Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:46 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Our Club is today near the bottom of the Championship, skint , in debt, Squad virtually worthless, crowds less , Board not interested, many court cases to come yet again after 12 years of this current Regime![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:38 pm
goats wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Our Club is today near the bottom of the Championship, skint , in debt, Squad virtually worthless, crowds less , Board not interested, many court cases to come yet again after 12 years of this current Regime![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We could be in the bottom 3 by Saturday too….great job vinnie eh?
Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:34 am
Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:01 am
Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:57 am
wez1927 wrote:This thread is like ground hog day .
Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:53 pm
piledriver64 wrote:goats wrote:Blue78 wrote:goats wrote:Don’t know how people can defend Tan at the moment, sure it’s been a successful time since 2010 but only because we’ve been so shocking for 30 years before….if it wasn’t for Derby and reading points deduction we’d be going down to league 1. The guy has failed at running a football club and has only achieved a tiny bit of success by throwing money at it, usually in the wrong places. Terrible CEO’s, interfering in team selection, re branding etc….
When we did have a bit of success with malky, he blew it, same with NW by not backing him properly when we got promoted.
Time for him to move on as he can’t emulate Leicester, Burnely, Watford, Brighton, Fulham, Leeds, swansea, wolves, saints or palace by being able to sustain PL status when getting there…..
FFS what do you mean he didn’t back his managers in the PL? He did and both of those managers (and a recruitment lead under Malkay) wasted it on players that barely played or were just poor - under Warnock…Murphy, Reid, Smithies, Cunningham and Bacuna. That was north of £30m just on those.
Maybe he should have spent £100m like Fulham did and finished below us.
Nobody who ‘defends’ Tan, think that he is perfect. I can acknowledged many mistakes he has and continues to make (one being allowing his board to continuing employing crap managers who waste money) but those that have it on for him can’t see any positives or suggest any better solution.
He did the first time with malky but then blew it anyway because malky called him a chink? Is that racist really? Is a taff, Ozzie, kiwi or yank racist too? Ffs….when my wife says shall we have a chinky tonight is that racist?He just blew that out of all proportion to justify getting rid of him as malky didn’t want him meddling in the team like he likes….
As for Warnock, the players he bought, Murphy, Reid, Cunningham and bacuna…..they worked out well didn’t they, transfer committee back them? Like Fulham proved its not how much you spend but where and as much as neil is ok at championship level he doesn’t seem to be able to cut it in the PL…..Tan didn’t get rid of him though because Warnock can sweet talk him and let him get away with murder…..
got nothing against tan just think he can’t cut it in football, it’s a bit too much for him…why doesnt he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?
Are you serious ?
So if you had an Asian boss and you called him a "Chink" or described him as having "slant eyes" like Mackay did would you expect to be in a job the next day ? Most reasonable people would say "no". If you believe you would then I can give you a guarantee that even if you took it to an Employment Tribunal would would be laughed out !! (in my opinion it is racist language but I'm not he person it's aimed at).
As for your genius statement "why doesn't he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?", lets think that through !! So Tan's sells 50%, that money goes to Tan where is the investment going to come from ? Or are you expecting Tan to gift that 50% money to the club out of the goodness of his own heart because of the love he gets from the supporters like you![]()
Wed Jan 26, 2022 6:25 pm
goats wrote:piledriver64 wrote:goats wrote:Blue78 wrote:goats wrote:Don’t know how people can defend Tan at the moment, sure it’s been a successful time since 2010 but only because we’ve been so shocking for 30 years before….if it wasn’t for Derby and reading points deduction we’d be going down to league 1. The guy has failed at running a football club and has only achieved a tiny bit of success by throwing money at it, usually in the wrong places. Terrible CEO’s, interfering in team selection, re branding etc….
When we did have a bit of success with malky, he blew it, same with NW by not backing him properly when we got promoted.
Time for him to move on as he can’t emulate Leicester, Burnely, Watford, Brighton, Fulham, Leeds, swansea, wolves, saints or palace by being able to sustain PL status when getting there…..
