Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:42 pm
skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:No 100 post threads, no complaints from the posters on here - Let's complain about Drakeford instead who introduced EXACTLY THE SAME measures as the tories introduced in England on the same day.
o sort of agree...but please explain how non essential items in super markets were so important last time, proper not budging... not so important this time... or will that be changed when its pointed out it doesnt make sense....
I'm not saying he's perfect mate far from it, but if you're going to close a small local business which sells books, toys etc why let a big super market chain chain reap the benefits of selling the exact same items in store? If businesses are only selling essentials it will also reduce footfall.
Not sure why this wasn't thought of sooner but I don't think any gov. will claim they've acted perfectly in the first lockdown as all were pretty much making it up as they went on, if governments realised they made mistakes in the first lockdown/first few months of Covid and change the rules I don't think that's a bad thing, just learning as we go on.
hmmm..the first lockdown... over zealous police in some parts were patrolling non essential aisles until it was cleared up that if a shop was open, you could buy whatever that shop had in stock... Drakeford made a real point of changing that for his firebreak... and its that sort of pettiness that people get peed with...
Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:42 pm
CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:No 100 post threads, no complaints from the posters on here - Let's complain about Drakeford instead who introduced EXACTLY THE SAME measures as the tories introduced in England on the same day.
o sort of agree...but please explain how non essential items in super markets were so important last time, proper not budging... not so important this time... or will that be changed when its pointed out it doesnt make sense....
I'm not saying he's perfect mate far from it, but if you're going to close a small local business which sells books, toys etc why let a big super market chain chain reap the benefits of selling the exact same items in store? If businesses are only selling essentials it will also reduce footfall.
Not sure why this wasn't thought of sooner but I don't think any gov. will claim they've acted perfectly in the first lockdown as all were pretty much making it up as they went on, if governments realised they made mistakes in the first lockdown/first few months of Covid and change the rules I don't think that's a bad thing, just learning as we go on.
hmmm..the first lockdown... over zealous police in some parts were patrolling non essential aisles until it was cleared up that if a shop was open, you could buy whatever that shop had in stock... Drakeford made a real point of changing that for his firebreak... and its that sort of pettiness that people get peed with...
I know it was a while ago now mate but I do not remember police officers patrolling super markets looking for people who were buying non essential items?!
Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:45 pm
CityBlue93 wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:No 100 post threads, no complaints from the posters on here - Let's complain about Drakeford instead who introduced EXACTLY THE SAME measures as the tories introduced in England on the same day.
o sort of agree...but please explain how non essential items in super markets were so important last time, proper not budging... not so important this time... or will that be changed when its pointed out it doesnt make sense....
I'm not saying he's perfect mate far from it, but if you're going to close a small local business which sells books, toys etc why let a big super market chain chain reap the benefits of selling the exact same items in store? If businesses are only selling essentials it will also reduce footfall.
Not sure why this wasn't thought of sooner but I don't think any gov. will claim they've acted perfectly in the first lockdown as all were pretty much making it up as they went on, if governments realised they made mistakes in the first lockdown/first few months of Covid and change the rules I don't think that's a bad thing, just learning as we go on.
hmmm..the first lockdown... over zealous police in some parts were patrolling non essential aisles until it was cleared up that if a shop was open, you could buy whatever that shop had in stock... Drakeford made a real point of changing that for his firebreak... and its that sort of pettiness that people get peed with...
I know it was a while ago now mate but I do not remember police officers patrolling super markets looking for people who were buying non essential items?!
I could be wrong (I f*cking hope not though!).
Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:56 pm
skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:No 100 post threads, no complaints from the posters on here - Let's complain about Drakeford instead who introduced EXACTLY THE SAME measures as the tories introduced in England on the same day.
o sort of agree...but please explain how non essential items in super markets were so important last time, proper not budging... not so important this time... or will that be changed when its pointed out it doesnt make sense....
I'm not saying he's perfect mate far from it, but if you're going to close a small local business which sells books, toys etc why let a big super market chain chain reap the benefits of selling the exact same items in store? If businesses are only selling essentials it will also reduce footfall.
