Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:01 pm
Green Arrow wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:TRose69 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Yes everyone makes typos but not everyone tries to palm off getting a whole paragraph wrong, and a change of argument as a "Typo" ffs.
As I said, some f*cking typo![]()
No inferiority complex here Bryan, your arguments are nearly always flawed and you are too arrogant to see it.
Well I'm gonna leave this one for the time being, being so young and all it's past my bedtime
You are too funny - I suggest you have a look at this test... To me it seems you fit ever catagory![]()
http://www.qatarliving.com/qatar-living ... se-7-signs
Catergory even
Category.
Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:06 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:TRose69 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Yes everyone makes typos but not everyone tries to palm off getting a whole paragraph wrong, and a change of argument as a "Typo" ffs.
As I said, some f*cking typo![]()
No inferiority complex here Bryan, your arguments are nearly always flawed and you are too arrogant to see it.
Well I'm gonna leave this one for the time being, being so young and all it's past my bedtime
You are too funny - I suggest you have a look at this test... To me it seems you fit ever catagory![]()
http://www.qatarliving.com/qatar-living ... se-7-signs
Catergory even
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:02 am
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:03 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:Another thread ruined by the usual suspects I see
Barry if you had a black cat mine would be blacker chuckles
Multiple account Barnett and possibly even roathie
No wonder people don't post on here anymore
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:05 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:x
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:08 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:Another thread ruined by the usual suspects I see
Barry if you had a black cat mine would be blacker chuckles
Multiple account Barnett and possibly even roathie
No wonder people don't post on here anymore
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:09 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Ive seen various comments about how we were difficult to beat under Malky, how he would have kept us up, how he had never dropped into the bottom 3.etc.etc.etc
Well I have done some in depth investigation on our season under Malky and here are my findings which I think dispell some of these comments.
Ok, lets take a look at Cardiff in the PL under Malky statistics shall we:
Games
Played: 18
Won: 4
Drew: 5
Lost: 9
Points: 17
Goals scored - 13
Goals conceded - 18
Defecit
Of the 9 games lost we lost by
1 goal - x 1
2 goals - x 4
3 goals - x 4
Goals Conceded
In the 18 games we conceded 27 goals. Split as followed:
5 clean sheets
1 goal x 3 games
2 goals x 6 games
3 goals x 3 games
4 goals x 1 games
Goals scored
In the 18 games we scored just 13 goals. Split as follows:
9 blanks
1 goal x 6 games
2 goals x 2 games
3 goals x 1 game
So on average we were conceding 1.55 goals per game under Malky and in 10 of the 18 games we conceded 2 or more goals.
On average we scored 0.72 goals per game, drawing a blank 9 times, and only scoring 2+ in 3 of the 18 games.
Also some side notes we conceded in the 1st half in 10 of the 18 games, and were also 2 or 3 goals down before half time in several of the games, 2 in particular Malkys last 2 games in charge.
Ive looked at where we accumulated the points and was alarmed to see that after match day 6, Fulham away, arguably our best PL performance under Malky, the stats are somehwat shocking.
Here are the stats post Fulham:
Games
Played: 12
Won: 2
Drew: 3
Lost: 7
Points: 9
Goals scored - 7
Goals conceded - 21
Defecit
Of the 7 games lost we lost by
2 goals - x 3
3 goals - x 4
Goals Conceded
In the 12 games we conceded 21 goals. Split as followed:
4 clean sheets
2 goals x 4 games
3 goals x 3 games
4 goals x 1 games
Goals scored
In the 12 games we scored just 7 goals. Split as follows:
6 blanks
1 goal x 5 games
2 goals x 1 games
So on average, post Fulham we were conceding 1.75 goals per games, and in 8 of the 12 games we conceded 2 or more goals.
On average we scored 0.58 goals per game, drawing a blank 6 times, and only scoring 2+ in 1 of the 12 games.
So as you can see we are getting progressively worse, and if you take the last 6 games of his reign, 6 being a usual marker for "form" it makes for worse reading than the post Fulham 12 game stats.
In a game wherby you have to score more than the opposition to win, or at least score as many to get a point, then the statistics do not read well.