FFS what do you mean he didn’t back his managers in the PL? He did and both of those managers (and a recruitment lead under Malkay) wasted it on players that barely played or were just poor - under Warnock…Murphy, Reid, Smithies, Cunningham and Bacuna. That was north of £30m just on those.
Maybe he should have spent £100m like Fulham did and finished below us.
Nobody who ‘defends’ Tan, think that he is perfect. I can acknowledged many mistakes he has and continues to make (one being allowing his board to continuing employing crap managers who waste money) but those that have it on for him can’t see any positives or suggest any better solution.
He did the first time with malky but then blew it anyway because malky called him a chink? Is that racist really? Is a taff, Ozzie, kiwi or yank racist too? Ffs….when my wife says shall we have a chinky tonight is that racist?He just blew that out of all proportion to justify getting rid of him as malky didn’t want him meddling in the team like he likes….
As for Warnock, the players he bought, Murphy, Reid, Cunningham and bacuna…..they worked out well didn’t they, transfer committee back them? Like Fulham proved its not how much you spend but where and as much as neil is ok at championship level he doesn’t seem to be able to cut it in the PL…..Tan didn’t get rid of him though because Warnock can sweet talk him and let him get away with murder…..
got nothing against tan just think he can’t cut it in football, it’s a bit too much for him…why doesnt he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?
Are you serious ?
So if you had an Asian boss and you called him a "Chink" or described him as having "slant eyes" like Mackay did would you expect to be in a job the next day ? Most reasonable people would say "no". If you believe you would then I can give you a guarantee that even if you took it to an Employment Tribunal would would be laughed out !! (in my opinion it is racist language but I'm not he person it's aimed at).
As for your genius statement "why doesn't he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?", lets think that through !! So Tan's sells 50%, that money goes to Tan where is the investment going to come from ? Or are you expecting Tan to gift that 50% money to the club out of the goodness of his own heart because of the love he gets from the supporters like you![]()
You ain’t no businessman are you? How is Tan ever going to have a chance to recoup his investment? It won’t be in league 1, if we end up there he will never see a penny of it again so his shares are worth less. If he can get 25/30 million off one of his wealthy Chinese mates for some equity I’d invest that wisely in the squad as it’s the only way we might go up so he can recoup some of the alleged money he has lost ( he never seems to mention money in from sky, tickets or selling players does he?) just the wage bill…..maybe his mate will invest a bit more like a Fulham and we’d fly this league. It wouldn’t take much in this climate.
Still, let’s wait another year or two see how things go in league 1 maybe? Club won’t be worth anything if so….
Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:28 pm
maccydee wrote:goats wrote:piledriver64 wrote:goats wrote:Blue78 wrote:goats wrote:Don’t know how people can defend Tan at the moment, sure it’s been a successful time since 2010 but only because we’ve been so shocking for 30 years before….if it wasn’t for Derby and reading points deduction we’d be going down to league 1. The guy has failed at running a football club and has only achieved a tiny bit of success by throwing money at it, usually in the wrong places. Terrible CEO’s, interfering in team selection, re branding etc….
When we did have a bit of success with malky, he blew it, same with NW by not backing him properly when we got promoted.
Time for him to move on as he can’t emulate Leicester, Burnely, Watford, Brighton, Fulham, Leeds, swansea, wolves, saints or palace by being able to sustain PL status when getting there…..
FFS what do you mean he didn’t back his managers in the PL? He did and both of those managers (and a recruitment lead under Malkay) wasted it on players that barely played or were just poor - under Warnock…Murphy, Reid, Smithies, Cunningham and Bacuna. That was north of £30m just on those.
Maybe he should have spent £100m like Fulham did and finished below us.
Nobody who ‘defends’ Tan, think that he is perfect. I can acknowledged many mistakes he has and continues to make (one being allowing his board to continuing employing crap managers who waste money) but those that have it on for him can’t see any positives or suggest any better solution.
He did the first time with malky but then blew it anyway because malky called him a chink? Is that racist really? Is a taff, Ozzie, kiwi or yank racist too? Ffs….when my wife says shall we have a chinky tonight is that racist?He just blew that out of all proportion to justify getting rid of him as malky didn’t want him meddling in the team like he likes….
