Sun May 25, 2014 10:02 am
steve davies wrote:carlccfc wrote:steve davies wrote:carlccfc wrote:steve davies wrote:carlccfc wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Will someone first tell me the full story on malky and moody. If they were indeed on the take VT got it right!!Annis must know after his bellamy chat??????
Wez, I got told from a very good source last week the reason why Malky and Moody were sacked and it was not because they were on the take.
Annis asked Bellamy about what I told him and Bellamy confirmed it as correct.
Neither were 'on the take'.
Carl if you gave a contract out to a company for 10 million 5 weeks after there was a tender for 2million in the offering your boss would sack you and certainly look into it to see if you were taking a bung.
Steve, looking into whether someone took a bung and actually proving they took a bung are two very different scenarios.
Are you accusing Malky and Moody of taking bungs or do you know/are aware of them taking bungs ?
See my answer to ian Carl I have always maintained Malky never took a bung I just think his three stage dossier has turned out to be totally unreliable and his inability to solve the striker problem over a number of transfer windows cost us dear.
Steve, I saw your answer after I posted my question.
It is difficult to argue against the striker issue and I raised concerns in Malky's first season regarding the dossier process but your post regarding bungs is dangerous ground as you do insinuate that he and moody were guilty of taking bungs and your pits is very misleading.
I do not insinuate that they took a bung at all Carl I am saying as I have always said that they paid 8 million euros more for Cornelius than was needed. You would rightly expect Vincent tan to expect an answer as to how that happened hence the reference to if you awarded a contract for 8 million more to a contractor your boss would investigate.
You say it's not financial the reasons they get sacked I believe it's everything to do with the summer window that they got sacked. The only value for money signing was caulker.
Sun May 25, 2014 10:31 am
wez1927 wrote:carlccfc wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Will someone first tell me the full story on malky and moody. If they were indeed on the take VT got it right!!Annis must know after his bellamy chat??????
Wez, I got told from a very good source last week the reason why Malky and Moody were sacked and it was not because they were on the take.
Annis asked Bellamy about what I told him and Bellamy confirmed it as correct.
Neither were 'on the take'.
A certain Cardiff city shareholder thinks he was and doesn't care who he tells and with moody and malkys ass licking apology last week looks like he right
Sun May 25, 2014 11:16 am
steve davies wrote:wez1927 wrote:carlccfc wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Will someone first tell me the full story on malky and moody. If they were indeed on the take VT got it right!!Annis must know after his bellamy chat??????
Wez, I got told from a very good source last week the reason why Malky and Moody were sacked and it was not because they were on the take.
Annis asked Bellamy about what I told him and Bellamy confirmed it as correct.
Neither were 'on the take'.
A certain Cardiff city shareholder thinks he was and doesn't care who he tells and with moody and malkys ass licking apology last week looks like he right
That certain shareholder Wez has had it in for Malky since the presentation of the championship trophy on the pitch last May.
He thought that he should have been involved and spent all summer trying to convince tan that Malky was not the man to manage us in the premier.
This was the man who welched on the deal to sell his shares to tan when all other shareholders complied.
I would take anything he says with a pinch of salt and the sooner he is removed from the club the better.
Sun May 25, 2014 11:51 am
barry boy wrote:Natman Blue wrote:barry boy wrote:RichardBluebird wrote:Im amazed people still harp on about Malky, wonder why he still cant find a job....?
Because he was and still is a good manager.
Surely if that were the case he would have found a job by now. hmmmmmm!
thought people were very recently saying he'd settled with tan to take the Norwich City job. lmao!
He has only recently been out of work...waiting for the settlement. Just because he did not get the Norwich job means sod all. Unless you create things. like you do to sustain your grievance.
"thought people were saying.....stuff" . great basis of fact there.
Sun May 25, 2014 11:53 am
Coco wrote:Natman Blue wrote:^ No we wouldn't as Cardiff City would have folded.
Based on what evidence pray tell ?!
Sun May 25, 2014 12:02 pm
Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:carlccfc wrote:steve davies wrote:carlccfc wrote:steve davies wrote:carlccfc wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Will someone first tell me the full story on malky and moody. If they were indeed on the take VT got it right!!Annis must know after his bellamy chat??????
Wez, I got told from a very good source last week the reason why Malky and Moody were sacked and it was not because they were on the take.
Annis asked Bellamy about what I told him and Bellamy confirmed it as correct.
Neither were 'on the take'.
Carl if you gave a contract out to a company for 10 million 5 weeks after there was a tender for 2million in the offering your boss would sack you and certainly look into it to see if you were taking a bung.
Steve, looking into whether someone took a bung and actually proving they took a bung are two very different scenarios.
Are you accusing Malky and Moody of taking bungs or do you know/are aware of them taking bungs ?
