THE COVID-19 VACCINE: WILL YOU HAVE ONE?

Covid-19 vaccine: Allergy warning over new jab -

People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not have the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid jab, regulators say.

It came after two NHS workers had allergic reactions on Tuesday.

The advice applies to those who have had reactions to medicines, food or vaccines, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said.

The two people had a reaction shortly after having the new jab, had treatment and are both fine now.

They are understood to have had an anaphylactoid reaction, which tends to involve a skin rash, breathlessness and sometimes a drop in blood pressure. This is not the same as anaphylaxis which can be fatal.

Both NHS workers have a history of serious allergies and carry adrenaline pens around with them.

This is extremely common for most vaccines and jabs. I needed a few different jabs when I went abroad a few years back and every doctor that administered them (multiple trips so different doctors) asked a series of questions about my health with quite a lot of the focus on allergies.
I know people with severe allergies are also warned against getting the flu jab in case of a negative reaction.

Some of these people will die if they eat a peanut, so to have a little reaction to a vaccine is to be expected.

What a crass statement!! A "little" reaction you say,as a sufferer of allergies myself,and suffered anaphylactic shock,on more than one occasion,I guarantee you a "little"reaction its not!!!! How f@cking ignorant are you? Im alright jack type that you are!
You do what you want,let others at least do the same?

It's a fact, so far people have had a little reaction, people who suffer from anaphylactic shock should be careful what they take regardless, it's not Pfizers fault?

You've been making crass statements like Corona only kills a small percentage of people for months, but you're ok jack!

Do what the feck you want, I know six people who have the virus right now, and I'll take the vaccine when I get the chance as it's proven safer than catching the virus


Covid is flying in Wales, watch this space we will be locked down for all of January at least, talk of it starting on the 27th December!

So you are saying what exactly Am I wrong in saying it only kills a small percentage? And no I am not alright jack ,I have to be careful on any medication I get,due to allergies,so this is no different so you know 6 people with it,are they hospitalised and in a bad way,or have they some mild symptoms ,to be totally honest,I know of 3 people who have had negative tests,doesn't mean they will not get it,but I know only one person to date,who has it,but they have had very mild symtoms
,remember your statement"so far".
Where did I say it was Pfizers fault by the way? Sorry but your statement is based on 2 cases to date,which luckily weren't serious.
That may not be the case for some!
You are stating nothing I haven't already read or seen regarding covid flying in Wales, same in Germany. And thanks for letting me do "what I want,regatding being vaccinated,although I didn't need permission from you thanks .

Why are you stating we will be in lockdown,this was obvious,due to this "virus holiday".
We all know your preference regards taking the vaccine,and you would have no hesitation in having it tomorrow,crack on I say
By the way,your having a go,but during the first lockdown I volunteered to take medications to isolated patients,mostly elderly people who were told to shield at home,and will do the same again if we are locked down once more
I've never denied it's existence (covid) but I guess you believe the figures we are fed too?

I and others don't believe them,and for various reasons,and those who wish to abstain from an untested (I don't count it as tested due to condensed period of time) should be allowed to do so,without people as yourself,trying to mock/ridicule them because you think differently to them,for some the time period to allow for vaccinated people to show adverse and possibly serious side effects.
I won't be surprised when they start new lockdown, as suggested,even though it may well start on my birthday
But it's not because people haven't been vaccinated! It's because people are crowding city centres for the Christmas covid holiday!!
Of course it will spike around January, that's not the fault of people not wanted to be vaccinated is it?? That fault lies clearly at the feet of the decision makers,although most people I have discussed it with,were doing family Christmas in the normal way,regardless of rules! The goverment knew this full well,so put out a "good news" story for once,you can meet people you haven't seen for 6 months or more? It's a gift from your leaders,yeah right,course it is,cos covid will understand,and perhaps take some time off,after all,they have been busy !! Anyway,I'll let you go,don't want to lose your place in the queue now

Been on the sherry?

I'm not really sure what that rant was all about?

People who are allergic to almost everything need to take care, so all I was saying originally is the fact two people had an allergic reaction is not a big deal.

Not sure what the hell your birthday and decision-makers nonsense means really, and I couldn't care if you abstain or have it, crack on with whatever you want?

Covid-19 vaccine: Allergy warning over new jab -

People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not have the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid jab, regulators say.

It came after two NHS workers had allergic reactions on Tuesday.

The advice applies to those who have had reactions to medicines, food or vaccines, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said.

The two people had a reaction shortly after having the new jab, had treatment and are both fine now.

They are understood to have had an anaphylactoid reaction, which tends to involve a skin rash, breathlessness and sometimes a drop in blood pressure. This is not the same as anaphylaxis which can be fatal.

Both NHS workers have a history of serious allergies and carry adrenaline pens around with them.

This is extremely common for most vaccines and jabs. I needed a few different jabs when I went abroad a few years back and every doctor that administered them (multiple trips so different doctors) asked a series of questions about my health with quite a lot of the focus on allergies.
I know people with severe allergies are also warned against getting the flu jab in case of a negative reaction.

Some of these people will die if they eat a peanut, so to have a little reaction to a vaccine is to be expected.

What a crass statement!! A "little" reaction you say,as a sufferer of allergies myself,and suffered anaphylactic shock,on more than one occasion,I guarantee you a "little"reaction its not!!!! How f@cking ignorant are you? Im alright jack type that you are!
You do what you want,let others at least do the same?

It's a fact, so far people have had a little reaction, people who suffer from anaphylactic shock should be careful what they take regardless, it's not Pfizers fault?

You've been making crass statements like Corona only kills a small percentage of people for months, but you're ok jack!

Do what the feck you want, I know six people who have the virus right now, and I'll take the vaccine when I get the chance as it's proven safer than catching the virus


Covid is flying in Wales, watch this space we will be locked down for all of January at least, talk of it starting on the 27th December!

So you are saying what exactly Am I wrong in saying it only kills a small percentage? And no I am not alright jack ,I have to be careful on any medication I get,due to allergies,so this is no different so you know 6 people with it,are they hospitalised and in a bad way,or have they some mild symptoms ,to be totally honest,I know of 3 people who have had negative tests,doesn't mean they will not get it,but I know only one person to date,who has it,but they have had very mild symtoms
,remember your statement"so far".
Where did I say it was Pfizers fault by the way? Sorry but your statement is based on 2 cases to date,which luckily weren't serious.
That may not be the case for some!
You are stating nothing I haven't already read or seen regarding covid flying in Wales, same in Germany. And thanks for letting me do "what I want,regatding being vaccinated,although I didn't need permission from you thanks .

Why are you stating we will be in lockdown,this was obvious,due to this "virus holiday".
We all know your preference regards taking the vaccine,and you would have no hesitation in having it tomorrow,crack on I say
By the way,your having a go,but during the first lockdown I volunteered to take medications to isolated patients,mostly elderly people who were told to shield at home,and will do the same again if we are locked down once more
I've never denied it's existence (covid) but I guess you believe the figures we are fed too?

I and others don't believe them,and for various reasons,and those who wish to abstain from an untested (I don't count it as tested due to condensed period of time) should be allowed to do so,without people as yourself,trying to mock/ridicule them because you think differently to them,for some the time period to allow for vaccinated people to show adverse and possibly serious side effects.
I won't be surprised when they start new lockdown, as suggested,even though it may well start on my birthday
But it's not because people haven't been vaccinated! It's because people are crowding city centres for the Christmas covid holiday!!
Of course it will spike around January, that's not the fault of people not wanted to be vaccinated is it?? That fault lies clearly at the feet of the decision makers,although most people I have discussed it with,were doing family Christmas in the normal way,regardless of rules! The goverment knew this full well,so put out a "good news" story for once,you can meet people you haven't seen for 6 months or more? It's a gift from your leaders,yeah right,course it is,cos covid will understand,and perhaps take some time off,after all,they have been busy !! Anyway,I'll let you go,don't want to lose your place in the queue now

Been on the sherry?

I'm not really sure what that rant was all about?

People who are allergic to almost everything need to take care, so all I was saying originally is the fact two people had an allergic reaction is not a big deal.

