Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:47 pm

Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
polo wrote:Wez please stop feeding him

Trying not to he's boring :lol:


Translation: "I am trying not to respond but when he highlights just how ridiculous the things I say are I have to respond somehow, even if it's just a smiley or a feeling masking quip.. You know the feeling" :lol:

Fool

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:15 pm

Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
polo wrote:Wez please stop feeding him

Trying not to he's boring :lol:


Translation: "I am trying not to respond but when he highlights just how ridiculous the things I say are I have to respond somehow, even if it's just a smiley or a feeling masking quip.. You know the feeling" :lol:

Fool


Right on cue. :D

Says the man who thinks Cardiff have one of the biggest budgets in the league and innocent muslims deserve to be murdered based in their religion alone :lol:

Your full of shit where have I said those things ? troll :lol:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:21 pm

Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
polo wrote:Wez please stop feeding him

Trying not to he's boring :lol:


Translation: "I am trying not to respond but when he highlights just how ridiculous the things I say are I have to respond somehow, even if it's just a smiley or a feeling masking quip.. You know the feeling" :lol:

Fool


Right on cue. :D

Says the man who thinks Cardiff have one of the biggest budgets in the league and innocent muslims deserve to be murdered based in their religion alone :lol:

Your full of shit where have I said those things ? troll :lol:


You are the troll young man. I have asked you direct on topic questions and you have resorted to abuse.

On this thread you said you believe Cardiff should have got into the play offs based on their budget. Which would mean they have the top 7 budgets in the league which is clearly not the case with one of the lowest spends this season and a reported meagre £20m wage bill.

On the other thread you alluded to the fact that those murdered in the mosque were helping terrorists, this purely based on their religion.

I said on the budget we had wages Inc we should and I bet that we are in the top 6 of highest wage bills we were 3rd in the 2015/16 season and I haven't alluded to anything what drugs are you on ????

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:23 pm

wez1927 wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
polo wrote:Wez please stop feeding him

Trying not to he's boring :lol:


Translation: "I am trying not to respond but when he highlights just how ridiculous the things I say are I have to respond somehow, even if it's just a smiley or a feeling masking quip.. You know the feeling" :lol:

Fool


Right on cue. :D

Says the man who thinks Cardiff have one of the biggest budgets in the league and innocent muslims deserve to be murdered based in their religion alone :lol:

Your full of shit where have I said those things ? troll :lol:


You are the troll young man. I have asked you direct on topic questions and you have resorted to abuse.

On this thread you said you believe Cardiff should have got into the play offs based on their budget. Which would mean they have the top 7 budgets in the league which is clearly not the case with one of the lowest spends this season and a reported meagre £20m wage bill.

On the other thread you alluded to the fact that those murdered in the mosque were helping terrorists, this purely based on their religion.

I said on the budget we had wages Inc we should and I bet that we are in the top 6 of highest wage bills we were 3rd in the 2015/16 season and I haven't alluded to anything what drugs are you on ????


That was before the clearout wez. Cardiffs wage bill prior to Warnock was around £19m. Thats peanuts. Cardiff will be nowhere near the top 7 in wage bill. Fact.

Ok then prove me wrong. Do you believe that the attack on the mosque was a dreadful act of terrorism that should not be tolerated.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:23 pm

Keep the f*cking Muslim arguments on the other thread ffs

No one wants to read you pair squabbling about muslims on multiple threads

Sort it out Annis or are you only interested in hits????

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:26 pm

Right lads (Roath & Wez) you're having the same argument over a couple of threads, posters are getting fed up of reading the same argument over different threads so I suggest you agree to disagree.

Don't mind you having a debate but stop following each other around having the same argument.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:28 pm

It's been reported now lads, you're derailing this topic. Curb it or you'll be off here for a bit.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:28 pm

Fair enough I accept that. Won't mention the other thread on here. My bad. :thumbright:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:29 pm

polo wrote:Keep the f*cking Muslim arguments on the other thread ffs

No one wants to read you pair squabbling about muslims on multiple threads

Sort it out Annis or are you only interested in hits????