See my answer to ian Carl I have always maintained Malky never took a bung I just think his three stage dossier has turned out to be totally unreliable and his inability to solve the striker problem over a number of transfer windows cost us dear.
Steve, I saw your answer after I posted my question.
It is difficult to argue against the striker issue and I raised concerns in Malky's first season regarding the dossier process but your post regarding bungs is dangerous ground as you do insinuate that he and moody were guilty of taking bungs and your pits is very misleading.
I do not insinuate that they took a bung at all Carl I am saying as I have always said that they paid 8 million euros more for Cornelius than was needed. You would rightly expect Vincent tan to expect an answer as to how that happened hence the reference to if you awarded a contract for 8 million more to a contractor your boss would investigate.
You say it's not financial the reasons they get sacked I believe it's everything to do with the summer window that they got sacked. The only value for money signing was caulker.
Steve, 100% I am now adamant Malky never took any money.![]()
Tan regards to transfers was throwing the money at Malky like it was just paper, I admit Malky made a couple of bad mistakes and he would also admit that. BUT THE FACTS ARE THERE MALKY DELIVERED WHAT WAS ASKED OF HIM![]()
![]()
Bellamy shocked me how much he respected Malky and backed him, not a good word to say about Tan.
Malky was also recognised by all managers and was voted by the LMA manager of the year![]()
Sun May 25, 2014 12:06 pm
Cardiffcitymad wrote:steve davies wrote:wez1927 wrote:carlccfc wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Will someone first tell me the full story on malky and moody. If they were indeed on the take VT got it right!!Annis must know after his bellamy chat??????
Wez, I got told from a very good source last week the reason why Malky and Moody were sacked and it was not because they were on the take.
Annis asked Bellamy about what I told him and Bellamy confirmed it as correct.
Neither were 'on the take'.
A certain Cardiff city shareholder thinks he was and doesn't care who he tells and with moody and malkys ass licking apology last week looks like he right
That certain shareholder Wez has had it in for Malky since the presentation of the championship trophy on the pitch last May.
He thought that he should have been involved and spent all summer trying to convince tan that Malky was not the man to manage us in the premier.
This was the man who welched on the deal to sell his shares to tan when all other shareholders complied.
I would take anything he says with a pinch of salt and the sooner he is removed from the club the better.
Suggest someone goes to companies house to check who the shareholders are! I believe Tan owns around 80% of the club who are the rest?
Sun May 25, 2014 12:12 pm
Sun May 25, 2014 12:21 pm
Sun May 25, 2014 12:31 pm
cigar wrote:Correct 47 a site now just to bash VT.Sickening and disturbing the length's people will go to try and turn people against him.
Sun May 25, 2014 12:49 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:cigar wrote:Correct 47 a site now just to bash VT.Sickening and disturbing the length's people will go to try and turn people against him.
Annis hates Bellamy but because Bellamy respects Malky Annis now loves Bellamy
Sun May 25, 2014 12:58 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:cigar wrote:Correct 47 a site now just to bash VT.Sickening and disturbing the length's people will go to try and turn people against him.
Annis hates Bellamy but because Bellamy respects Malky Annis now loves Bellamy
Sun May 25, 2014 1:09 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:cigar wrote:Correct 47 a site now just to bash VT.Sickening and disturbing the length's people will go to try and turn people against him.
Annis hates Bellamy but because Bellamy respects Malky Annis now loves Bellamy

Sun May 25, 2014 1:33 pm
Forever Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:cigar wrote:Correct 47 a site now just to bash VT.Sickening and disturbing the length's people will go to try and turn people against him.
Annis hates Bellamy but because Bellamy respects Malky Annis now loves Bellamy
![]()
Not true at all Chris, it was because he was not this arrogant person that many including myself had thought he was and he was down to earth,straight and honest![]()
![]()
And I hold my hands up regarding Bellamy I was wrong
Sun May 25, 2014 1:39 pm
Sun May 25, 2014 2:01 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Cardiffcitymad wrote:steve davies wrote:wez1927 wrote:carlccfc wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Will someone first tell me the full story on malky and moody. If they were indeed on the take VT got it right!!Annis must know after his bellamy chat??????
Wez, I got told from a very good source last week the reason why Malky and Moody were sacked and it was not because they were on the take.
Annis asked Bellamy about what I told him and Bellamy confirmed it as correct.
Neither were 'on the take'.
A certain Cardiff city shareholder thinks he was and doesn't care who he tells and with moody and malkys ass licking apology last week looks like he right
That certain shareholder Wez has had it in for Malky since the presentation of the championship trophy on the pitch last May.
He thought that he should have been involved and spent all summer trying to convince tan that Malky was not the man to manage us in the premier.
This was the man who welched on the deal to sell his shares to tan when all other shareholders complied.
I would take anything he says with a pinch of salt and the sooner he is removed from the club the better.
Suggest someone goes to companies house to check who the shareholders are! I believe Tan owns around 80% of the club who are the rest?
Plenty of shareholder left.
This individual Steve is going on about needs to be removed from the club. A total sellout.
Sun May 25, 2014 2:03 pm
Cardiffcitymad wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Cardiffcitymad wrote:steve davies wrote:wez1927 wrote:carlccfc wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Will someone first tell me the full story on malky and moody. If they were indeed on the take VT got it right!!Annis must know after his bellamy chat??????
Wez, I got told from a very good source last week the reason why Malky and Moody were sacked and it was not because they were on the take.
Annis asked Bellamy about what I told him and Bellamy confirmed it as correct.
Neither were 'on the take'.
A certain Cardiff city shareholder thinks he was and doesn't care who he tells and with moody and malkys ass licking apology last week looks like he right
That certain shareholder Wez has had it in for Malky since the presentation of the championship trophy on the pitch last May.
He thought that he should have been involved and spent all summer trying to convince tan that Malky was not the man to manage us in the premier.
This was the man who welched on the deal to sell his shares to tan when all other shareholders complied.
I would take anything he says with a pinch of salt and the sooner he is removed from the club the better.
Suggest someone goes to companies house to check who the shareholders are! I believe Tan owns around 80% of the club who are the rest?
Plenty of shareholder left.
This individual Steve is going on about needs to be removed from the club. A total sellout.
Who needs to be removed?
Sun May 25, 2014 2:03 pm
Sun May 25, 2014 2:09 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Cardiffcitymad wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Cardiffcitymad wrote:steve davies wrote:wez1927 wrote:carlccfc wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Will someone first tell me the full story on malky and moody. If they were indeed on the take VT got it right!!Annis must know after his bellamy chat??????
Wez, I got told from a very good source last week the reason why Malky and Moody were sacked and it was not because they were on the take.
Annis asked Bellamy about what I told him and Bellamy confirmed it as correct.
Neither were 'on the take'.
A certain Cardiff city shareholder thinks he was and doesn't care who he tells and with moody and malkys ass licking apology last week looks like he right
That certain shareholder Wez has had it in for Malky since the presentation of the championship trophy on the pitch last May.
He thought that he should have been involved and spent all summer trying to convince tan that Malky was not the man to manage us in the premier.
This was the man who welched on the deal to sell his shares to tan when all other shareholders complied.
I would take anything he says with a pinch of salt and the sooner he is removed from the club the better.
Suggest someone goes to companies house to check who the shareholders are! I believe Tan owns around 80% of the club who are the rest?
Plenty of shareholder left.
This individual Steve is going on about needs to be removed from the club. A total sellout.
Who needs to be removed?
Mr Isaacs as he like to be known by us common folk.
Sun May 25, 2014 2:11 pm
VinnyLiar wrote:Lot's of cock sucking of Milky Mackay here and he's feck all to do with our club anymore yet its full of Tan Haters who kept us out of the clutches of the tax man and saved us from extinction. Couldn't make it up could you? Well this is Cardiff City after all but I smell a Lebanese rat behind the scenes working the puppets
Sun May 25, 2014 2:13 pm
VinnyLiar wrote:Lot's of cock sucking of Milky Mackay here and he's feck all to do with our club anymore yet its full of Tan Haters who kept us out of the clutches of the tax man and saved us from extinction. Couldn't make it up could you? Well this is Cardiff City after all but I smell a Lebanese rat behind the scenes working the puppets
Sun May 25, 2014 2:16 pm
Canton stand bluebird wrote:VinnyLiar wrote:Lot's of cock sucking of Milky Mackay here and he's feck all to do with our club anymore yet its full of Tan Haters who kept us out of the clutches of the tax man and saved us from extinction. Couldn't make it up could you? Well this is Cardiff City after all but I smell a Lebanese rat behind the scenes working the puppets
so this board is full of mackay cock suckers but not full of tan cock suckers ? urrm ok then
Sun May 25, 2014 2:25 pm
carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carl, I think (even as a Jack) I speak for most here when I say either post what the reason you have been told was or STFU
NJ, as a jack why not stay off topics that should have no concern to you![]()
I was told and was asked to keep it off here for the time being but it won't stop me from rubbishing the rumours of Malky or Moody taking backhanders.
Sun May 25, 2014 2:29 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carl, I think (even as a Jack) I speak for most here when I say either post what the reason you have been told was or STFU
NJ, as a jack why not stay off topics that should have no concern to you![]()
I was told and was asked to keep it off here for the time being but it won't stop me from rubbishing the rumours of Malky or Moody taking backhanders.
You're more than happy to have Roath Magic give his opinion on all things Cardiff when it suits you.
Same old "we know something you don't know" and that the "truth will always come out" yet never does.
Sun May 25, 2014 2:31 pm
VinnyLiar wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carl, I think (even as a Jack) I speak for most here when I say either post what the reason you have been told was or STFU
NJ, as a jack why not stay off topics that should have no concern to you![]()
I was told and was asked to keep it off here for the time being but it won't stop me from rubbishing the rumours of Malky or Moody taking backhanders.
You're more than happy to have Roath Magic give his opinion on all things Cardiff when it suits you.
Same old "we know something you don't know" and that the "truth will always come out" yet never does.
Just more hear say shit stirring don't you think?
Sun May 25, 2014 2:32 pm
VinnyLiar wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carl, I think (even as a Jack) I speak for most here when I say either post what the reason you have been told was or STFU
NJ, as a jack why not stay off topics that should have no concern to you![]()
I was told and was asked to keep it off here for the time being but it won't stop me from rubbishing the rumours of Malky or Moody taking backhanders.
You're more than happy to have Roath Magic give his opinion on all things Cardiff when it suits you.
Same old "we know something you don't know" and that the "truth will always come out" yet never does.
Just more hear say shit stirring don't you think?
Sun May 25, 2014 2:33 pm
Natman Blue wrote:VinnyLiar wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carl, I think (even as a Jack) I speak for most here when I say either post what the reason you have been told was or STFU
NJ, as a jack why not stay off topics that should have no concern to you![]()
I was told and was asked to keep it off here for the time being but it won't stop me from rubbishing the rumours of Malky or Moody taking backhanders.
You're more than happy to have Roath Magic give his opinion on all things Cardiff when it suits you.
Same old "we know something you don't know" and that the "truth will always come out" yet never does.
Just more hear say shit stirring don't you think?
Yes! and I love your signature!
Sun May 25, 2014 3:39 pm
NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carl, I think (even as a Jack) I speak for most here when I say either post what the reason you have been told was or STFU
NJ, as a jack why not stay off topics that should have no concern to you![]()
I was told and was asked to keep it off here for the time being but it won't stop me from rubbishing the rumours of Malky or Moody taking backhanders.
Because that's not how messageboards work, no need to get all defensive![]()
Of course you were
Expected better off you NJ, very weak comeback.
Like I said, either tell what you know or stfu and say nothing.
It's pathetic honestly.
In my opinion of course blah blah blah.
So I have to give my reason for rubbishing the unfounded rumours that our ex manager took backhanders.
It is a message board as you stated earlier.
Yes. You claim to know the truth so either share it with your fellow fans or stfu.
This whole "I know something you don't know" stance is frankly pathetic and child like.
But hey, it keep the hits coming eh.
Sun May 25, 2014 3:47 pm
Jinks wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carl, I think (even as a Jack) I speak for most here when I say either post what the reason you have been told was or STFU
NJ, as a jack why not stay off topics that should have no concern to you![]()
I was told and was asked to keep it off here for the time being but it won't stop me from rubbishing the rumours of Malky or Moody taking backhanders.
Because that's not how messageboards work, no need to get all defensive![]()
Of course you were
Expected better off you NJ, very weak comeback.
Like I said, either tell what you know or stfu and say nothing.
It's pathetic honestly.
In my opinion of course blah blah blah.
So I have to give my reason for rubbishing the unfounded rumours that our ex manager took backhanders.
It is a message board as you stated earlier.
Yes. You claim to know the truth so either share it with your fellow fans or stfu.
This whole "I know something you don't know" stance is frankly pathetic and child like.
But hey, it keep the hits coming eh.
Pathetic shit like that and all the other agenda stirring causes more divide than tan himself.
Sun May 25, 2014 3:53 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Carl, I think (even as a Jack) I speak for most here when I say either post what the reason you have been told was or STFU
NJ, as a jack why not stay off topics that should have no concern to you![]()
I was told and was asked to keep it off here for the time being but it won't stop me from rubbishing the rumours of Malky or Moody taking backhanders.
Because that's not how messageboards work, no need to get all defensive![]()
Of course you were
Expected better off you NJ, very weak comeback.
Like I said, either tell what you know or stfu and say nothing.
It's pathetic honestly.
In my opinion of course blah blah blah.
So I have to give my reason for rubbishing the unfounded rumours that our ex manager took backhanders.
It is a message board as you stated earlier.
Yes. You claim to know the truth so either share it with your fellow fans or stfu.
This whole "I know something you don't know" stance is frankly pathetic and child like.
But hey, it keep the hits coming eh.
Pathetic shit like that and all the other agenda stirring causes more divide than tan himself.
testify!!!!!