As for Warnock, the players he bought, Murphy, Reid, Cunningham and bacuna…..they worked out well didn’t they, transfer committee back them? Like Fulham proved its not how much you spend but where and as much as neil is ok at championship level he doesn’t seem to be able to cut it in the PL…..Tan didn’t get rid of him though because Warnock can sweet talk him and let him get away with murder…..
got nothing against tan just think he can’t cut it in football, it’s a bit too much for him…why doesnt he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?
Are you serious ?
So if you had an Asian boss and you called him a "Chink" or described him as having "slant eyes" like Mackay did would you expect to be in a job the next day ? Most reasonable people would say "no". If you believe you would then I can give you a guarantee that even if you took it to an Employment Tribunal would would be laughed out !! (in my opinion it is racist language but I'm not he person it's aimed at).
As for your genius statement "why doesn't he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?", lets think that through !! So Tan's sells 50%, that money goes to Tan where is the investment going to come from ? Or are you expecting Tan to gift that 50% money to the club out of the goodness of his own heart because of the love he gets from the supporters like you![]()
You ain’t no businessman are you? How is Tan ever going to have a chance to recoup his investment? It won’t be in league 1, if we end up there he will never see a penny of it again so his shares are worth less. If he can get 25/30 million off one of his wealthy Chinese mates for some equity I’d invest that wisely in the squad as it’s the only way we might go up so he can recoup some of the alleged money he has lost ( he never seems to mention money in from sky, tickets or selling players does he?) just the wage bill…..maybe his mate will invest a bit more like a Fulham and we’d fly this league. It wouldn’t take much in this climate.
Still, let’s wait another year or two see how things go in league 1 maybe? Club won’t be worth anything if so….
What a peculiar person.
Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:46 pm
goats wrote:maccydee wrote:goats wrote:piledriver64 wrote:goats wrote:Blue78 wrote:goats wrote:Don’t know how people can defend Tan at the moment, sure it’s been a successful time since 2010 but only because we’ve been so shocking for 30 years before….if it wasn’t for Derby and reading points deduction we’d be going down to league 1. The guy has failed at running a football club and has only achieved a tiny bit of success by throwing money at it, usually in the wrong places. Terrible CEO’s, interfering in team selection, re branding etc….
When we did have a bit of success with malky, he blew it, same with NW by not backing him properly when we got promoted.
Time for him to move on as he can’t emulate Leicester, Burnely, Watford, Brighton, Fulham, Leeds, swansea, wolves, saints or palace by being able to sustain PL status when getting there…..
FFS what do you mean he didn’t back his managers in the PL? He did and both of those managers (and a recruitment lead under Malkay) wasted it on players that barely played or were just poor - under Warnock…Murphy, Reid, Smithies, Cunningham and Bacuna. That was north of £30m just on those.
Maybe he should have spent £100m like Fulham did and finished below us.
Nobody who ‘defends’ Tan, think that he is perfect. I can acknowledged many mistakes he has and continues to make (one being allowing his board to continuing employing crap managers who waste money) but those that have it on for him can’t see any positives or suggest any better solution.
He did the first time with malky but then blew it anyway because malky called him a chink? Is that racist really? Is a taff, Ozzie, kiwi or yank racist too? Ffs….when my wife says shall we have a chinky tonight is that racist?He just blew that out of all proportion to justify getting rid of him as malky didn’t want him meddling in the team like he likes….
As for Warnock, the players he bought, Murphy, Reid, Cunningham and bacuna…..they worked out well didn’t they, transfer committee back them? Like Fulham proved its not how much you spend but where and as much as neil is ok at championship level he doesn’t seem to be able to cut it in the PL…..Tan didn’t get rid of him though because Warnock can sweet talk him and let him get away with murder…..
got nothing against tan just think he can’t cut it in football, it’s a bit too much for him…why doesnt he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?
Are you serious ?
So if you had an Asian boss and you called him a "Chink" or described him as having "slant eyes" like Mackay did would you expect to be in a job the next day ? Most reasonable people would say "no". If you believe you would then I can give you a guarantee that even if you took it to an Employment Tribunal would would be laughed out !! (in my opinion it is racist language but I'm not he person it's aimed at).