Chris, Do you honestly think I bother to follow Roathie around, does not interest me or help us get hits.
Those that don't like him,put him on ignore,this that love an argument with him, please stay on the same topic and don't ruin others.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:30 pm

norms76 wrote:Right lads (Roath & Wez) you're having the same argument over a couple of threads, posters are getting fed up of reading the same argument over different threads so I suggest you agree to disagree.

Don't mind you having a debate but stop following each other around having the same argument.


Spot on Norms :thumbright: :thumbright:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:31 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
polo wrote:Keep the f*cking Muslim arguments on the other thread ffs

No one wants to read you pair squabbling about muslims on multiple threads

Sort it out Annis or are you only interested in hits????


Chris, Do you honestly think I bother to follow Roathie around, does not interest me or help us get hits.
Those that don't like him,put him on ignore,this that love an argument with him, please stay on the same topic and don't ruin others.



I will agree with you Chris,he has derailed a good topic of mine and if he does it again he will be gone :thumbright:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:33 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
polo wrote:Keep the f*cking Muslim arguments on the other thread ffs

No one wants to read you pair squabbling about muslims on multiple threads

Sort it out Annis or are you only interested in hits????


Chris, Do you honestly think I bother to follow Roathie around, does not interest me or help us get hits.
Those that don't like him,put him on ignore,this that love an argument with him, please stay on the same topic and don't ruin others.



I will agree with you Chris,he has derailed a good topic of mine and if he does it again he will be gone :thumbright:



Chris,
Your right the Muslim stuff should of stayed in that topic, just read and deleted loads on here :thumbright: :thumbright:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:33 pm

norms76 wrote:It's been reported now lads, you're derailing this topic. Curb it or you'll be off here for a bit.

How the f**k gave I been derailing the threads roathy has tbh f**k you I'm gone

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:34 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
polo wrote:Keep the f*cking Muslim arguments on the other thread ffs

No one wants to read you pair squabbling about muslims on multiple threads

Sort it out Annis or are you only interested in hits????


Chris, Do you honestly think I bother to follow Roathie around, does not interest me or help us get hits.
Those that don't like him,put him on ignore,this that love an argument with him, please stay on the same topic and don't ruin others.

It's pretty difficult to ignore him when he's derailing the thread having yet another spat with Wez :banghead:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:35 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
polo wrote:Keep the f*cking Muslim arguments on the other thread ffs

No one wants to read you pair squabbling about muslims on multiple threads

Sort it out Annis or are you only interested in hits????


Chris, Do you honestly think I bother to follow Roathie around, does not interest me or help us get hits.
Those that don't like him,put him on ignore,this that love an argument with him, please stay on the same topic and don't ruin others.



I will agree with you Chris,he has derailed a good topic of mine and if he does it again he will be gone :thumbright:


Hardly derailed it. I picked up on a comment that wez made suggesting Cardiff have one of the biggest budgets. I disagreed and posted facts surrounding it.

He abused me FIRST (important) and I responded with an off topic comment that I admit I should not have. The abuse needs to stop first though and then nothing will be derailed. I champion it in every thread I am in. I am always an advocate of sticking to the topic. But when abuse is allowed it will naturally steer it away. But do apologise for my part in it.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:39 pm

Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0


Cheers for this, I will use it in a future topic :D :D

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:41 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0


Cheers for this, I will use it in a future topic :D :D

117.73m spent by the top two on that list, that's crazy. :shock:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:41 pm

No worries.

Tried to find the wage bills too but they are difficult to find as they are not fully known until accounts are released and as you know they are always a year behind added to the fact that each club releases them at different times. But from what I gather Cardiffs wage bill will be around £20m p/a which is pretty meagre really.

But should be refreshing that the club is run on an even keel currently. I would take that as a positive.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:43 pm

norms76 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0


Cheers for this, I will use it in a future topic :D :D

117.73m spent by the top two in that list, that's crazy. :shock:



Norms, Stupidity beyond and Villa are No better of than us, big money does not always guarantee promotion, the right manager with some money has to go hand in hand :thumbright: :thumbright: :bluebird: :bluebird:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:49 pm

Feck me.. It's do or die for Villa now, ain't it?.. Jesus.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:50 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
norms76 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0


Cheers for this, I will use it in a future topic :D :D

117.73m spent by the top two in that list, that's crazy. :shock:



