Spurs all over jacks

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Well you keep using this 8/9 players out at once - can you name them and name what games where you played with all these players out at once then?

If not, then it shows that you lied.

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

Name them you liar

Show me where I said that 8 /9 players were out for a prolonged period like you claimed.

Semantics.

You kept mentioning 8/9 then in the same post tried to use us as an example, using the word prolonged and even saying "and thars just 5".

Clearly making out you had 8/9 players out for a prolonged period of time.

You havent even had 8/9 out for one game so how would the rest of the players be flogged?

"2 games from relegation"



3 points from the bottom.

It will take at least 2 games played for us to enter the bottom 3 and that is after our worst run of fixtures.

From here on in things generally get easier fixture wise.

Well you keep using this 8/9 players out at once - can you name them and name what games where you played with all these players out at once then?

If not, then it shows that you lied.

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

Name them you liar

Show me where I said that 8 /9 players were out for a prolonged period like you claimed.

Semantics.

You kept mentioning 8/9 then in the same post tried to use us as an example, using the word prolonged and even saying "and thars just 5".

Clearly making out you had 8/9 players out for a prolonged period of time.

You havent even had 8/9 out for one game so how would the rest of the players be flogged?

Apology accepted

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

You said 8 or 9 of your first team. That's 7 you've just named. so that doesn't count anyway.

Most Swansea fans wouldn't consider Tiendalli as one of the first names on the team sheet either, so it's 6 really.

Struggling.

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Tiendalli was on the bench so i make that 6 not 8/9, nice try though Porkies.

It will take at least 2 games played for us to enter the bottom 3 and that is after our worst run of fixtures.

From here on in things generally get easier fixture wise.

Same for us after Utd.

It will take at least 2 games played for us to enter the bottom 3 and that is after our worst run of fixtures.

From here on in things generally get easier fixture wise.

Same for us after Utd.

Apart from the first part

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Tiendalli was on the bench so i make that 6 not 8/9, nice try though Porkies.

He was on the bench to make up the numbers.

The fact we only made one sub and that was enforced today tells you everything about what we had on the bench.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

You said 8 or 9 of your first team. That's 7 you've just named. so that doesn't count anyway.

Most Swansea fans wouldn't consider Tiendalli as one of the first names on the team sheet either, so it's 6 really.

Struggling.

No he wouldn't be the first name on the team sheet but the fact he has been unavailable means others have to play every game. It's a squad game these days Baz.

Still not backed up your claim of 8/9 first teamers that have all been out at once, as you stated.

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Tiendalli was on the bench so i make that 6 not 8/9, nice try though Porkies.

He was on the bench to make up the numbers.

The fact we only made one sub and that was enforced today tells you everything about what we had on the bench.

It tells me you havent got the strength in depth you claim.

how come the players are flogged then with these 2 Premiership teams you have?

Still not backed up your claim of 8/9 first teamers that have all been out at once, as you stated.

Are you confusing first team players with first choice players Baz?

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

You said 8 or 9 of your first team. That's 7 you've just named. so that doesn't count anyway.

Most Swansea fans wouldn't consider Tiendalli as one of the first names on the team sheet either, so it's 6 really.

Struggling.

No he wouldn't be the first name on the team sheet but the fact he has been unavailable means others have to play every game. It's a squad game these days Baz.

He started 2 games ago giving Rangel a rest

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Tiendalli was on the bench so i make that 6 not 8/9, nice try though Porkies.

He was on the bench to make up the numbers.

The fact we only made one sub and that was enforced today tells you everything about what we had on the bench.

Ffs give up,you are in the shit same as us,injuries injuries injuries that's football grow a pair and admit it

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Tiendalli was on the bench so i make that 6 not 8/9, nice try though Porkies.

He was on the bench to make up the numbers.

The fact we only made one sub and that was enforced today tells you everything about what we had on the bench.

It tells me you havent got the strength in depth you claim.

how come the players are flogged then with these 2 Premiership teams you have?

Because of the number of injuries we've had.

Isn't that what we've been talking about?