Not sure what the hell your birthday and decision-makers nonsense means really, and I couldn't care if you abstain or have it, crack on with whatever you want?

Abstain from having what exactly? I dont drink alcohol (and havent for 30 yrs!) So my birthat will remain the same pretty much.And it was your piss poor attempt at trying to make light of peoples possibly life threatening risk in having this vaccine!! Very condescending as per usual!! As per the "been on the sherry" comment.you hzve been waiting for this "miracle" nof me mate,now get back in the queue,before you lose your place.

Covid-19 vaccine: Allergy warning over new jab -

People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not have the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid jab, regulators say.

It came after two NHS workers had allergic reactions on Tuesday.

The advice applies to those who have had reactions to medicines, food or vaccines, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said.

The two people had a reaction shortly after having the new jab, had treatment and are both fine now.

They are understood to have had an anaphylactoid reaction, which tends to involve a skin rash, breathlessness and sometimes a drop in blood pressure. This is not the same as anaphylaxis which can be fatal.

Both NHS workers have a history of serious allergies and carry adrenaline pens around with them.

This is extremely common for most vaccines and jabs. I needed a few different jabs when I went abroad a few years back and every doctor that administered them (multiple trips so different doctors) asked a series of questions about my health with quite a lot of the focus on allergies.
I know people with severe allergies are also warned against getting the flu jab in case of a negative reaction.

Some of these people will die if they eat a peanut, so to have a little reaction to a vaccine is to be expected.

What a crass statement!! A "little" reaction you say,as a sufferer of allergies myself,and suffered anaphylactic shock,on more than one occasion,I guarantee you a "little"reaction its not!!!! How f@cking ignorant are you? Im alright jack type that you are!
You do what you want,let others at least do the same?

It's a fact, so far people have had a little reaction, people who suffer from anaphylactic shock should be careful what they take regardless, it's not Pfizers fault?

You've been making crass statements like Corona only kills a small percentage of people for months, but you're ok jack!

Do what the feck you want, I know six people who have the virus right now, and I'll take the vaccine when I get the chance as it's proven safer than catching the virus


Covid is flying in Wales, watch this space we will be locked down for all of January at least, talk of it starting on the 27th December!

So you are saying what exactly Am I wrong in saying it only kills a small percentage? And no I am not alright jack ,I have to be careful on any medication I get,due to allergies,so this is no different so you know 6 people with it,are they hospitalised and in a bad way,or have they some mild symptoms ,to be totally honest,I know of 3 people who have had negative tests,doesn't mean they will not get it,but I know only one person to date,who has it,but they have had very mild symtoms
,remember your statement"so far".
Where did I say it was Pfizers fault by the way? Sorry but your statement is based on 2 cases to date,which luckily weren't serious.
That may not be the case for some!
You are stating nothing I haven't already read or seen regarding covid flying in Wales, same in Germany. And thanks for letting me do "what I want,regatding being vaccinated,although I didn't need permission from you thanks .

Why are you stating we will be in lockdown,this was obvious,due to this "virus holiday".
We all know your preference regards taking the vaccine,and you would have no hesitation in having it tomorrow,crack on I say
By the way,your having a go,but during the first lockdown I volunteered to take medications to isolated patients,mostly elderly people who were told to shield at home,and will do the same again if we are locked down once more
I've never denied it's existence (covid) but I guess you believe the figures we are fed too?

I and others don't believe them,and for various reasons,and those who wish to abstain from an untested (I don't count it as tested due to condensed period of time) should be allowed to do so,without people as yourself,trying to mock/ridicule them because you think differently to them,for some the time period to allow for vaccinated people to show adverse and possibly serious side effects.
I won't be surprised when they start new lockdown, as suggested,even though it may well start on my birthday
But it's not because people haven't been vaccinated! It's because people are crowding city centres for the Christmas covid holiday!!
Of course it will spike around January, that's not the fault of people not wanted to be vaccinated is it?? That fault lies clearly at the feet of the decision makers,although most people I have discussed it with,were doing family Christmas in the normal way,regardless of rules! The goverment knew this full well,so put out a "good news" story for once,you can meet people you haven't seen for 6 months or more? It's a gift from your leaders,yeah right,course it is,cos covid will understand,and perhaps take some time off,after all,they have been busy !! Anyway,I'll let you go,don't want to lose your place in the queue now

Been on the sherry?

I'm not really sure what that rant was all about?

People who are allergic to almost everything need to take care, so all I was saying originally is the fact two people had an allergic reaction is not a big deal.

Not sure what the hell your birthday and decision-makers nonsense means really, and I couldn't care if you abstain or have it, crack on with whatever you want?

Abstain from having what exactly? I dont drink alcohol (and havent for 30 yrs!) So my birthat will remain the same pretty much.And it was your piss poor attempt at trying to make light of peoples possibly life threatening risk in having this vaccine!! Very condescending as per usual!! As per the "been on the sherry" comment.you hzve been waiting for this "miracle" nof me mate,now get back in the queue,before you lose your place.

Hmmm are you sure, if you remember you mention above about abstaining?

You don't have to queue it's not a fairground attraction?

The NHS will write to older adults and people who have serious medical conditions well before me, and happy with that as it's those that need it, so from what you've said you are much closer to getting one than me.

When I do eventually receive my invitation, I will, of course, follow the top medical advice and not Dia from Pontypandy who says it's dangerous cos two people who have allergies were allergic

I see a new strain just been released, sorry identified. How many jabs they want us to have ffs

Covid-19 vaccine: Allergy warning over new jab -

People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not have the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid jab, regulators say.

It came after two NHS workers had allergic reactions on Tuesday.

The advice applies to those who have had reactions to medicines, food or vaccines, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said.

The two people had a reaction shortly after having the new jab, had treatment and are both fine now.

They are understood to have had an anaphylactoid reaction, which tends to involve a skin rash, breathlessness and sometimes a drop in blood pressure. This is not the same as anaphylaxis which can be fatal.

Both NHS workers have a history of serious allergies and carry adrenaline pens around with them.

This is extremely common for most vaccines and jabs. I needed a few different jabs when I went abroad a few years back and every doctor that administered them (multiple trips so different doctors) asked a series of questions about my health with quite a lot of the focus on allergies.
I know people with severe allergies are also warned against getting the flu jab in case of a negative reaction.

Some of these people will die if they eat a peanut, so to have a little reaction to a vaccine is to be expected.

What a crass statement!! A "little" reaction you say,as a sufferer of allergies myself,and suffered anaphylactic shock,on more than one occasion,I guarantee you a "little"reaction its not!!!! How f@cking ignorant are you? Im alright jack type that you are!
You do what you want,let others at least do the same?

It's a fact, so far people have had a little reaction, people who suffer from anaphylactic shock should be careful what they take regardless, it's not Pfizers fault?

You've been making crass statements like Corona only kills a small percentage of people for months, but you're ok jack!

Do what the feck you want, I know six people who have the virus right now, and I'll take the vaccine when I get the chance as it's proven safer than catching the virus


Covid is flying in Wales, watch this space we will be locked down for all of January at least, talk of it starting on the 27th December!

So you are saying what exactly Am I wrong in saying it only kills a small percentage? And no I am not alright jack ,I have to be careful on any medication I get,due to allergies,so this is no different so you know 6 people with it,are they hospitalised and in a bad way,or have they some mild symptoms ,to be totally honest,I know of 3 people who have had negative tests,doesn't mean they will not get it,but I know only one person to date,who has it,but they have had very mild symtoms
,remember your statement"so far".
Where did I say it was Pfizers fault by the way? Sorry but your statement is based on 2 cases to date,which luckily weren't serious.
That may not be the case for some!
You are stating nothing I haven't already read or seen regarding covid flying in Wales, same in Germany. And thanks for letting me do "what I want,regatding being vaccinated,although I didn't need permission from you thanks .

Why are you stating we will be in lockdown,this was obvious,due to this "virus holiday".
We all know your preference regards taking the vaccine,and you would have no hesitation in having it tomorrow,crack on I say
By the way,your having a go,but during the first lockdown I volunteered to take medications to isolated patients,mostly elderly people who were told to shield at home,and will do the same again if we are locked down once more
I've never denied it's existence (covid) but I guess you believe the figures we are fed too?

