Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:23 pm
64JACK wrote:popeye21 wrote:Wrong again. 69% possession; 7 shots on goal each; 5 on target to Palace's 4; 1 corner to Palace's 4 and 1 goal each is not complete dominance. Yes at one point in the game you had most of the ball, BUT YOU COULDN'T SCORE THE WINNER. You don't get any extra points for having most of the possession.
Yeah point taken, except that we did get a point today, yet you don't seem to get any at all do you!
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:23 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:Monk's honeymoon period is over.![]()
He has the best points per game ratio for any Swansea manager in the Premier League
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:24 pm
nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:One win in seven under Monk. Hes doing a great job.
Don't be silly nobby 4 prem games beaten once at Liverpool!
How am I being silly Gary. 1 win in 7 its a fact regardless of who you've played.
As I said
As I said to one win in seven

Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:26 pm
PalaceFan21 wrote:swansealad69 wrote:Why are u bitching? As I said we were lucky to get a point in tge end.
But dont make out it was a one sided game as in the first half u were boring and shit and played every player behind the half way line.
Off course we going to pass it about to try and open u up.
Bony some how got his foot to the ball that made your keeper make a great save so im not sure whst game u was watching.
Second hslf u had to come out and have a go as u had nothing to lose and we were out on our feet.
Like I said a game of 2halfs and a draw a fair result
I aint haha im just saying the first half agreed we was bad but the fact you could only create 2 chances for all that possession says a lot about your style of football. Second half we dominated and created a lot more then you did. Did the game not finish 50 50 in terms of possession.
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:26 pm
64JACK wrote:popeye21 wrote:Wrong again. 69% possession; 7 shots on goal each; 5 on target to Palace's 4; 1 corner to Palace's 4 and 1 goal each is not complete dominance. Yes at one point in the game you had most of the ball, BUT YOU COULDN'T SCORE THE WINNER. You don't get any extra points for having most of the possession.
Yeah point taken, except that we did get a point today, yet you don't seem to get any at all do you!
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:26 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:64JACK wrote:popeye21 wrote:Wrong again. 69% possession; 7 shots on goal each; 5 on target to Palace's 4; 1 corner to Palace's 4 and 1 goal each is not complete dominance. Yes at one point in the game you had most of the ball, BUT YOU COULDN'T SCORE THE WINNER. You don't get any extra points for having most of the possession.
Yeah point taken, except that we did get a point today, yet you don't seem to get any at all do you!
Not against Spurs away, no. Never expected to. You didn't get any there either, did you?
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:27 pm
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:27 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:Monk's honeymoon period is over.![]()
He has the best points per game ratio for any Swansea manager in the Premier League
The flaw with that ratio is he wont play teams who were 4th, 15th, 16th and 19th every 4 games for 38 games.![]()
Sensational football that has a return rate of 1 in 7 or 14% if you want to talk percentages.
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:28 pm
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:29 pm
bloo wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:Monk's honeymoon period is over.![]()
He has the best points per game ratio for any Swansea manager in the Premier League
The flaw with that ratio is he wont play teams who were 4th, 15th, 16th and 19th every 4 games for 38 games.![]()
Sensational football that has a return rate of 1 in 7 or 14% if you want to talk percentages.
1 defeat in 5 in the league is how I see it
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:30 pm
popeye21 wrote:64JACK wrote:popeye21 wrote:Wrong again. 69% possession; 7 shots on goal each; 5 on target to Palace's 4; 1 corner to Palace's 4 and 1 goal each is not complete dominance. Yes at one point in the game you had most of the ball, BUT YOU COULDN'T SCORE THE WINNER. You don't get any extra points for having most of the possession.
Yeah point taken, except that we did get a point today, yet you don't seem to get any at all do you!
We'll see on the 5th April when we play Palace at home.
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:33 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:bloo wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:Monk's honeymoon period is over.![]()
He has the best points per game ratio for any Swansea manager in the Premier League
The flaw with that ratio is he wont play teams who were 4th, 15th, 16th and 19th every 4 games for 38 games.![]()
Sensational football that has a return rate of 1 in 7 or 14% if you want to talk percentages.
1 defeat in 5 in the league is how I see it
Youve only played 4 in the league under him did you count your extra finger?