So to conclude, we had a good start to life in the PL. Up to and including Fulham I am sure we would all agree 8 points (2 wins, 2 draws, 2 losses) from 6 games (18 points available), scoring 6, conceding 7, we were aquitting ourselves well, especially having faced home games against City, Spurs and Everton.
However, after this point, we then only take another 9 points in the next 12 games (36 points available). Scoring just 7 and conceding 21.
So whilst we may have not dropped into the bottom 3 under Malky we were in freefall, had dropped to 17th and with Arsenal, City and Man U away in January only the staunchest of Malky fans, or a complete retard, could deny dropping into the relegation zone was inevitable, and given we could not score under Malky, that in my opinion is where we were staying.
Also, to those who will inevitabely say we faced a number of the top teams at home pre Xmas, we also faced 7 of the bottom half teams away from home and only managed 6 points out of 21, and a measley 3 goals. A poor return I am sure you will agree.
We drew 5 blanks v West Ham, Norwich, Villa, Stoke and Palace. Not only that we barely created a chance in any of those games. Unforgiveable if we are truly honest.
All of this and only now I am mentioning the piss poor signings and the huge budget wasted on sub standard players. 3 of which now look to be out of the club already.
Ladies and gentleman of the jury. I rest my case.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:15 am
Green Arrow wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:x
This is my only account and I've been on one account since my JBCCFC1927 account. If you want me to go back to using multiples at the same time then just say the magic words and I will. However, don't start moaning then if I do okay. You cried for ages so I stuck to one. I would still be on my other had my email not been accessed by someone else and I've stuck to this one. If I've got something to say I'm more than happy to say it on this one.
Everyone knows your a multi of a known user anyway so cut the crap.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:16 am
Blue_Always wrote:You are correct about Barnett, wrong about the rest. Barnett would be a decent lad if he stuck to one account,but he can't because he's a crap wind upmerchant who has to keep reinventing himself.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:18 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:Another thread ruined by the usual suspects I see
Barry if you had a black cat mine would be blacker chuckles
Multiple account Barnett and possibly even roathie
No wonder people don't post on here anymore
What, for posting an opinion? Don't be so ridiculous.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:19 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:I'm a multiple I've only got this account
There's lots of sad people on here and at least 3/4 or commenting as multiple accounts in one thread it's extremely sad
And I've never cried at you using multiple accounts so no idea where u get that from Barnett
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:21 am
Green Arrow wrote:Blue_Always wrote:You are correct about Barnett, wrong about the rest. Barnett would be a decent lad if he stuck to one account,but he can't because he's a crap wind upmerchant who has to keep reinventing himself.
List my current other accounts then smart arse. I only use this account and I'm quite happy to call you an arsehole on this one. Ive got no need for another.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:23 am
Blue_Always wrote:
Barnett, You won't change until your acknowledge your behaviour. I'll be here for you .......watching.....waiting.....praying for your recovery.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:23 am
Green Arrow wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:I'm a multiple I've only got this account
There's lots of sad people on here and at least 3/4 or commenting as multiple accounts in one thread it's extremely sad
And I've never cried at you using multiple accounts so no idea where u get that from Barnett
My apologies smakerz. I thought you were on about me. Roathie was on here yesterday on about 8 accounts and he's been doing it for a while and often talks to himself to create debate to bring others in then he goes at them. The bloke is absolutely insane. I can be confrontational and opinionated and up for a laugh but I only use one account. If I wanted to use more I could and have this forum in ruins but i just want to talk football.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:26 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:
You post an opinion yes chuckles but then you split hairs constantly over wording of posts by other users correcting what they have said it's pathetic
You don't allow another opinion that doesn't fit in with yours and you always want the last say on everything this thread is completely typical of that
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:28 am
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:32 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:
You post an opinion yes chuckles but then you split hairs constantly over wording of posts by other users correcting what they have said it's pathetic
You don't allow another opinion that doesn't fit in with yours and you always want the last say on everything this thread is completely typical of that
& then people debate it with me, so I debate back - that's the point of discussion.
I don't allow other opinions, yet I've done this in this exact thread.I will always challenge opinion if I disagree with it.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:34 am
Bluebird86 wrote:He's right though.
You don't disagree with opinions because you don't take anything in unless its what you think. Your right an everybody else is wrong.
You twist things people say. You try putting people down an acting as if they are stupid and cry if anything bad is said to you.
