UPDATED ' Worst home crowd ever '

I'm sure it has.. However anyone can edit Wikipedia, tutors told me to stay away from that when I was in Uni. It can be very deceiving on some topics.

Are you suggesting the information is incorrect? If so then in the interest of the discussion it would be helpful to have the correct stats. I guess unless you can show otherwise then it may be best we take it as correct.

I'm sure it has.. However anyone can edit Wikipedia, tutors told me to stay away from that when I was in Uni. It can be very deceiving on some topics.

Are you suggesting the information is incorrect? If so then in the interest of the discussion it would be helpful to have the correct stats. I guess unless you can show otherwise then it may be best we take it as correct.

Oh no of course not. I'm just saying it can be unreliable on some topics as for the stated reasons. I really couldn't care less really, like I said I thought i read 13,000 but even at 15,000, compared to the crowds the get now. It's an example of floating supporters and if they went down these would disappear too, just like any club. That's all I'm saying on the subject.
You remind me of someone who won't let something drop. . Can't think for the life of me who though?

Oh no of course not. I'm just saying it can be unreliable on some topics as for the stated reasons. I really couldn't care less really, like I said I thought i read 13,000 but even at 15,000, compared to the crowds the get now. It's an example of floating supporters and if they went down these would disappear too, just like any club. That's all I'm saying on the subject.
You remind me of someone who won't let something drop. . Can't think for the life of me who though?

What am I not letting drop? It is a conversation. You gave a figure, I corrected it, you said it may not be reliable and I asked you to give accurate figures if you had them. I think that is pretty standard. If you no longer wish to discuss it then thats your choice, i just assumed you were interested considering it is your subject we are discussing.

I'm sure it has.. However anyone can edit Wikipedia, tutors told me to stay away from that when I was in Uni. It can be very deceiving on some topics.

Are you suggesting the information is incorrect? If so then in the interest of the discussion it would be helpful to have the correct stats. I guess unless you can show otherwise then it may be best we take it as correct.

Oh no of course not. I'm just saying it can be unreliable on some topics as for the stated reasons. I really couldn't care less really, like I said I thought i read 13,000 but even at 15,000, compared to the crowds the get now. It's an example of floating supporters and if they went down these would disappear too, just like any club. That's all I'm saying on the subject.
You remind me of someone who won't let something drop. . Can't think for the life of me who though?

I think we all know exactly who he is. I just hope the mods don't let him ruin this forum again.

I'm sure it has.. However anyone can edit Wikipedia, tutors told me to stay away from that when I was in Uni. It can be very deceiving on some topics.

Are you suggesting the information is incorrect? If so then in the interest of the discussion it would be helpful to have the correct stats. I guess unless you can show otherwise then it may be best we take it as correct.

Oh no of course not. I'm just saying it can be unreliable on some topics as for the stated reasons. I really couldn't care less really, like I said I thought i read 13,000 but even at 15,000, compared to the crowds the get now. It's an example of floating supporters and if they went down these would disappear too, just like any club. That's all I'm saying on the subject.
You remind me of someone who won't let something drop. . Can't think for the life of me who though?

I think we all know exactly who he is. I just hope the mods don't let him ruin this forum again.

Everyone does. They know he's on here too.

I'm sure it has.. However anyone can edit Wikipedia, tutors told me to stay away from that when I was in Uni. It can be very deceiving on some topics.

Are you suggesting the information is incorrect? If so then in the interest of the discussion it would be helpful to have the correct stats. I guess unless you can show otherwise then it may be best we take it as correct.

Oh no of course not. I'm just saying it can be unreliable on some topics as for the stated reasons. I really couldn't care less really, like I said I thought i read 13,000 but even at 15,000, compared to the crowds the get now. It's an example of floating supporters and if they went down these would disappear too, just like any club. That's all I'm saying on the subject.
You remind me of someone who won't let something drop. . Can't think for the life of me who though?

I think we all know exactly who he is. I just hope the mods don't let him ruin this forum again.

oh yes he really loves it when figures come into topic!. he as degree in it

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

As you are so interested in accurate figures, do you agree that the average attendance for the first three games of Swansea Town's last season in the Championship was less than 13,500?

Notice there is no edit!

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

As you are so interested in accurate figures, do you agree that the average attendance for the first three games of Swansea Town's last season in the Championship was less than 13,500?

Notice there is no edit!

I think it is vital that it is accurate. But no in the interests of accuracy, i do not agree Swansea Town averaged less than 13,500 in the Championship for their first three games in their last championship season.

Last edited by Wiltshireblue on Sun Sep 13, 2015 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

As you are so interested in accurate figures, do you agree that the average attendance for the first three games of Swansea Town's last season in the Championship was less than 13,500?

Notice there is no edit!

I think it is vital that it is accurate. But no I do not agree Swansea Town averaged less than 13,500 in the Championship for their first three games in their last championship season.

First three home games in their last season in the Championship averaged less than 13,500 do you agree?

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

As you are so interested in accurate figures, do you agree that the average attendance for the first three games of Swansea Town's last season in the Championship was less than 13,500?

Notice there is no edit!

I think it is vital that it is accurate. But no I do not agree Swansea Town averaged less than 13,500 in the Championship for their first three games in their last championship season.

First three home games in their last season in the Championship averaged less than 13,500 do you agree?

In whose? If the question is the same then the answer is the same - no I don't agree.

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

As you are so interested in accurate figures, do you agree that the average attendance for the first three games of Swansea Town's last season in the Championship was less than 13,500?

Notice there is no edit!

I think it is vital that it is accurate. But no I do not agree Swansea Town averaged less than 13,500 in the Championship for their first three games in their last championship season.

First three home games in their last season in the Championship averaged less than 13,500 do you agree?

In whose? If the question is the same then the answer is the same - no I don't agree.

Swansea Town's first three home games in their last ChAmpionship season 2010-2011 had an average attendance of less than 13,500. Correct or incorrect?

Incorrect

In the Internet of complete accuracy the average attendance for the first three home games of the season they were promoted was 13, 487.

I think you mean 15,772.

Swansea 3-1 Forest 16,661
Swansea 1-1 Sheff Wed 16,702
Swansea 1-1 Derby 14,003

I think you are incorrect! If they were promoted in the 2010-2011 season their first three games were against:

Preston North End 14,010

Burnley 14,010

Coventry City 12,441

These were not the first three home games played by Swansea in their last season 2010-2011 in the Championship?

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

Oh no it's not that and don't think otherwise. It's the pretending to be something you're not, time and time again. It just stinks of plain odd behaviour. I prefered you when you were Roath magic, at least you were semi-normal.

Town or City? I think you have your dates wrong if you believe your question to be correct.

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

Oh no it's not that and don't think otherwise. It's the pretending to be something you're not, time and time again. It just stinks of plain odd behaviour. I prefered you when you were Roath magic, at least you were semi-normal.

That's a guess though isn't it. But I'm glad you have no issue with our discussion.

Town or City? I think you have your dates wrong if you believe your question to be correct.

What dates do I have wrong? I am always interested in accuracy.

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

Oh no it's not that and don't think otherwise. It's the pretending to be something you're not, time and time again. It just stinks of plain odd behaviour. I prefered you when you were Roath magic, at least you were semi-normal.

That's a guess though isn't it. But I'm glad you have no issue with our discussion.

It's an informed guess based on your odd behaviour. I don't know why you can't just be yourself? Are you afraid of something? It's never made sense to me.

Town or City? I think you have your dates wrong if you believe your question to be correct.

What dates do I have wrong? I am always interested in accuracy.

No idea. It depends on what you are trying to ask, I am having difficulty finding out what you want to know. But you are asking me if a team from the 70's had an average attendance of less than 13,500 in the first three games of a season which commenced less than 5 years ago. I just don't understand the question.

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

Oh no it's not that and don't think otherwise. It's the pretending to be something you're not, time and time again. It just stinks of plain odd behaviour. I prefered you when you were Roath magic, at least you were semi-normal.

That's a guess though isn't it. But I'm glad you have no issue with our discussion.

It's an informed guess based on your odd behaviour. I don't know why you can't just be yourself? Are you afraid of something? It's never made sense to me.

Yes as I said, a guess. What is factual however is my contribution to the thread which is more than fair I'm sure you agree.

Well if ruining the forum is bringing accuracy to it then it may suggest there isnt much to ruin in the first place. What is the point in duscussing a subject that is inherently incorrect?

If you dont wish to discuss it, then you really dont have to. I have no idea why you have become upset at the fact that I corrected the figures?

Oh no it's not that and don't think otherwise. It's the pretending to be something you're not, time and time again. It just stinks of plain odd behaviour. I prefered you when you were Roath magic, at least you were semi-normal.

That's a guess though isn't it. But I'm glad you have no issue with our discussion.

It's an informed guess based on your odd behaviour. I don't know why you can't just be yourself? Are you afraid of something? It's never made sense to me.

Yes as I said, a guess. What is factual however is my contribution to the thread which is more than fair I'm sure you agree.

Ah I give up. You really are one of a kind. Take that as you like.

Town or City? I think you have your dates wrong if you believe your question to be correct.

What dates do I have wrong? I am always interested in accuracy.

No idea. It depends on what you are trying to ask, I am having difficulty finding out what you want to know. But you are asking me if a team from the 70's had an average attendance of less than 13,500 in the first three games of a season which commenced less than 5 years ago. I just don't understand the question.

Running away from facts again rather than admit the truth, was the average attendance figures for the first three home games of the Championship season for the team representing Swansea in the 2010-2011 season less than 13,500? I can not think how I can be any clearer.

Ah I give up. You really are one of a kind. Take that as you like.

Thank you.

Town or City? I think you have your dates wrong if you believe your question to be correct.

What dates do I have wrong? I am always interested in accuracy.

No idea. It depends on what you are trying to ask, I am having difficulty finding out what you want to know. But you are asking me if a team from the 70's had an average attendance of less than 13,500 in the first three games of a season which commenced less than 5 years ago. I just don't understand the question.

Running away from facts again rather than admit the truth, was the average attendance figures for the first three home games of the Championship season for the team representing Swansea in the 2010-2011 season less than 13,500? I can not think how I can be any clearer.

No running away from facts, the fact is Swansea Town have not been a team for decades so I just cannot understand your question if you believe it to be 100% accurate. Clarify the team name you mean and I can do some research and help you out.

Town or City? I think you have your dates wrong if you believe your question to be correct.

What dates do I have wrong? I am always interested in accuracy.

No idea. It depends on what you are trying to ask, I am having difficulty finding out what you want to know. But you are asking me if a team from the 70's had an average attendance of less than 13,500 in the first three games of a season which commenced less than 5 years ago. I just don't understand the question.

Running away from facts again rather than admit the truth, was the average attendance figures for the first three home games of the Championship season for the team representing Swansea in the 2010-2011 season less than 13,500? I can not think how I can be any clearer.

No running away from facts, the fact is Swansea Town have not been a team for decades so I just cannot understand your question if you believe it to be 100% accurate. Clarify the team name you mean and I can do some research and help you out.

Don't need your help with research, I know for a fact that the team promoted via the play-offs in 2010-2011 from the Championship and play their home games at the Liberty Stadium averaged less than13,500 for their first three home games of that season 2010-2011. Do you accept the facts as I present them?

But you think the team promoted on that date was Swansea Town. Do you agree that you were wrong? If so then that's fine, no need to be defensive. I will then take a look at your corrected question and provide the answer.

But you think the team promoted on that date was Swansea Town. Do you agree that you were wrong? If so then that's fine, no need to be defensive. I will then take a look at your corrected question and provide the answer.

Thanks for confirming I was correct! No real City fan would get so defensive over calling the Jacks Swansea Town. It was the Jacks that were promoted via the play-offs in 2010-2011 and their average attendance for their first three home games of that season was less than 13,500.

But you think the team promoted on that date was Swansea Town. Do you agree that you were wrong? If so then that's fine, no need to be defensive. I will then take a look at your corrected question and provide the answer.

Thanks for confirming I was correct! No real City fan would get so defensive over calling the Jacks Swansea Town. It was the Jacks that were promoted via the play-offs in 2010-2011 and their average attendance for their first three home games of that season was less than 13,500.

I have no idea if you were correct as you haven't clarified what your question is, currently, to me it looks incorrect. I'm not defensive, I have clearly stated these matters require accuracy that goes for all teams. Although one might say that someone harbours a whole packet of chips on their shoulder if they cannot bring themselves to state the correct team name. Clarify for me and by all means I can validate your stat.

But you think the team promoted on that date was Swansea Town. Do you agree that you were wrong? If so then that's fine, no need to be defensive. I will then take a look at your corrected question and provide the answer.

Thanks for confirming I was correct! No real City fan would get so defensive over calling the Jacks Swansea Town. It was the Jacks that were promoted via the play-offs in 2010-2011 and their average attendance for their first three home games of that season was less than 13,500.

I have no idea if you were correct as you haven't clarified what your question is, currently, to me it looks incorrect. I'm not defensive, I have clearly stated these matters require accuracy that goes for all teams. Although one might say that someone harbours a whole packet of chips on their shoulder if they cannot bring themselves to state the correct team name. Clarify for me and by all means I can validate your stat.

You don't know what team I am referring to when I call them the Jacks?