Norms, Stupidity beyond and Villa are No better of than us, big money does not always guarantee promotion, the right manager with some money has to go hand in hand :thumbright: :thumbright: :bluebird: :bluebird:


Crazy money being thrown about these days even at Championship level, it shows what pulling power the Premier League has these day where clubs are going all out to get there and risking financial meltdown if they fail to get there.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:07 pm

norms76 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0


Cheers for this, I will use it in a future topic :D :D

117.73m spent by the top two on that list, that's crazy. :shock:


yes but they recieved an almost identical figure in player sales.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:09 pm

Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0



its not even half a story though. no mention of players sold. in newcastles case its almost double purchases. no mention of wages either. a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:11 pm

dogfound wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0



its not even half a story though. no mention of players sold. in newcastles case its almost double purchases. no mention of wages either. a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.


Cardiffs wage bill is around £20m as I have mentioned. That is peanuts.

More than happy to do an updated one showing player sales if you want? Cardiff still wont be anywhere near top 7 though. :thumbright:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:13 pm

Iroas wrote:
dogfound wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0



its not even half a story though. no mention of players sold. in newcastles case its almost double purchases. no mention of wages either. a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.


Cardiffs wage bill is around £20m as I have mentioned. That is peanuts.

More than happy to do an updated one showing player sales if you want? Cardiff still wont be anywhere near top 7 though. :thumbright:




Have you got the rest of the Championship wages for this season ? :thumbright:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:14 pm

dogfound wrote:
norms76 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0


Cheers for this, I will use it in a future topic :D :D

117.73m spent by the top two on that list, that's crazy. :shock:


yes but they recieved an almost identical figure in player sales.



Thats fair enough if they received back in, in sales :thumbright:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:20 pm

Iroas wrote:
dogfound wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0



its not even half a story though. no mention of players sold. in newcastles case its almost double purchases. no mention of wages either. a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.


Cardiffs wage bill is around £20m as I have mentioned. That is peanuts.

More than happy to do an updated one showing player sales if you want? Cardiff still wont be anywhere near top 7 though. :thumbright:


wages are the big one and signing on fees. as a jack you should be aware of this. in fact ,im talking to the brain of britain who destroys everyone.cant believe im explaing basics.

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:21 pm

dogfound wrote:
norms76 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0


Cheers for this, I will use it in a future topic :D :D

117.73m spent by the top two on that list, that's crazy. :shock:


yes but they recieved an almost identical figure in player sales.

It'd be interesting to see what the figures actually are with the outs as well as the ins that would give a clearer picture for sure. I Wonder if they're available somewhere?!

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:27 pm

norms76 wrote:
dogfound wrote:
norms76 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Iroas wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Common sense and you dont mix ,You don't know zzzzzzzzzz


*When I can't answer I post a smiley or a zzzzz, hopefully nobody will notice* :lol:

Here is a bit of common sense for you:-

Tramsfer fees spent..

1) Villa - £62.99m
2) Newcastle - £54.74m
3) Wolves - £25.42m
4) Norwich - £22.48m
5) Fulham - £21.72m
6) Derby - £14.67m
7)Bristol C - £11.05m
8) Wednesday - £9.26m
9) QPR - £9.58m
10) Birmingham - £7.78m
11) Reading - £7.59m
12) Brighton - £7.44m
13) Leeds - £7.29m
14) Brentford - £4m
15) Forest - £3.79m
16) Huddersfield - £3.78m
17) Cardiff - £3.66m
18) Barnsley - £2.16m
19) Wigan - £1.69m
20) Ipswich - £1.42m
21) Rotherham - £914k
22) Burton - £304k
23) Preston - £225k
24) Blackburn - £0


Cheers for this, I will use it in a future topic :D :D

117.73m spent by the top two on that list, that's crazy. :shock:


yes but they recieved an almost identical figure in player sales.

It'd be interesting to see what the figures actually are with the outs as well as the ins that would give a clearer picture for sure. I Wonder if they're available somewhere?!



they must be if these figures are available but guess there are unavailable to this forum? :laughing6:

Re: " NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED "

Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:28 pm

Pembroke. But this is where it get interesting though, ain't it? Is it sustainable?