As for your genius statement "why doesn't he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?", lets think that through !! So Tan's sells 50%, that money goes to Tan where is the investment going to come from ? Or are you expecting Tan to gift that 50% money to the club out of the goodness of his own heart because of the love he gets from the supporters like you![]()
You ain’t no businessman are you? How is Tan ever going to have a chance to recoup his investment? It won’t be in league 1, if we end up there he will never see a penny of it again so his shares are worth less. If he can get 25/30 million off one of his wealthy![]()
Chinese mates for some equity I’d invest that wisely in the squad as it’s the only way we might go up so he can recoup some of the alleged money he has lost ( he never seems to mention money in from sky, tickets or selling players does
he?
) just the wage bill…..maybe his mate will invest a bit more like a Fulham and we’d fly this league. It wouldn’t take much in this climate.
Still, let’s wait another year or two see how things go in league 1 maybe? Club won’t be worth anything if so….
What a peculiar person.
Thanks for the compliment
Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:02 pm
Forever Blue wrote:goats wrote:maccydee wrote:goats wrote:piledriver64 wrote:goats wrote:Blue78 wrote:goats wrote:Don’t know how people can defend Tan at the moment, sure it’s been a successful time since 2010 but only because we’ve been so shocking for 30 years before….if it wasn’t for Derby and reading points deduction we’d be going down to league 1. The guy has failed at running a football club and has only achieved a tiny bit of success by throwing money at it, usually in the wrong places. Terrible CEO’s, interfering in team selection, re branding etc….
When we did have a bit of success with malky, he blew it, same with NW by not backing him properly when we got promoted.
Time for him to move on as he can’t emulate Leicester, Burnely, Watford, Brighton, Fulham, Leeds, swansea, wolves, saints or palace by being able to sustain PL status when getting there…..
FFS what do you mean he didn’t back his managers in the PL? He did and both of those managers (and a recruitment lead under Malkay) wasted it on players that barely played or were just poor - under Warnock…Murphy, Reid, Smithies, Cunningham and Bacuna. That was north of £30m just on those.
Maybe he should have spent £100m like Fulham did and finished below us.
Nobody who ‘defends’ Tan, think that he is perfect. I can acknowledged many mistakes he has and continues to make (one being allowing his board to continuing employing crap managers who waste money) but those that have it on for him can’t see any positives or suggest any better solution.
He did the first time with malky but then blew it anyway because malky called him a chink? Is that racist really? Is a taff, Ozzie, kiwi or yank racist too? Ffs….when my wife says shall we have a chinky tonight is that racist?He just blew that out of all proportion to justify getting rid of him as malky didn’t want him meddling in the team like he likes….
As for Warnock, the players he bought, Murphy, Reid, Cunningham and bacuna…..they worked out well didn’t they, transfer committee back them? Like Fulham proved its not how much you spend but where and as much as neil is ok at championship level he doesn’t seem to be able to cut it in the PL…..Tan didn’t get rid of him though because Warnock can sweet talk him and let him get away with murder…..
got nothing against tan just think he can’t cut it in football, it’s a bit too much for him…why doesnt he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?
Are you serious ?
So if you had an Asian boss and you called him a "Chink" or described him as having "slant eyes" like Mackay did would you expect to be in a job the next day ? Most reasonable people would say "no". If you believe you would then I can give you a guarantee that even if you took it to an Employment Tribunal would would be laughed out !! (in my opinion it is racist language but I'm not he person it's aimed at).
As for your genius statement "why doesn't he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?", lets think that through !! So Tan's sells 50%, that money goes to Tan where is the investment going to come from ? Or are you expecting Tan to gift that 50% money to the club out of the goodness of his own heart because of the love he gets from the supporters like you![]()
You ain’t no businessman are you? How is Tan ever going to have a chance to recoup his investment? It won’t be in league 1, if we end up there he will never see a penny of it again so his shares are worth less. If he can get 25/30 million off one of his wealthy![]()
Chinese mates for some equity I’d invest that wisely in the squad as it’s the only way we might go up so he can recoup some of the alleged money he has lost ( he never seems to mention money in from sky, tickets or selling players does
he?