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Tiendalli was on the bench so i make that 6 not 8/9, nice try though Porkies.

He was on the bench to make up the numbers.

The fact we only made one sub and that was enforced today tells you everything about what we had on the bench.

Ffs give up,you are in the shit same as us,injuries injuries injuries that's football grow a pair and admit it

I've already said we're in a relegation fight

So then Polo, Baz and JB, how do you think you would have done this season if you had the same number of injuries we have had to contend with considering you're bottom without them?

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Tiendalli was on the bench so i make that 6 not 8/9, nice try though Porkies.

He was on the bench to make up the numbers.

The fact we only made one sub and that was enforced today tells you everything about what we had on the bench.

Ffs give up,you are in the shit same as us,injuries injuries injuries that's football grow a pair and admit it

I've already said we're in a relegation fight

We'll stop making fukin excuses then

I take it you now accept that I didn't say what you claimed?

You didn't word it as was suggested, but can you now name your 8/9 players you've had out all at the same time & what games you played without 8/9 players?

You've already avoided that question once, I'll give you another chance.

Vorm, Tiendalli, Canas, De Guzman, Hernandez, Michu, Dyer for today. Lamah was only fit enough for the bench and probably wouldn't have been used if Shelvey (who can now be added to that list) hadn't got injured after starting with a hamstring problem he's been carrying for the last week.

Tiendalli was on the bench so i make that 6 not 8/9, nice try though Porkies.

He was on the bench to make up the numbers.

The fact we only made one sub and that was enforced today tells you everything about what we had on the bench.

It tells me you havent got the strength in depth you claim.

how come the players are flogged then with these 2 Premiership teams you have?

Because of the number of injuries we've had.

Isn't that what we've been talking about?

But you havent had many prolonged injuries

Still not backed up your claim of 8/9 first teamers that have all been out at once, as you stated.

Are you confusing first team players with first choice players Baz?

You still haven't named any occasion where you had 8/9 players out... You named today and that was 7 (at a push!)

Were you exaggerating, to give your point more credibility?

So then Polo, Baz and JB, how do you think you would have done this season if you had the same number of injuries we have had to contend with considering you're bottom without them?

Weve established you havent had many

So then Polo, Baz and JB, how do you think you would have done this season if you had the same number of injuries we have had to contend with considering you're bottom without them?

How about you back up your points first, with evidence, before moving onto another topic...

You normally demand that when it's the other way around.. In facts you go chasing people around giving them links to unanswered questions...

Come on now.

Still not backed up your claim of 8/9 first teamers that have all been out at once, as you stated.

Are you confusing first team players with first choice players Baz?

You still haven't named any occasion where you had 8/9 players out... You named today and that was 7 (at a push!)

Were you exaggerating, to give your point more credibility?

Well you can add Monk to that as he is a first team squad member so that's 8

So then Polo, Baz and JB, how do you think you would have done this season if you had the same number of injuries we have had to contend with considering you're bottom without them?

How about you back up your points first, with evidence, before moving onto another topic...

You normally demand that when it's the other way around.. In facts you go chasing people around giving them links to unanswered questions...

Come on now.

A poor version of Roathie

So then Polo, Baz and JB, how do you think you would have done this season if you had the same number of injuries we have had to contend with considering you're bottom without them?

How about you back up your points first, with evidence, before moving onto another topic...

You normally demand that when it's the other way around.. In facts you go chasing people around giving them links to unanswered questions...

Come on now.

I've answered

If you want to avoid my question, feel free

Well you can add Monk to that as he is a first team squad member so that's 8

It's been a bad day. Time to log off.

I've answered

If you want to avoid my question, feel free

I said first teamers. Desperation.

8/9 first teamers.

Well you can add Monk to that as he is a first team squad member so that's 8

It's been a bad day. Time to log off.

Why, because I've backed up my statement?

Brilliant

Well you can add Monk to that as he is a first team squad member so that's 8

It's been a bad day. Time to log off.

Why, because I've backed up my statement?

Brilliant

You havent