Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:44 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Aramore wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Natman is a prostitute?
Banned for accusation.
He said he had been accused of soliciting. I can only assume he is a red loving rent boy.
But he should have a voice regardless of profession.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:48 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:50 am
Paulinho wrote:
So the fact he is banned on false accusation wasnt that important after all? The fact that he is being accused of abusing annis, and hiring solicitors without being able to stand up for him self is ok?
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:55 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Paulinho wrote:
So the fact he is banned on false accusation wasnt that important after all? The fact that he is being accused of abusing annis, and hiring solicitors without being able to stand up for him self is ok?
Soliciting means prostitution, i think you meant "hiring a solicitor" - it was just a joke, calm down.
I am fully in Natman's corner on this banning issue.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:55 am
Paulinho wrote:maccydee wrote:Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Your (sic) gonna be banned soon. Or are you Natman too?
No im not natman. Im the one telling him on pm, which the mods accuse him of. Natman can prove this posting my pm, but he is not allowed to. Neither all the other accusations made on him. Offcourse i will get banned, but its the truth!
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:59 am
Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:01 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Aramore wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Natman is a prostitute?
Banned for accusation.
He said he had been accused of soliciting. I can only assume he is a red loving rent boy.
But he should have a voice regardless of profession.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:10 pm
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:27 pm
ClydachBluebird wrote:Interesting debate! Does anyone know where the thread is that started all this?
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:27 pm
Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:28 pm
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:30 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:31 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:33 pm
Pontyclun Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
He reminded me of the original Polo when you first started posting
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:33 pm
Pontyclun Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
He reminded me of the original Polo when you first started posting
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:38 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
He reminded me of the original Polo when you first started posting
Leave it there the original Polo was far funnier and had more charisma than that bore
get the forum back to what it was a few years ago
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:39 pm
Daya wrote:
At least old browner stood his ground
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:40 pm
Pontyclun Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
He reminded me of the original Polo when you first started posting
Leave it there the original Polo was far funnier and had more charisma than that bore
Bring back original Polo![]()
get the forum back to what it was a few years ago
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:42 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Daya wrote:
At least old browner stood his ground
Stood his ground
He was hoping for a slap so he could running off to grass and get more compo.
Hes got form for doing that. Grass.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:43 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
He reminded me of the original Polo when you first started posting
Leave it there the original Polo was far funnier and had more charisma than that bore
Bring back original Polo![]()
get the forum back to what it was a few years ago
No chance, the dynamics have completely changed, because of the likes of Natman and his sort.
All the posters who liked a bit of banter have gone replaced by annoying yoof and the PC brigade.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:45 pm
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:46 pm
AlwaysBBlue wrote:once again bakedalaska is called to task over banning members without good cause.
Im sure i dont need to copy and paste what you said to me in a pm but it sets out pretty well that the T&Cs are just crap and its basically on the mods whim.
i hope all mods are not like you, and i seriously think the admins should look at removing mods if they recieve enough complaints
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:50 pm
Daya wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:once again bakedalaska is called to task over banning members without good cause.
Im sure i dont need to copy and paste what you said to me in a pm but it sets out pretty well that the T&Cs are just crap and its basically on the mods whim.
i hope all mods are not like you, and i seriously think the admins should look at removing mods if they recieve enough complaints
He's been baked that way - the proof is in the pudding
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:52 pm
Daya wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:once again bakedalaska is called to task over banning members without good cause.
Im sure i dont need to copy and paste what you said to me in a pm but it sets out pretty well that the T&Cs are just crap and its basically on the mods whim.
i hope all mods are not like you, and i seriously think the admins should look at removing mods if they recieve enough complaints
He's been baked that way - the proof is in the pudding
Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:53 pm
Daya wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Daya wrote:
At least old browner stood his ground
Stood his ground
He was hoping for a slap so he could running off to grass and get more compo.
Hes got form for doing that. Grass.
You got form - free speech Polo to - Mario polottetti let me think about it polo
Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:15 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Daya wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Daya wrote:
At least old browner stood his ground
Stood his ground
He was hoping for a slap so he could running off to grass and get more compo.
Hes got form for doing that. Grass.
You got form - free speech Polo to - Mario polottetti let me think about it polo
Polo was 7 foot 4 and hard as f**k but then my identity was outed
Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:21 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:30 pm
maccydee wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
I'm not sure that's true at all. He was very staunch with his views but backed up his viewpoints well I thought.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:33 pm
Natman Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
I'm not sure that's true at all. He was very staunch with his views but backed up his viewpoints well I thought.
Guess who's back!!!!!
Update to follow tonight!!!! And all will be revealed!
Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:42 pm
Natman Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Aramore wrote:Especially because Annis did seem to be baiting Natman most of the time.
Are you serious?
The guy purposely set out every time he posted on here to antagonise Annis.
He offered nothing to the forum, no banter, no football talk, no logic, thing of any substance except complaining and whinging about which topics were made stickys.
As I said earlier, good riddance to him.
I'm not sure that's true at all. He was very staunch with his views but backed up his viewpoints well I thought.
Guess who's back!!!!!
Update to follow tonight!!!! And all will be revealed!