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:35 pm
64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:One win in seven under Monk. Hes doing a great job.
Don't be silly nobby 4 prem games beaten once at Liverpool!
How am I being silly Gary. 1 win in 7 its a fact regardless of who you've played.
As I said
As I said to one win in seven
And seven being the lucky number nobby. Seven points behind us and on your form it would take you seven games to make that up!
Edit: It's more than that actually!
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:37 pm
bloo wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:bloo wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:GENERAerr thstL CHAT wrote:Monk's honeymoon period is over.![]()
He has the best points per game ratio for any Swansea manager in the Premier League
The flaw with that ratio is he wont play teams who were 4th, 15th, 16th and 19th every 4 games for 38 games.![]()
Sensational football that has a return rate of 1 in 7 or 14% if you want to talk percentages.
1 defeat in 5 in the league is how I see it
Youve only played 4 in the league under him did you count your extra finger?
You are correct - damn iphone! Even better then, 1 loss in 4. I'll take that any day
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:39 pm
Lengee wrote:I'd give up the ghost Nobby
Whatever you say this person will never admit they are wrong. For example.......
Quote Roath Magic aka the Weather Girl........
"The sensational football under Monk continues, ....... Count us out of the relegation scrap if anybody still thought we were in it."
.............Nothing wrong with that prediction ! No error of judgement there!!
I ,mistakenly thought that the weather girl / Roath Magic was merely ignorant and mistaken. But I must remember that you can teach the ignorant but stupidity is forever!
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:42 pm
nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:One win in seven under Monk. Hes doing a great job.
Don't be silly nobby 4 prem games beaten once at Liverpool!
How am I being silly Gary. 1 win in 7 its a fact regardless of who you've played.
As I said
As I said to one win in seven
And seven being the lucky number nobby. Seven points behind us and on your form it would take you seven games to make that up!
Edit: It's more than that actually!
im not talking about us. What you say is correct though the same as what im saying is correct. One win in seven thats the facts end of. you can try and hit back with anything you wont but those facts are there and nothing will change them. Been on the pop again have you
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:43 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:So to summarise Swansea had twice has much possession yet Palace scored just as many goals and created just as many chances.
Sensational that.
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:46 pm
64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:One win in seven under Monk. Hes doing a great job.
Don't be silly nobby 4 prem games beaten once at Liverpool!
How am I being silly Gary. 1 win in 7 its a fact regardless of who you've played.
As I said
As I said to one win in seven
And seven being the lucky number nobby. Seven points behind us and on your form it would take you seven games to make that up!
Edit: It's more than that actually!
im not talking about us. What you say is correct though the same as what im saying is correct. One win in seven thats the facts end of. you can try and hit back with anything you wont but those facts are there and nothing will change them. Been on the pop again have you
It's Sunday nobby. Do you honestly think I wouldn't have a drink or two? But from experience I have always found that people who accuse others of 'having a drink' quite often have had one themselves!
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:48 pm
nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:One win in seven under Monk. Hes doing a great job.
Don't be silly nobby 4 prem games beaten once at Liverpool!
How am I being silly Gary. 1 win in 7 its a fact regardless of who you've played.
As I said
As I said to one win in seven
And seven being the lucky number nobby. Seven points behind us and on your form it would take you seven games to make that up!
Edit: It's more than that actually!
im not talking about us. What you say is correct though the same as what im saying is correct. One win in seven thats the facts end of. you can try and hit back with anything you wont but those facts are there and nothing will change them. Been on the pop again have you
It's Sunday nobby. Do you honestly think I wouldn't have a drink or two? But from experience I have always found that people who accuse others of 'having a drink' quite often have had one themselves!
Correct. Perhaps we can have one together one day. I know many Jacks and I often go over the bridge for a beer bring roathie with you to.
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:50 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:So to summarise Swansea had twice has much possession yet Palace scored just as many goals and created just as many chances.
Sensational that.
Or the true summary of.... Swansea were completely and utterly dominant in the first half displaying sensational football and were deservedly ahead.
The second half was a different story as the effects of Bony, Williams and Hernandez being forced off took its toll. We also were down to 10 mean and they equalised through a wrongly given penalty.
