Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:26 pm
expat1 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:
Why do consistently argue the semantics? Are you that delusional that you can't read the subtext of many of the jack posters?
Semantics? You just complained about something and I asked you who said it?
So... who do you refer to again?
Of the 125000+ posts on this forum you want me to link and reference all the jack posts that aggrieve most real cardiff supports on here? By the looks of your post history, you're not a knuckle dragging halfwit so you should know what i'm referring to, however, you choose to be pedantic by sidetracking my question by paying attention the the semantics rather than understanding my question.
Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:32 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:
At last he catches on. Yes, I believe you are a liar! At best you exaggerate to the extreme and that's being kind. You suffer from a superiority complex due to something that's happened to you in your life. It's a football forum, you don't expect to learn much about peoples personal lives yet you've been happy to tell all.
hmmm i don't believe that for a second. It just doesnt add up, if you thought I was lying you wouldnt be so angry and obsessed by it. You have no proof to back your claims, in fact we just have the opposite and proof to the contrary... You also know that I am asked about my personal life constantly yet make out that I give it without prompt... Im afraid that smacks of someone trying to protest they dont believe when on fact they do and are insanely jealous of it.
You bare all the hallmarks.
We know where you live, your work, who your shagging (even feeling the need to post weird pictures), your financial status, your hobbies etc etc. In your eyes all of it amazing of course. You know nothing about others yet still feel able to judge and make accusations of jealousy when the likes of myself don't believe you. What I do believe is that you're lonely, unhappy, paranoid, friendless, bitter and twisted. I could go on.
buy why do you know these things?? Because im asked them. Almost daily. What have I ever posted that is bitter or twisted? Again your explanation is not adding up at all, it seems you are using your conversation with me as an opportunity to vent your frustrations rather than tell me what you really feel.
There is a barrier there. Why?
So why the need to impress strangers, poor pitiful paranoid puppet boy?
and again we are back at 1, 2 and 3 to round it off in one sentence![]()
Ive got you wrapped up sunshine![]()
Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:34 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:
Why do consistently argue the semantics? Are you that delusional that you can't read the subtext of many of the jack posters?
Semantics? You just complained about something and I asked you who said it?
So... who do you refer to again?
Of the 125000+ posts on this forum you want me to link and reference all the jack posts that aggrieve most real cardiff supports on here? By the looks of your post history, you're not a knuckle dragging halfwit so you should know what i'm referring to, however, you choose to be pedantic by sidetracking my question by paying attention the the semantics rather than understanding my question.
So by asking who you are referring to is semantics?
Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:35 pm
expat1 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:
Why do consistently argue the semantics? Are you that delusional that you can't read the subtext of many of the jack posters?
Semantics? You just complained about something and I asked you who said it?
So... who do you refer to again?
Of the 125000+ posts on this forum you want me to link and reference all the jack posts that aggrieve most real cardiff supports on here? By the looks of your post history, you're not a knuckle dragging halfwit so you should know what i'm referring to, however, you choose to be pedantic by sidetracking my question by paying attention the the semantics rather than understanding my question.
So by asking who you are referring to is semantics?
Jesus christ you must be a halfwit. Back on planet earth roath, the regular poster isn't going sift through tens of thousands of posts looking for a handful that supports his/her case. You're on here every day, you know what i'm talking about. Yet rather than
take on board my point, you argue the semantics and specifically ask me for references. You've completely ignored my question and now we're getting into some abstract debate about grammar.
Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:46 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:
Why do consistently argue the semantics? Are you that delusional that you can't read the subtext of many of the jack posters?
Semantics? You just complained about something and I asked you who said it?
So... who do you refer to again?
Of the 125000+ posts on this forum you want me to link and reference all the jack posts that aggrieve most real cardiff supports on here? By the looks of your post history, you're not a knuckle dragging halfwit so you should know what i'm referring to, however, you choose to be pedantic by sidetracking my question by paying attention the the semantics rather than understanding my question.
So by asking who you are referring to is semantics?
Jesus christ you must be a halfwit. Back on planet earth roath, the regular poster isn't going sift through tens of thousands of posts looking for a handful that supports his/her case. You're on here every day, you know what i'm talking about. Yet rather than
take on board my point, you argue the semantics and specifically ask me for references. You've completely ignored my question and now we're getting into some abstract debate about grammar.
