Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:32 am

Roath_Magic_ wrote:
7Summit wrote:Why do you continue to try debating this guy simon? He cant even read "the bluebirds is protected towards anything related with football". He continue to argue you can make coffee mugs with a bluebird, hench it is not protected. He dosent even see the difference between the OWNER being able to carry the dept and previous owners failing to want to. Just smile, nod your head and walk away with people like this, and let children like chuckles learn their own lessons :thumbup:


You are in the same mould as soulofthesea. Thick as they come. Ive told you many times about the copyright, you are completely wrong as many have told you - and the thread is still open, lets go again for round 2 :thumbup:

On to this thread.... Are you suggesting Tan will walk away from the money he is owed? :laughing6:


Roath, a guy involved with copyright law has just reinforced that 7Summit was correct

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:34 am

7Summit wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:you can put AN EXAMPLE..................as much as you like

your post was there to decieve..........and belittle..........to look big and clever for your follower
no harm done..Robin is still there like a dog with two tails............
awaiting the masters next set of lies


So you now acknowledge it was an example, good boy :laughing6:

Now then, how about this counter.

How can the club afford to bare £150m of debt on its own? :thumbup:


NO I DONT ACCEPT IT WAS ANYTHING OTHER THAN A SAD DESPERATE MAN ,, HAVING TO LIE ON A MESSAGE BOARD


Oh my :D

So then i will ask again - which part of "an example" confuses you? (Remember that was a quote from the direct transcript) :lol: :D


the part.............where IN THIS THREAD............you atribute the response to me........
liar

Why do you continue to try debating this guy simon? He cant even read "the bluebirds is protected towards anything related with football". He continue to argue you can make coffee mugs with a bluebird, hench it is not protected. He dosent even see the difference between the OWNER being able to carry the dept and previous owners failing to want to. Just smile, nod your head and walk away with people like this, and let children like chuckles learn their own lessons :thumbup:


yes you are spot on...........just hate liars, and really dont like anyone saying ive said things i havent said......
the man is a flat out LIAR.

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:36 am

Roath_Magic_ wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:
7Summit wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you where (sic) wrong? :?

Come on Pete there was nothing to read. It was common sense :laughing6:

I'm able to get the point presented to you in this thread and read copyrights. All good thanx


Thanx? (sic) :?

Reading copyrights and understanding copyrights are completely different, the thread is still going if you would like to take it up with me again? :thumbright:

As for this thread? What point has been presented young man? £150m is manageable for the club alone because tan is a successful businessman? :lol:

Nice.


if you were a millionaire business man........youd fully understand that different people have different plans,and thoughts and ideas to yours........you would understand that........whats too much of a gamble in one mans eyes makes perfect sense to another....one might have better advice,,know things about situation the other doesnt............business as life does not have one highway,its diverse............your rigid business rantings show no understanding,or experience.....its all parrot fashion............you know this its why ill be called a ranting pleb in amongst lots of laughing heads,lols, thumbsups and plebs......its not tyour out of your depth talking to me,your out of your depth full stop.........


:D here you go again. Absolutely no sense to your post what so ever.

When someone makes an obvious point that you dont like to admit you tend to say "how do you know? X,y and z could happen" even though x,y or z is ridiculously unlikely.

Remember what i said the other day regarding someone asking me what would happen if someone jumped out of a plane at 30000 feet? Me answering "death" and you responding with "how do you know? You may land on another passing plane and be fine" - and think both are equal statements :lol:

How about this.... YOU put forward a counter, and not a reply that consists of "there may be an alternative" - tell me what it is and why you think there is equal chance than my view on the situation.

Do your best :laughing6: :thumbup:


AND YOU RESPONDING......................how do you know? you may land on another plane and be fine..........
but i didnt respond..............thats your stupid story,not anybody elses..................
its there to try to gain the high ground..........and i know you have that already..lol.......but resort to LIES..LIES AND MORE LIES....................on a message board..get a life


Yes soulofthesea - if it was an example hypothetical question then surely one would assume the answer would also be of that nature? :laughing6:

This is like talking to someone rocking back and forth in a straight jacket :lol:


yes i know..ill go.............honestly , honour..truth,,dignity......are all missing with you............LIARS have no real friends do they?

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:37 am

simon.wiesenthal wrote:
7Summit wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:you can put AN EXAMPLE..................as much as you like

your post was there to decieve..........and belittle..........to look big and clever for your follower
no harm done..Robin is still there like a dog with two tails............
awaiting the masters next set of lies


So you now acknowledge it was an example, good boy :laughing6:

Now then, how about this counter.

How can the club afford to bare £150m of debt on its own? :thumbup:


NO I DONT ACCEPT IT WAS ANYTHING OTHER THAN A SAD DESPERATE MAN ,, HAVING TO LIE ON A MESSAGE BOARD


Oh my :D

So then i will ask again - which part of "an example" confuses you? (Remember that was a quote from the direct transcript) :lol: :D


the part.............where IN THIS THREAD............you atribute the response to me........
liar

Why do you continue to try debating this guy simon? He cant even read "the bluebirds is protected towards anything related with football". He continue to argue you can make coffee mugs with a bluebird, hench it is not protected. He dosent even see the difference between the OWNER being able to carry the dept and previous owners failing to want to. Just smile, nod your head and walk away with people like this, and let children like chuckles learn their own lessons :thumbup:


yes you are spot on...........just hate liars, and really dont like anyone saying ive said things i havent said......
the man is a flat out LIAR.


:laughing6: it was an example you moron.

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:38 am

simon.wiesenthal wrote:

yes i know..ill go.............honestly , honour..truth,,dignity......are all missing with you............LIARS have no real friends do they?


Yeah how dare i give a hypothetical example to show your stupidity, what is amazingly ironic - is your response showed how stupid you are more than the example itself, even your own fellow fans are embarrassed for you :lol:

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:40 am

Roath_Magic_ wrote:
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
no no no...............you were desperate......so made out id said what in fact you had said............LIAR


You have to be just avoiding apologising for being wrong, nobody can be this stupid. Can they? :laughing6:

In that case. Apology accepted :thumbup:


no i dont accept your apology.............the lie was deliberate.............
you need to take up basket weaving mate,if you cant come on here without LIES........whats the point?

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:42 am

simon.wiesenthal wrote:
no i dont accept your apology.............the lie was deliberate.............
you need to take up basket weaving mate,if you cant come on here without LIES........whats the point?


You have to be digging the biggest hole since the Mirny Diamond mine, quit while you are considerably behind mr soulofthesea :laughing6:

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:45 am

Roathie, anyone with sense can clearly see it was an example. He is ranting and raving because he knows he is wrong. He needs sectioning after this thread.

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:46 am

Joffrey wrote:Roathie, anyone with sense can clearly see it was an example. He is ranting and raving because he knows he is wrong. He needs sectioning after this thread.


He needed sectioning long before this thread Joff, check his post history, he is bonkers :laughing6:

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:11 pm

The change of colour to red is appropriate, because the club, and a large section of the supporters, have behaved like tarts. If you take the money, without asking questions, like like tarts do, you are going to get screwed like tars do, and that's just what has happened. Tan was the punter, Ridsdale was the pimp and the club was his bitch.

You'll never get your club, and your self respect back until he's been dumped. How you can do that though, god only knows.

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Wed Jun 04, 2014 3:56 pm

Roath_Magic_ wrote:
Joffrey wrote:Roathie, anyone with sense can clearly see it was an example. He is ranting and raving because he knows he is wrong. He needs sectioning after this thread.


He needed sectioning long before this thread Joff, check his post history, he is bonkers :laughing6:



Don't you post as Joffrey on planet swans roathie.
Running two accounts to back yourself up by the look of it ?

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:53 pm

steve davies wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:
Joffrey wrote:Roathie, anyone with sense can clearly see it was an example. He is ranting and raving because he knows he is wrong. He needs sectioning after this thread.


He needed sectioning long before this thread Joff, check his post history, he is bonkers :laughing6:



Don't you post as Joffrey on planet swans roathie.
Running two accounts to back yourself up by the look of it ?


No. Parlay on planetswans, never seen a joffrey. I never dabble in multis steve, you should know that? You disappoint me.

Surely to God i didnt need backing up anyway :lol:

Apology accepted :thumbup:

Re: sam =700% tan =400%

Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:05 am

well this thread got well and truly side tracked :ole: :ole: :ole: :ole: :bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf: