Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Banning of members poll

You may select up to 2 options

 
 
View results

Re: Banning members

Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:03 pm

I would ban all extreme blues and extreme reds. Tidy this place up a bit ffs.

Re: Banning members

Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:12 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:I would ban all extreme blues and extreme reds. Tidy this place up a bit ffs.


this board would average about 4 posts a day if that happened

Re: Banning members

Tue Apr 01, 2014 4:04 pm

AlwaysBBlue wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:I would ban all extreme blues and extreme reds. Tidy this place up a bit ffs.


this board would average about 4 posts a day if that happened


No it wouldn't the majority of us are sane individuals.

Re: Banning members

Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:27 pm

AlwaysBBlue wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
Natman Blue wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
Natman Blue wrote:
:thumbright:

Guess he can't answer it then! His question dodging tactic are on a par with Annis to be fair


Massive hypocrisy alert. You've avoided a question TWICE in another thread. :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:


Nope, I've answered it for you about 20 times before. Just not bothering to go over it again!


You haven't answered it once, not even in the original thread. :laughing6:


what was the question?


Exactly!

Re: Banning members

Wed Apr 02, 2014 2:04 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
AlwaysBBlue wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:I would ban all extreme blues and extreme reds. Tidy this place up a bit ffs.


this board would average about 4 posts a day if that happened


No it wouldn't the majority of us are sane individuals.

I find abzolutely no evidence of that :!:

Re: Banning members

Mon Oct 06, 2014 8:33 pm

Woodville Willie wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote:
jtc wrote:
Roath_Magic_ wrote::D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you :thumbright:

it,s quite simple mr roath.if people dont want to engage in debate or banter with you they should put you on ignore.personally i dont see the fuss about you if im honest.you just offer a view.no one has to agree or disagree and if they do disagree they certainly dont have to go in to meltdown


Quite right sir :thumbup:



This is exactly the point I made above. I don't need to agree with what you say as long as it is said without offensive language, etc.

I would hate to hear you had been banned even though I often find what you say uncomfortable to accept or just plain wrong in my eyes. This forum would be a mutual back-slapping club or even worse, turn us on ourselves without the likes of you.

Every football game needs an opponent. The best games I have seen have often been between arch rivals. Long may that continue.

Your insights are often very telling and if I'm honest, sometimes I wish I had made the same observations.



Here you are backing yourself up roathie!!!

And you also back up crimson canton which is another roathie alias

I am adamant your are roathie!!!

Re: Banning members

Mon Oct 06, 2014 8:36 pm

Woodville Willie wrote:
AlwaysBBlue wrote:
Dawyd wrote:Would be nice to see how big this problem really is, even though it is a blue forum. And why is Roathie still here?


roathie is contraversial and gets people riled up and gets them posting which means more hits...its the "quiet" ones with opinions that get banned

Although i do like roathie, when he's not arguing about the most pointless of things (which is a lot) he offers a perspective that a lot of blinkered city fans and a lot of bias jacks don't offer. Shame he's just such an arse about it all the time that no one takes his decent points seriously



I agree with this. Roath Magic isn't offensive or abusive. He is forthright and asks difficult questions. Sometimes the truth is difficult to take.

I totally disagree with most of what is said, but as you point out, he gets conversations going. We are living in a democracy and I value our right to certIn freedoms. This forum isn't a despotic regime. We all contribute even if some of the views are totally against my beliefs (BLUE!!!).

Even Crimson Canton makes me smile!


Backing up crimson canton another roathie alias

Hahah

Re: Banning members

Mon Oct 06, 2014 9:10 pm

smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Woodville Willie wrote:
AlwaysBBlue wrote:
Dawyd wrote:Would be nice to see how big this problem really is, even though it is a blue forum. And why is Roathie still here?


roathie is contraversial and gets people riled up and gets them posting which means more hits...its the "quiet" ones with opinions that get banned

Although i do like roathie, when he's not arguing about the most pointless of things (which is a lot) he offers a perspective that a lot of blinkered city fans and a lot of bias jacks don't offer. Shame he's just such an arse about it all the time that no one takes his decent points seriously



I agree with this. Roath Magic isn't offensive or abusive. He is forthright and asks difficult questions. Sometimes the truth is difficult to take.

I totally disagree with most of what is said, but as you point out, he gets conversations going. We are living in a democracy and I value our right to certIn freedoms. This forum isn't a despotic regime. We all contribute even if some of the views are totally against my beliefs (BLUE!!!).

Even Crimson Canton makes me smile!


Backing up crimson canton another roathie alias

Hahah



How the hell does this prove anything? You are completely obsessed. You dug this post up from a while ago which proves you are just digging in the sand hoping to find water. Just keep on digging mucker - eventually you'll arrive in Australia and you can say hi to the real Roathie. :wave: :wave:

As for Crimson Canton, he was an over-the-top parody who was amusing. End of chat. If he was Roathie, then maybe he was my brother too then!! You've just been told by Annis that I would have been banned ages ago if I'd stepped out of line. I haven't been banned. Why? Am I Tan?

Have a word with yourself!! :!:

:bluescarf:

Re: Banning members

Tue Oct 07, 2014 1:07 pm

Crimson Canton was a Jack (not Roathie), he was on twitter too and posted pictures of himself pretending to be CC. 100% not Roathie that one.

Re: Banning members

Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:12 am

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Crimson Canton was a Jack (not Roathie), he was on twitter too and posted pictures of himself pretending to be CC. 100% not Roathie that one.


Crimson canton was 100% roath

As is woodville willie

As was Castro

And a whole host of other usernames

Very sad individual

Re: Banning members

Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:26 am

*edit

Have been banned since. :laughing6:

Re: Banning members

Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:33 am

smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Crimson Canton was a Jack (not Roathie), he was on twitter too and posted pictures of himself pretending to be CC. 100% not Roathie that one.


Crimson canton was 100% roath

As is woodville willie

As was Castro

And a whole host of other usernames

Very sad individual



Smakerz is wrong about me. He has been told by Annis, I have withdrawn a thread which explained it all as a gesture of goodwill and he repays me by continuing to spread lies. I totally understand he thinks he is acting in the best interests of the club and as we don't agree on certain things, he could interpret that as betrayal, but there is room in the club for fans to have opposing views.

I repeat: I AM NOT ROATHIE or CRIMSON CANTON

smakerz, stop your mudslinging as it is against the rules of the forum. A lot were banned for exactly this recently and it would be a shame to lose such a passionate supporter because of a misplaced obsession. (Cue the comment about me being obsessive - For the record, I had considered leaving but can't stand bullies).

Please sort this out Annis. I have tried my best. :sad7:

Re: Banning members

Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:47 am

Woodville Willie wrote:
smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Crimson Canton was a Jack (not Roathie), he was on twitter too and posted pictures of himself pretending to be CC. 100% not Roathie that one.


Crimson canton was 100% roath

As is woodville willie

As was Castro

And a whole host of other usernames

Very sad individual



Smakerz is wrong about me. He has been told by Annis, I have withdrawn a thread which explained it all as a gesture of goodwill and he repays me by continuing to spread lies. I totally understand he thinks he is acting in the best interests of the club and as we don't agree on certain things, he could interpret that as betrayal, but there is room in the club for fans to have opposing views.

I repeat: I AM NOT ROATHIE or CRIMSON CANTON

smakerz, stop your mudslinging as it is against the rules of the forum. A lot were banned for exactly this recently and it would be a shame to lose such a passionate supporter because of a misplaced obsession. (Cue the comment about me being obsessive - For the record, I had considered leaving but can't stand bullies).

Please sort this out Annis. I have tried my best. :sad7:


This has nothing to do with views I'm purely stating that your are not a city fan which you are masquerading to be

If If I think you are roath Magic then I will say it

Even if you are not roath magic you certainly have an obsession with Swansea yet profess to be a city supporter

Very odd that

Re: Banning members

Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:09 am

smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Woodville Willie wrote:
smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Crimson Canton was a Jack (not Roathie), he was on twitter too and posted pictures of himself pretending to be CC. 100% not Roathie that one.


Crimson canton was 100% roath

As is woodville willie

As was Castro

And a whole host of other usernames

Very sad individual



Smakerz is wrong about me. He has been told by Annis, I have withdrawn a thread which explained it all as a gesture of goodwill and he repays me by continuing to spread lies. I totally understand he thinks he is acting in the best interests of the club and as we don't agree on certain things, he could interpret that as betrayal, but there is room in the club for fans to have opposing views.

I repeat: I AM NOT ROATHIE or CRIMSON CANTON

smakerz, stop your mudslinging as it is against the rules of the forum. A lot were banned for exactly this recently and it would be a shame to lose such a passionate supporter because of a misplaced obsession. (Cue the comment about me being obsessive - For the record, I had considered leaving but can't stand bullies).

Please sort this out Annis. I have tried my best. :sad7:


This has nothing to do with views I'm purely stating that your are not a city fan which you are masquerading to be

If If I think you are roath Magic then I will say it

Even if you are not roath magic you certainly have an obsession with Swansea yet profess to be a city supporter

Very odd that



Make your mind up. You think I'm Roath Magic so you say I am....... and then even if I am not him, you say I'm obsessed with them down the road......., but there are plenty on this board who are more than interested with the nearest club in the top half of the league. Odd?

Have you considered that some of us actually take an active interest in football outside Cardiff? I enjoy watching MOTD and La Liga every week. Doesn't mean I'm less of a fan than you. Far from it. I look at the bigger picture. Didn't those Derby games last season mean something? Of course they did!!

Now stop bad-mouthing me, spreading lies and just get on with supporting the club, there's a good chap. :thumbup: