Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:10 pm
Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
You call it selling your soul because you'll never be given the chance to gain major investment. That's why you're so bitter. Put it this way, if Huw was offered £100m to change you pink then he would take it because he's a businessman. So much for your traditionalist views. He's a businessman first and foremost and if he wasn't he wouldn't be taking dividends out of the club now would he? He would reinvest it as he would have the clubs best interests at heart.
NJ73, sorry but you're falling behind with the times. Its a business world now and thats football in a nutshell. Rightly or wrongly thats the way it is. Your club is no different believe me. We'll all eventually fall victim to the Sky and Premier League monopoly.
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:11 pm
Green Arrow wrote:xajax wrote:Anyhow you lot were going on about us playing a a council stadium. Now you want to shift the goal posts and brag about size. If we are going to argue about size, then Cardiff is not amongst the largest two thousand cities in the world. But SCFC is amongst the fifty richest clubs in the world, which on football terms (this is a football forum) means we are punching way above our weight. If football success was dependant upon population, neither city would have a premier league side. And thats the truth of it.
True. However, your main selling point is us which is why you sell goods at Cardiff International Airport because you do not possess one. Is Huw or a major investor going to build one in Swansea? I doubt it. These external offerings all offer attraction to potential investors or owners. They want growth and want to invest in something where they can maximise profits. Tell me how they can get that at Swansea please. You have no economic hub in Swansea and your town is notoriously known for many socio-economic issues which doesn't present a very good picture. Cardiff meanwhile has an International Airport, of which ill admit is doing poorly, is closer to cities like London, Birmingham and Bristol and has a growing economic centre and offers much more as a whole. It also has a very attractive bayside area that is of course going to set investors on red alert.
Football clubs are businesses these days and investors want the whole package. They want to own hotels and want to offer package holidays to fans flying in from abroad to stay there and experience the game and get them hooked. The fact your stadium is owned by the council is also a massive issue for you yet you seem to be unable to understand that its not. Your stadium is not yours and is not an asset of the clubs and therefore any potential investor will be put off by the fact they do not have control of that stadium in its complete form. Its great for you from a traditional point of view because the council can reject any applications it damn well likes but from a USP point of view its ridiculous. Investors want to own things and they want full control, especially the new types who like to make changes and impose themselves upon already established businesses. The fact you do not own your stadium hinders that.
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:13 pm
soulofthesea wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:xajax wrote:Anyhow you lot were going on about us playing a a council stadium. Now you want to shift the goal posts and brag about size. If we are going to argue about size, then Cardiff is not amongst the largest two thousand cities in the world. But SCFC is amongst the fifty richest clubs in the world, which on football terms (this is a football forum) means we are punching way above our weight. If football success was dependant upon population, neither city would have a premier league side. And thats the truth of it.
True. However, your main selling point is us which is why you sell goods at Cardiff International Airport because you do not possess one. Is Huw or a major investor going to build one in Swansea? I doubt it. These external offerings all offer attraction to potential investors or owners. They want growth and want to invest in something where they can maximise profits. Tell me how they can get that at Swansea please. You have no economic hub in Swansea and your town is notoriously known for many socio-economic issues which doesn't present a very good picture. Cardiff meanwhile has an International Airport, of which ill admit is doing poorly, is closer to cities like London, Birmingham and Bristol and has a growing economic centre and offers much more as a whole. It also has a very attractive bayside area that is of course going to set investors on red alert.
Football clubs are businesses these days and investors want the whole package. They want to own hotels and want to offer package holidays to fans flying in from abroad to stay there and experience the game and get them hooked. The fact your stadium is owned by the council is also a massive issue for you yet you seem to be unable to understand that its not. Your stadium is not yours and is not an asset of the clubs and therefore any potential investor will be put off by the fact they do not have control of that stadium in its complete form. Its great for you from a traditional point of view because the council can reject any applications it damn well likes but from a USP point of view its ridiculous. Investors want to own things and they want full control, especially the new types who like to make changes and impose themselves upon already established businesses. The fact you do not own your stadium hinders that.
You seem to be under the impression that we would like a major investor.
This shows a complete and utter misunderstanding of everything the club stands for and how we work.
Local club owned by local people and fans. Long may it continue.
you have been owned by local people throughout your history,give or take, and to be honest, not been happy hoppers until you got promoted..so yes at the moment you are the model club........but havent always been.....and will you in the future,or will you crave investment?
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:24 pm
NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:You seem to be under the impression that we would like a major investor.
This shows a complete and utter misunderstanding of everything the club stands for and how we work.
Local club owned by local people and fans. Long may it continue.
You'll never reach the top then in this league or compete. You need to spend big in this league to compete as proven over the last few years. I admire your traditionalist ways but your lack of ambition is appalling.
I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:32 pm
wez1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:You seem to be under the impression that we would like a major investor.
This shows a complete and utter misunderstanding of everything the club stands for and how we work.
Local club owned by local people and fans. Long may it continue.
You'll never reach the top then in this league or compete. You need to spend big in this league to compete as proven over the last few years. I admire your traditionalist ways but your lack of ambition is appalling.
I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
That's bullshit being owed by local people one if your owners/ director is from Scandinavia lol
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:33 pm
wez1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:You seem to be under the impression that we would like a major investor.
This shows a complete and utter misunderstanding of everything the club stands for and how we work.
Local club owned by local people and fans. Long may it continue.
You'll never reach the top then in this league or compete. You need to spend big in this league to compete as proven over the last few years. I admire your traditionalist ways but your lack of ambition is appalling.
I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
That's bullshit being owed by local people one if your owners/ director is from Scandinavia lol
One is also South African.Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:33 pm
wez1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:You seem to be under the impression that we would like a major investor.
This shows a complete and utter misunderstanding of everything the club stands for and how we work.
Local club owned by local people and fans. Long may it continue.
You'll never reach the top then in this league or compete. You need to spend big in this league to compete as proven over the last few years. I admire your traditionalist ways but your lack of ambition is appalling.
I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
That's bullshit being owed by local people one if your owners/ director is from Scandinavia lol
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:35 pm
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:35 pm
NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
You call it selling your soul because you'll never be given the chance to gain major investment. That's why you're so bitter. Put it this way, if Huw was offered £100m to change you pink then he would take it because he's a businessman. So much for your traditionalist views. He's a businessman first and foremost and if he wasn't he wouldn't be taking dividends out of the club now would he? He would reinvest it as he would have the clubs best interests at heart.
NJ73, sorry but you're falling behind with the times. Its a business world now and thats football in a nutshell. Rightly or wrongly thats the way it is. Your club is no different believe me. We'll all eventually fall victim to the Sky and Premier League monopoly.
If Huw was offered £100m that would mean our club was valued at approx £850m as he is a minority shareholder.
My club is run exactly the way I want it to be run, and with a 20% supporters trust (larger than Huw's) shareholding. How on earth does that make me bitter?
I guess it just goes to show the difference in mentality.
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:40 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
You call it selling your soul because you'll never be given the chance to gain major investment. That's why you're so bitter. Put it this way, if Huw was offered £100m to change you pink then he would take it because he's a businessman. So much for your traditionalist views. He's a businessman first and foremost and if he wasn't he wouldn't be taking dividends out of the club now would he? He would reinvest it as he would have the clubs best interests at heart.
NJ73, sorry but you're falling behind with the times. Its a business world now and thats football in a nutshell. Rightly or wrongly thats the way it is. Your club is no different believe me. We'll all eventually fall victim to the Sky and Premier League monopoly.
If Huw was offered £100m that would mean our club was valued at approx £850m as he is a minority shareholder.
My club is run exactly the way I want it to be run, and with a 20% supporters trust (larger than Huw's) shareholding. How on earth does that make me bitter?
I guess it just goes to show the difference in mentality.
I think the problem for jenkins and co is to try and work a way out of their box (I posted on this months ago).
Welsh Wigan is I am afraid an apt metaphor but you don't even have Whelan.
You don't own the ground - but I suspect you will try and buy it from the council
Relatively small town
A formula/system that could easily go tits up
AFAIK limited commercial income and entirely dependent upon pl money
ownership structure that mitigates against external investment
How do you grow?
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:42 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
You call it selling your soul because you'll never be given the chance to gain major investment. That's why you're so bitter. Put it this way, if Huw was offered £100m to change you pink then he would take it because he's a businessman. So much for your traditionalist views. He's a businessman first and foremost and if he wasn't he wouldn't be taking dividends out of the club now would he? He would reinvest it as he would have the clubs best interests at heart.
NJ73, sorry but you're falling behind with the times. Its a business world now and thats football in a nutshell. Rightly or wrongly thats the way it is. Your club is no different believe me. We'll all eventually fall victim to the Sky and Premier League monopoly.
If Huw was offered £100m that would mean our club was valued at approx £850m as he is a minority shareholder.
My club is run exactly the way I want it to be run, and with a 20% supporters trust (larger than Huw's) shareholding. How on earth does that make me bitter?
I guess it just goes to show the difference in mentality.
I think the problem for jenkins and co is to try and work a way out of their box (I posted on this months ago).
Welsh Wigan is I am afraid an apt metaphor but you don't even have Whelan.
You don't own the ground - but I suspect you will try and buy it from the council
Relatively small town
A formula/system that could easily go tits up
AFAIK limited commercial income and entirely dependent upon pl money
ownership structure that mitigates against external investment
How do you grow?
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:52 pm
NJ73 wrote:wez1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:You seem to be under the impression that we would like a major investor.
This shows a complete and utter misunderstanding of everything the club stands for and how we work.
Local club owned by local people and fans. Long may it continue.
You'll never reach the top then in this league or compete. You need to spend big in this league to compete as proven over the last few years. I admire your traditionalist ways but your lack of ambition is appalling.
I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
That's bullshit being owed by local people one if your owners/ director is from Scandinavia lol
Not unless Holland is in Scandinavia he isn'tOne is also South African.
But the vast majority of the shareholding is local.
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:54 pm
wez1927 wrote:So your not owned locally then as.most of you jacks keep harping on about hmmmmm
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:54 pm
wez1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:wez1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:You seem to be under the impression that we would like a major investor.
This shows a complete and utter misunderstanding of everything the club stands for and how we work.
Local club owned by local people and fans. Long may it continue.
You'll never reach the top then in this league or compete. You need to spend big in this league to compete as proven over the last few years. I admire your traditionalist ways but your lack of ambition is appalling.
I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
That's bullshit being owed by local people one if your owners/ director is from Scandinavia lol
Not unless Holland is in Scandinavia he isn'tOne is also South African.
But the vast majority of the shareholding is local.
So your not owned locally then as.most of you jacks keep harping on about hmmmmm
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:54 pm
Cardiff_Casual wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
You call it selling your soul because you'll never be given the chance to gain major investment. That's why you're so bitter. Put it this way, if Huw was offered £100m to change you pink then he would take it because he's a businessman. So much for your traditionalist views. He's a businessman first and foremost and if he wasn't he wouldn't be taking dividends out of the club now would he? He would reinvest it as he would have the clubs best interests at heart.
NJ73, sorry but you're falling behind with the times. Its a business world now and thats football in a nutshell. Rightly or wrongly thats the way it is. Your club is no different believe me. We'll all eventually fall victim to the Sky and Premier League monopoly.
If Huw was offered £100m that would mean our club was valued at approx £850m as he is a minority shareholder.
My club is run exactly the way I want it to be run, and with a 20% supporters trust (larger than Huw's) shareholding. How on earth does that make me bitter?
I guess it just goes to show the difference in mentality.
I think the problem for jenkins and co is to try and work a way out of their box (I posted on this months ago).
Welsh Wigan is I am afraid an apt metaphor but you don't even have Whelan.
You don't own the ground - but I suspect you will try and buy it from the council
Relatively small town
A formula/system that could easily go tits up
AFAIK limited commercial income and entirely dependent upon pl money
ownership structure that mitigates against external investment
How do you grow?
Welsh Wigan is a stupid term. Its like calling you Welsh Leyton Orient.
Ac Milan dont own their ground. What is the purpose of owning a ground then? Do you wish to sell it... If so where will you play?