Not sure why this wasn't thought of sooner but I don't think any gov. will claim they've acted perfectly in the first lockdown as all were pretty much making it up as they went on, if governments realised they made mistakes in the first lockdown/first few months of Covid and change the rules I don't think that's a bad thing, just learning as we go on.
hmmm..the first lockdown... over zealous police in some parts were patrolling non essential aisles until it was cleared up that if a shop was open, you could buy whatever that shop had in stock... Drakeford made a real point of changing that for his firebreak... and its that sort of pettiness that people get peed with...
I know it was a while ago now mate but I do not remember police officers patrolling super markets looking for people who were buying non essential items?!
I could be wrong (I f*cking hope not though!).
it wasnt widespread but happened..which is what brought on the government announcement i referred to..
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/p ... 11991.html
Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:11 am
CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:No 100 post threads, no complaints from the posters on here - Let's complain about Drakeford instead who introduced EXACTLY THE SAME measures as the tories introduced in England on the same day.
o sort of agree...but please explain how non essential items in super markets were so important last time, proper not budging... not so important this time... or will that be changed when its pointed out it doesnt make sense....
I'm not saying he's perfect mate far from it, but if you're going to close a small local business which sells books, toys etc why let a big super market chain chain reap the benefits of selling the exact same items in store? If businesses are only selling essentials it will also reduce footfall.
Not sure why this wasn't thought of sooner but I don't think any gov. will claim they've acted perfectly in the first lockdown as all were pretty much making it up as they went on, if governments realised they made mistakes in the first lockdown/first few months of Covid and change the rules I don't think that's a bad thing, just learning as we go on.
hmmm..the first lockdown... over zealous police in some parts were patrolling non essential aisles until it was cleared up that if a shop was open, you could buy whatever that shop had in stock... Drakeford made a real point of changing that for his firebreak... and its that sort of pettiness that people get peed with...
I know it was a while ago now mate but I do not remember police officers patrolling super markets looking for people who were buying non essential items?!
I could be wrong (I f*cking hope not though!).
it wasnt widespread but happened..which is what brought on the government announcement i referred to..
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/p ... 11991.html
Fair enough that was in England though so don't think it really relates to Drakeford's announcement on supermarkets/non-essential shops as what happened in Cambridge was totally out of his control.
Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:15 am
CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:No 100 post threads, no complaints from the posters on here - Let's complain about Drakeford instead who introduced EXACTLY THE SAME measures as the tories introduced in England on the same day.
o sort of agree...but please explain how non essential items in super markets were so important last time, proper not budging... not so important this time... or will that be changed when its pointed out it doesnt make sense....
I'm not saying he's perfect mate far from it, but if you're going to close a small local business which sells books, toys etc why let a big super market chain chain reap the benefits of selling the exact same items in store? If businesses are only selling essentials it will also reduce footfall.
Not sure why this wasn't thought of sooner but I don't think any gov. will claim they've acted perfectly in the first lockdown as all were pretty much making it up as they went on, if governments realised they made mistakes in the first lockdown/first few months of Covid and change the rules I don't think that's a bad thing, just learning as we go on.
hmmm..the first lockdown... over zealous police in some parts were patrolling non essential aisles until it was cleared up that if a shop was open, you could buy whatever that shop had in stock... Drakeford made a real point of changing that for his firebreak... and its that sort of pettiness that people get peed with...
I know it was a while ago now mate but I do not remember police officers patrolling super markets looking for people who were buying non essential items?!
I could be wrong (I f*cking hope not though!).
it wasnt widespread but happened..which is what brought on the government announcement i referred to..
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/p ... 11991.html
Fair enough that was in England though so don't think it really relates to Drakeford's announcement on supermarkets/non-essential shops as what happened in Cambridge was totally out of his control.
Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:16 am
Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:17 am
skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:No 100 post threads, no complaints from the posters on here - Let's complain about Drakeford instead who introduced EXACTLY THE SAME measures as the tories introduced in England on the same day.
o sort of agree...but please explain how non essential items in super markets were so important last time, proper not budging... not so important this time... or will that be changed when its pointed out it doesnt make sense....
I'm not saying he's perfect mate far from it, but if you're going to close a small local business which sells books, toys etc why let a big super market chain chain reap the benefits of selling the exact same items in store? If businesses are only selling essentials it will also reduce footfall.
Not sure why this wasn't thought of sooner but I don't think any gov. will claim they've acted perfectly in the first lockdown as all were pretty much making it up as they went on, if governments realised they made mistakes in the first lockdown/first few months of Covid and change the rules I don't think that's a bad thing, just learning as we go on.
hmmm..the first lockdown... over zealous police in some parts were patrolling non essential aisles until it was cleared up that if a shop was open, you could buy whatever that shop had in stock... Drakeford made a real point of changing that for his firebreak... and its that sort of pettiness that people get peed with...
I know it was a while ago now mate but I do not remember police officers patrolling super markets looking for people who were buying non essential items?!
I could be wrong (I f*cking hope not though!).
it wasnt widespread but happened..which is what brought on the government announcement i referred to..
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/p ... 11991.html
Fair enough that was in England though so don't think it really relates to Drakeford's announcement on supermarkets/non-essential shops as what happened in Cambridge was totally out of his control.
it was the UK lockdown which included us...but my point was more to do with the clarification than the police... and how when Drakeford took the reigns he seemed not able to resist the change... which now doesnt seem so important..
Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:23 am
CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:skidemin wrote:CityBlue93 wrote:No 100 post threads, no complaints from the posters on here - Let's complain about Drakeford instead who introduced EXACTLY THE SAME measures as the tories introduced in England on the same day.
o sort of agree...but please explain how non essential items in super markets were so important last time, proper not budging... not so important this time... or will that be changed when its pointed out it doesnt make sense....
I'm not saying he's perfect mate far from it, but if you're going to close a small local business which sells books, toys etc why let a big super market chain chain reap the benefits of selling the exact same items in store? If businesses are only selling essentials it will also reduce footfall.
Not sure why this wasn't thought of sooner but I don't think any gov. will claim they've acted perfectly in the first lockdown as all were pretty much making it up as they went on, if governments realised they made mistakes in the first lockdown/first few months of Covid and change the rules I don't think that's a bad thing, just learning as we go on.
hmmm..the first lockdown... over zealous police in some parts were patrolling non essential aisles until it was cleared up that if a shop was open, you could buy whatever that shop had in stock... Drakeford made a real point of changing that for his firebreak... and its that sort of pettiness that people get peed with...
I know it was a while ago now mate but I do not remember police officers patrolling super markets looking for people who were buying non essential items?!
I could be wrong (I f*cking hope not though!).
it wasnt widespread but happened..which is what brought on the government announcement i referred to..
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/p ... 11991.html
Fair enough that was in England though so don't think it really relates to Drakeford's announcement on supermarkets/non-essential shops as what happened in Cambridge was totally out of his control.
it was the UK lockdown which included us...but my point was more to do with the clarification than the police... and how when Drakeford took the reigns he seemed not able to resist the change... which now doesnt seem so important..
It wasn't a UK lockdown we had our own powers which we exercised - As per my previous comment there are reasons why he felt the need to 'resist the change'.
Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:25 am
pembroke allan wrote:And people said you cant cancel xmas when I asked question a couple of months ago? Well may as well been cancelled it will be me the other half and the cat for xmas dinner !![]()
Bet lots people without presents because last minute shopping is off the agenda.
Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:41 am
skidemin wrote:at what point did he start making independent decisions ? i thought the initial lockdown was UK, at least at the beginning ?
not that it matters because every time he has been asked for evidence to back actions ...it doesnt appear...
Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:23 am
Mon Dec 21, 2020 9:24 pm
Mon Dec 21, 2020 9:33 pm
montyblue wrote:Vaugn gethin says he wants to come down hard on mass gatherings
May i suggest he starts with un policed areas such as supermarkets and schools
It seems to be a free for all in both especially supermarkets no one way systems and now pubs and other shops have closed your more likely to catch the disease in a supermarket than anywhere else.
Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:23 pm
FOOTSOLDIER wrote:Just been to Tesco, free to buy whatever you want, not much social distancing going on and a few people without masks.
Mon Dec 21, 2020 11:48 pm
stickywicket wrote:pembroke allan wrote:And people said you cant cancel xmas when I asked question a couple of months ago? Well may as well been cancelled it will be me the other half and the cat for xmas dinner !![]()
Bet lots people without presents because last minute shopping is off the agenda.
The greatest present will be to still be alive next Christmas.
Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:44 am
FOOTSOLDIER wrote:Just been to Tesco, free to buy whatever you want, not much social distancing going on and a few people without masks.
Tue Dec 22, 2020 12:26 pm
stickywicket wrote:pembroke allan wrote:And people said you cant cancel xmas when I asked question a couple of months ago? Well may as well been cancelled it will be me the other half and the cat for xmas dinner !![]()
Bet lots people without presents because last minute shopping is off the agenda.
The greatest present will be to still be alive next Christmas.
Tue Dec 22, 2020 7:32 pm
skidemin wrote:stickywicket wrote:pembroke allan wrote:And people said you cant cancel xmas when I asked question a couple of months ago? Well may as well been cancelled it will be me the other half and the cat for xmas dinner !![]()
Bet lots people without presents because last minute shopping is off the agenda.
The greatest present will be to still be alive next Christmas.
indeed but thats every year though....
Tue Dec 22, 2020 7:39 pm
bluesince62 wrote:skidemin wrote:stickywicket wrote:pembroke allan wrote:And people said you cant cancel xmas when I asked question a couple of months ago? Well may as well been cancelled it will be me the other half and the cat for xmas dinner !![]()
Bet lots people without presents because last minute shopping is off the agenda.
The greatest present will be to still be alive next Christmas.
indeed but thats every year though....
Im just grateful as each year passes,f@ck Christmas,every day is a bonus!
Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:38 pm
Wed Dec 23, 2020 10:43 pm
Big Hill Blue wrote:Not seen our esteemed leader on the telly lately, nothing trivial I hope?
Thu Dec 24, 2020 9:39 am
TopCat CCFC wrote:Big Hill Blue wrote:Not seen our esteemed leader on the telly lately, nothing trivial I hope?
Apparently reports from the weekend - He's got a cold
Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:31 am
TopCat CCFC wrote:Big Hill Blue wrote:Not seen our esteemed leader on the telly lately, nothing trivial I hope?
Apparently reports from the weekend - He's got a cold
Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:47 am
pembroke allan wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:Big Hill Blue wrote:Not seen our esteemed leader on the telly lately, nothing trivial I hope?
Apparently reports from the weekend - He's got a cold
The heating must have packed up in the shed he lives in!
Thu Dec 24, 2020 1:34 pm
skidemin wrote:pembroke allan wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:Big Hill Blue wrote:Not seen our esteemed leader on the telly lately, nothing trivial I hope?
Apparently reports from the weekend - He's got a cold
The heating must have packed up in the shed he lives in!
![]()
![]()
![]()
you couldnt make it up could you...
Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:10 pm
Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:17 pm
Big Hill Blue wrote:So he has Christmas off work. How convenient.
Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:31 pm
pembroke allan wrote:And people said you cant cancel xmas when I asked question a couple of months ago? Well may as well been cancelled it will be me the other half and the cat for xmas dinner !![]()
Bet lots people without presents because last minute shopping is off the agenda.
Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:12 pm
Big Hill Blue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:And people said you cant cancel xmas when I asked question a couple of months ago? Well may as well been cancelled it will be me the other half and the cat for xmas dinner !![]()
Bet lots people without presents because last minute shopping is off the agenda.
Eating your cat tomorrow. Shame.