We are now 5 points clear of the relegation zone (including GD)
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:50 pm
bloo wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:bloo wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:Monk's honeymoon period is over.![]()
He has the best points per game ratio for any Swansea manager in the Premier League
The flaw with that ratio is he wont play teams who were 4th, 15th, 16th and 19th every 4 games for 38 games.![]()
Sensational football that has a return rate of 1 in 7 or 14% if you want to talk percentages.
1 defeat in 5 in the league is how I see it
Youve only played 4 in the league under him did you count your extra finger?
You are correct - damn iphone! Even better then, 1 loss in 4. I'll take that any day
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:52 pm
64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:64JACK wrote:nobby wrote:One win in seven under Monk. Hes doing a great job.
Don't be silly nobby 4 prem games beaten once at Liverpool!
How am I being silly Gary. 1 win in 7 its a fact regardless of who you've played.
As I said
As I said to one win in seven
And seven being the lucky number nobby. Seven points behind us and on your form it would take you seven games to make that up!
Edit: It's more than that actually!
im not talking about us. What you say is correct though the same as what im saying is correct. One win in seven thats the facts end of. you can try and hit back with anything you wont but those facts are there and nothing will change them. Been on the pop again have you
It's Sunday nobby. Do you honestly think I wouldn't have a drink or two? But from experience I have always found that people who accuse others of 'having a drink' quite often have had one themselves!
Correct. Perhaps we can have one together one day. I know many Jacks and I often go over the bridge for a beer bring roathie with you to.
Have a beer with you anytime. But I can't bring Roathie????????????
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:57 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:So to summarise Swansea had twice has much possession yet Palace scored just as many goals and created just as many chances.
Sensational that.
Or the true summary of.... Swansea were completely and utterly dominant in the first half displaying sensational football and were deservedly ahead.
The second half was a different story as the effects of Bony, Williams and Hernandez being forced off took its toll. We also were down to 10 mean and they equalised through a wrongly given penalty.
We are now 5 points clear of the relegation zone (including GD)
Yet you dont include the games in hand those below have on you.
why would i include that? They may lose.c![]()
Dont think you are to be counted out just yet.
i counted us out long ago.
Palace on the otherhand, ironically win their game in hand and they go above you.
then best of luck to them. If my auntie had bollocks....
All in all youve looked very silly with this thread counting your chickens at half time.
where have i counted my chickens? I said we were completely dominant at half time and we were. I was spot on.
The reaction to the second half not being the same as the first half (even though nobody said it would be) smacks of frustrations with your own team. I dont see what else it can be.
Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:01 pm
Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:02 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Such a dominant first half that Palace had more shots on goal in the 2nd half that Swansea did in this sensational first half
Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:02 pm
Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:06 pm
waddle wrote:Fucked that right up today , can't believe monk brought Leroy f*cking lita on that bloke controls a ball further than i could kick it , players looked knackered at the end hope it's just a reaction to the napoli games if not we could still be in the shit
Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:07 pm
waddle wrote:Fucked that right up today , can't believe monk brought Leroy f*cking lita on that bloke controls a ball further than i could kick it , players looked knackered at the end hope it's just a reaction to the napoli games if not we could still be in the shit
Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:10 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:waddle wrote:Fucked that right up today , can't believe monk brought Leroy f*cking lita on that bloke controls a ball further than i could kick it , players looked knackered at the end hope it's just a reaction to the napoli games if not we could still be in the shit
Nice honest opinion. In fairness to the jacks I can't believe monk played 7 or 8 of team that played v Napoli ( think that's correct?). Really naive management if true given the performance on Thursday.
Got to laugh at roathie on here. Came on at half time trying to give it big one assuming that the 3 points were in the bag yet he has spent 3 hours on here trying to justify that he was talking about the first half. Games are won or lost at 90 minutes. Half time means nothing.
Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:12 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:waddle wrote:Fucked that right up today , can't believe monk brought Leroy f*cking lita on that bloke controls a ball further than i could kick it , players looked knackered at the end hope it's just a reaction to the napoli games if not we could still be in the shit
Dont see what options he had in fairness, we dont have a replacement for Bony. There is no way Marvin Emnes can lead the line on his own with 4 or 5 Palace defenders to contend with.
At the end of the day the goal we conceded was an incorrect penalty decision. First half was terrific, second half we were clearly depleted with arguably the most key defender, midfielder and attacker taken off injured or sick.