An on some occasions you just pluck things out on thin air.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:35 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:
You post an opinion yes chuckles but then you split hairs constantly over wording of posts by other users correcting what they have said it's pathetic
You don't allow another opinion that doesn't fit in with yours and you always want the last say on everything this thread is completely typical of that
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:37 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:
There's difference between debating and just posting the same thing consistently
If your in a debate you see others points of view and if in disagreement give a counter argument but with you you just put down another's view because yours is all that counts in your own little world and it would seriously debt your pride if you had to agree with someone on an issue immediately without having to dispute their original post
If you did that then your existence would be pointless hence why even if deep down you no someone is right you will just disagree with them to have a differing opinion
It makes you different from a sheep who follows I'll give you that but it's also an extremely annoying trait to have
I'm certain you'll never agree with anyone's opening post entirely because you'll have no meaning in life if you can't argue with opinions
You should go into politics fit right in with the rest of the pillocks in office
don't ever give up the day job, you'll make a rubbish psychologist. Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:39 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:
There's difference between debating and just posting the same thing consistently
If your in a debate you see others points of view and if in disagreement give a counter argument but with you you just put down another's view because yours is all that counts in your own little world and it would seriously debt your pride if you had to agree with someone on an issue immediately without having to dispute their original post
If you did that then your existence would be pointless hence why even if deep down you no someone is right you will just disagree with them to have a differing opinion
It makes you different from a sheep who follows I'll give you that but it's also an extremely annoying trait to have
I'm certain you'll never agree with anyone's opening post entirely because you'll have no meaning in life if you can't argue with opinions
You should go into politics fit right in with the rest of the pillocks in office
This is all complete and utter nonsense.don't ever give up the day job, you'll make a rubbish psychologist.
If I agree, I will say so, if I disagree, I will debate. There's been plenty of threDs where I've agreed with the point, you really are talking rubbish.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:40 am
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:41 am
Green Arrow wrote:Blue_Always wrote:
Barnett, You won't change until your acknowledge your behaviour. I'll be here for you .......watching.....waiting.....praying for your recovery.
Another obvious Roathie multi this.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:44 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:One minute ago, you said I never do it, now you say it's less than 5.. Already changing your mind I see?![]()
You're wrong, simple as that.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:46 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Read again Barry I said im sure you'll never agree with an opening post ENTIRELY
Again twisting words to suit your agenda and to also keep this argument going cos you must have the final say on every issue
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:46 am
Blue_Always wrote:Green Arrow wrote:Blue_Always wrote:
Barnett, You won't change until your acknowledge your behaviour. I'll be here for you .......watching.....waiting.....praying for your recovery.
Another obvious Roathie multi this.
It's taken months but here it is......Barnett now spitefully calling me roathie just because I've said he's a crap wind-up.
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:53 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Read again Barry I said im sure you'll never agree with an opening post ENTIRELY
Again twisting words to suit your agenda and to also keep this argument going cos you must have the final say on every issue
haven't twisted any words, you're the one who said these things & you're wrong about that too!
![]()
I'm replying to you to counter your incorrect accusations. Are you seriously suggesting that nobody can reply to you after you make a point?
Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:55 am
Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:05 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:
You post an opinion yes chuckles but then you split hairs constantly over wording of posts by other users correcting what they have said it's pathetic
You don't allow another opinion that doesn't fit in with yours and you always want the last say on everything this thread is completely typical of that
& then people debate it with me, so I debate back - that's the point of discussion.
I don't allow other opinions, yet I've done this in this exact thread.I will always challenge opinion if I disagree with it.
[/quote
There's difference between debating and just posting the same thing consistently
If your in a debate you see others points of view and if in disagreement give a counter argument but with you you just put down another's view because yours is all that counts in your own little world and it would seriously debt your pride if you had to agree with someone on an issue immediately without having to dispute their original post
If you did that then your existence would be pointless hence why even if deep down you no someone is right you will just disagree with them to have a differing opinion
It makes you different from a sheep who follows I'll give you that but it's also an extremely annoying trait to have
I'm certain you'll never agree with anyone's opening post entirely because you'll have no meaning in life if you can't argue with opinions read this again by here chuckles then apologise it says never agree entirely that means you will agree to some extent but not fully
You should go into politics fit right in with the rest of the pillocks in office
Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:07 am