) just the wage bill…..maybe his mate will invest a bit more like a Fulham and we’d fly this league. It wouldn’t take much in this climate.
Still, let’s wait another year or two see how things go in league 1 maybe? Club won’t be worth anything if so….
What a peculiar person.
Thanks for the compliment
I can vouch for Goats,
He is an old timer like me, Blue through and through and loyal till they come
Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:02 pm
Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:08 pm
maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:goats wrote:maccydee wrote:goats wrote:piledriver64 wrote:goats wrote:Blue78 wrote:goats wrote:Don’t know how people can defend Tan at the moment, sure it’s been a successful time since 2010 but only because we’ve been so shocking for 30 years before….if it wasn’t for Derby and reading points deduction we’d be going down to league 1. The guy has failed at running a football club and has only achieved a tiny bit of success by throwing money at it, usually in the wrong places. Terrible CEO’s, interfering in team selection, re branding etc….
When we did have a bit of success with malky, he blew it, same with NW by not backing him properly when we got promoted.
Time for him to move on as he can’t emulate Leicester, Burnely, Watford, Brighton, Fulham, Leeds, swansea, wolves, saints or palace by being able to sustain PL status when getting there…..
FFS what do you mean he didn’t back his managers in the PL? He did and both of those managers (and a recruitment lead under Malkay) wasted it on players that barely played or were just poor - under Warnock…Murphy, Reid, Smithies, Cunningham and Bacuna. That was north of £30m just on those.
Maybe he should have spent £100m like Fulham did and finished below us.
Nobody who ‘defends’ Tan, think that he is perfect. I can acknowledged many mistakes he has and continues to make (one being allowing his board to continuing employing crap managers who waste money) but those that have it on for him can’t see any positives or suggest any better solution.
He did the first time with malky but then blew it anyway because malky called him a chink? Is that racist really? Is a taff, Ozzie, kiwi or yank racist too? Ffs….when my wife says shall we have a chinky tonight is that racist?He just blew that out of all proportion to justify getting rid of him as malky didn’t want him meddling in the team like he likes….
As for Warnock, the players he bought, Murphy, Reid, Cunningham and bacuna…..they worked out well didn’t they, transfer committee back them? Like Fulham proved its not how much you spend but where and as much as neil is ok at championship level he doesn’t seem to be able to cut it in the PL…..Tan didn’t get rid of him though because Warnock can sweet talk him and let him get away with murder…..
got nothing against tan just think he can’t cut it in football, it’s a bit too much for him…why doesnt he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?
Are you serious ?
So if you had an Asian boss and you called him a "Chink" or described him as having "slant eyes" like Mackay did would you expect to be in a job the next day ? Most reasonable people would say "no". If you believe you would then I can give you a guarantee that even if you took it to an Employment Tribunal would would be laughed out !! (in my opinion it is racist language but I'm not he person it's aimed at).
As for your genius statement "why doesn't he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?", lets think that through !! So Tan's sells 50%, that money goes to Tan where is the investment going to come from ? Or are you expecting Tan to gift that 50% money to the club out of the goodness of his own heart because of the love he gets from the supporters like you![]()
You ain’t no businessman are you? How is Tan ever going to have a chance to recoup his investment? It won’t be in league 1, if we end up there he will never see a penny of it again so his shares are worth less. If he can get 25/30 million off one of his wealthy![]()
Chinese mates for some equity I’d invest that wisely in the squad as it’s the only way we might go up so he can recoup some of the alleged money he has lost ( he never seems to mention money in from sky, tickets or selling players does
he?
) just the wage bill…..maybe his mate will invest a bit more like a Fulham and we’d fly this league. It wouldn’t take much in this climate.
Still, let’s wait another year or two see how things go in league 1 maybe? Club won’t be worth anything if so….
What a peculiar person.
Thanks for the compliment
I can vouch for Goats,
He is an old timer like me, Blue through and through and loyal till they come
Fair enough mate.
To liken chink to yank though is bonkers.
Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:07 pm
Forever Blue wrote:goats wrote:maccydee wrote:goats wrote:piledriver64 wrote:goats wrote:Blue78 wrote:goats wrote:Don’t know how people can defend Tan at the moment, sure it’s been a successful time since 2010 but only because we’ve been so shocking for 30 years before….if it wasn’t for Derby and reading points deduction we’d be going down to league 1. The guy has failed at running a football club and has only achieved a tiny bit of success by throwing money at it, usually in the wrong places. Terrible CEO’s, interfering in team selection, re branding etc….
When we did have a bit of success with malky, he blew it, same with NW by not backing him properly when we got promoted.
Time for him to move on as he can’t emulate Leicester, Burnely, Watford, Brighton, Fulham, Leeds, swansea, wolves, saints or palace by being able to sustain PL status when getting there…..
FFS what do you mean he didn’t back his managers in the PL? He did and both of those managers (and a recruitment lead under Malkay) wasted it on players that barely played or were just poor - under Warnock…Murphy, Reid, Smithies, Cunningham and Bacuna. That was north of £30m just on those.
Maybe he should have spent £100m like Fulham did and finished below us.
Nobody who ‘defends’ Tan, think that he is perfect. I can acknowledged many mistakes he has and continues to make (one being allowing his board to continuing employing crap managers who waste money) but those that have it on for him can’t see any positives or suggest any better solution.
He did the first time with malky but then blew it anyway because malky called him a chink? Is that racist really? Is a taff, Ozzie, kiwi or yank racist too? Ffs….when my wife says shall we have a chinky tonight is that racist?He just blew that out of all proportion to justify getting rid of him as malky didn’t want him meddling in the team like he likes….
As for Warnock, the players he bought, Murphy, Reid, Cunningham and bacuna…..they worked out well didn’t they, transfer committee back them? Like Fulham proved its not how much you spend but where and as much as neil is ok at championship level he doesn’t seem to be able to cut it in the PL…..Tan didn’t get rid of him though because Warnock can sweet talk him and let him get away with murder…..
got nothing against tan just think he can’t cut it in football, it’s a bit too much for him…why doesnt he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?
Are you serious ?
So if you had an Asian boss and you called him a "Chink" or described him as having "slant eyes" like Mackay did would you expect to be in a job the next day ? Most reasonable people would say "no". If you believe you would then I can give you a guarantee that even if you took it to an Employment Tribunal would would be laughed out !! (in my opinion it is racist language but I'm not he person it's aimed at).
As for your genius statement "why doesn't he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?", lets think that through !! So Tan's sells 50%, that money goes to Tan where is the investment going to come from ? Or are you expecting Tan to gift that 50% money to the club out of the goodness of his own heart because of the love he gets from the supporters like you![]()
You ain’t no businessman are you? How is Tan ever going to have a chance to recoup his investment? It won’t be in league 1, if we end up there he will never see a penny of it again so his shares are worth less. If he can get 25/30 million off one of his wealthy![]()
Chinese mates for some equity I’d invest that wisely in the squad as it’s the only way we might go up so he can recoup some of the alleged money he has lost ( he never seems to mention money in from sky, tickets or selling players does
he?
) just the wage bill…..maybe his mate will invest a bit more like a Fulham and we’d fly this league. It wouldn’t take much in this climate.
Still, let’s wait another year or two see how things go in league 1 maybe? Club won’t be worth anything if so….
What a peculiar person.
Thanks for the compliment
I can vouch for Goats,
He is an old timer like me, Blue through and through and loyal till they come
Thu Jan 27, 2022 1:40 pm
piledriver64 wrote:
I’ve been supporting this club since 1971
Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:03 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:piledriver64 wrote:![]()
I’ve been supporting this club since 1971
So have I and I hope you are not the f^*ker that nick my scarf. If you are then I want it back.
Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:31 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:piledriver64 wrote:![]()
I’ve been supporting this club since 1971
So have I and I hope you are not the f^*ker that nick my scarf. If you are then I want it back.