Grammar? Who is talking about grammar?![]()
We are. You're arguing the semantics of my sentence by paying attention to who i specifically mean. Rather than comfortably assume that the jack remarks on this forum have been less than tasteful lately is not much an insult to the cardiff fans, but more to your intelligence, due to the fact that you'd rather sidestep my question by asking who said it.
Are you drunk? No. Would I be having a coherent conversation with a monkey like you if i were?
Im not asking you to sift through posts, you came on here with a pretty specific gripe. Is it not fair to suggest you know what your complaint is?Course you are! You literally just said below : "Ive simply asked you to whom you refer." How can i do that unless i sift through posts?
Ive simply asked you to whom you refer. If you don't know then just say so and I will ignore the complaint
Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:47 pm
Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:57 pm
expat1 wrote:
Grammar? Who is talking about grammar?![]()
We are. You're arguing the semantics of my sentence by paying attention to who i specifically mean. Rather than comfortably assume that the jack remarks on this forum have been less than tasteful lately is not much an insult to the cardiff fans, but more to your intelligence, due to the fact that you'd rather sidestep my question by asking who said it.
I suggest you look up the meaning of "grammar" and "semantics" both dont make sense in your sentence.
Ive not seen any comments like you describe, if you tell me who said them then i can investigate and answer your question. Although im not starting to doubt the existence of the comments.![]()
Are you drunk? No. Would I be having a coherent conversation with a monkey like you if i were?
it isnt coherent, you arent making any sense what so ever.
Im not asking you to sift through posts, you came on here with a pretty specific gripe. Is it not fair to suggest you know what your complaint is?Course you are! You literally just said below : "Ive simply asked you to whom you refer." How can i do that unless i sift through posts?
so you have a complaint about comments made but have no idea who said them without looking? Thats just weird.
Ive simply asked you to whom you refer. If you don't know then just say so and I will ignore the complaint

Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:02 am
Carpe Diem wrote:Wrapped up, you've been on the rack all day![]()
![]()
Classic puppet boy though, when you're taking a hiding declare yourself the winner. You're fooling nobody sunshine![]()
how am I taking a hiding?![]()
All you have done all day is say "boogie man" and "puppet boy" surrounded by stuff incriminating you as an insanely jealous obsessive. That passage describing one fits you perfectly and its knocked you for 6![]()
I've told you what I really feel about you. All my posts have been calm and assured![]()
your posts have not made sense, full of angry insults, lies and a lot of covering up with sketchy excuses - if you dug anymore in this thread you would be waking up in Malaysia
![]()
I'm off now, bed calling. Things to establish later:
1. Who is out there who wants to stab you?
the posters that said it at a guess![]()
2. Why do you strive to impress strangers to the extent you will post weird / juvenile photos?
i dont, i simy answered questions honestly. Imoressing doesnt enter my mind... but glad you are impressed all the same.
3. How often do you wash that sock?
my hot fiancee does all my laundry![]()
Have the last word you always crave, roathy the poor paranoid pitiful puppet boy![]()
game set and match.
You have been leathered.
Break down of the year goes to..... Fibber diem.
As you were![]()
Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:03 am
[/quote]Roath_Magic_ wrote:expat1 wrote:
Grammar? Who is talking about grammar?![]()
We are. You're arguing the semantics of my sentence by paying attention to who i specifically mean. Rather than comfortably assume that the jack remarks on this forum have been less than tasteful lately is not much an insult to the cardiff fans, but more to your intelligence, due to the fact that you'd rather sidestep my question by asking who said it.
I suggest you look up the meaning of "grammar" and "semantics" both dont make sense in your sentence.
Ive not seen any comments like you describe, if you tell me who said them then i can investigate and answer your question. Although im not starting to doubt the existence of the comments.![]()
Are you drunk? No. Would I be having a coherent conversation with a monkey like you if i were?
it isnt coherent, you arent making any sense what so ever.
Im not asking you to sift through posts, you came on here with a pretty specific gripe. Is it not fair to suggest you know what your complaint is?Course you are! You literally just said below : "Ive simply asked you to whom you refer." How can i do that unless i sift through posts?
so you have a complaint about comments made but have no idea who said them without looking? Thats just weird.
Ive simply asked you to whom you refer. If you don't know then just say so and I will ignore the complaint
You know those stupid people who are so retarded that they don't realise how stupid they are? That's ol' roathie
yet you dont even know what your complaint is or who said it![]()
Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:04 am
Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:06 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:So your complaint was?....
Or have you forgotten?
Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:10 am
Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:23 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Ok I see it.
You are saying that there are jacks posting "vitriolic poison".
As this is a complaint im going to need more details if you wish for an answer. Think of me as a police manNo thanks, i'll just think of you as an anonymous poster sat alone with too much time on his hands. and you are someone reporting a crime.
The two questions i need you to answer are
1) what is the nature of these posts to make them vitreolic poison as i need to establish what the content on the posts are, as ive not seen any.
Well as I am unable to draw on specific posts due to time constraints and having a life, the general tone is one of : 1.) Complete insolvency of cardiff city as a club, taking away the community of fans who have tirelessly supported the club for many years, all of whom would be at an emotional debt due to an important cultural institution becoming nothing less than a memory
2.) Incessant personal abuse towards individuals, some of which is of a violent nature
2) who said them. Again ive not seen anyone do this so will need some help.
Well as i said roath, I don't have the time to reference everything,however, you seem to want to play the policeman role. So i'd suggest you investigate and report back. It's only fair if you want to live this fantasy of a policeman![]()
![]()
If you can only answer 1 then at least that is a start
Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:29 am
expat1 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Ok I see it.
You are saying that there are jacks posting "vitriolic poison".
As this is a complaint im going to need more details if you wish for an answer. Think of me as a police manNo thanks, i'll just think of you as an anonymous poster sat alone with too much time on his hands. if lying to yourself will get you through this post and make some sense then by all means.and you are someone reporting a crime.
The two questions i need you to answer are
1) what is the nature of these posts to make them vitreolic poison as i need to establish what the content on the posts are, as ive not seen any.
Well as I am unable to draw on specific posts due to time constraints and having a life, the general tone is one of : 1.) Complete insolvency of cardiff city as a club, taking away the community of fans who have tirelessly supported the club for many years, all of whom would be at an emotional debt due to an important cultural institution becoming nothing less than a memory
[color=#4000FF] sounds fair. As a club you are running insolvent, that is a fact not poison.
2.) Incessant personal abuse towards individuals, some of which is of a violent nature
personal abuse and violence will not be tolerated by me, ive not seen any but will keep an eye out for you![]()
[/color]k
2) who said them. Again ive not seen anyone do this so will need some help.
Well as i said roath, I don't have the time to reference everything,however, you seem to want to play the policeman role. So i'd suggest you investigate and report back. It's only fair if you want to live this fantasy of a policeman![]()
![]()
like I said, ive not seen anything but I will keep an eye out and thanks for bringing it to my attention. I will ask though, next time you come to me with a complaint it would help if you knew what was said or who said it. Its all a bit vague.
Thanks for reporting it though
If you can only answer 1 then at least that is a start
Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:33 am
Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:36 am
expat1 wrote:Thanks roath, top boy fair play![]()
If you go back to my original post though, i'm sorry but you wont find your name mentioned in there. So where you get this idea that i was targeting you from the outset i'll never know, but never mind, we all make mistakes eh![]()
Right i'm off to bed, all the best fella
Mon Apr 28, 2014 7:46 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Wrapped up, you've been on the rack all day![]()
![]()
Classic puppet boy though, when you're taking a hiding declare yourself the winner. You're fooling nobody sunshine![]()
how am I taking a hiding?![]()
All you have done all day is say "boogie man" and "puppet boy" surrounded by stuff incriminating you as an insanely jealous obsessive. That passage describing one fits you perfectly and its knocked you for 6![]()
I've told you what I really feel about you. All my posts have been calm and assured![]()
your posts have not made sense, full of angry insults, lies and a lot of covering up with sketchy excuses - if you dug anymore in this thread you would be waking up in Malaysia
![]()
I'm off now, bed calling. Things to establish later:
1. Who is out there who wants to stab you?
the posters that said it at a guess![]()
2. Why do you strive to impress strangers to the extent you will post weird / juvenile photos?
i dont, i simy answered questions honestly. Imoressing doesnt enter my mind... but glad you are impressed all the same.
3. How often do you wash that sock?
my hot fiancee does all my laundry![]()
Have the last word you always crave, roathy the poor paranoid pitiful puppet boy![]()
game set and match.
You have been leathered.
Break down of the year goes to..... Fibber diem.
As you were![]()
Mon Apr 28, 2014 8:43 am
Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:17 am
Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:25 am