It is a city, not a town and one that has about 90,000-100,000 less inhabitants than Cardiff. Thats hardly staggering differences.
AFAIK proves to be just that then. Our commercial income is excellent and we do not seek externat investment, why would we? Involving external investments ruins everything we are and have worked for.
You have tons of external investment and have had your name dragged through the mud and turned out red for it, not even known if you will keep that name while being in over £100m of debt and rooted to the bottom of the league. Think about what you are saying.
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:55 pm
Cardiff_Casual wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:NJ73 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:NJ73 wrote:I prefer to stay as we are and compete as best we can.
I'm well aware that we'll never reach the top of this league. It's something that probably wouldn't happen even with major investment. That's not a lack of ambition, it's realism.
Give me my club playing in it's traditional colours and owned by local people who have it's best interests at heart, over selling our soul for a shot at a chance to finish a couple of places higher any day of the week.
You call it selling your soul because you'll never be given the chance to gain major investment. That's why you're so bitter. Put it this way, if Huw was offered £100m to change you pink then he would take it because he's a businessman. So much for your traditionalist views. He's a businessman first and foremost and if he wasn't he wouldn't be taking dividends out of the club now would he? He would reinvest it as he would have the clubs best interests at heart.
NJ73, sorry but you're falling behind with the times. Its a business world now and thats football in a nutshell. Rightly or wrongly thats the way it is. Your club is no different believe me. We'll all eventually fall victim to the Sky and Premier League monopoly.
If Huw was offered £100m that would mean our club was valued at approx £850m as he is a minority shareholder.
My club is run exactly the way I want it to be run, and with a 20% supporters trust (larger than Huw's) shareholding. How on earth does that make me bitter?
I guess it just goes to show the difference in mentality.
I think the problem for jenkins and co is to try and work a way out of their box (I posted on this months ago).
Welsh Wigan is I am afraid an apt metaphor but you don't even have Whelan.
You don't own the ground - but I suspect you will try and buy it from the council
Relatively small town
A formula/system that could easily go tits up
AFAIK limited commercial income and entirely dependent upon pl money
ownership structure that mitigates against external investment
How do you grow?
Welsh Wigan is a stupid term. Its like calling you Welsh Leyton Orient.
Ac Milan dont own their ground. What is the purpose of owning a ground then? Do you wish to sell it... If so where will you play?
It is a city, not a town and one that has about 90,000-100,000 less inhabitants than Cardiff. Thats hardly staggering differences.
AFAIK proves to be just that then. Our commercial income is excellent and we do not seek externat investment, why would we? Involving external investments ruins everything we are and have worked for.
You have tons of external investment and have had your name dragged through the mud and turned out red for it, not even known if you will keep that name while being in over £100m of debt and rooted to the bottom of the league. Think about what you are saying.
Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:59 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:
Now then c**t face.
You've been peddling your tripe for a couple or more years now. In that time and despite your reams of bollocks we got promoted, we're a couple of points away from the jerky wonders and have a new manager in place(who you said you admire) with obvious financial backing and a stadium extension underway.The red stuff will sort itself out.So let's see how things pan out over the next twelve months. On past experience you might be choosing to stick to tennis.
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:00 am
waddle wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:I same players that failed to shine at the end of last season too and for the majority of the calendar year..
Come on ffs that team finished ninth won a cup and qualified for Europa , I know you love an argument mate but you're talking Bollocks now
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:04 am
Cardiff_Casual wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:
Now then c**t face.
You've been peddling your tripe for a couple or more years now. In that time and despite your reams of bollocks we got promoted, we're a couple of points away from the jerky wonders and have a new manager in place(who you said you admire) with obvious financial backing and a stadium extension underway.The red stuff will sort itself out.So let's see how things pan out over the next twelve months. On past experience you might be choosing to stick to tennis.
Now now Bomber Jacket, if you are going to talk rubbish then dont get angry when it is put in its place![]()
Ive never doubted you could buy your way to promotion. By point has always been to what end. I and many other fans would never risk their club to be bottom of the premier league. Your club is in unmanageable levels of debt, has broken financial fair play rules, is seen as somewhat of a laughing stock and a circus, is not known whether you will keep your name, has infighting and a divided fanbase.... Ad thats just the tip of the ice berg sonny![]()
Everything i have spoken about so far has come to fruition
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:08 am
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Cardiff_Casual wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:
Now then c**t face.