![]()
Fri Jan 28, 2022 3:51 pm
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:goats wrote:maccydee wrote:goats wrote:piledriver64 wrote:goats wrote:Blue78 wrote:goats wrote:Don’t know how people can defend Tan at the moment, sure it’s been a successful time since 2010 but only because we’ve been so shocking for 30 years before….if it wasn’t for Derby and reading points deduction we’d be going down to league 1. The guy has failed at running a football club and has only achieved a tiny bit of success by throwing money at it, usually in the wrong places. Terrible CEO’s, interfering in team selection, re branding etc….
When we did have a bit of success with malky, he blew it, same with NW by not backing him properly when we got promoted.
Time for him to move on as he can’t emulate Leicester, Burnely, Watford, Brighton, Fulham, Leeds, swansea, wolves, saints or palace by being able to sustain PL status when getting there…..
FFS what do you mean he didn’t back his managers in the PL? He did and both of those managers (and a recruitment lead under Malkay) wasted it on players that barely played or were just poor - under Warnock…Murphy, Reid, Smithies, Cunningham and Bacuna. That was north of £30m just on those.
Maybe he should have spent £100m like Fulham did and finished below us.
Nobody who ‘defends’ Tan, think that he is perfect. I can acknowledged many mistakes he has and continues to make (one being allowing his board to continuing employing crap managers who waste money) but those that have it on for him can’t see any positives or suggest any better solution.
He did the first time with malky but then blew it anyway because malky called him a chink? Is that racist really? Is a taff, Ozzie, kiwi or yank racist too? Ffs….when my wife says shall we have a chinky tonight is that racist?He just blew that out of all proportion to justify getting rid of him as malky didn’t want him meddling in the team like he likes….
As for Warnock, the players he bought, Murphy, Reid, Cunningham and bacuna…..they worked out well didn’t they, transfer committee back them? Like Fulham proved its not how much you spend but where and as much as neil is ok at championship level he doesn’t seem to be able to cut it in the PL…..Tan didn’t get rid of him though because Warnock can sweet talk him and let him get away with murder…..
got nothing against tan just think he can’t cut it in football, it’s a bit too much for him…why doesnt he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?
Are you serious ?
So if you had an Asian boss and you called him a "Chink" or described him as having "slant eyes" like Mackay did would you expect to be in a job the next day ? Most reasonable people would say "no". If you believe you would then I can give you a guarantee that even if you took it to an Employment Tribunal would would be laughed out !! (in my opinion it is racist language but I'm not he person it's aimed at).
As for your genius statement "why doesn't he sell half his stake at least so we can invest some in the squad?", lets think that through !! So Tan's sells 50%, that money goes to Tan where is the investment going to come from ? Or are you expecting Tan to gift that 50% money to the club out of the goodness of his own heart because of the love he gets from the supporters like you![]()
You ain’t no businessman are you? How is Tan ever going to have a chance to recoup his investment? It won’t be in league 1, if we end up there he will never see a penny of it again so his shares are worth less. If he can get 25/30 million off one of his wealthy![]()
Chinese mates for some equity I’d invest that wisely in the squad as it’s the only way we might go up so he can recoup some of the alleged money he has lost ( he never seems to mention money in from sky, tickets or selling players does
he?
) just the wage bill…..maybe his mate will invest a bit more like a Fulham and we’d fly this league. It wouldn’t take much in this climate.
Still, let’s wait another year or two see how things go in league 1 maybe? Club won’t be worth anything if so….
What a peculiar person.
Thanks for the compliment
I can vouch for Goats,
He is an old timer like me, Blue through and through and loyal till they come
We’re all supporters we have different views.
Why to you think vouching for someone makes his view anymore valid ?
I’ve been supporting this club since 1971, that doesn’t make me anymore or less of a fan than somebody who’s only recently started supporting their club. It just means I’ve seen more ups and downs.
I don’t agree with your views on Hammam v Tan. I have no attachment to either, unlike you, and I will have a pop at either where merited.
What I won’t stand by and ignore is re-writing history, glossing over what has happened in the past and a complete distortion of what is going on now.
Our club is not going out of business. We are not in a great position financially but we have no better alternatives. Hammam has had his time, he nearly ruined us and away from this message board he is even more divisive amongst the fans than Tan.
So how about at a time of trouble we get behind the club and show a bit of loyalty rather than trying to undermine the only option we have right now as an owner.