our manager next season.
Although I think DJ is a miserable sod who blames everyone under the sun except himself for anything and everything I also recognise it would be very difficult to justify sacking him after he has again this season improved the clubs position. 79 points is a record haul under his stewardship and we still have 2 games remaining so whatever the outcome this season we should recognise he has again improved our clubs standing.
Neil Warnock has done a fantastic job at QPR this season no doubt about that but when he was manager at Sheffield Utd he got that club promoted at the end of his 7th season in charge, like DJ he lost a playoff final against Wolves and DJ. Who knows if its not this year maybe DJ will do it next year but if another factor like a club breaking rules allowed our club to win promotion surely no one could blame DJ for the actions of another club.
However in the OP Carl makes a statement that the club Do Not Pay Anywhere A Percentage Of His Wages Before It Is Deemed Morally Correct well I don't know how you validate that statement because to my knowledge there is no measure no formal level which can be used that would decide when a loan agreement is either moral or immoral. One of the literal meanings of morality is The Quality Of Being In Accordance With Right And Good. In my opinion our club having acted fully in compliance with the rules and regulations of the FA & FL in this loan agreement has fully met any test or measure of morality in this matter and personal I deem it both moral and ethical.
I wonder how many people would have accepted promotion last season if we had won the playoff final would we have earned it? would we have won it on merit?
Lets face it last season our club was in turmoil we owed money left right and centre, our players were not being paid on time, as fans we were conned by the owners into believing our ST monies would be spent on new players even though the club had a transfer embargo in place for breaking FL rules. We were faced with one winding up order after another and even had one to face a few weeks after the playoff final. So how many would have accepted promotion last season against that background and ask yourself on any reasonable scale how you would have measured the moral behaviour of the club last season.
Well I would have accepted promotion in a heartbeat because whilst our club was in a very dark place last season where we did infringe FL rules we were punished by a transfer embargo. This meant that we could not sign any players after August 2009 and our team and manager did an incredible job to not onlu qualify for the playoffs but to also reach the final. We had to compete under a handicap and rightly so after breaking the rules but having accepted the handicap we had an absolute right to be in the playoff final and if we hadwon to be in the PL.
This season another club has been charged with breaking rules and regulations and they are about to be judged and IF the charges against them are proven they will face sanctions. If as a result another club benefits then that is absolutely right because they will be the next best placed club on MERIT.
![]()
![]()
Mon May 02, 2011 8:50 am
castleblue wrote:Well I would put myself firmly in the hate DJ group absolutely no doubt about that but last week I replied to a post which asked if DJ should be our manager next season.
Although I think DJ is a miserable sod who blames everyone under the sun except himself for anything and everything I also recognise it would be very difficult to justify sacking him after he has again this season improved the clubs position. 79 points is a record haul under his stewardship and we still have 2 games remaining so whatever the outcome this season we should recognise he has again improved our clubs standing.
Neil Warnock has done a fantastic job at QPR this season no doubt about that but when he was manager at Sheffield Utd he got that club promoted at the end of his 7th season in charge, like DJ he lost a playoff final against Wolves and DJ. Who knows if its not this year maybe DJ will do it next year but if another factor like a club breaking rules allowed our club to win promotion surely no one could blame DJ for the actions of another club.
However in the OP Carl makes a statement that the club Do Not Pay Anywhere A Percentage Of His Wages Before It Is Deemed Morally Correct well I don't know how you validate that statement because to my knowledge there is no measure no formal level which can be used that would decide when a loan agreement is either moral or immoral. One of the literal meanings of morality is The Quality Of Being In Accordance With Right And Good. In my opinion our club having acted fully in compliance with the rules and regulations of the FA & FL in this loan agreement has fully met any test or measure of morality in this matter and personal I deem it both moral and ethical.
I wonder how many people would have accepted promotion last season if we had won the playoff final would we have earned it? would we have won it on merit?
Lets face it last season our club was in turmoil we owed money left right and centre, our players were not being paid on time, as fans we were conned by the owners into believing our ST monies would be spent on new players even though the club had a transfer embargo in place for breaking FL rules. We were faced with one winding up order after another and even had one to face a few weeks after the playoff final. So how many would have accepted promotion last season against that background and ask yourself on any reasonable scale how you would have measured the moral behaviour of the club last season.
Well I would have accepted promotion in a heartbeat because whilst our club was in a very dark place last season where we did infringe FL rules we were punished by a transfer embargo. This meant that we could not sign any players after August 2009 and our team and manager did an incredible job to not onlu qualify for the playoffs but to also reach the final. We had to compete under a handicap and rightly so after breaking the rules but having accepted the handicap we had an absolute right to be in the playoff final and if we hadwon to be in the PL.
This season another club has been charged with breaking rules and regulations and they are about to be judged and IF the charges against them are proven they will face sanctions. If as a result another club benefits then that is absolutely right because they will be the next best placed club on MERIT.
![]()
![]()
Mon May 02, 2011 10:08 am
Mon May 02, 2011 11:33 am
Mon May 02, 2011 12:11 pm