You've been peddling your tripe for a couple or more years now. In that time and despite your reams of bollocks we got promoted, we're a couple of points away from the jerky wonders and have a new manager in place(who you said you admire) with obvious financial backing and a stadium extension underway.The red stuff will sort itself out.So let's see how things pan out over the next twelve months. On past experience you might be choosing to stick to tennis.
Now now Bomber Jacket, if you are going to talk rubbish then dont get angry when it is put in its place![]()
Ive never doubted you could buy your way to promotion. By point has always been to what end. I and many other fans would never risk their club to be bottom of the premier league. Your club is in unmanageable levels of debt, has broken financial fair play rules, is seen as somewhat of a laughing stock and a circus, is not known whether you will keep your name, has infighting and a divided fanbase.... Ad thats just the tip of the ice berg sonny![]()
Everything i have spoken about so far has come to fruition
Like I said c**t face,
let's see how things pan out.
Just keep obsessing.
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:09 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:waddle wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:I same players that failed to shine at the end of last season too and for the majority of the calendar year..
Come on ffs that team finished ninth won a cup and qualified for Europa , I know you love an argument mate but you're talking Bollocks now
No bollocks, just facts. Saw a shocking stat about the amount of premiership games you have won since your secondary cup win. If that is "doing the business", then I'm amazed.
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:10 am
Cardiff_Casual wrote:Its got us to 15th position and a 9th place position last year.
Thats more than fine.
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:12 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Cardiff_Casual wrote:Its got us to 15th position and a 9th place position last year.
Thats more than fine.
But if that woeful form continues from the secondary cup win, you are in grave danger of relegation.
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:18 am
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Cardiff_Casual wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:
Now then c**t face.
You've been peddling your tripe for a couple or more years now. In that time and despite your reams of bollocks we got promoted, we're a couple of points away from the jerky wonders and have a new manager in place(who you said you admire) with obvious financial backing and a stadium extension underway.The red stuff will sort itself out.So let's see how things pan out over the next twelve months. On past experience you might be choosing to stick to tennis.
Now now Bomber Jacket, if you are going to talk rubbish then dont get angry when it is put in its place![]()
Ive never doubted you could buy your way to promotion. By point has always been to what end. I and many other fans would never risk their club to be bottom of the premier league. Your club is in unmanageable levels of debt, has broken financial fair play rules, is seen as somewhat of a laughing stock and a circus, is not known whether you will keep your name, has infighting and a divided fanbase.... Ad thats just the tip of the ice berg sonny![]()
Everything i have spoken about so far has come to fruition
Like I said c**t face,
let's see how things pan out.
Just keep obsessing.
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:29 am
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:50 am
Malbouy wrote:Spot on 64
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:53 am
64JACK wrote:Malbouy wrote:Spot on 64
I'd like to think that he took my advice. But in reality I guess his last post was his final stand before he collapsed from his chair! Hope he's ok!
Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:01 am
Malbouy wrote:64JACK wrote:Malbouy wrote:Spot on 64
I'd like to think that he took my advice. But in reality I guess his last post was his final stand before he collapsed from his chair! Hope he's ok!
I assume he got tired after searching through gay porn and getting angry that Swansea are 5 places above him and in the last 32 of europe all beong locally owned.
I mean, thats all he seems to talk about. Well... That stuff and me. I just hope to God he doesnt cross over his interests and I end up the face of his sex doll with a swans top and a stake through the swans badge
Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:04 am
Malbouy wrote:64JACK wrote:Malbouy wrote:Spot on 64
I'd like to think that he took my advice. But in reality I guess his last post was his final stand before he collapsed from his chair! Hope he's ok!
I assume he got tired after searching through gay porn and getting angry that Swansea are 5 places above him and in the last 32 of europe all beong locally owned.
I mean, thats all he seems to talk about. Well... That stuff and me. I just hope to God he doesnt cross over his interests and I end up the face of his sex doll with a swans top and a stake through the swans badge
Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:05 am