I and others don't believe them,and for various reasons,and those who wish to abstain from an untested (I don't count it as tested due to condensed period of time) should be allowed to do so,without people as yourself,trying to mock/ridicule them because you think differently to them,for some the time period to allow for vaccinated people to show adverse and possibly serious side effects.
I won't be surprised when they start new lockdown, as suggested,even though it may well start on my birthday
But it's not because people haven't been vaccinated! It's because people are crowding city centres for the Christmas covid holiday!!
Of course it will spike around January, that's not the fault of people not wanted to be vaccinated is it?? That fault lies clearly at the feet of the decision makers,although most people I have discussed it with,were doing family Christmas in the normal way,regardless of rules! The goverment knew this full well,so put out a "good news" story for once,you can meet people you haven't seen for 6 months or more? It's a gift from your leaders,yeah right,course it is,cos covid will understand,and perhaps take some time off,after all,they have been busy !! Anyway,I'll let you go,don't want to lose your place in the queue now

Been on the sherry?

I'm not really sure what that rant was all about?

People who are allergic to almost everything need to take care, so all I was saying originally is the fact two people had an allergic reaction is not a big deal.

Not sure what the hell your birthday and decision-makers nonsense means really, and I couldn't care if you abstain or have it, crack on with whatever you want?

Abstain from having what exactly? I dont drink alcohol (and havent for 30 yrs!) So my birthat will remain the same pretty much.And it was your piss poor attempt at trying to make light of peoples possibly life threatening risk in having this vaccine!! Very condescending as per usual!! As per the "been on the sherry" comment.you hzve been waiting for this "miracle" nof me mate,now get back in the queue,before you lose your place.

Hmmm are you sure, if you remember you mention above about abstaining?

You don't have to queue it's not a fairground attraction?

The NHS will write to older adults and people who have serious medical conditions well before me, and happy with that as it's those that need it, so from what you've said you are much closer to getting one than me.

When I do eventually receive my invitation, I will, of course, follow the top medical advice and not Dia from Pontypandy who says it's dangerous cos two people who have allergies were allergic

no mate...your actually listening to someone like dai who became an MP

Covid-19 vaccine: Allergy warning over new jab -

People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not have the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid jab, regulators say.

It came after two NHS workers had allergic reactions on Tuesday.

The advice applies to those who have had reactions to medicines, food or vaccines, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said.

The two people had a reaction shortly after having the new jab, had treatment and are both fine now.

They are understood to have had an anaphylactoid reaction, which tends to involve a skin rash, breathlessness and sometimes a drop in blood pressure. This is not the same as anaphylaxis which can be fatal.

Both NHS workers have a history of serious allergies and carry adrenaline pens around with them.

This is extremely common for most vaccines and jabs. I needed a few different jabs when I went abroad a few years back and every doctor that administered them (multiple trips so different doctors) asked a series of questions about my health with quite a lot of the focus on allergies.
I know people with severe allergies are also warned against getting the flu jab in case of a negative reaction.

Some of these people will die if they eat a peanut, so to have a little reaction to a vaccine is to be expected.

What a crass statement!! A "little" reaction you say,as a sufferer of allergies myself,and suffered anaphylactic shock,on more than one occasion,I guarantee you a "little"reaction its not!!!! How f@cking ignorant are you? Im alright jack type that you are!
You do what you want,let others at least do the same?

It's a fact, so far people have had a little reaction, people who suffer from anaphylactic shock should be careful what they take regardless, it's not Pfizers fault?

You've been making crass statements like Corona only kills a small percentage of people for months, but you're ok jack!

Do what the feck you want, I know six people who have the virus right now, and I'll take the vaccine when I get the chance as it's proven safer than catching the virus


Covid is flying in Wales, watch this space we will be locked down for all of January at least, talk of it starting on the 27th December!

So you are saying what exactly Am I wrong in saying it only kills a small percentage? And no I am not alright jack ,I have to be careful on any medication I get,due to allergies,so this is no different so you know 6 people with it,are they hospitalised and in a bad way,or have they some mild symptoms ,to be totally honest,I know of 3 people who have had negative tests,doesn't mean they will not get it,but I know only one person to date,who has it,but they have had very mild symtoms
,remember your statement"so far".
Where did I say it was Pfizers fault by the way? Sorry but your statement is based on 2 cases to date,which luckily weren't serious.
That may not be the case for some!
You are stating nothing I haven't already read or seen regarding covid flying in Wales, same in Germany. And thanks for letting me do "what I want,regatding being vaccinated,although I didn't need permission from you thanks .

Why are you stating we will be in lockdown,this was obvious,due to this "virus holiday".
We all know your preference regards taking the vaccine,and you would have no hesitation in having it tomorrow,crack on I say
By the way,your having a go,but during the first lockdown I volunteered to take medications to isolated patients,mostly elderly people who were told to shield at home,and will do the same again if we are locked down once more
I've never denied it's existence (covid) but I guess you believe the figures we are fed too?

I and others don't believe them,and for various reasons,and those who wish to abstain from an untested (I don't count it as tested due to condensed period of time) should be allowed to do so,without people as yourself,trying to mock/ridicule them because you think differently to them,for some the time period to allow for vaccinated people to show adverse and possibly serious side effects.
I won't be surprised when they start new lockdown, as suggested,even though it may well start on my birthday
But it's not because people haven't been vaccinated! It's because people are crowding city centres for the Christmas covid holiday!!
Of course it will spike around January, that's not the fault of people not wanted to be vaccinated is it?? That fault lies clearly at the feet of the decision makers,although most people I have discussed it with,were doing family Christmas in the normal way,regardless of rules! The goverment knew this full well,so put out a "good news" story for once,you can meet people you haven't seen for 6 months or more? It's a gift from your leaders,yeah right,course it is,cos covid will understand,and perhaps take some time off,after all,they have been busy !! Anyway,I'll let you go,don't want to lose your place in the queue now

Been on the sherry?

I'm not really sure what that rant was all about?

People who are allergic to almost everything need to take care, so all I was saying originally is the fact two people had an allergic reaction is not a big deal.

Not sure what the hell your birthday and decision-makers nonsense means really, and I couldn't care if you abstain or have it, crack on with whatever you want?

Abstain from having what exactly? I dont drink alcohol (and havent for 30 yrs!) So my birthat will remain the same pretty much.And it was your piss poor attempt at trying to make light of peoples possibly life threatening risk in having this vaccine!! Very condescending as per usual!! As per the "been on the sherry" comment.you hzve been waiting for this "miracle" nof me mate,now get back in the queue,before you lose your place.

Hmmm are you sure, if you remember you mention above about abstaining?

You don't have to queue it's not a fairground attraction?

The NHS will write to older adults and people who have serious medical conditions well before me, and happy with that as it's those that need it, so from what you've said you are much closer to getting one than me.

When I do eventually receive my invitation, I will, of course, follow the top medical advice and not Dia from Pontypandy who says it's dangerous cos two people who have allergies were allergic

no mate...your actually listening to someone like dai who became an MP

I'd only listen to Dai doctor (a medical one) or Dai Professor (medical) or Dai virologist, not dopey Dai the ex-union rep MP

It's simple if anyone does not want it , respect there decision but if you come down with the virus and need hospital you will be refused treatment that's fair .

So based on your solution,those who smoke,drink,take drugs,should all be refused treatment,as its their use of these things that has caused them to be in hospital?? I have paid my fare share in taxes and national insurance,so would be excluded for not taking a vaccine,thst may well cause serious side effects down the line,or in many cases(mine inc) some of us wont be able to take this vaccine safely,but hey it doesnt matter,no tratment for me!how can you say in one breath "respect their decision" and then finish with "ban them from recieving nhs treatment"???

It's simple if anyone does not want it , respect there decision but if you come down with the virus and need hospital you will be refused treatment that's fair .

So based on your solution,those who smoke,drink,take drugs,should all be refused treatment,as its their use of these things that has caused them to be in hospital?? I have paid my fare share in taxes and national insurance,so would be excluded for not taking a vaccine,thst may well cause serious side effects down the line,or in many cases(mine inc) some of us wont be able to take this vaccine safely,but hey it doesnt matter,no tratment for me!how can you say in one breath "respect their decision" and then finish with "ban them from recieving nhs treatment"???

he is correct mate...its simple

Think authorities need to sort themselves out

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sou ... s-55324640

Think authorities need to sort themselves out

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sou ... s-55324640

Wow they probably caught it at work, the virus seems way more prevalent that last April, I know 12 people that have it right now!!!

Think authorities need to sort themselves out

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sou ... s-55324640

Wow they probably caught it at work, the virus seems way more prevalent that last April, I know 12 people that have it right now!!!

Your attachment of !!! Shows you are panicking a bit? Are they hospitalized or have severe symtoms? They have alresdy said a more prevalent steain is here,so why so shocked?

Think authorities need to sort themselves out

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sou ... s-55324640

Wow they probably caught it at work, the virus seems way more prevalent that last April, I know 12 people that have it right now!!!

Your attachment of !!! Shows you are panicking a bit? Are they hospitalized or have severe symtoms? They have alresdy said a more prevalent steain is here,so why so shocked?

For the sake of staff and patients just in that location let alone wider community I would have thought safety protocols and PPE would make that environment safer than nine staff becoming positive in next to no time.

Think authorities need to sort themselves out

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sou ... s-55324640

Wow they probably caught it at work, the virus seems way more prevalent that last April, I know 12 people that have it right now!!!

Your attachment of !!! Shows you are panicking a bit? Are they hospitalized or have severe symtoms? They have alresdy said a more prevalent steain is here,so why so shocked?

For the sake of staff and patients just in that location let alone wider community I would have thought safety protocols and PPE would make that environment safer than nine staff becoming positive in next to no time.

sort of dispels the idea that its this gang of young naughty people spreading it... its the vaccinators...

Think authorities need to sort themselves out

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sou ... s-55324640

Wow they probably caught it at work, the virus seems way more prevalent that last April, I know 12 people that have it right now!!!

Your attachment of !!! Shows you are panicking a bit? Are they hospitalized or have severe symtoms? They have alresdy said a more prevalent steain is here,so why so shocked?

No, I'm not panicking, I don't work at a covid centre why would I panic?

It's quite a surprise that nine people wearing PPE and taking measures at a covid vaccination centre got it though!!!

I don't think any were hospitalised, all felt fairly rough and passed it on to family members, I guess they were lucky but time will tell if it's damaged their major organs and lungs and whether they have long covid?

!!! is just to emphasize the point !!!

Anyone who doesn’t have one should be refused access to any ventilator treatment if they become ill.

Why the extreme points of view? Both sides are being ridiculous, if you want it have it & if you don't want it or can't have it for whatever reason then don't have it, it's pretty simple. No need for all this crap.

Anyone who doesn’t have one should be refused access to any ventilator treatment if they become ill.

Think authorities need to sort themselves out

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sou ... s-55324640

Wow they probably caught it at work, the virus seems way more prevalent that last April, I know 12 people that have it right now!!!

Your attachment of !!! Shows you are panicking a bit? Are they hospitalized or have severe symtoms? They have alresdy said a more prevalent steain is here,so why so shocked?

No, I'm not panicking, I don't work at a covid centre why would I panic?

It's quite a surprise that nine people wearing PPE and taking measures at a covid vaccination centre got it though!!!

I don't think any were hospitalised, all felt fairly rough and passed it on to family members, I guess they were lucky but time will tell if it's damaged their major organs and lungs and whether they have long covid?

!!! is just to emphasize the point !!!

Oh,I thought you were emphasizing the 12 you actually know,and it was them I was referring to,not the link.
And not really surprising is it,when according to figures,we have had stacks actually die,when wearing probably better ppe?

Anyone who doesn’t have one should be refused access to any ventilator treatment if they become ill.

Well thanks for your input,some are unable to take this vaccine,for a variety of reasons,does your solution include us too!!